XRCF CALIBRATION OF AXAF OBSERVATORY PROJECT/TELESCOPE SCIENCE SHIFT REPORTS Edited (partially) by PS/ Steve O'Dell +++ After-the-fact editorial comments are prefixed by +++. um = micrometer ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB C SERIES *************************** !!! HRMA position is fixed throughout, aligned to X-ARM. ### HRMA actuator failures preclude pitch and yaw movements. 12/19/96/B Harvey Tananbaum <<< Begin XSS = EIPS(Al). NO MEASUREMENT 355/01:47 ### Top-quadrant shutter for shell 4 (S4T) is stuck open. Previous problems with this shutter were apparently related to a "stuck" limit switch (possible mechanical problem). EK is looking for "fixes" which bypass limit switch, but must avoid overheating motor. Consider which tests can be done (if any) and work-arounds (if any). This shutter was successfully cycled a few times earlier this evening, under vacuum; now it appears stuck open. After some experimentation at control panel, EK was able to open and close shutter regularly. Consequently, we shall resume the x-ray measurements. C-IXF-BG-1.018 355/03:00 Time is uncertain due to trouble-shooting a CMBD issue. Some time was required before data accumulation, to move BND-H mapper to home position. ### Abort test at 03:24 GMT due to premature termination of HSI data collection. Recycle HSI power; then restart at ~03:28, for 1000-s accumulation. ### Encountered another problem with HSI: Buffer overflowed at major frame 0. MST checked HSI PC server and reconnected cables. Restarted a 1000-s background run at 03:41; completed at 03:59. &&& Open shutters so TRW can complete MDS tests (about 30 minutes). &&& Data look nominal for all HXDS detectors. C-BND-BU-2.035 355/04:44 FPC_5 7-point beam map for Al-K. &&& Data seem reasonable, based on count rates and spectral shapes. C-BND-BU-2.036 355/05:08 FPC_H-N 40-point beam map for Al-K. ### Terminated measurement at 05:48 GMT, due to accumulated IRIG timing errors. MST/ John Moran found that the power supplies at Bldg 500 had been turned on without rebooting the PC server, thus resulting in synch problems. MST rebooted computer and edited listscan to remove 11 completed points. Restart failed due to dropouts in facility IRIG signal. John Moran fixed by sending IRIG signal from HXDA PC to BND PC. Restarted at 06:00 GMT. ### Noticed after several tests that SSD_5 has very large number of low-amplitude noise pulses. Check on count rates show 20% increase around time of reboot/restart, not tied to a large temperature change. Need to trouble-shoot this further. &&& Finished at 355/06:48 GMT = Dec 20 00:48 CST. 12/19/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-EA-1.001 355/07:03 BND measurements with HRMA still closed. ### Initial problem with BND_5 noise was traced possibly to noisy pole zero potentiometer, but may have been related to temperature change of order +0.06 degrees during the noisy period. Spectra remained bad during measurement. C-IXF-EA-1.002 355/07:19 BND measurements with HRMA still closed. ### BND_5 is noisy; temperature data are erratic. C-IXF-EA-1.003 355/07:37 BND measurements with HRMA still closed. C-IXF-EA-1.004 355/07:43 See Al peak, but also low-pulse-height noise.. C-IXF-EA-1.005 355/07:52 No apparent peak. C-IXF-EA-1.006 Aborted. Turned off high voltages in anticipation of opening HRMA contamination covers. TCQM readings were flat at 1-Hz digitization limit. HRMA FCC opened at 08:19 GMT, with no perceptible change in the chamber vacuum; ACC opened at 08:25 GMT. Door movement electrical cables disconnected at 08:30; HSI voltage turned on at 08:38 GMT. C-IXH-PI-3.001 355/08:40 Image diameter is about 600 um, corresponding to about 5-mm defocus. Moved HSI in Y to center image; raised flux; and moved HSI in Z. C-IXH-SF-2.001 355/08:58 HSI is behind focus. Based on low out-of-plane scattering, there appears to be very little dust. Focus calculation was 5.074 mm from Y and 4.996 mm from Z data. Updated FOA and ran a short collect with HSI in focus. Set current to 0.3 mA and other source parameters as for C-IXH-PI-3.001 Resulting image is in focus and approximately as expected. ### There appears to be an error in the update of the FOA table. Corrected one error; but another, 20-um offset in HSI-Z remains. C-IXF-AL-51.001 Performed C-IXF-AL-51.002 Performed C-IXF-AL-51.003 355/11:02 MST/ Ian Evans did cuts through the HSI image; got FWHM of about 0.6 arcsec horizontal and 0.5 arcsec vertical. C-IXF-AL-51.004 355/11:08 FPC_X detected 742,256 counts in 400.24 s (1854. Hz); FPC_HN detected 1,409,520 counts in 392.38 s (3592. Hz). C-IXS-EA-4.003 355/12:10 Found low counting rate in SSD_X; moved 6 mm in Y, improving counting rate. Beam centered on 2-mm, then 0.5-mm SSD apertures. C-IXF-EA-4.001 355/12:27 C-IXF-EA-4.002 355/12:35 C-IXF-EA-4.005 355/13:05 ### There is still confusion in the FOA and offsets. Also, this measurement uses the 2-mm FPC_X aperture, which has the largest discrepancy between the existing offset table and recent microscope measurements. The FOA was updated using the SSD data. However, the rates for the smaller (1-mm) apertures indicate that this proceedure failed. We discovered the problem: The ensemble FOA had been updated, but not the S1 FOA, which was to be used for the measurement. !!! We need clear instructions for the operators on updating FOAs etc. In addition, the .loc files are combined with the FOA to generate a listscan when the proceedures are compiled; thus, new listscans must be generated when the FOA is updated. C-IXF-PW-51.021 355/13:10 Restarted measurement with TRW-ID suffix A. ### Mesurement failed to run properly: The .loc file was interpreted to set the Prime-X to 0.0 absolute, rather than to 0.0 relative to the FOA. MST edited procedures to avoid .loc files. &&& We spent additional time on these wing scans, waiting for the optical bench to reach thermal equilibrium. !!! At the conclusion of this shift, we decided to abort the wings scans and the next HSI shutter focus (C-IXH-SF-3.001) because too little time has elapsed since the last HSI shutter focus. 12/20/96/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXH-HF-7.001 355/14:52 ### Listscan file was incorrectly named as a .loc file, but we found it. HSI-Z and Prime-Y stages did not settle on requested value, so MST killed child process waiting for updates to begin collect. C-IXH-RF-1.003 355/15:57 Repeat after next measurement. ### Neither HSI-Z, Prime-X, nor Prime-Y stage settled on requested value. Prime-X did not reach RF destination. !!! Must ensure RF position is reached before exposing HSI. C-IXF-P2-4.001 355/16:22 Located 100-um aperture, approximately -100 um off in Y and +300 um in Z. C-IXH-RF-1.003A 355/17:38 Repeated measurement because a baseline for epoxy shinkage effects is needed early in testing. Beautiful rings! C-IXF-P2-3.001 355/17:56 Located 50-um aperture. 2D scan was well centered after adjustment based on C-IXF-P2-4.001. C-IXF-SF 7.001 355/19:18 MST adjusted position tables prior to start of S1 FPC shutter focus. ### The bottom (B) shutter (3) 2D scan does not cover the entire image but is adequate; however, a problem with the shutter actuator mechanism may cause this problem. &&& T, N and S quadrant centroids are close, while the B centroid is displaced by >60 um in Z. All Y centoids are close. 12/20/96/B Harvey Tananbaum <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). Adjustted focus based on N,S data (~270-um change). Next iteration of shutter focus starts at 355/23:00 GMT. Will monitor status of "bad" shutter. Will check focus convergence using N,S data and examine T,B for info on shutter behavior. Asked MST to investigate shutter for possible impact on FOA measurement via T,B and N,S comparisons. Recall that T,B data differed by almost 10% during alignment test suggesting a fairly large pitch difference (possibly 2-5'). ### Shutter behaved erratically again: Run points 48 or 49 of 196, then restart at point 56. S1B shutter status is unknown. Will flag the sets and run s/w at end of test to find all shutter anomalies. Will analyze data with all points included and then with questionable data excluded. Shutter problems continue: Unknown on 58; open on 59; unknown on 60, 61, 62; open on 63; unknown on 64, 65; open on 67; closed for run 69,70; open on 71; bad on 72,73,74; open on 75; closed on 76,77,78; open on 79; unknown on 80; etc. At end of this focus, will put pinhole at center and take a few points with all shutters closed, then open and close S1B shutter. Will measure count rate when indicator for shutter is open, closed, and unknown to determine state when unknown is indicated. Test is slowed by having to try 3 times to close shutter, before system gives up and runs test anyway. Problems continue until last 20-25 data runs, then shutter opens and closes as it should. &&& Test completed at 356/02:28 GMT. Calculate 51-um focus change from Y data (currently ahead of focus), 34 um from Z data, and 42 um average. Move FPC_X to center of beam, 20-um aperture, and keep same source settings. Update FOA data to incorporate previous focus adjustment of 350 um estimated from N,S data. !!! Tests show that when S1B shutter is indeterminate, it is actually closed (1 case) or partially open (3 cases), as indicated by a count rate about 75% of that for an open shutter. Therefore ignore data from 2nd SF. EK calling home for help: They suspect shutter is binding. C-IXF-SF-7.002 356/03:33 S3 SF. EK closed S3B shutter using manual drive control. Started with focus the same as previous best focus (Iteration 1) of S1. Decided to stop test and move to -99 um (detector away from HRMA), the nominal offset between S3 and S1. Restart test at 03:43 GMT. ### After 20 -30 good runs, S3B shutter shows unknown state (point 56) and system appears to be hung. Point 54 completed more than 15 minutes ago, and point 55 was only one to fail. Restarted at 04:17 GMT and completed point 55, but point 56 failed to start. EK used manual command to close shutter. Then found unexplained shutter readings with lots of errors. Data appears OK for points 56 and 57, but point 56 has error for Q3 shutter (same as 55) and point 57 looks OK. Go on to 58, but shutter seems hungwith strange shutter readings. Go on to point 59 and 60. ### Can't get shutter data into MST machine, perhaps due to manual operation of shutter. Abort run after test 61 since seem to be stopped again. Restart measurement at 04:59 GMT. In parallel, install a new PHA for SSD_5 electronics: SSD_5 data look good. After point 23, get an unknown state for Q3 shutter. Shutter opened OK for point 27 and closed OK for run 28. Unknown if data are being corrupted by this process. Decide to do only 1 iteration, then go to S4. Shutter state is unknown for points 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, etc., with large number of errors. Abort this measurement at 356/05:53 due to slowness and multiple shutter errors. Proceed to S4 shutter focus. 12/20/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-SF-7.003 356/06:00 S4 shutter focus. Enter a new axial distance to correct for the nominal offset between S3 and S1. Enter a new axial distance to correct for S4 and S6, and for the system to S1. ### Abandoned all measurements requiring S3B shutter to be closed. C-IXF-SF-7.004 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.001 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.002 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.003 356/07:10 S3 FWHM with 5-um ap on 2-um centers in Y. &&& FWHM is about 13 um (0.25 arcsec). Peak has a shoulder at about 20% of peak intensity. ### Failed to get "complete" for one stage motion, but sensor indicated that the motion completed. Finished at 08:44 GMT. C-IXF-P1-1.004 356/08:45 S3 FWHM with 5-um ap on 2-um centers in Z. MST/ Ian Evans deleted a move to focus in order to preserve the validity of the beam center. &&& Peak is obviously broader: FWHM about 22 um (0.44 arcsec). C-IXF-P1-1.005 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.006 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.007 Aborted. C-IXF-P1-1.008 Aborted. C-IXF-P2-4.002 356/09:38 Ensemble 2D scan, 100-mu ap. Changed procedure to use previous beam center. Ended at 10:45 GMT. C-IXF-P2-3.002 356/10:59 Ensemble 2D scan, 50-mu ap. ### Encountered another case when completion of stage movement was not sensed. Adopted this procedure: Check if the stages have reached the requested position: if so, kill the child move process allowing the parent process proceed to proceed its next point. If stage has not reached the desired position, re-home the stage, go to the desired position, and restart the process. MST/ Ian Evans thinks that this is not a hardware problem, but that one of the computers missesg a signal because it is busy with something else. C-IXF-P2-2.001 356/12:32 Ensemble 2D scan, 10-mu ap. !!! Updated FOA based on C-IXF-P1-1.003 and C-IXF-P1-1.004. 12/21/96/A Steve O'Dell <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-P2-1.001 Aborted. S3Q3 shutter is stuck open. C-IXF-P2-1.002 356/15:37 S3 2D scan, 10-mu ap. C-IXF-P2-1.003 Aborted. S3Q3 shutter is stuck open. C-IXF-P2-1.004 Aborted. S3Q3 shutter is stuck open. C-LXH-SF-1.001 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-LXH-FC-1.004 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-LXH-FC-1.005 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-SF-1.002 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-SF-1.003 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.006 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.007 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.008 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.009 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.010 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-FC-1.011 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-IXH-RF-1.001 356/19:22 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.001 356/19:43 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.002 356/19:57 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.003 356/20:04 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.004 356/20:15 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.005 356/20:24 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.006 356/20:31 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.007 356/20:50 Completed. C-IXH-RF-5.008 356/20:59 Completed. C-IXH-AL-4.001 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-IXH-AL-4.004 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-LXH-AL-4.005 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-LXH-3D-2.001 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-AL-4.002 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-AL-4.003 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-3D-2.002 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. C-HXH-3D-2.003 Aborted. Skip OTGs until actuators have been exercised. !!! Notes: 1 S3B failed open; S1B is sticking; and S1T is reporting both states. Leave shutters in open position (except for C-IXF-AL-61.001-4). Move HSI out of position until flux is confirmed. 2 All actuators are suspect, so postpone OTG measurements until last. 3 Revise CMDB to complete key measurements before engineering tests. Al-K S3alignment test. C-continuum MC measurement. Al-K 4 LETG and 4 HETG measurements. 12/21/96/B Martin C. Weisskopf ### I was called in at 8:00 am CST to address the worsening shutter problem. After many meetings, we agreed to a "minimum science program" allowing for trouble shooting. !!! We want first to determine the alignment, although MST/ Terry Gaetz modeled the first image and found it consistent with the misalignment measured. +++ Difficulties in determining x-ray alignment had resulted from (a then unknown) decenter in HRMA assembly, which mislead interpretation of the shutter-balance test. Next we'll switch to EIPS(C) to perform the ensemble-HRMA MC measurement, providing a baseline for molecular contamination. Then we'll return to EIPS(Al), while EK closes the ACC and tests the OTG actuators. If that is successful, we shall proceed with OTG measurements. ### SSD_5 still (again) flaky at 16:20 GMT. ### Failure to turn on focal-plane detector delayed first measurement. C-IXF-FM-3.001 356/22:16 Completed. C-IXF-AL-61.001 356/23:05 Completed. All shutters worked. C-IXF-AL-61.002 356/23:21 Completed. C-IXF-AL-61.003 356/23:33 Completed. C-IXF-AL-61.004 356/23:43 Completed. >>> End XSS = EIPS(Al). <<< Begin XSS = EIPS(C). C-IXF-BG-60.006 356/23:52 BG for C-K measurements. ### CMDB is set up for C-K rather than C continuum for MC measurements. ### Collect is set for 3000 s and cannot be stopped without losing data. The collects should comprise 100-s intervals to allow termination when the source is ready. ### Processing HSI background file takes many minutes, delaying testing. ### TS/ Ping Ziao jfound that RF measurements were shorter than requested. C-IXF-BU-60.009 357/01:05 FPC_5 7-point beam map for C-K. ### Shadowing of FPC_H detectors by FPC_5 caused some confusion. ### C-K flux is low by an order of magnitude. ### Measurement required excessive time to set up. &&& FPC_% quick-look map shows +/-3% top-to-bottom variation. C-IXF-BU-60.010 357/01:28 FPC_HN 40-point beam map for C-K. &&& Gives approximately the same result as FPC_5 map. C-IXS-MC-61.001 357/02:55 SSD_X C-continuum measurement. ### HXDS integration time was 300 s versus requested 750 s. ### Corrected CMDB which set up FPCs for C-K rather than C-continuum. ### Had to wait for FPC_HN to return from last map to its monitor position. >>> End XSS = EIPS(C). <<< Begin XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-BG-60.005 357/04:00 BG for Al-K measurements. ### Delay for EKC to close ACC and exercise both OTG mechanisms. ### Waiting: ACC showed indefinite state after attempt to re-open. 12/21/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-BU-60.007 357/06:07 FPC_5 7-point beam map for Al-K. C-IXF-BU-60.008 357/06:30 FPC_HN 40-point beam map for Al-K. &&& Beam is uniform to about 5% peak to valley. ### Status of ACC/OTG insertion problem: 1 LETG was known to have been removed. 2 At one time, ACC was known to be closed; and HETG, to be removed. 3 When ACC was commanded to open, the primary open-position sensor showed open; but, the open required slightly less time than the closing. 4 When HETG was commanded to be inserted, it moved off its primary open-position sensor, and then off of its redundant open-position sensor. 5 The redundant ACC open-position sensor (not polled by s/w) did not indicate that ACC was open, and stopped HETG motion. Presumably HETG is nearly, but not totally, retracted. 6 We want to retract fully HETG, but existing s/w prevents this while ACC sensors show indefinite state. EKC will bring in experts to resolve problem. 7 We shall perform an RF measurement to locate HETG and ACC. The likely result will be no ACC blockage; if so, we shall perform S4 SF. C-IXH-RF-1.003B 357/08:10 RF to check HETG and ACC positions. <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). !!! HETG is blocking part of S1; as expectred, ACC is not blocking. !!! We shall perform SF measurements of inner 3 shells, until EKC begins shutter tests to see if failures are associated with repetition rate, etc. ### We don't yet know when EKC can begin fixes, and therefore when re-pressing would be useful. C-IXF-SF-7.002A 357/08:54 S3 SF. ### Proceedure (from older CMDB) is wrong, thus requiring manual control. ### Aborted: The previously failed S3B shutter worked for about 13 iterations before failing, indicating "unknown" state. We were unable to close failed shutter after 5-min wait. !!! We shall perform wing scans on S4 and S6, also taking data with the S3B alone, which must be subtracted because it can't be closed. C-IXF-PW-51.011A 357/11:10 1-mm Y scan S4NS (+S3B). ### Listscan files were incorrect, resulting in no aperture movement. Edited the listscan file, and restarted at 11:34 GMT. C-IXF-PW-51.011B 357/11:44 1-mm Y scan S3B only, for subtraction. ### Edited the listscan file for this and remaining PW measurements. C-IXF-PW-51.016 357/11:59 1-mm Y scan S6NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.012A 357/12:10 4-mm Y scan S4NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.017A 357/12:24 4-mm Y scan of S6NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.017B 357/12:48 4-mm Y scan S3B only, for subtraction. 12/22/96/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-PW-51.013A 357/13:06 10-mm Y scan S4NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.018A 357/13:25 10-mm Y scan S6NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.014A 357/13:35 20-mm Y scan S4NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.019A 357/13:45 20-mm Y scan S6NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.015A 357/14:04 35-mm Y scan S4NS (+S3B). C-IXF-PW-51.020A 357/14:15 35-mm Y scan S6NS (+S3B). C-IXF-SF-7.003A 357/14:15 S4 SF aborted: S4N shutter problems. ### S4N shutter failed. C-IXF-SF-7.004A 357/16:14 S6 SF completed. ### Experienced problems with another shutter (S6S). !!! Implemented a revised CMDB here, to substitute 7x7 2D (P2) scans for SF measurements, to shift shutter changes from inner to outer loop. !!! MST will calculate centroids, determine focus shift, and update FOA. C-IXF-P2-62.001 357/19:41 20-um 7x7 scan S3T. C-IXF-P2-62.002 357/20:13 20-um 7x7 scan S3N. C-IXF-P2-62.003 357/20:46 20-um 7x7 scan S3B. C-IXF-P2-62.004 357/21:14 20-um 7x7 scan S3S. &&& EK is ready to repower rack for ACC/OTG positioning. !!! If successful, we'll go directly to essential OTG measurements (~8 h), followed by engineering tests of shutters at 50 F, warm-up with more CMDB measurements, more shutter tests at 65 F, then re-press. 12/22/96/B Steve O'Dell <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-IXF-P2-62.005 357/21:52 20-um 7x7 scan S4T. C-IXF-P2-62.006 357/22:32 20-um 7x7 scan S4N. C-IXF-P2-62.007 357/23:03 20-um 7x7 scan S4B. C-IXF-P2-62.008 357/23:41 20-um 7x7 scan S4S. ### EKC verified that ACC is open and jumped protection to drive OTGs open. C-IXH-RF-1.005 358/01:24 Ensemble RF. ### Confirmed that HETG is stowed. ### BNDs were very noisy because EKC actuators were still connected. C-IXH-AL-4.001 358/02:27 Aborted. ### Flux was too high, so used AlK2 filter. Thus, the measurement became same as C-IXH-RF-1.005 and was aborted. ### EKC performed some additional work and disconnected actuator cables. C-IXH-AL-4.004 358/02:54 S1346 !!! Use AlK2 filter for spectral purity. C-LXH-AL-4.005 358/03:18 S1346-LETG !!! Use AlK2 filter for spectral purity. ### S3N shutter is kept closed, because it failed to open fully. C-LXH-3D-2.001 358/04:32 S1346-LETG ### S3N shutter is kept closed, because it failed to open fully. !!! Changed integration time from 23 to 60 s per point. C-HXH-AL-4.002 358/05:17 S1346-HETG ### S3N shutter is kept closed, because it failed to open fully. !!! Use AlK2 filter for spectral purity. C-HXH-AL-4.003 358/06:06 S46-HETG ### S3N shutter is kept closed, because it failed to open fully. !!! Notes: 1 S3N shutter could no longer be open fully, so has been held closed. 2 Al-K flux has been too high by about a factor of 2. Need to see if the CMDB flux predictions have changed. 3 HXDA Prime-Y FOA location has shifted by about 200 um. 4 Based on P2-62.001-8, updated Prime-X FOA focus: -111 um for S3, -105 um for S4, -108 um for others. 12/22/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). !!! S3N shutter is kept closed, because it failed to open fully. C-HXH-3D-2.002 358/06:40 S13-HETG &&& Increased integration time to 120 s per point. ### Changed EIPS to 5.57 kV, 0.1 mA to reduce (unfiltered) flux. ### Procedure opens all 8 shutters, but closes them when S3N does not respond. Thus operator must issue "open" command, which results in an error in opening all shutters (except S3N). Aborted and restarted run with correct shutters (except S3N) C-HXH-3D-2.003 358/08:14 S46-HETG &&& Increased integration time to 120 s per point. ### Flux remains about twice CMDB prediction, for the unfiltered source. &&& Turned off HSI. Turned on HSI to take background data. (Source is off.) ### Prepare for shutter and grating motion tests. &&& Removed the HETG successfully and reconnected power to ACC. ### Commanded ACC to close command: Close gave error because of apparent software error, probably system needed initialization. Ignored error and started ACC motion: ACC went to home and then successfully closed. ### Actuator movement causes noise in the HXDS detectors. &&& The system is now in its "as built" configuration, with power available, and no switches bypassed. &&& MST/ Nick Mistry prepared a proceedure for the shutter test. ### Started EKC shutter proceedure at 10:00 GMT, ran into proceedure problems: We seem to get the times associated with the slowest shutter, and in the case of a failed shutter, this is the default timeout. ### Removed shutters from the test as they fail, by commanding them to their present state. So, S3N was removed initially (always commanded to close). ### S3B now stuck open. Completed EKC test at 11:18 GMT. !!! Begin OTG insertions and retractions, with HETG at about 12:50 GMT. 12/23/96/A Martin C. Weisskopf <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). &&& EKC is performing some OTG motion tests. !!! We shall meet at 9:00 am CST (15:00 GMT) to plan how to proceed. &&& From the meeting, we learned that the shutters that have to work harder! We shall try some PO measurements and then some OTG EE measurements which are meaningful in this configuration. C-IXF-PO-1.001 358/17:31 Problems with first try of this approach. ### Cusp did not move to image was still there &&& MST/ Bill Podgorsky was moderately successful when done by hand. C-IXF-PO-1.002 358/18:35 Cusp not well placed on image. ### Wrong aperture on FPC_5 resulted in 70,000 Hz. C-IXF-PO-1.003 358/19:14 ### Procedure failed, so tried by hand. Took too long! C-IXF-PO-1.004 Abort. C-LXF-EE-3.001 358/20:17 S1346-LETG 0 First try at zero order EE! 12/23/96/B Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-LXF-EE-3.002 358/21:54 S1346-LETG+1 !!! Did only 200, 20, 500 um aps, instead of 500, 200, 70, 20, 500 um. C-LXF-EE-3.007 358/22:45 S1346-LETG-1 C-HXF-EE-3.003 358/23:41 S13-HETG 0 &&& All S4 and S6 shutters closed successfully. C-HXF-EE-3.004 359/00:44 S13-HETG+1 !!! Z position of 20-um beam center increased at 22 um per hour, probably due to thermal changes. This will be corrected for in grating tests if needed. C-HXF-EE-3.005 359/01:38 S46-HETG 0 &&& Had HXDS operator move up 300 um to start, corresponding to offset from the table value to the current beam center. ### HXDS accidentally ran 70-um beam center with this offset. C-HXF-EE-3.006 359/02:33 S46-HETG+1 !!! Had we not corrected for thermal drift, beam center would have failed. C-IXF-FM-61.001 359/03:22 FPC mesh scan &&& Allotted 2 hours for this test. !!! MST/ Bill Podgorsky adjusted position +370 um for thermal changes. &&& Shutters opened fine. ### Small error in file required re-initialization; a second error required file edit and restart, costing about 40 minutes. 12/23/96/C Steve O'Dell <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). C-LXF-EE-3.008 359/06:03 S1346-LETG-9 ### FPC_X rate is very low (50 Hz). ### 20-um beam center did not converge, so use 70-um center. !!! HXDA PCAZ is drifting at about 22 um/h during thermalization. C-LXF-EE-3.009 359/08:04 S1346-LETG+9 !!! Skip 20-um beam center, use only 70-um beam center. C-HXF-EE-3.010 Skip. !!! Go to EE-3.013 to tie down HEG orientation before stopping. C-HXF-EE-3.011 Skip. C-HXF-EE-3.012 Skip. C-HXF-EE-3.013 359/08:45 S46-HETG-1 ### Had some difficulty beam centering in Z. C-HXF-EE-3.005a 359/09:40 S46-HETG 0 &&& Provide long baseline for drift in HXDA PCAZ before stopping. C-HXF-EE-3.010 359/10:19 S13-HETG-1 ### At 359/11:07, stopped CMDB measurements for shutter testing at 65 F. &&& Stowed OTGs and closed ACC & FCC. !!! Notes: 1 Thermal drift required moving HXDA PCAZ about +20 um/h initially. Time constant is 6.0 h; asymptotic m=0 is at Z = 33690 um. 2 For OTG beam centering, consider making Z step larger than Y step, or more Z steps than Y steps. (We ended up using 7 Y steps and 11 Z steps.) 3 Don't need so many different apertures for the beam centering. (We ended up using 200 um, then 20 um apertures only.) 4 During shutter testing, S3B failed early, S1B failed on 6th cycle, and S3N stuck. 5 Begin re-pressurization 359/13:30 (07:30 CST). 6 Scheduled pumpdown is 364/05:00 (12/28/96 21:00 CST). *************************** END CMDB C SERIES *************************** ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB D SERIES *************************** !!! HRMA pitch started with limited range; then one actuator soon failed. ### HRMA actuator failures preclude pitch movements, except at beginning. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of alignment test, so many D-series measurements were off by -1 arcmin yaw. 12/30/96/B Martin C. Weisskopf &&& We are under vacuum again at 365/14:00 GMT! ### One of the "fixed" vertical actuators froze the other day during test. A "cobbled" one allows HRMA motion of +/-5 arcmin pitch. We have adjusted CMDB. !!! ASC/ Larry David's simulations of alignment tests indicate axes can be determined to within +/-10 arcsec. +++ At this time, we were unaware of HRMA decenter errors, which confused interpretation of the alignment measurements. <<< Begin XSS = EIPS(Al). D-IXF-BG-1.018 366/02:?? !!! In order to avoid 2-h delay, begin BGs without HSI. &&& Will repeat BG with HSI, if HRMA must stay closed after D-IXF-EA-1.006. ### Backgrounds in sum files are higher than ROI values. +++ This was later found to result from a s/w bug in "HSI collect". D-BND-BU-2.035 365/03:?? FPC_5 7-point beam map for Al-K. 12/30/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). D-BND-BU-2.036 366/04:?? FPC_HN 40-point beam map for Al-K. D-IXF-EA-1.001 366/05:?? D-IXF-EA-1.002 366/06:?? D-IXF-EA-1.003 366/07:?? D-IXF-EA-1.004 366/08:?? Completed 08:55. D-IXF-EA-1.005 366/09:04 Completed 09:08. D-IXF-EA-1.006 366/09:11 Completed 09:36. &&& TQCM is still dropping, so will repeat BG, including HSI this time. D-BND-BG-1.018B 366/10:?? Repeat BG. ### Aborted first run because HSI not enabled. ### BU measurements showed about 5.3% peak-to-valley variation in Y, larger than previous experience of about 2.6%. &&& Had XSS alignment checked: It seemed OK, but replaced target. &&& TQCM is still dropping. D-BND-BU-2.035A 366/12:26. Completed D-BND-BU-2.036A 366/12:37. Completed 08:01. &&& TQCM is still dropping. !!! Perform Cm244 calibration of SSD_5, to check for icing. 12/31/96/A Steve O'Dell <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). SSD_5 Cm244 366/14:30 Ran Cm244 calibration of SSD_5. !!! Waiting for TQCM to drop below 1 Hz per 4 hours. &&& TQCM_W is about 3 per 4 hours, so repeat D-IXF-EA-1 series. D-IXF-EA-1.001A 366/15:36 D-IXF-EA-1.002A 366/16:24 D-IXF-EA-1.003A 366/16:41 D-IXF-EA-1.004A 366/16:53 D-IXF-EA-1.005A 366/17:08 D-IXF-EA-1.006A 366/17:25 !!! OPEN 366/18:00 Open FCC and ACC. &&& TQCM_E at 1 Hz per 4 h; TQCM_W at 2 Hz per 4 h. !!! Scan 366/18:40 Perform FPC scan to find image. &&& HRMA moved during re-press dY = 12 mm & dZ = -20 mm since Phase 1.1. !!! Update FOA for S1346. D-IXH-PI-3.001 366/19:37 Second first light gave image like first. D-IXH-SF-2.001 366/20:05 Update FOAs. D-IXH-PI-3.001A 366/21:15 Take image to verify FOA update. D-IXF-AL-11.001 366/21:33 8108 Hz @ {0, 15} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.002 366/21:49 9278 Hz @ {0, 10} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.003 366/21:53 10323 Hz @ {0, 5} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.004 366/21:57 10959 Hz @ {0, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.005 366/22:01 9906 Hz @ {0, -5} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.006 366/22:04 9042 Hz @ {0,-10} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.007 366/22:09 7780 Hz @ {0,-15} arcmin. &&& Best-fit yaw off-set is +0.76 arcmin. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-AL-14.001 366/22:13 10269 Hz @ { 5, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.002 366/22:17 10482 Hz @ { 4, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.003 366/22:21 10778 Hz @ { 3, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.004 366/22:26 11116 Hz @ { 2, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.005 366/22:31 10976 Hz @ { 1, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.006 366/22:36 10504 Hz @ { 0, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.007 366/22:41 10843 Hz @ {-1, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.008 366/22:45 10684 Hz @ {-2, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-14.009 366/22:50 Aborted: HRMA vertical actuator failed. ### FAIL 366/22:50 NE vertical actuator failed. &&& Best-fit pitch off-set is +1.22 arcmin, but double peaked. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-AL-14.009 Skipped. Vertical actuator failure. D-IXF-AL-14.010 Skipped. Vertical actuator failure. D-IXF-AL-14.011 Skipped. Vertical actuator failure. !!! Notes: 1 HRMA was moved about 12 mm in Y and -20 mm in Z during re-press. 2 HXDA stages exhibited one episode of oscillating behavior. 3 Best-fit tilt off-sets are +0.76-arcmin yaw and +1.22-arcmin pitch. Pitch is suspect, due to actuator failure and double-peaked shape. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of these alignment tests. 12/31/96/B Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). ### HRMA "aft far" vertical actuator failed at about 366/22:50 GMT. !!! Met to review status: 1 HRMA was at -13-arcmin pitch and 0-arcmin in yaw. 2 Actuator failure is similar to previous one. 3 Other 5 actuators still work and are usable. 4 Thus, we have the full range in yaw and an ability to change pitch, although the beam will move with pitch. 5 It was stated that had the move been from -5 to 5 arcmin instead of 5 to -5, this problem might not have occurred because an extra -10 arcmin is required to remove backlash on negative relative moves. 6 Re-press now is not practical because fixes are not yet availiable. !!! Re-plan 1 Bring HRMA on axis using 2 remaining working vertical actuators. Move +2 arcmin steps in pitch from -13 to +5 arcmin with the following procedure: a Beam center with a medium sized pinhole (~200 um). b Swap ap to a smaller pinhole (20-70um) and beam center. c Acquire data with large pinhole. 2 Adopted this procedure because alignment measurements showed unexpected features possibly caused by mesh effects, not avoided in beam centering. 3 I suggest we repeat yaw alignment at -10, -5, 0, +5 and +10 arcmin, using this method to ensure alignment is correct. After that, we could proceed with wing scans with N and S shutters. 4 All planned tests could be done in pitch as well as yaw, provided vertical displacement of HRMA node and, hence, image is accounted for. D-IXF-AL-99.001 001/04:30 {+5, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.002 001/05:36 {+4, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.003 Skipped. D-IXF-AL-99.004 Skipped. 12/31/96/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). !!! Decided that beam center with 200-um aperture was adequate. !!! Will acquire data at -5, -3, -1, +1, +3, and +5 arcmin, in that order. !!! Decided to repeat yaw tests with beam centers. D-IXF-AL-99.005 001/06:29 {-5, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.006 001/07:03 {-3, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.007 001/07:28 {-1, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.013 001/07:51 { 0, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.008 001/08:24 {+1, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.009 001/08:42 {+3, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-99.010 001/08:57 {+5, 0} arcmin. !!! Calculated pitch center to be +0.008 (quadradic) or -0.806 (quartic). Told TRW to use -0.4 arcmin as the pitch and moved to new boresight. Later calculation, with pitch = 0 point in place of pitch = -13 point, resulted in a center of -0.0866 (quadradic), -0.569 (quartic), or -0.328 (average). Did not update boresight from previous value of -0.4 arcmin. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-AL-11.004A 001/09:40 { 0, 0} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.007A 001/09:52 { 0,-15} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.006A 001/10:16 { 0,-10} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.005A 001/10:32 { 0, -5} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.003A 001/10:51 { 0, +5} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.002A 001/11:08 { 0,+10} arcmin. D-IXF-AL-11.001A 001/11:28 { 0,+15} arcmin. !!! Calculated yaw center to be +0.760 (quadradic) or +0.877 (quartic). Told TRW to use +0.819 arcmin as the yaw and moved to new boresight. Did 70-um beam center, followed by 20-um beam center, and updated all FOA values. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-PW-1.105 13:44 GMT. S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 1-mm ap. 01/01/97/A Steve O'Dell <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). D-IXF-PW-1.106 001/14:08 S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.107 001/14:26 S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.108 001/14:44 S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.109 001/15:02 S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.110 001/15:23 S3S @ {0,-2.87} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.111 001/15:43 S3S @ {0,-2.87} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.112 001/16:01 S3S @ {0,-2.87} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.113 001/16:18 S3S @ {0,-2.87} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.114 001/16:35 S3S @ {0,-2.87} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.115 001/16:52 S4S @ {0,-2.53} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.116 001/17:11 S4S @ {0,-2.53} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.117 001/17:32 S4S @ {0,-2.53} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.118 001/17:57 S4S @ {0,-2.53} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.119 001/18:16 S4S @ {0,-2.53} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.120 001/18:34 S6S @ {0,-1.88} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.121 001/18:55 S6S @ {0,-1.88} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.122 001/19:12 S6S @ {0,-1.88} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.123 001/19:29 S6S @ {0,-1.88} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.124 001/19:47 S6S @ {0,-1.88} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-BG-1.018B 001/20:06 BG for PW measurements. D-IXF-PW-1.048 001/21:11 S6S @ {0, 1.88} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.049 001/21:43 S6N @ {0, 1.88} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.050 001/22:04 S6N @ {0, 1.88} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.051 001/22:24 S6N @ {0, 1.88} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.052 001/22:43 S6N @ {0, 1.88} arcmin, 35-mm ap. !!! Notes: 1 Skip all measurements requiring nonzero pitch. 2 Order measurements requiring nonzero yaw to increment yaw (dyaw>0). 3 After PW-1 series, skip SF-3.001, go to D-IXF-AL-1 series (yaw), then skip D-IXF-AL-21 series (pitch). 4 Keep a record of new tests "newtests.txt" in /users/asc/cmdb snowwhite. 01/01/97/B Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). D-IXF-PW-1.043 001/23:06 S4N @ {0, 2.53} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.044 001/23:34 S4N @ {0, 2.53} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.045 001/23:51 S4N @ {0, 2.53} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.046 002/00:08 S4N @ {0, 2.53} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.047 002/00:26 S4N @ {0, 2.53} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.038 002/00:45 S3N @ {0, 2.87} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.039 002/01:04 S3N @ {0, 2.87} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.040 002/01:21 S3N @ {0, 2.87} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.041 002/01:38 S3N @ {0, 2.87} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.042 002/01:58 S3N @ {0, 2.87} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.033 002/02:21 S1N @ {0, 3.56} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.034 002/02:43 S1N @ {0, 3.56} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.035 002/02:59 S1N @ {0, 3.56} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.036 002/03:17 S1N @ {0, 3.56} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-1.037 002/03:34 S1N @ {0, 3.56} arcmin, 35-mm ap. !!! Moved HRMA on axis for beam center to check pinhole alignment before starting the AL series. Y=-307232 Z=11149 for offset dY=-14 dZ=+2; therefore did not update FOA tables. D-IXF-AL-1.001 002/04:32 S1 @ {0,-30} arcmin, norm=3.6067 D-IXF-AL-1.002 002/04:40 S1 @ {0,-25} arcmin, norm=4.1077 D-IXF-AL-1.003 002/04:44 S1 @ {0,-20} arcmin, norm=5.0535 D-IXF-AL-1.004 002/04:48 S1 @ {0,-15} arcmin, norm=5.8360 D-IXF-AL-1.005 002/04:50 S1 @ {0,-10} arcmin, norm=6.9024 D-IXF-AL-1.006 002/04:53 S1 @ {0, -5} arcmin, norm=8.395 D-IXF-AL-1.007 002/04:56 S1 @ {0, 0} arcmin, norm=8.9599 D-IXF-AL-1.008 002/04:58 S1 @ {0, +5} arcmin, norm=8.6412 D-IXF-AL-1.009 002/05:01 S1 @ {0,+10} arcmin, norm=7.3559 D-IXF-AL-1.010 002/05:03 S1 @ {0,+15} arcmin, norm=6.2892 D-IXF-AL-1.011 002/05:06 S1 @ {0,+20} arcmin, norm=5.6456 D-IXF-AL-1.012 002/05:08 S1 @ {0,+25} arcmin, norm=4.5929 D-IXF-AL-1.013 002/05:10 S1 @ {0,+30} arcmin, norm=3.6110 01/01/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). &&& Delayed measurements a few minutes for the shift meeting. D-IXF-AL-1.026 002/05:22 S3 @ {0,-30} arcmin, norm=1.9027 D-IXF-AL-1.025 002/05:30 S3 @ {0,-25} arcmin, norm=2.2416 D-IXF-AL-1.024 002/05:35 S3 @ {0,-20} arcmin, norm=2.2416 D-IXF-AL-1.023 002/05:44 S3 @ {0,-15} arcmin, norm=3.0468 D-IXF-AL-1.022 002/05:52 S3 @ {0,-10} arcmin, norm=4.1675 D-IXF-AL-1.021 002/05:57 S3 @ {0, -5} arcmin, norm=5.0088 D-IXF-AL-1.020 002/06:00 S3 @ {0, 0} arcmin, norm=5.1324 D-IXF-AL-1.019 002/06:04 S3 @ {0, +5} arcmin, norm=4.9779 D-IXF-AL-1.018 002/06:08 S3 @ {0,+10} arcmin, norm=4.5535 D-IXF-AL-1.017 002/06:11 S3 @ {0,+15} arcmin, norm=3.7846 D-IXF-AL-1.016 002/06:14 S3 @ {0,+20} arcmin, norm=2.8342 D-IXF-AL-1.015 002/06:18 S3 @ {0,+25} arcmin, norm=2.2920 D-IXF-AL-1.014 002/06:21 S3 @ {0,+30} arcmin, norm=1.7895 D-IXF-AL-1.027 002/06:25 S4 @ {0,-30} arcmin, norm=1.8776 D-IXF-AL-1.028 002/06:33 S4 @ {0,-25} arcmin, norm=2.1175 D-IXF-AL-1.029 002/06:38 S4 @ {0,-20} arcmin, norm=2.1680 D-IXF-AL-1.030 002/06:41 S4 @ {0,-15} arcmin, norm=2.8545 D-IXF-AL-1.031 002/06:44 S4 @ {0,-10} arcmin, norm=3.4020 D-IXF-AL-1.032 002/06:48 S4 @ {0, -5} arcmin, norm=4.0083 D-IXF-AL-1.033 002/06:52 S4 @ {0, 0} arcmin, norm=4.1161 D-IXF-AL-1.034 002/06:56 S4 @ {0, +5} arcmin, norm=3.8840 D-IXF-AL-1.035 002/06:59 S4 @ {0,+10} arcmin, norm=3.5481 D-IXF-AL-1.036 002/07:03 S4 @ {0,+15} arcmin, norm=2.9908 D-IXF-AL-1.037 002/07:08 S4 @ {0,+20} arcmin, norm=2.4041 D-IXF-AL-1.038 002/07:13 S4 @ {0,+25} arcmin, norm=1.8635 D-IXF-AL-1.039 002/07:17 S4 @ {0,+30} arcmin, norm=1.7750 D-IXF-AL-1.052 002/07:21 S6 @ {0,-30} arcmin, norm=0.8526 D-IXF-AL-1.051 002/07:30 S6 @ {0,-25} arcmin, norm=0.9873 D-IXF-AL-1.050 002/07:36 S6 @ {0,-20} arcmin, norm=1.1053 D-IXF-AL-1.049 002/07:40 S6 @ {0,-15} arcmin, norm=1.5158 D-IXF-AL-1.048 002/07:44 S6 @ {0,-10} arcmin, norm=1.7987 D-IXF-AL-1.047 002/07:48 S6 @ {0, -5} arcmin, norm=2.1406 D-IXF-AL-1.046 002/07:51 S6 @ {0, 0} arcmin, norm=2.1193 D-IXF-AL-1.045 002/07:54 S6 @ {0, +5} arcmin, norm=1.9830 D-IXF-AL-1.044 002/07:57 S6 @ {0,+10} arcmin, norm=1.7802 D-IXF-AL-1.043 002/08:00 S6 @ {0,+15} arcmin, norm=1.4509 D-IXF-AL-1.042 002/08:04 S6 @ {0,+20} arcmin, norm=1.0914 D-IXF-AL-1.041 002/08:08 S6 @ {0,+25} arcmin, norm=1.0279 D-IXF-AL-1.040 002/08:13 S6 @ {0,+30} arcmin, norm=0.8590 !!! TRW yaw center calculations indicate that there is still a yaw offset comparable to the one originally calculated. This may mean that most of the offset was due to beam nonuniformity, aperture effects, etc., rather than due to an alignment error. Shell 1 0.7361 1.1139 0.9250 Shell 3 0.4505 1.2083 0.8294 Shell 4 -0.0797 0.4883 0.2043 Shell 6 -0.0803 -0.3652 -0.2228 +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-P2-4.001 Aborted: Unnecessary because beam location is known. ### EKC found that actuator-6 encoder read 4919 versus expected -199949. Returned actuator 6 to nominal on-axis HRMA value of -199949. D-IXF-P2-3.001 Aborted: No counts because of HRMA problem. ### EKC found that actuator-7 encoder read 4118 versus expected -327517. Returned actuator 6 to nominal on-axis HRMA value of -199949. !!! Performed scans with 10-mm and 1-mm aperture. Beam appears to be at Z = +2.8 mm, Y = -5.8 mm Y from previous position. &&& Actuators 6, 7, and 8 are vertical actuators at forward, aft south, and aft north (stuck), respectively. Horizontal actuators are 3, 4, and 5 (axial, forward Y, and aft Y, respectively. ### Desired position of actuator 5 was 4919. Log showed no EKC command which should have made these moves. However, the EKC log may not reflect the commands if a command followed by a delete or backspace. ### Later, there appeared to be drift of about 1.5 mm in Y during the period 10:40 GMT to 12:10 GMT, but this subsequently was traced to the bad behavior of the centroid algorithm with the particular choice of 1-mm pinhole and the approximately 1-mm image diameter. Actuators had been energized, and actuator temperatures had gone to 100 F. See plot in the test log. Max temperature of the actuators was 125 F. The command ST0 must have been given, which turned on all actuators. Also, the buffers for unimitiated actuators, such as the gratings and the covers, had been set to the 4919 value. Thermal data indicate that the vertical actuators were energized between 05:30 GMT and 06:30 GMT. My (LPVS) best guess at the sequence is as follows: 1 Sometime in the past, a D4919 command was sent, which set this value into all motor controllers. 2 At about 06:00 GMT, or between S1 and S2 alignment data, an ST0 command energized all motor controllers. 3 At start of D-IXF-P2-3.001, a "G" command was given, which caused all motors to go to the motor controller positions. Actuators 6 and 7 followed this command (and the grating and cover actuators also would have gone to position 4919 if they had been "initialized" and not protected by the "redundant" limit switch logic). Evidence for this is noise in BND detectors at that time, but is not conclusive. This scenario suggests that wings data are OK, and narrow-beam center scans before and after the wings scans support this. However, the AL series may be compromised. The above scenario would result in these data also being OK, only slightly degraded by thermal effects, but this should be tested by repeating some samples of these data. ### EKC returned to "IAP2", which is the X-ARM boresight in vacuum, and got no return image in the autocollimator. They currently are searching for the return image, being somewhat guided by HSI images. 01/02/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). !!! Notes: 1 During actuator episode, TQCM_W indicated -3 Hz over the 5 hours the HRMA actuators were overheated. 2 Take HSI images while TRW searches for X-ARM return. 3 To check HRMA tilt repeatability, TRW/ Scott Texter returned to post-actuator-failure, optically aligned position IAP2, by repeating optical alignment using the scope in Bldg. 600 and the X-ARM. 4 Took HSI image (RunID 107236) at (208, 1981) HSI centroid coordinates. 5 Moved off 10 arcmin in yaw and took HSI image (RunID 107237) at (2052,1979). Obtained 29x6.42 = 187 um in 10-arcmin yaw move. Returned, but were off due to first point not being backlash corrected. Adjusted optically. 6 Took HSI image (RunID 107238) at (2087, 1982); went off 10 arcmin in yaw and back, and found same optical alignment 7 Took HSI image (RunID 107239) at (2086, 1982), in agreement with above. Position from optical alignment is a more repeatable than x-ray boresight alignment and indicates alignment to within 1 arcmin. So we'll stay at the optical alignment position now. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. !!! Summary of IAP (Initial Alignment Position) 1 IAP1 was defined by centering X-ARM beam in Bldg.-600 scope. 2 There is no evidence that X-ARM beam was recentered after actuator failure; however, a new IAP (IAP2) was defined based on EKC calculations and a refence point was observed in the scope. I believe that no attempt was made to center it better than 1-2 arcmin. 3 Based on alignment tests with all shells, changed IAP +0.8 in yaw and -0.4 in pitch, to define IAP3 relative to IAP2. 4 After positioning problems (described in previous shift), we redefined IAP based on optical alignment and by Scott Texter and EKC. We are leaving the HRMA here for SF and P2 pseudo shutter-focus tests pending further analyses. 5 Will now execute IXH-SF and IXF-AL series (yaw & pitch). D-IXH-SF-3.001 started 18:38 GMT !!! Redefined FOA. ### Experienced problems in going from HSI to pinholes. D-IXH-SF-3.001 002/18:29 01/02/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). D-IXF-P2-3.001A 002/19:32 !!! Double check relative positions of FPC and HSI. Relative offsets are now correct in the HSI and FPC. (See RunID 107251, not in CMDB.) !!! Repeat top quadrant of each shell to check for drifts. D-IXF-P2-66.001 002/22:38 S3T Y=-307069.63 Z=+10717.92 D-IXF-P2-66.002 002/23:11 S3N Y=-307087.37 Z=+10715.48 D-IXF-P2-66.003 002/23:41 S3B Y=-307066.67 Z=+10702.89 D-IXF-P2-66.004 003/00:10 S3S Y=-307072.00 Z=+10712.11 !!! Needed focus shift is +181 um (Y), +177 um (Z), or +179 um (ave). D-IXF-P2-66.005 003/00:38 S3T Y=-307070.59 Z=+10717.08 !!! Needed focus shift is +181 um (Y), +167 um (Z), or +174 um (average). !!! Update Prime-X for all FOAs by effectively subtracting 237 um. ### This error probably occurred because the display gives the last input, rather than the current value for the mirror being updated. !!! Move and repeat the sequence, as planned. D-IXF-P2-66.026 003/01:07 S3T Y=-307069.91 Z=+10707.43 D-IXF-P2-66.027 003/01:44 S3N Y=-307077.45 Z=+10714.55 D-IXF-P2-66.028 003/02:13 S3B Y=-307065.46 Z=+10710.76 D-IXF-P2-66.029 003/02:41 S3S Y=-307078.73 Z=+10710.62 &&& Needed focus shift is -15 um (Y), -39 um (Z), or -27 um (ave). D-IXF-P2-66.030 003/03:09 S3T Y=-307069.91 Z=+10703.21 &&& Needed focus shift is -15 um (Y), -89 um (Z), or -52 um (ave). !!! Do not update. Drifts? +++ Remarks made without knowledge of error in previous FOA update. D-IXF-P2-66.006 003/03:44 S4T Y=-307067.57 Z=+10707.81 D-IXF-P2-66.007 003/04:17 S4N Y=-307074.29 Z=+10709.98 D-IXF-P2-66.008 003/04:45 S4B Y=-307074.29 Z=+10709.22 D-IXF-P2-66.009 003/05:11 S4S Y=-307082.26 Z=+10713.08 &&& Needed focus shift is -106 um (Y), -19 um (Z), or -62 um (ave). D-IXF-P2-66.010 003/05:52 S4T Y=-307069.20 Z=+10706.22 &&& Needed focus shift is -106 um (Y), -40 um (Z), or -73 um (ave). !!! Notes: 1 These tests proceed smoothly and are faster than a SF! 2 Marc Freeman suggested a possibly better alignment test. Examine displacement of image as a function of off-axis angle. He claims that image will move even if HRMA rotates about its node and that this is a better and more definitive test. Mark should examine existing data from beam centers performed during the full-HRMA EIPS(Al) tests. I cautioned him that the HRMA may not rotate aout its node. 3 UPDATE ONLY RELATIVE OFF-SETS. DO NOT UPDATE GLOBALLY AFTER EACH SHELL. 01/02/97C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Continue XSS = EIPS(Al). !!! Updated FOA focus for S4 only by -62 um, giving Prime-X =-32502. D-IXF-P2-66.011 Y:-307060.63 Z:10682.57 Shell 6T D-IXF-P2-66.012 Y:-307087.65 Z:10703.75 Shell 6N D-IXF-P2-66.013 Y:-307067.87 Z:10685.25 Shell 6B D-IXF-P2-66.014 Y:-307093.72 Z:10706.62 Shell 6S Focus shift says move X based on Y:-108.86 based on Z:-47.89 Ave: -78.38 D-IXF-P2-66.015 Y:-307061.90 Z:10681.33 Shell 6T Repeat Complete 02:52 CST Focus shift says move X based on Y:-108.86 based on Z:-70.24 Ave: -89.55 Updated focus term for shell 6 (only) by (subtracting) (-84) um resulting in the primeX value of -32975 Corrected foa for shell 3 by updating foa primeX to -32755 Roger checked facility auto-collimator at 02:00 CST, and found the alignment of the HRMA to be essentially perfect (in angle). D-IXF-P2-66.016 Y:-307069.61 Z:10710.15 Shell 1T D-IXF-P2-66.017 Y:-307074.69 Z:10708.66 Shell 1N D-IXF-P2-66.018 Y:-307073.21 Z:10688.07 Shell 1B D-IXF-P2-66.019 Y:-307075.91 Z:10710.18 Shell 1S Focus shift says move X based on Y:-11.53 based on Z:209.27 Ave:98.87 D-IXF-P2-66.020 Y:-307071.13 Z:10709.52 Shell 1T Repeat Completed:05:28 Focus shift says move X based on Y:-11.53 based on Z:203.24 Ave:95.85 Updated focus term for shell 1 (only) by (subtracting) 97 um Resulting in the primeX value of: -33061 D-IXF-P2-66.021 Y:-307072.08 Z:10700.83 Shell all T D-IXF-P2-66.022 Y:-307079.20 Z:10705.87 Shell all N D-IXF-P2-66.023 Y:-307074.44 Z:10696.29 Shell all B D-IXF-P2-66.024 Y:-307083.31 Z:10706.72 Shell all S Focus shift says move X based on Y:-49.46 based on Z:54.72 Ave: 2.63 D-IXF-P2-66.025 Y:-307072.87 Z:10699.87 Shell 1T Repeat Completed 08:12 Focus shift says move X based on Y:-49.46 based on Z:43.16 Ave:-3.15 Decided NOT to update FOA tables; average of above is -0.26 Resulting in the primeX value of: 32867 01/03/97/A Steve O'Dell Derived FOA X (um): Shells X_area X_unwt X_u-X_a S13 = MEG -32937 -32908 + 29 um S46 = HEG -32676 -32738 - 62 um All = LEG -32848 -32823 + 25 um Update X_MEG = -32937, X_HEG = -32676; leave unchanged X_LEG = -32867. Last shift got Y = -307077 & Z = 10703, but FOA Y & Z were NOT updated. D-IXF-P1-1.001 14:12 GMT. FWHM_Y(S1) = 11 um. D-IXF-P1-1.002 15:37 GMT. FWHM_Z(S1) = 16 um. Re-run because stage was at wrong position. (SEE BELOW) D-IXF-P1-1.005 16:51 GMT. FWHM_Y(S4) = 33 um. Beam center converged on local max because of algorithm. Need more steps for small apertures. D-IXF-P1-1.006 17:59 GMT. FWHM_Z(S4) = um. Skip remaining P1-1 and following P2-1 series until FOA Y&Z defined. D-LXH-SF-1.001 18:45 GMT. LEG { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0} SF algorithm failed: May be centroiding on m=1 instead of m=0 image. D-HXH-SF-1.002 19:49 GMT. MEG { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0} SF algorithm gave 200 um shift, but do not update FOA. Reliability of SF centroiding algorithm with dispersed image. D-HXH-SF-1.003 20:49 GMT. HEG { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0} D-LXH-FC-1.004 22:22 GMT. Need to skip this and remaining FCs. Procedures are not correctly set to move stage. Notes: 1. Beam center for P1 series has 2 problems. a. Y 1D scan uses BC info, but Z 1D scan did not. Solution: Need to skip "focus move" for Z 1D scan. b. BC with small ap has too small a range and can converge on local max. 2. Shutter focus with OTGs can fail if multiple orders are present. It is also suspect because of dispersed continuum. 3. Could not execute FCs because "go move" was not in command list to move HSI for nonzero order. 01/03/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-HXH-SF-1.003 in process. Data are difficult to interpret directly because the images are not points and include continuum too. The grating team says to proceed while they analyze the data. This problem was even worse for the LEG measurement as both 0th and 1st order were present. Anyway, the first iteration said move the focus -235 um. The idea is to see what the second iteration gives: Move 26 um - i.e. it "converged"! The FOA data were (and should not be) updated. Skip ahead to EE-2.001 through 2.004. D-IXF-EE-2.001 at 4:38 (CST). For time management, BE SURE TO HAVE THE OPERATOR LOOK AT THE PEAK RATE FROM THE PINHOLE. If the rate gets to be about 100 counts/s, then DO NOT ALLOW A BEAM CENTER FOR THE NEXT (SMALLER) PINHOLE. Basically, the whole thing worked anyway. Completed at 7:45. 80% within 100 um! Center of this shell, based on 20 um ph, was Y:-307077; Z:10708 D-IXF-EE-2.002 (004/01:45:44 GMT) 7:45 end at 10:33 Center of this shell, based on 20 um ph, was Y:-307079, Z:10703 RAISE CURRENT TO 0.5 mA BEFORE EXECUTING THE NEXT EE. D-IXF-EE-2.003 start at 10:36 pm must end at 1:47. Y:-307081, Z: 10698 Notes: 1. THE P1 problem was that procedure did not skip the focus move. These procedures are incorrect! 2. DO NOT LET ANY OF THE EE 2.000 series go longer than the 3:11! 3. After these EE, pick up FC series: Diab has fixed procedure. CRITICAL: Start with FC-1.006 through 1.011, then do FC-1.004,5. This is because HETG is not totally open. Kodak wants to start by putting it back into the beam. 4. Several (Shell 1 and Shell 6) of the P2 shutter focus measurements were off because the entire image was not taken. DO NOT SCHEDULE EXTRA TESTS. There are P2 (shell by shell) tests already planned. 01/03/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck Raise beam current to 0.75 mA before executing next EE. D-IXF-EE-2.004 Should start at 1:47 and end at 4:58. Completed 04:18. Encircled energies for shells 1, 3, 4 are less than predictions for diameters of about 25 um and less, and slightly exceed predictions for larger diameters. Shell 6 is less than expected for diameters less than 70 um. Encircled energy from shell 6 at 50 um diameter is about 10% low, although the appearance of the encircled energy plots for shells 1, 3, and 4 hints that the 50 um pinhole may be slightly smaller than its nominal value, or perhaps partially blocked. BEAM CENTER VALUES ARE VERY CONSISTENT FROM SHELLS 1, 3, and 4. STAGE REPEATABILITY and image stability must be very good. These data should be used to update the aperture offset tables and to reduce the need for future beam centers. Image asymmetries in shell 6 are larger, and the smaller pinholes obviously center on different parts of the image. D-HXH-FC-1.006 Started: 04:43 CST. Aborted. Setup was not correct because "setup" occurred before CMDB compilation. D-HXH-FC-1.006 Restarted: 05:08. D-HXH-FC-1.007 Started: 05:28 Complete 05:35 D-HXH-FC-1.008 Started: 05:38 Complete 05:48 D-HXH-FC-1.009 Started: 05:54 Complete 06:02 D-HXH-FC-1.010 Started: 06:10 Complete 06:30 CST D-HXH-FC-1.011 Started: 06:37 Complete 07:06 Switch to LETG successful D-HXH-FC-1.004 Started: 07:08 CST D-HXH-FC-1.005 Started: 07:39 CST 01/04/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-LXF-EE-3.001 14:01 GMT. D-LXF-EE-3.002 14:40 GMT. D-LXF-EE-3.003 15:20 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.004 15:57 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.005 16:42 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.006 17:17 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.007 17:52 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.008 18:32 GMT. D-HXF-EE-3.009 19:14 GMT. Skipped D-IXF-EE-3 series because they are too sensitive to alignment to give meaningful data. Want to get a look at HSI images shell by shell first. Skipped to PO tests while Ian is here to help if debug is needed, then do PI tests to see if we can test alignment. After that, do remaining grating EE tests if alignment numbers are OK; otherwise revise numbers or abort. While the EEs are running, we can eyeball the shell images to see if we can convince ourselves that were're aligned in yaw well enough to proceed with D-IXF-EE-3s. D-IXH-PO-1.001 20:00 GMT D-IXH-PO-1.002 20:18 GMT D-IXH-PO-1.003 20:48 GMT D-IXH-PO-1.004 20:57 GMT Completed 21:18 GMT There was an error in the procedure causing an fpc collect instead of hsi_image and fp rates were about 2.5x too high; so fluxes should be lowered to 40% of set values for future tests. The procedure NEEDS TO BE FIXED before we can complete these. D-IXH-PI-3.002 21:19 GMT Needed to adjust some fpc voltages. 01/04/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXH-PI-3.004 @3:44 CST D-IXH-PI-3.005 Started D-IXH-PI-3.006 Started D-IXH-PI-3.007 Started D-IXH-PI-3.003 Completed @ 4:41 CST Against my better judgement, because of the alignment confusion, we inserted repeats of these tests (shell 4 and 6) but at +/- 1 arcmin with respect to the optical axis. Diab will examine these to try to determine the yaw alignment. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. I deferred many hours of "end survey" EE tests until this is resolved. D-IXH-PI-3.006a (-1 arcmin in Yaw) @4:43(CST) D-IXH-PI-3.007a (-1 arcmin in Yaw) D-IXH-PI-3.006b (+1 arcmin in Yaw) D-IXH-PI-3.007b (+1 arcmin in Yaw) Completed @5:21(CST) Reordered these to minimize grating insertions. D-HXH-EE-3.014 5:22 (CST) 11:22(GMT) D-HXH-EE-3.015 D-HXH-EE-3.012 D-HXH-EE-3.013 D-LXH-EE-3.010 D-LXH-EE-3.011 Completed at 9:42 (CST) The impending PO measurements are next are confused. Set beam current to 0.68 mA. D-IXH-PO-2.001 at 9:42 (CST) D-IXH-PO-2.005 D-IXH-PO-2.002 D-IXH-PO-2.006 Raised Current (to 1.2 mA). D-IXH-PO-2.003 D-IXH-PO-2.007 D-IXH-PO-2.004 D-IXH-PO-2.008 Lower current. D-IXH-PO-2.009 D-IXH-PO-2.013 D-IXH-PO-2.011 D-IXH-PO-2.014 D-IXH-PO-2.011 D-IXH-PO-2.015 D-IXH-PO-2.012 D-IXH-PO-2.016 NOTES: 1) I found the problem with the continuum measurement - the 2 mm pinhole placement! Leon and I must discuss. 2) We have to decide on the alignment, and whether to proceed with the "ends" EEs. 3) Jeff, the CMDB should always include (at the end) ALL measurements we are currenly "skipping" that include the pitch moves. Just place them at the end of the entire data base. Also, and for now more important, we need to reinstate tests D-IXF-P1-1.001-8 and P2-1.001,3,4 after IXF-RF-4.004. 01/04/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck Postponed D-IXH-PO-2.004-16 because the procedure for placing the image on the cusp for the quadrant images failed. Did beam center on SSD 500-um aperture, then updated SSD offsets for all apertures by the indicated value. Update SSD tables again after beam centering on smaller SSD apertures. D-IXF-3D-26.001 Completed D-IXF-3D-26.009 Completed, but SSD offsets were bad. D-IXF-3D-26.010 Completed, but with 10 microsec time constant D-IXF-3D-26.009A Repeat with proper SSD offsets D-IXF-3D-26.010A Completed repeat, but with 2 microsec time constant D-IXF-3D-26.002 02:17 Completed 02:19 D-IXF-3D-26.004 Completed 02:38 D-IXF-3D-26.012 02:46 Completed 02:53 D-IXF-3D-26.003 02:54 Completed 03:13 D-IXF-3D-26.011 03:20? Completed 03:31 D-IXF-3D-26.013 Completed ~03:50 D-IXF-3D-26.005 03:57 Completed 04:02 D-IXF-3D-26.014 ~04:10 Completed 04:22 D-IXF-3D-26.015 04:23 Completed 04:47 D-IXF-3D-26.016 04:53 Completed D-IXF-3D-26.006 Completed D-IXF-3D-26.007 Completed D-IXF-3D-26.008 06:00 Completed 06:23 Decided to yaw about -40 arcsec to be "on axis" based on examination of HSI images. Will check shutter throughput tests, MP3, MP6. Also, beam center with 20 um aperture and update the foa tables before starting, if we change the yaw offset. Sequence: 1. Do TNBS measurements on MP3, MP6. Set flux to get 5-10,000 Hz; 100 sec exposure. 2. Select yaw using Diab's calculations of 01/04/97; repoint HRMA and redefine IAP4. 3. Do 20 um beam center. 4. Update FOA (primeY, pcaZ) (Global), all tables. 5. Do SF-67.xxx series; watch for properly centered images. We expect small changes, but if changes are large for any mirror, we should iterate. 6. Update the FOA tables if required (primeX), (Single). 7. Do the Ends survey series D-IXF-EE-7.013-5. Approximate corrections for beam uniformity using BND-H map from run D-BND-BU-2.036, interpolating from map to MP3, MP6: Shell Top North Bottom South 3 4625 4718 4698 4639 6 4638 4693 4646 4616 Statistical accuracies of the above are about +|- 15 (0.0033), but actual uncertainties probably are dominated by problems in mapping beam uniformity data onto the mirror apertures. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. D-IXF-AL-51.001 MP6 Top 06:45. Added test to get throughput by quadrant for determining HRMA pointing. D-IXF-AL-51.002 MP6 North 06:49 D-IXF-AL-51.003 MP6 Bottom Completed 06:53 D-IXF-AL-51.004 MP6 South Completed 07:03 D-IXF-AL-61.001 MP3 TOP D-IXF-AL-61.002 MP3 North Started D-IXF-AL-61.003 MP3 Bottom Started D-IXF-AL-61.004 MP3 South Started Above test suggested a required yaw correction of between -0.71 and -1.19 arcmin for shell 3, and between -0.78 and -1.11 arcmin for shell 6, the smaller magnitudes including corrections for beam uniformity. The nominal beam uniformity correction, as best we (Dan Schwartz and Leon Van Speybroeck) could determine, is -0.88 and -0.89 arcmin for shells 3 and 6 respectively. We moved -1.0 arcmin in yaw to IAP5 and repeated the above process. The new data indicated a yaw correction of between 0.45 and 0.97 arcmin for shell 3, and between +0.09 and -0.23 arcmin for shell 6. The nominal beam uniformity correction (see above) resulted in a correction of -0.66 and -0.02 arcmin for shells 3 and 6, respectively. Thus, relatively consistent results were obtained for shells 3 and 6 at the original yaw position (IAP4) and for shell 6 at the -1 arcmin yaw position (IAP5). However, results for shell 3 at IAP5 are not consistent. No beam center was done for either MP3 or MP6 measurements at IAP5 before the rates were measured (with the 35 mm pinhole). It does not seem likely that FPC mesh effects are important for this small offset (later determined to be 74 um in y and 21 um in z). We left the HRMA at IAP5 because the difference between this result and the value derived from inspection of the IAP5 HSI images seems unimportant for our current series of measurements. We beam centered with 20 um pinhole and shell 3; then updated all Y and Z values in the FOA tables before beginning shutter focus series 67. 01/05/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXF-P2-67.001 Y:-306167.6 Z: 10676.3 Shell 3T 16:23 GMT D-IXF-P2-67.002 Y:-307156.8 Z: 10688.6 Shell 3N D-IXF-P2-67.003 Y:-307150.0 Z: 10680.8 Shell 3B D-IXF-P2-67.004 Y:-307153.2 Z: 10674.6 Shell 3S Focus shift says move X 41.5 based on Y, -52.6 based on Z, -5.6 ave. D-IXF-P2-67.005 Y:-307166.5 Z: 10674.1 Shell 3T Repeat Focus shift says move X 41.5 based on Y, -79.0 based on Z, -18.8 ave. D-IXF-P2-67.006 Y:-307163.6 Z: 10677.8 Shell 4T 18:51 GMT D-IXF-P2-67.007 Y:-307153.7 Z: 10685.4 Shell 4N ### HXDS s/w quit after 18 of 49 points, so restart 67.007. ### Stopping rate-server process stopping causes DAQ process to quit without notice. D-IXF-P2-67.008 Y:-307152.2 Z: 10679.6 Shell 4S D-IXF-P2-66.009 Y:-307152.0 Z: 10677.1 Shell 4T repeat Focus shift says move X 22.9 based on Y, -23.2 based on Z, -0.1 ave. D-IXF-P2-66.010 Y:-307162.3 Z: 10676.7 Shell 4T repeat Focus shift says move X 22.9 based on Y, -37.9 based on Z, -7.5 ave. D-IXF-P2-67.011 Y: Z: Shell 6T ### Decentered image led to incomplete coverage, so beam centered. ### Found that image is too big for a 7x7 pinhole scan. NOTES: 1 We added 4-6 hours to perform supplemental alignment tests. 2 Ping added 1800-s RF at Fe and increased one from 200 s to 1800 s. 3 We may need to cut out 7-8 hours from the HXDS plan. I suggest that we might delete future PO tests, because rates are prohibitively low, unless we decide that they are so important we need to integrate about 10 x longer. !!! The ring-focus slit scans may fail if Ping didn't account for the PrimeX-stage misalignment with respect to the optical axis. Diab will check on this. !!! Confirm scan range before executing these tests. 01/05/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf Decided to do a 7 x 11 for shell 6. D-IXF-P2-67.012 Y:-307162.0 Z: 10681.6 Shell 6N D-IXF-P2-67.013 Y:-307143.1 Z: 10654.7 Shell 6B D-IXF-P2-67.014 Y:-307161.7 Z: 10670.0 Shell 6S D-IXF-P2-66.015 Y:-307157.2 Z: 10641.4 Shell 6T Focus shift says move X 5.3 based on Y, -238.1 based on Z, -116.4 ave. D-IXF-P2-67.016 Y:-307159.7 Z: 10676.9 Shell 1T D-IXF-P2-67.017 Y:-307147.7 Z: 10683.7 Shell 1N D-IXF-P2-67.018 Y:-307152.5 Z: 10665.2 Shell 1B D-IXF-P2-67.019 Y:-307146.3 Z: 10677.7 Shell 1S Focus shift says move X 12.9 based on Y, 111.1 based on Z, 62.0 ave. D-IXF-P2-66.020 Y:-307159.6 Z: 10674.6 Shell 1T repeat Focus shift says move X 12.9 based on Y, 89.9 based on Z, 51.4 ave. 01/05/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-P2-67.021 Y:-307160.7 Z:10670.0 Shell 1346T D-IXF-P2-67.022 Y:-307152.4 Z:10682.7 Shell 1346N D-IXF-P2-67.023 Y:-307149.3 Z:10667.8 Shell 1346B D-IXF-P2-67.024 Y:-307150.2 Z:10671.8 Shell 1346S Done 03:37 CST Focus shift says move X 26.0 based on Y, 26.3 based on Z, 26.2 ave. D-IXF-P2-66.025 Y:-307160.4 Z:10668.3 Shell 1346T repeat 04:40 Focus shift says move X 26.0 based on Y, 5.6 based on Z, 15.8 ave. !!! New FOA entries for prime X: S1 -33115 S3 -32764 S4 -32495 S6 -32867 All -32882 Derived FOA X (um) using area at 1.49 keV. Shells X_area X_unwt X_u-X_a S13 = MEG -32968 -32940 + 28 um S46 = HEG -32634 -32681 - 47 um All = LEG -32844 -32810 + 34 um (predicted; exp. value used) !!! Revise tables (if necessary): All FOAs revised in Prime X! NOTES: 1 To ensure RF tests will work, we shall use a 50-um pinhole, go to the RF position, and find the ring (two chords). We shall do this tonight so they can check the RF tests and make sure they work. 2 We really should avoid use of the 5-mm aperture for SSD5. Please be sure this gets changed in the CMDB. 3 The BG for the Fe series has the wrong integration time. They should be 1500 s each. !!! Leon, the 3rd floor is checking beam uniformity. If there is still concern about off-axis angle, do the 1D and 2D scans first. !!! Please update FOA Y and Z with a 20-um pinhole first. 01/06/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-EE-7.013 12:28 GMT. S1S @ th_Z = -3.56'. !!! For remaining EEs, beam center on 20-um ap, then use aperture table to offset other aps without beam centering. ### Cannot yet use ap_swap for this. D-IXF-EE-7.014 15:21 GMT. S3S @ th_Z = -2.87'. ### Trying to by-pass beam centers on smaller apertures resulted in obvious errors in encircled energy. Hence, beam center for <200 um diam. ### Five apertures were not properly placed and were repeated. D-IXF-EE-7.015 17:04 GMT. S4S @ th_Z = -2.53'. D-IXF-EE-7.016 20:14 GMT. S6S @ th_Z = -1.88'. D-IXF-EE-7.008 22:48 GMT. S6N @ th_Z = +1.88'. Notes: 1 Attempt to perform small-ap EEs without beam centering failed. Returned to original plan of beam centering for ap < 200 um. 01/06/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-EE-7.007 01:34 GMT. S4N @ th_Z = +2.53'. D-IXF-EE-7.006 04:30 GMT. S3N @ th_Z = +2.87'. ### Diab Jerius discovered an error in the ring focus scan procedure resulting from the requirement on the CMBD that all scans be positive: For the ring focus scan, this would result in incomplete collection of data for 4 of the 12 RF tests (corresponding to 1 of the 3 slits used in these tests). &&& SAO/MST software has been updated (~5:30 GMT 1/7/97) &&& Parameters for RF scans (2.001-2.004,, 3.001-3.004, 4.001-4.004) also have been updated to fix this problem. !!! Will need to fix CMBD s/w (expander s/w too) to allow future RF scans without requiring ALL motions to be positive. ### Brad Wargelin uncovered an error in the CCI procedure which copied a file to itself. &&& Diab fixed this problem on 2nd floor - no impact elsewhere. !!! Per input from Ping Zhou, do RF defocus at one primex location (All) for all shells. TABLE of PRELIMINARY numbers for EE. Choose 70-um diameter pinhole (1.4") because 50-um pinhole is suspect and want large enough diameter to include significant fraction of flux, without being on flat = 1.0 part of curve. Eyeball (with ruler) values from hard copy plots (+/- ~2%). Compare on-axis data - tests D-IXF-EE-2.001-4 (for each individual shell, but all 4 quadrants) with today's data - tests D-IXF-EE-7.013-16 (for each individual shell, South quadrant only, illuminating ends by choice of th_Z) and tests D-IXF-EE-7.005-8 (North quadrants only). SHELL # ON-AXIS SOUTH Quad. th_Z NORTH Quad. th_Z 1 61% 61% -3.56' 62% +3.56' 3 72% >65% (*) -2.87' 71% +2.87' 4 80% 72% -2.53' 74% +2.53' 6 66% 72% -1.88' 70% +1.88' * Data are lower limit due to no good beam centers for this test ID. &&& Focus conditions probably differ for two sets of tests, which can favor some shells relative to others, thereby biasing numbers in table. 01/06/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-EE-7.005 07:16GMT. S1N @ th_Z = +3.56'. &&& Moved HRMA back to IAP5; this required a move through IAP4; auto-collimator showed HRMA pointed on axis at IAP4. !!! CHANGED all FOAs for the ring focus slit scans to account for offset due to the primeX stage not being perpendicular to primeY, PCAZ. &&& primeY -> -304476 PCAZ -> 10722 !!! At end of ring-focus slit scans, return all FOAs to current nominal value for the focal plane: (-305151, 10687). &&& Note on 1/7/97 01:24 GMT - MST log and computer file shows -305151 for nominal FOA is REally -307151 (typo on part of PS apparently) ** RF-2 series: Horizontal-15 slit offset small neg Y, large pos Z. D-IXF-RF-2.001 10:44 GMT. S6 RF slit scan. ### This test did not work as expected. There may be an error in calculating the position of the ring focus, either slit's location or the rings' radii. &&& Restarted test, offset to capture ring and decided to do 1-D scans (13 30-um steps in Y, 10 s) as part of setup for the next 3 tests. ### This test had unexpected offset of +30 um in Y and -111 um in Z. D-IXF-RF-2.002 12:14 GMT. S4 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = -67, dY = 0. D-IXF-RF-2.003 13:41 GMT. S3 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = -67, dY = 0. 01/07/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-RF-2.004 14:48 GMT. S1 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = -67, dY = 0. RF-3 series: Vertical-15 slit offset by large neg Y, small neg Z. D-IXF-RF-3.001 16:07 GMT. S6 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 0. D-IXF-RF-3.002 17:14 GMT. S4 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 0. D-IXF-RF-3.003 18:26 GMT. S3 RF slit scan. Skipped beam center. D-IXF-RF-3.004 19:19 GMT. S1 RF slit scan. Skipped beam center. RF-4 series: Vertical-5 slit offset larger neg Y, smaller neg Z. D-IXF-RF-4.001 20:13 GMT. S6 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 30. ### Listscan files were corrupt. Corrected files and restarted. Notes: 1 After D-IXF-RFs, restore FOAs to nominal values (-305151, 10687). 2 Before D-IXF-P1s, update transverse FOAs from 20-um beam center. 01/07/97/B Harvey Tananbaum ### Rates for RF-4.001 were lower than expected, causing some conjecture that obscuration might be present. Dan Schwartz noted that ring focus for shell 6 is not as sharp as for other optics, anassertion supported by relative count rates for different shells in the preceding RF tests. &&& Decided to proceed with remaining RF tests as planned. D-IXF-RF-4.002 22:03 GMT. S4 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 47. D-IXF-RF-4.003 23:17 GMT. S3 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 45. D-IXF-RF-4.004 00:24 GMT. S1 RF slit scan. Offset dZ = 0, dY = 60. &&& For this final set of 4 RF tests we see a lot more structure, sometimes as many as 3 or more peaks when we scan through the ring. &&& Begin to turn on the HSI HV off-line (and out of the beam) . &&& 3rd floor provides quadrant-by-quadrant, shell-by-shell data for beam uniformity. Data analyzed by Mark Freeman. ### Largest deviations are +0.7% and -0.5%, better than reported earlier today from plots/scans of data. Note data don't average out to exactly 1.0. Output filed as last page in PS Measurements Record Vol.2, Test D-BND-BU-2.035-6. !!! At end of ring-focus slit scans, MUST return all FOAs to the current nominal value for the focal plane: (-305151, 10687). ### On 1/7/97 01:24 GMT, MST log and computer file shows -305151 for nominal FOA: It is really -307151 (apparent typo). D-HXH-AL-27.001 01:27 GMT. HSI image of HETG to understand better extra little images around 3rd order dispersed peak !!! Moved back to nominal FOA and verified numbers. !!! SSD 500 gave ~500 Hz, so reduce source to get closer to 350 Hz given in CMBD. &&& Data accumulation started ~ 01:55 GMT. ### HSI image shows a few problem grating facets apparent to the eye as break in circular pattern plus a gratuitous displaced image. ### Problems all seem to be for shell 3 and show gratings rotated (off-alignment) in the same direction. ### Command to begin next test inadvertantly inserted by MST before data compression completed for HSI: 3rd floor may have to "edit" around this or it may not be a problem. D-IXF-P1-11.005 02:39 GMT Aborted at 03:02 GMT. ### Test was started when beamcen was started, however, beamcen is part of set-up. ### Abort test; restart with suffix a and keep beamcen as part of set-up before official start. D-IXF-P1-11.005a 03:04 GMT 1D pinhole scan shell4 (All) !!! Do beamcen with 20 um pinhole as part of set-up. &&& Start acquisition of formal test data at 03:21 GMT. First step calls for beamcen with 5 um pinhole in y and z. Execute this then do 1D pinhole scanin y. Next test is 1D scan in z Decide to eliminate separate beamcens for the second test. Use position found in DX-IXF-P1-11.005a as starting position for scan in 11.006. D-IXF-P1-11.006 04:28 GMT. Test runs smoothly - deletion of extra beamcenters OK. 01/07/97/C Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXF-P1-11.007 at 05:15 GMT !!! As part of set-up, go to best focus for shell 6 and do beamcenters in y and z with 20 um aperture. Now do beamcens with 5-um pinholes (and omit beamcens from next test). &&& Of course shell 6 looks bad due to the coma. We extended the range (to 33) and increased the step size (3) to provide the data. D-IXF-P1-11.008 Completed at 008/07:20:45 (GMT) D-IXF-P2-11.001 at 008/07:20:45 (GMT). This is shell 1 (10 um) PH to look at the inner core of the PSF. Completed 008/10:40:40 D-IXF-P2-11.002 Shell 4 D-IXF-P2-11.003 Shell 6 NOTES: 1 Have CMDB always include at the end ALL measurements we are now "skipping" because they require pitch moves. We really need this in order to see where we stand in terms of time. 2 Remove "FA" test in Fe series. It's a relic of moving Fe before C. 3 Why are there two "EA" measurements with the SSDx (92.003, 92.004) of the Shell 6 north? Why do the tests use the Fe-K (not Mn-K) filter? Why only shell 6N? (Icing test?). 4 The more I look at EE data, the more I get confused. These PSFs are clearly NOT symmetric. Thus, what use is the EE, especially in the core? It is far better to look at the 2 dimensional PSF! We're asking the analysts to deal with a nightmare by doing small pinhole EEs! Wouldn't the time spent on EEs be far better used on PSF (i.e., P2) measurements? 5 Get 3rd-floor analysis results and file in Measurements Recoed. 6 How do we know that the SSD_X is at the proper focus for the D-IXS-AL-71.00x series? Ed is supposed to check this. 7 For the EE, we need to deal with the ends, so what good is a full-HRMA EE (done on-axis). I will discuss with Leon, but I do not believe that we should do this test with Al-K. 8 For SSD tests, increase integration time to 200 s per quadrant, to maximize the probability that the shutters work. 01/08/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-P2-11.003 13:57 GMT. S6 PSF 2D. D-IXS-AL-71.001 18:20 GMT. S6 quadrant balance. Shell 6: (T-B)/T = 0.1003 (N-S)/N = 0.0079 D-IXS-AL-71.002 19:56 GMT. S3 quadrant balance. Shell 3: (T-B)/T = 0.0375 (N-S)/N = 0.0443 +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. 01/08/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-EE-2.004a 21:04 GMT. S6 all quadrants encircled energy Repeat of an earlier test but for best focus for shell 6. For 70 um pinhole, encircled energy increses from 66% to 69% for improved focus - marginal change given our ability to read the hard copy plots. For 40 um pinhole increase is from 28% to 36% with better focus. D-IXF-EE-7.014a 23:52 GMT. S3S encircled energy for S quadrant of shell 3. repeat of earlier measurement with beamcenters deleted in part. Result for shell 3 South quadrant is ~64% EE for 70 um pinhole, compared to >65% for prvious run (EE-7.014) and 72% for North quadrant. Will check if system was at correct focus for shell 3. Check shows focus where it was intended to be. ### At completion of test, Mark Ordway noted that the SSD_5 was not operating. Speculate that this was case for this test and previous, but does not really impact scientific results for these 2 tests which use FPC-H and FPC-X as their primary data. ### Check shows that SSD-5 was operating normally through D-IXS-AL-71.002, which completed at ~21:00 and off for much of D-IXF-EE-2.004a which started at 21:04 GMT and which completed around 23:52. &&& After visit by Ian Evans to bldg 500, the SSD_5 system started again. Don't know what the problem was. An LN2 fill did occur around time of turn-off (and SSD_5 may have been warming up) but the system should have restarted after the LN2 fill. OK now so proceeding. D-IXF-FA-4.005 02:21 GMT. Aging test for FPC_x2. D-HXH-FC-28.001 02:50 GMT. HETG Focus check using HSI. Shell 1 quadrant by quadrant scan: (+) third order data. ### Source filter wheel hung up, delaying set-up for this test. &&& Fixed and found SSD_5 rates OK. Start up HSI. !!! First run still ~147 sec. Increase next 3 to 200 s each. ### TC suggested increasing integration time to 800 s (spread over 4 intervals), to reduce risk of shutter failure, thus added 212 s. D-HXH-FC-28.002 03:40 GMT. HETG focus check using HSI. Shell 3 quadrant by quadrant scan: (+) third order data. D-HXH-FC-28.003 04:07 GMT. HETG focus check using HSI. All shells/all quadrants: (+) third order. ### At end of procedure, there were steps left over from some type of focus check procedure that wanted to cycle shutters and take more data. We skipped these steps for this test and for the next one as well. D-HXH-FC-28.004 04:28 GMT. HETG focus check using HSI. All shells/all quadrants : (-) third order. ### The problems (misaligned gratings) are clearly visible. D-IXS-AL-99.014 04:46 GMT. S4 quadrant balance (added by PS) to include with S6 and S3 conflicting data. !!! Beamcen with 70-um pinhole and then swap_ap to 2-mm pinhole. 01/08/97/C Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXS-AL-99.015 009/06:08:34 GMT. S1 quadrant balance (added by PS) to address S6 and S3 conflicting data. Completed at 009/07:19. Shell 4: (T-B)/B = 0.093 (N-S)/N = 0.005 Shell 1: (T-B)/T = 0.044 (N-S)/N = 0.023 +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. <<< Begin XSS = EIPS(Al). D-IXF-BG-1.014 009/07:19:35 Fe L-alpha settings for the FPCs D-IXF-BG-1.013 009/07:55:22 Fe K-alpha settings for the FPCs Terminate early because source is ready. D-BND-BU-2.025 Aborted D-BND-BU-2.026 009/08:28:34 Completed 009/10:05:31 &&& Looks like about 1.5% by taking slices in y and z. D-BND-BU-2.027 Aborted D-BND-BU-2.028 009/10:05:31 D-IXS-EA-92.003 009/11:44:33. Lots of confusion. ### Trouble with requesting wrong filters. ??? Should the voltage really be this low? !!! These data can be used to do a good effective area! D-IXF-P2-4.004 009/12:30. 100-um ap, 11x11 100-um steps. Beam Cen at y=-307185, z= -38481. ### Restart - IRIG crash. ### Another restart - wrong coordinate entry. Notes: 1 SSD alignment measurements are very interesting: Shells 1 and 3 show similar results; so do 4 and 6. However, they do not agree with each other! +++ Edited out some speculation of cause for alignment ambiguity. +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this alignment test. 2 Why is SSD_5 set for 5-mm aperture!? I thought we agreed not to use this aperture due to the relative size of the SSD. 3 Several grating tests were improperly ordered. 4 Why does this measurement only use N&S quadrants? It would have been a good continuum effective-area measurement if it used all quadrants. 01/09/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-P2-3.004 009/15:27 50-um ap, 11x11 50-um steps. D-IXF-P2-2.003 009/16:58 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. Notes: 1 After D-IXS-EA-92.004 (end Fe series), re-insert BND_5 beam maps: D-BND-BU-2.025a FPC_5 map @ Fe-L. D-BND-BU-2.027 FPC_5 map @ Fe-K. 2 During above BND_5 beam maps, perform SSD_5 Cm244 (icing) test. 3 Reduce OTG insertions by re-arranging 3D-11 and 3D-25 series. 01/09/97/B Harvey Tananbaum ### Realized EE procedures were not updated to include beamcens for apertures smaller than 200 um. &&& Procedure did beamcen at 20 um and started a series of collects for all larger apertures. ### Data are clearly bad from plots of first several points. Aborted D-IXF-EE-3.009 21:49 GMT !!! Skip next 2 EE tests (3.010 and 3.011) and ask CMBD to regenerate test files with new beamcen and collect procedure and get the new CMBD down to 2nd floor before Fe tests are completed. D-IXF-3D-11.002 21:52 GMT Shell 4 and 6 exposure using FPCx_2 ### Integration time increased to 200 s to reduce risk of too rapid a change of shutters. D-IXF-3D-11.001 22:07 GMT Shells 1 and 3 using FPCx_2. D-HXF-3D-11.016 22:17 GMT HETG data at -1,0,+1 order Shells 1 and 3 (MEG). &&& Changed order of several tests to reduce number of grating moves. &&& Rough estimate of MEG (1-side) efficiency at Fe-K ~1% (based on ratio of first to zero order counts in peak). D-HXF-3D-11.017 22:32 GMT HETG Shells 4 and 6 (HEG) and -1,0,+1. !!! Total integration time increased to 200 s to increase time before shutters changed. D-LXF-3D-11.015 22:47 GMT. All shells, LETG -1,0,+1 data D-LXH-3D-11.027 23:01 GMT. All shells LETG 3D scan for Fe-K D-LXH-3D-25.001 23:14 GMT. All shells LETG 3D scan for Fe-L &&& 4 points +3,-3,-2,+2 &&& Ian Evans concerned about flux as scan crosses center of HSI. Estimated count rate not a problem, taking into account the motion from the scan, so proceed with test. ### Upon test completion, IPI states that the line is so broad (w/o the filter) that the data are not useful. !!! For next 2 tests same conditions would apply, so insert filter and then adjust current to achieve the desired count rate. Proceed to next 2 tests and if all runs well, repeat 25.001 as 25.001a. D-LXH-3D-25.002 23:42 GMT All shells LETG 3D scan for Fe-L. &&& 10 points covering + and - orders 3 to 7. ### Some time spent adjusting filter and source flux. Can get to monitor rates of 150-200 cps with current at 2.5 mA. !!! Exposures increased from 33 to 60 sec and data accumulated. Useful data obtained for replanning purposes and some higher analysis, but flux still lower than desired. ### Stage restarted after interval #7 -computer hang-up. !!! Complete this test, skip 25.003, delete 25.004 (later), and do not repeat 25.001 as 25.001a. D-LXH-3D-11.030 00:44 GMT. LETG all shells, Fe-L, 1st order. !!! Increased current to 2.5 in order to get within 2x of desired flux. D-HXH-3D-11.031 01:07 GMT. MEG 3D scan for Fe-L. !!! Keep source at same parameters as for previous test. D-HXH-3D-11.032 01:31 GMT. HETG 3D scan for Fe-L. !!! Keep source at same parameters as for previous test. !!! Order of next 5 tests revised to reduce grating and shutter moves. D-HXF-3D-11.020 02:47 GMT. Continue with HETG. &&& 3D scan at Fe-L for shells 4 and 6, orders -1,0,+1. !!! For the filter and source settings, max count rate at BND is ~3/4 of that desired. D-HXF-3D-11.019 03:19 GMT. 3D scan at Fe-L for MEG, orders -1,0,+1 D-HXF-3D-11.003 03:32 GMT. On-axis flux measuremen, shells 1 & 3. No grating. D-HXF-3D-11.004 03:46 GMT. On-axis flux for S4&6 - no grating. D-HXF-3D-11.018 03:55 GMT. 3D scan at Fe-L for LETG, -1,0,+1 order. D-HXH-3D-11.028 04:05 GMT. Change filter and source setting. !!! Go to Fe-K. MEG with HSI. D-HXH-3D-11.029 04:28 GMT. Fe-K, HEG with HSI. D-IXH-PO-7.001 04:42 GMT. Outer core, Fe-K with HSI. !!! 100 s with Mnx4 filter. 100-s exposure near, but not on the cusp. D-IXH-PO-7.002 04:52 GMT. Outer core. Fe-K on cusp 2000 sec with Mnx2 filter. ### Some set-up time used to put image on cusp and adjust flux. 01/09/97/C Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXH-PO-7.003 010/05:57. D-IXH-PO-7.004 010/06:17. D-IXH-RF-1.003 010/07:03. D-IXF-PW-3.040 010/07:46. S3S @ -2.87'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.041 010/08:26. S3S @ -2.87'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.042 010/08:55. S3S @ -2.87'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.043 010/09:25. S3S @ -2.87'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.044 010/09:55. S3S @ -2.87'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.045 010/10:26. S4S @ -2.53'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.046 010/11:04. S4S @ -2.53'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.047 010/11:32. S4S @ -2.53'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.048 010/12:01. S4S @ -2.53'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.049 010/12:30. S4S @ -2.53'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.050 010/12:59. S6S @ -1.88'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.051 010/13:30. S6S @ -1.88'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.052 010/13:58. S6S @ -1.88'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. !!! Changing EE 3.009, etc. to always do beamcens doubled their time! ??? Are the HXDS aperture tables simply incorrect? &&& Dan S compared the table to the results Leon so carefully tabulated when we did beamcens for all shells at Al, to refine the HXDS aperture table. &&& The idea was to do beamcens on only a few apertures (say the 20 um), update the FOA Y and Z, and use swapap to avoid timely beamcens. ### The table was not updated, thus, of course, the problems with EE 3.009. !!! Use this procedure: Update the table and then proceed. If it still doesn't work, then ask why (energy dependent coma?). 01/10/97A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-PW-3.053 010/14:27. S6S @ -1.88'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.054 010/14:56. S6S @ -1.88'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.023 010/15:24. S6N @ +1.88'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.024 010/15:57. S6N @ +1.88'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.025 010/16:27. S6N @ +1.88'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.026 010/16:55. S6N @ +1.88'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.027 010/17:23. S6N @ +1.88'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.018 010/17:52. S4N @ +2.53'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.019 010/18:24. S4N @ +2.53'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.020 010/18:55. S4N @ +2.53'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.021 010/19:24. S4N @ +2.53'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.022 010/19:52. S4N @ +2.53'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.013 010/20:21. S3N @ +2.87'. 1-mm ap, 7 1-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.014 010/20:55. S3N @ +2.87'. 4-mm ap, 7 4-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.015 010/21:27. S3N @ +2.87'. 10-mm ap, 7 10-mm steps. D-IXF-PW-3.016 010/22:05. S3N @ +2.87'. 20-mm ap, 7 20-mm steps. Notes: 1 Perform 50-um beam center at start of D-IXS-3D-29; swap ap to 500 um. 2 Run D-IXF-EE-3.009a-011 with beam centers as specified. a EEs without beam centering have not succeeded for apertures < 200 um. b Using full-shell corrected table for quadrant EEs was not successful. c MST today updated aperture table based on previous x-ray beam centers. d Will compare new beam-center data with new table for future. 3 Final Fe measurements are as follows: a D-IXS-EA-92.004 May need to adjust EIPS V to balance Fe-K & Fe-L. b D-BND-BU-2.027 Run Fe-K BU first to avoid a BND setup. c D-BND-BU-2.025a Run Fe-L BU second to avoid a BND setup. d Run SSD_5 calibration (icing test) during BUs. 01/10/97B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-PW-3.017 010/22:44. S3N @ +2.87'. 35-mm ap, 7 35-mm steps. D-IXS-3D-29.001 011/00:01. S4&6. 3D scan at Fe-K with SSD_x, 32 s. ### Delays encountered in setting up test due to errror in TC test script. ### Switch to SSD_x and preparation for beamcen is a "manual" procedure with delays encountered. !!! Adjust source; return HRMA to nominal position. !!! Perform 50-um beamcen at start of D-IXS-3D-29; swapap to 500 um. D-IXS-3D-29.002 011/00:28. S1&3. 3D scan at Fe-K with SSD_x, 31 s D-HXS-3D-29.005 011/00:41. 3D scan with HETG at Fe-K with SSD_x. MEG -1,0,+1. ### At conclusion of 29.004, tracking rates on screen and plotting outputs shows that first data point for each of the 3 scans is unintentionally 0 order. &&& Robert Austin prints listscan to show CMBD requested correct values and examines listscan_1_new finding that the procedure made the first point of each scan 0,0,0, thus missing MEG +1, HEG +1 and +4. &&& Robert's analysis indicates that the first position must be selected right after a focus move. Then the cci s/w treats the first line as delta's and not absolute positions, so 0,0,0 keeps you where you want to be. Apparently, our operating approach was to set the first position to 0,0,0 and expect the procedure to move us to the first position in the original listscan. &&& Robert will write something to say this more clearly and to guide the operators in this regard. D-HXS-3D-29.003 011/00:53. 3D scan with HETG at Fe-K with SSD_x. HEG scan 0, (+ and -) 1,2,3 order. &&& Count rate in 2nd and 3rd orders comparable to order of ~10%. D-HXS-3D-29.004 011/01:06. 3D scan with HETG at Fe-K with SSD_x. &&& HEG scan (+ and -) 4,5,6,7 order D-IXF-EE-3.009A 011/01:31. Encircled energy S3 at Fe-K. !!! Follow procedure as set-up. D-IXF-EE-3.010 011/04:24. Encircled energy S4 at Fe-K. !!! Because beamcens in previous test agree with those in updated table, we shall beamcen only at 20 um and do rest of test without beamcens. ### Dan Schwartz notes that tables are not updated for 150 and 200 um (because they weren't beamcen'd in tests of several days ago). &&& Because EE data shows that new values are needed for 150 and 200 um, Dan takes them from EE-3.009A beamcens and uses offset (avg) from smaller pinholes from earlier data and 3.009A to generate entry to table for 150 and 200 um apertures. !!! For 3.010 and 3.011, beamcen on 20 um and use table plus swapap to get beamcen value. 01/10/97C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-EE-3.011 011/05:49:05. Encircled energy S6 at Fe-K. Complete 07:16:20. D-IXS-EA-92.004 07:31 (Before coordination with TRW) Complete 07:46:38 D-BND-BU-2.025A Completed D-BND-BU-2.027 08:15 GMT; Complete 08:34 GMT ### Repeat test D-IXF-EE-010 because of anomolous pinholes. &&& We have a new beam center and a new position for the 300 um poinhole, the latter determined from the change to the 200 um pinhole. D-IXF-EE-3.010A 011/08:35. Encircled energy S4 at Fe-K. Complete 09:47 &&& Results are much more believable. !!! The repeated graphs in the PS book include both D-IXF-EE-3.010 and D-IXF-EE-3.010A. ### Noted sparking from outside transformer and flickering lights due to down line. Firemen taking care of the problem. &&& No apparent noise on the counters. D-IXF-EA-99.016 09:48 Add Fe-K collect, S1, 100 s, 35-mm ap. Complete 09:53. D-IXF-BG-1.019 011/10:06 Background run and SSD-500 icing test. Complete 011/10:45 (7 of 10 iterations; stopped because source was ready). D-BND-BU-2.037 011/10:46 C-Ka bnd-500 uniformity test. Complete 011/11:00 D-BND-BU-2.038 011/11:01 C-Ka bnd-h uniformity test. ### Power trip of fpchb. Reset fpchb. Restart 011/11:19, complete 12:52. D-IXF-P2-4.003 11 by 11 scan, C-Ka, Ensemble, 100 um pinhole Started setup 011/12:52, started test 13:16, completed 14:23. ### Suffered another high voltage trip of fpchb during test. 01/11/97A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-P2-3.003 011/14:23. 50-um ap, 11x11 50-um steps. D-IXF-P2-2.002 011/15:47. 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. Re-started ~16:23 because of socket error from FPC_5. FPC_HB high voltage tripped; re-set after this measurement. D-IXF-P2-1.005 011/19:49. S1; 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. FPC_HB high voltage tripped; re-set after this measurement. Notes: 1 To beamcen or not to beamcen, that is the question. a For D-IXF-EE C-K, use 1 of 2 parallel TRW IDs. i Beamcen for ap =< 200 um. Use only if necessary. ii Beamcen for ap = 20 um only. If possible use for all EEs. b For D-IXS-EE C-cont, use 1 of 2 parallel TRW IDs. i Beamcen for ap =< 200 um. Use for 1st EE, for others if necessary. Check against expected positions, update ap table if necessary. ii Beamcen for ap =< 20 um only. If possible use for all EEs but 1st??? WARNING: SSD ap wheel is probably repeatible only to 10 or 20 um. My (SO) recommendation is to use beamcen for all ap =< 200 um. 2 Call Martin in for all C-continuum SSD measurements. a D-IXS-MC-4.* t_SSD = 10 us; I ~ 0.35 mA, SSD_5 rate = 150 Hz. b D-IXS-EE-1.* t_SSD = 2 us; I ~ 0.45 mA, SSD_5 rate = 190 Hz. 3 Consider other CMDB submissions. a Submit another IXF-FM to re-measure FPC mesh. b Re-submit D-IXF-EA-99.016. As-run used S4 instead of requested S1. c Additional alignment tests: i IXH-RF with 1 shell-quadrant open or closed per exposure. ii IXS-EA ensemble quadrant-balance test. iii FPC_X collect with all shutters closed. (Fit in during set-up.) a Change copies of D-IXS-EA-92.004 (EIPS Fe-L/K icing test). i Logs indicate that requested [FeL2] filter was not used. ii If so, change CMDB so that filter is not used in future measurements. 01/11/97B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-P2-1.006 012/00:03. S3; 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. ### Re-started at 012/02:44 after fpcscan quit. ### Experienced additional FPC_hb high voltage trips. ### Noted excessive background in lowest 25-30 channels of FPC_x1 during C BG measurement. This is not a problem now, since that FPC not in use. &&& Calculate background in FPC_x2 during D-IXF-BG-1.019. For ROI 20:101, observed 95 cts in 299.22 s = 0.317 +/- 0.032 Hz. !!! Test for filter leak after this test, by closing all shutters and looking for excess over background with source still on. &&& Co-add ~2100 s from bkgd test interval: find 567 cts in ROI, 0.270 +/- 0.011 Hz for bkgd rate. Use this as basis for leak test comparison. D-IXF-P2-1.007 012/04:21. S4; 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. !!! Procedure for testing light leak through shutters. a During set-up, move on-axis to previous beamcenter; close shutters; swap_ap to 35mm aperture. With gate valve closed, accumulate 100 s. RunID 108377 - display says 26 cts in 99.74 sec = previous background. b Now open gate valve and collect for 100 s with shutters still closed. RunID 108378 - display says 18 cts in 99.74sec for ROI. Now run for 10 s with shutters open - see 214913 counts in 8.02 s (live-time). RunID 108379. c Close shutters and gate valve. Simple/imprecise calculation gives -.08 +/- 0.07 Hz for difference between shutter open and closed. Three sigma limit is <0.21 Hz through the shutter with source intensity at 26,864 Hz, so limit on leakage is ~8 x 10^-6. !!! Hence, shutter leakage cannot cause "alignment" measurement problem. ### Before start of *1.007, Paul Okun fixes loose cable on rate meter in Bldg 500, which may be source of socket error shutdown. D-IXF-P2-1.007 012/05:01. ### Paul Okun also troubleshoots cause of FPC_hb high voltage shutdowns. Finds possible bad HV cable. Shuts off FPC-hb. ### Stopped after 182 of 361 steps. ID 108384 is the first half. &&& Restarted 12/07:19 GMT; ID = 108385. ### Cause of scan interruption is unknown: There was no socket error. ### High voltage trip on fpc_hb. Reset High voltage. Complete 012/09:16. 01/11/97C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-P2-1.008 Started setup 012/09:17. S6; 10-um ap, 19x19 10-um steps. ### Beam center stopped after two iterations, but did not converge. &&& Started test 09:48 (03:48 CST). ### Process hung; killed child process. ### Voltage trip, fpc_hb, reset. ### Run hung; restarted, so two test Ids. Complete 012/13:39 D-IXS-MC-4.001 First continuum run. S1N !!! Martin wants 10 us time constant (max rate of 1500). He expects statistics to be dominated by the ssd_5 counter, but we should adjust current to approach max rate in one or the other. If necessary, adjust integration time. !!! Martin is concerned about beam centers; the 2-mm aperture will not beam center well, but we can do scans to find its edges. I suggest 100 um increments near the edges. ### Because FPC voltages were not set up and integration time was only 300 s the first try, we repeat the test without skipping detector setup and with 750 s integration time. !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431708,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-4.001a S1N; Started:15:09 D-IXS-MC-4.002 S3N; Started:15:42 !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431761,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-4.003 012/16:13 S4N !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431761,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-4.004 S6N; Started:16:39 !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431761,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-2.004 S6S; Started:17:03 !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431665,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-2.003 S4S; Started:17:28 !!! Center after edge scans location: 2-mm pinhole (y=431665,z=-3405). D-IXS-MC-2.002 S3S; Started:17:52 !!! Discontinued edge scans because changes are relatively small. D-IXS-MC-2.001 S1S; Started:18:09 D-IXS-EE-1.001 S1; Started:18:26 Completed 012/22:56:03 Pinhole Y Z 100 431380 -3407 200 431391 -3409 500 N/A N/A 2000 N/A N/A 70 431413 -3393 50 431515 -3372 40 431516 -3370 30 431636 -3326 20 431430/(431427) -3343/(-3346) 15 431422 -3271 !!! If we have a problem, abort sub-20um pinholes.(We did). ### 15 um rate looks wrong 100 ph/s instead of 400 ph/s ### 10 um swap_ap yielded no counts. Aborted remaining pinholes. Notes: 1 Update ssd aperture tables while the ssd fill takes place. 2 Do D-IXS-EE-1.002 (with many beamcens) to check repeatability. 3 Evaluate the remainder of the EEs. ### Just before leaving, I noticed that the sign of yaw for the N and S shells for the MC test was reversed from the C-K. T and B are also reversed. !!! Repeat tests (D-IXS-MC) after ssd EEs. Just reverse quadrant: N for S. 01/12/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf &&& Waiting while the SSDs fill. D-IXS-EE-1.003 012/22:56:01 (5 pm) ### Computer failure (irig) during this run. Restart. ### Lost SSD5 during reboot, but not noticed until I mentioned it. !!! To collect needed counts in SSD5, increased collect to 1500 s. NOTES: +++ Deleted speculations about confusion over alignment tests, later shown to result from decenter. !!! Need to re-run the MC tests because of reversed tilts. !!! As the angle changes there may be a slight displacement of Beam Center. &&& I suggest splitting the difference in the previous tests and using Y:431700; Z:-3405. 01/12/97C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXS-EE-1.003 Finished 013/10:32 GMT Edited master_SSD tables D-IXS-EE-1.004 Shell 6; started 013/10:33 Complete 12:54 GMT !!! Repeat MC series with correct offsets; use primey = 431700, hriz=-3405 D-IXS-MC-2.001A Repeat, shell 1S Started: 013/13:00 Complete: 013/13:23 D-IXS-MC-2.002A Repeat, shell 3S Started: 013/13:24 Complete: 013/14:42 D-IXS-MC-2.003A Repeat, shell 4S Started: 013/13:43 Complete: 013/14:04 D-IXS-MC-2.004A Repeat, shell 6S Started: 013/14:05 Complete: 013/14:24 01/13/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXS-MC-4.004A 013/14:25. S6N @ +1.88'. D-IXS-MC-4.003A 013/14:44. S4N @ +2.53'. D-IXS-MC-4.002A 013/15:02. S3N @ +2.87'. D-IXS-MC-4.001B 013/15:19. S1N @ +3.56'. D-IXF-EE-3.012 013/15:40. S1 EE with 20-um beam center only. ### EEs are problematic with some clearly low points. D-IXF-EE-3.013 013/16:41. S3 EE with 20-um beam center only. ### EEs are problematic with some clearly low points. !!! Skip remaining 2 EEs (S4 & S6) until EE approach is agreed upon. D-HXH-3D-5.002 013/17:50. HEG 3D scan, 30 x 11 s, I = 0.2 mA. ### HSI rate was only 30 Hz. Reschedule measurement with 60-s collects. D-LXH-3D-5.001 013/18:36. LEG 3D scan, 180 x 14 s, I = 0.6 mA. D-HXH-3D-99.017 013/20:36. HEG 3D scan, 30 x 60 s, I = 0.6 mA. &&& Re-run of D-HXH-3D-5.002. D-LXH-3D-11.047 013/21:30. LEG m=+1. D-HXH-3D-11.048 013/21:46. MEG m=+1. Notes: 1 EEs without beamcens are still unreliable. Consider alternatives. a Rely upon slightly oversampled P2 scans and reduce number of EEs. b Perform EEs with beam centers. Sample more sparsely to save time. 01/13/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-HXF-3D-11.046 013/22:06. MEG m=-1,0,+1 3D scan. D-LXF-3D-11.045 013/22:36. LEG m=-1,0,+1 3D scan. D-IXF-3D-11.007 013/22:57 S13 (OTG=0). D-IXF-3D-11.008 013/23:15:01 S46 (OTG=0) Completed 013/23:31:50. ### Break for Paul and John to change out a board in bldg 600. D-IXF-EE-3.001 014/00:29:36 MP1 D-IXF-EE-3.002 014/03:07:11 MP3 Notes: 1 EEs without beamcens are still unreliable. Consider alternatives. a Rely upon slightly oversampled P2 scans and reduce number of EEs. b Perform EEs with beam centers. Sample more sparsely to save time. 2 Leon, please read Brad's memo. 01/13/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-EE-3.003 014/05:46 MP4 Complete 08:42 D-IXF-EE-3.004 014/08:42 MP6 Complete 11:42 CCC 01/14/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXF-EE-8.013 014/11:24. S1S @ -3.56', with beamcen. D-IXF-EE-8.014 014/14:25. S3S @ -2.87', with beamcen. Ian noticed a problem with 500 um aperture (approx. 90 um location which when corrected gave a "better", larger EE value. We can correct the position manually until the next convenient table update. D-IXF-EE-8.015 014/17:05. S4S @ -2.53', with beamcen. D-IXF-EE-8.016 014/19:42. S6S @ -1.88', with beamcen. NOTES: On the subject of alignment the MC tests (right and wrong) may be a sensitive test of the mirror alignment independent of vignetting. Doug S. and I have been looking at some plots with the following (rough eye-ball) conclusions. angle wrt current on-axis approx "cutoff" energy Shell 1N +3.56 arcmin 4800 eV Shell 1N -3.56 5080 eV Shell 1S -3.56 4880 eV If the relation is linear, then the implied difference between 1N and 1S alignment would be: 7.12 * 80/280 = 2.03 arcmin Shell 6N +1.88 8800 eV Shell 6N -1.88 9320 eV Shell 6S -1.88 9080 eV The implied difference between 6N and 6S alignment would be: 3.76 * 280/520 = 2.02 arcmin. 2 arcmin implies a 1 arcmin move is required for correction If this is right it means if we yaw the HRMA +1 arcmin we will be aligned for both P1 and P6. This would exactly offset the -1 arcmin we are currently yawed wrt the ARM. It would also means that the off-axis anomalies we've observed are not be caused by the mirrors. If this result holds up we can peform this test (C continuum) on axis with the T and B shutters to test Pitch alignment of the optic as well. We need to do this before leaving C. I put these in at the spur of the moment because we'll be done with C before tomorrow, but they should be aborted if the assumptions are wrong. The missing data above are the 6S at +1.88 and 1S at +3.56. These don't exhibit the linear behavior we assumed so the concept is still in question. 01/14/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXF-EE-8.008 014/22:08:11 S6N @ +1.88', with beamcen. D-IXF-EE-8.007 015/01:14:22 S4N @ +2.53', with beamcen. Computer problems. Long Delay! D-IXF-EE-8.006 015/05:01:27 S3N @ +2.87', with beamcen. Notes: 1 SDACS problem cost us 1.5 hr. 2 For remaining two EEs, use 2.5 hours as cuttoff. If you have not gone down to 20 um, cuttoff after 20 um. 3 Read Jeff's notes on alignment. 01/14/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-EE-8.005 015/07:45 S1N @ +3.56', with beamcen. Complete 10:17. D-IXF-FM-3.002 Mesh test, 1 mm pinhole 015/10:20 (includes edge scans of 200, 300, 500, and 1000 micrometer apertures, and beam center, 20 um aperture). Found position of 1000 um aperture to be adequately centered (48 um error in Z, 101 um error in Y) so this test should be adequate. D-IXF-FM-3.003 MFPC mesh test, 35 pinhole Aborted Updated FOA; have data for master table update. D-IXH-PO-6.001 HSI setup, CAR1 Started: D-IXH-PO-6.002 HSI UR95 Started: 015/13:40 D-IXH-PO-6.003 HSI setup, CAL1 Started: 015/13:53 GMT D-IXH-PO-6.004 HSI LL95 Started: 015/14:01 GMT 01/15/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXH-RF-1.002 Ring focus, Ensemble; 015/14:12. I = 0.905 mA D-IXH-RF-17.001 Ring focus, MP1, TB; 015/14:50. I = 2.578 mA D-IXH-RF-17.002 Ring focus, MP1, NS; 015/15:00. D-IXH-RF-17.003 Ring focus, MP3, TB; 015/15:10. D-IXH-RF-17.004 Ring focus, MP3, NS; 015/15:27. D-IXH-RF-17.005 Ring focus, MP4, TB; 015/15:43. D-IXH-RF-17.006 Ring focus, MP4, NS; 015/15:59. D-IXH-RF-17.007 Ring focus, MP6, TB; 015/16:20. D-IXH-RF-17.008 Ring focus, MP6, NS; 015/16:41. Repeated at sh1 and sh 4 at a different defocus (32.65 mm)to help determine origin of odd features found in the images above. D-IXH-RF-17.001A Ring focus, MP1, TB; 015/17:04. current=2.578 D-IXH-RF-17.002A Ring focus, MP1, NS; 015/17:15. D-IXH-RF-17.005A Ring focus, MP4, TB; 015/17:25. D-IXH-RF-17.006A Ring focus, MP4, NS; 015/17:43. D-IXS-MC-3.001 18:07 GMT did beam center using 1d edge scans found y=431655. will leave it here for all tests. D-IXS-MC-3.002 18:55 GMT D-IXS-MC-3.003 19:12 GMT D-IXS-MC-3.004 19:17 GMT The process for 3.003 died and data were never written D-IXS-MC-3.003a 19:32 GMT D-IXS-MC-5.001 19:51 GMT D-IXS-MC-5.002 20:09 GMT D-IXS-MC-5.003 20:26 GMT D-IXS-MC-5.004 20:42 GMT Note: 1) Mark Bautz says, tentatively, that a nominal 5 ph/sec is the in-focus limit for Acis-2c 01/15/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-IXF-BG-1.017 015/21:00:05 D-BND-BU-2.033 015/22:47:56 D-BND-BU-2.034 015/23:07:33 D-IXH-SF-1.012 016/00:38:47 This showed (indicated) a focus move of 37 um relative to the previous position. We did not update and pressed on. D-LXH-dF-16.001 016/01:36:04 D-HXH-dF-16.002 016/02:18:38 D-HXH-dF-16.003 016/02:42:04 D-LXF-EE-3.016 016/03:08:33 D-LXF-EE-3.017 016/03:35:4 D-LXF-EE-3.018 016/03:57:36 D-LXF-EE-3.019 016/04:20:55 D-LXF-EE-3.020 016/04:58:33 D-LXF-EE-3.021 016/05:27:38 D-LXF-EE-3.022 016/05:56:25 01/15/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck Analysis of mesh data from D-IXF-FM-3.002 shows that the sum of pcay and pcy (which should be a constant) differs by 1 um from previous values; thus pcy values were not changed, except for a few which did not have the proper sum of pcay and pcy). The sum of pcaz and pcz, which also should be a constant, differed by 10 um from the previously obtained value, but by 95 um from the current table entries (the previously obtained value had not been used in the current table entries); we updated the pcz values at about 08:00 (pm 1 hour) GMT. We now have reasonably well measured values for all pcy, pcz, and for pcay and pcaz for apertures one mm in diameter and smaller. D-LXF-EE-3.023 016/06:26. D-LXF-EE-3.024 016/06:32. D-LXF-EE-3.025 016/07:15. D-LXF-EE-3.026 016/07:36. D-HXH-3D-21.005 016/07:57. D-HXH-3D-21.006 016/08:17. D-HXH-3D-21.011 016/08:32. D-HXH-3D-21.012 016/08:50. D-HXH-3D-21.015 016/09:04. D-HXH-3D-21.016 016/09:25. D-HXH-3D-21.021 016/19:41. D-HXH-3D-21.024 016/10:20. D-HXH-3D-21.026 016/10:48. D-HXF-P1-19.001 016/11:20. Data taken, but z position of slit is bad. Repeat after 19.002. Also, beam center increment in z is too small; expander must use a fraction of the narrow dimension! D-HXF-P1-19.002 Started: 016/11:58. Proceedure question. Skip to D-IXF-3D-8.001 and return to the 19 series after some thought. D-IXF-3D-8.001 Started: 016/12:40. D-IXF-3D-8.002 Started: 016/12:48. D-IXF-3D-8.003 Started: 016/12:59. D-IXF-3D-8.004 Started: 016/13:12. D-IXF-3D-8.005 Started: 016/13:28. 01/16/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak EIPS(Mg) D-HXF-P1-19.001A 016/13:52. HEG m = 0, 10x200v+5. D-HXF-P1-19.002A 016/14:20. HEG m =+1, 10x200v+5. D-HXF-P1-19.003 016/14:49. HEG m =+2, 10x200v+5. D-HXF-P1-19.004 016/15:30. MEG m = 0, 10x200v-5. D-HXF-P1-19.005 016/16:14. MEG m =+1, 10x200v-5. D-HXF-P1-19.006 016/16:29. MEG m =+3, 10x200v-5. D-HXF-P1-19.007 016/17:12. HEG m = 0, 80x500v D-HXF-P1-19.008 016/17:38. HEG m =+1, 80x500v D-HXF-P1-19.009 016/18:05. HEG m =+2, 80x500v D-HXF-P1-19.010 016/18:47. MEG m = 0, 80x500v HXDS procedure Failed to move pinhole back on axis in Y: Had to restart 19.010 D-HXF-P1-19.011 016/19:40. MEG m =+1, 80x500v D-HXF-P1-19.012 016/20:14. MEG m =+3, 80x500v Notes: 1 3N shutter is beginning to stick occasionally. (3 times today, 12:30, 15:35 18:53 GMT) but, so far, a repeat of the command gets it to work. Reorder tests so that we further minimize shifts. 01/16/97/B M.C. Weisskopf D-HXF-P1-19.016 016/21:04. MEG m = 0, 10x200h Beam center here D-HXF-P1-19.017 016/21:56:43 MEG m = +1, 10x200h ### The requested measurement was wrong: It simply repeated the 0-order measurement, but 54 um out of focus. D-HXF-P1-19.018 016/22:32:33. MEG m = +3, 10x200h D-HXF-P1-19.017a 017/00:37:28 MEG m = +1, 10x200h D-HXF-P1-19.013 017/01:05:35 HEG m = 0, 10x200h D-HXF-P1-19.014 017/01:41:39 HEG m = +1, 10x200h D-HXF-P1-19.015 017/02:11:14 HEG m = +2, 10x200h ### Shutter problem: Shell 3 did not open on first command, but did on second, done manually by KODAK. D-LXF-P1-17.001 017/03:14:30 LETG m = 0, 10x200v. D-LXF-P1-17.002 017/03:58:21 LETG m =+1, 10x200v. D-LXF-P1-17.003 017/04:17:49 LETG m =+5, 10x200v. D-LXF-P1-17.004 017/05:05:57 LETG m = 0, 80x500v. Notes: 1 Steve O'Dell has shown (in approximation) that the critical-angle test is indeed correct, and highly sensitive. We now need hard numbers fit to a real simulation. But, the conclusion that the optical axis and the x-ray axis were and are the same seems inescapable. Thus most of the data we have obtained have been with the HRMA 1 minute off in yaw. We need to discuss whether we should move back or press on!? 2 Dan P is still working the RF shutter test to see if the vignetting is due to the shutters. 3 Kodak hasn't given us their calculation of the overall vignetting function. 4 The shutter problem (shell 3) seems to be "getting worse". Minimize use of the shutters even more. In the upcoming Ti series, can we simply do the EE for the HRMA as a whole --- i.e., avoid the shell by shell? Can we get someone to compare (on the same piece of paper the EE data for the continuum at Fe and AL to see if the shapes are the same!? 5 For the upcoming HETG experiments, modify the CMDB to do their 0-order experiments with MEG and MEG+HEG (as opposed to MEG, HEG). Finally, for the low energies with Si and O, modify the CMDB to leave the HRMA open (since the spectra are dispersed a long distance and the probability of contamination from the MEG onto the HEG is negligible (and vice versa). We have time to think before we get to copper, where we shall play with the shutters. However, the experiemnts need to be reordered to minimize shutter movements! 6 Theo is at the La Quinta West (number upstairs) if anything looks weird for the gratings. 7 Steve O'Dell needs to feed the MST the finite-conjugate focus off-sets (for Prime-X) when we go to the different sources. 01/16/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-LXF-P1-17.005 017/05:41 LETG m =+1, 80x500v. D-LXF-P1-17.006 017/06:10 LETG m =+5, 80x500v. D-LXF-P1-17.007 017/06:59 LETG m = 0, 10x200h. D-LXF-P1-17.008 017/07:17 LETG m =+1, 10x200h. D-LXF-P1-17.009 017/07:36 LETG m =+5, 10x200h. Source change to Titanium; had to adjust voltages manually; power set commands did not work. Source also found to arc, so must be run at a lower current for about an hour. Decided to run beam uniformity at lower current and extend the times (essentially using the one hour of source conditioning). D-IXF-BG-1.015 017/10:07 (background) (delayed because of grating motions) D-IXF-BU-2.009 Beam uniformity, bnd_5 D-IXF-BU-2.030 017/10:51 Beam uniformity, bnd_h D-IXF-P2-4.005 Started: 017/12:40 2d scan, 100 um pinhole ### Shutter 3N required a special open. ### Aborted test; vacuum leak at X-ray source must be repaired, and a new cathode installed. May see small change in the source size. Will need new HRI image of the new source configuration. ??? Also must repeat beam uniformity?? 01/17/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak &&& Repeating the BUs may not be necessary because the filter is the primary cause of beam non-uniformity. We've done beam maps, unfiltered, I think. We can check before we do it. The source location may change, however, so we should decide before the end of Ti. I would trust Steve O'Dell's opinion since he's looked at more beam maps than I have. D-IXF-P2-4.005A Started:13:58 2d scan, 100 um pinhole D-IXF-P2-3.005 Started:15:57 2d scan, 50 um pinhole D-IXF-P2-2.004 Started:17:30 2d scan, 10 um pinhole 01/17/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-EE-3.005 Started:21:36 Encircled energy. All apertures done. D-IXF-EE-3.007 Started:00:13 Encircled energy. S4. !!! Reordered seq. to defer shutter change on S3 and save 1 shutter cycle. &&& Went down to 7.5 um (diameter) aperture and skipped 5 um. Based on count rate, increased time constant in SSD_5 to 10 microsec for this test and next 2 tests. D-IXF-EE-3.008 Started:03:05 Encircled energy. S6. Skipped 5u aperture. D-IXF-EE-3.006 Started:05:51 Encircled energy. S3. ### Took two tries to open S3 North shutter. Notes: ### 3rd Floor noticed problem in 2D scan D-IXF-P2-2.004. Part way through the test the flux suddenly appears significantly reduced (almost a factor of 100). Check of BND data shows source remained constant. Second floor starts to investigate further. Will also plan to redo last 150 points or so as new #ID. !!! Galen finds that the gain increased significantly in FPC_x2 at time that the focal plane rate appeared to drop. With increased gain, the region of interest is now missing the source data (or most of it), Bill Podgorski analyzes data with modified ROI (~2x usual for Ti) and data look fine. Decide that data are OK and analysis will allow information to be recovered, so no additional test scheduled. &&& A quick check between tests showed that the increased gain was apparently what would be seen if the HV on FPC_x2 were inadvertently set for the Mg line, instead of the Ti line. Brad Wargelin later explained what probably happened. The high voltage power supplies have two voltage settings, a primary setting (V0) and a backup setting (V1) for each channel; when a detector trips, all of the non-tripped channels switch to the backup setting. Normally, this backup setting is the same as the primary setting. However, this morning there was trouble with the binary file used to set the voltages, so they were set by hand, and only V0 was set for titanium, V1 remaining set to the voltage for Mg. The SSD became warm and sent a kill signal, causing the power supply for fpc_x2 to change to V1 during the run (which was higher, still being set for Mg). The supply later switched back to V0 when the SSD_x again became cold and operable. The V1 setting was verified to be appropriate for Mg, and changed to be correct for Ti. 01/18/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXF-3D-9.001 Started: 018/08:44 Grating-out normalization point D-LXF-3D-9.002 Started: 018/08:58 LETG, high orders ### To avoid counter damage at these high fluxes, the procedure, which would have taken the counter through focus, will aborted and separate collects will be taken at the intended counter positions for the next two tests, with the gate valve closed to avoid the move across focus D-LXF-3D-9.003 Started: 018/09:14 LETG, -6 and +6 orders D-LXF-3D-9.004 Started: 018/09:26 LETG, -1 and +1 orders D-LXH-3D-9.005 Started: 018/09:36 LETG, HSI, high orders D-LXH-3D-9.006 Started: 018/10:56 LETG, HSI, -6 and +6 orders D-LXH-3D-9.007 Started: 018/11:18 LETG, HSI, -1 and +1 orders D-IXH-PO-11.001 Started: 018/11:46 HSI CAR1; locate cusp; D-IXH-PO-11.002 Started: 018/11:59 HSI UR95; on cusp D-IXH-PO-11.003 Started: 018/12:14 HSI CAL1; locate cusp D-IXH-PO-11.004 Started: 018/12:24 HSI LL95; on cusp ### The following Wing scans will pass through focus. We should save the actual counting rates in addition to the plots. D-IXF-PW-6.014 Started: 018/12:36 MP1, S; 1 mm pinhole ### Yaw was positive instead of negative. Aborted after on-axis points. Yaw corrected to the negative (-3.56) D-IXF-PW-6.014A Started: 018/12:36 MP1, S; 1 mm pinhole ### Source was at 18 kV instead of 25 kV, resulting in about a factor of two reduction in flux; voltage changed to 25 kV at beginning of next test. D-IXF-PW-6.015 Started: 018/13:42 MP1, S; 4 mm pinhole 01/19/97/A Steve O'Dell D-IXF-PW-6.016 018/14:24. S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.017 018/14:53. S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.018 018/15:21. S1S @ {0,-3.56} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.009 018/15:50. S1N @ {0,+3.56} arcmin, 1-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.010 018/16:21. S1N @ {0,+3.56} arcmin, 4-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.011 018/16:49. S1N @ {0,+3.56} arcmin, 10-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.012 018/17:17. S1N @ {0,+3.56} arcmin, 20-mm ap. D-IXF-PW-6.013 018/17:45. S1N @ {0,+3.56} arcmin, 35-mm ap. D-IXF-FA-4.006 Skip FPC aging test. (Move D-IXF-FA-4.008 earlier in Cu-K.) !!! Changing to EIPS(SiO2). Always use target 93_SiO_onCu. D-IXF-BG-1.004 018/18:14. FPCs set up for O-K (0.525 keV) D-BND-BU-2.007 018/19:30. BND5 map for EIPS(SiO2,1.70kV)-[CrL2]. Map is very uniform; therefore, skip Si-K maps. D-IXF-3D-11.011 018/19:59. S13 no-OTG. D-HXF-3D-11.040 018/20:11. S13 HETG MEG m = -1,0,+1. D-HXF-3D-11.041 018/20:25. S46 HETG HEG m = -1,0,+1. D-IXF-3D-11.012 018/21:13. S46 no-OTG. D-LXF-3D-11.039 018/21:28. All LETG m = -1, 0, +1. D-LXF-3D-12.001 018/21:50. All LETG m = -3,-2,+2,+3,+4,+5,-5,-4. Notes: 1 For O-K and Si-K, always use EIPS target 93_SiO_onCu. 2 Keep power into SiO2 target to no more than 6 W (0.5 mA @ 12 kV). Double collect times for 3Ds calling for 0.7 mA @ 12 kV. 3 BND5 map at O-K [CrL2 filter] was very uniform. This is Si-K target. a Skip D-BND-BU-2.021 (BND5 map for Si-K). b Skip D-BND-BU-2.022 (BNDH map for Si-K). 4 Re-order BGs to avoid serial measurement. a Do D-IXF-BG-1.011 (BG for Si-K) during change to EIPS(Cu). b Do D-IXF-BG-1.002 (BG for Cu-K before Cu-L) during change to PIGS. c Do D-IXF-BG-1.001 (BG for Cu-L after Cu-K) during change to PIGS. 5 Have re-ordered 3D scans (for O-K & Si-K) to reduce shutter moves. 01/19/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-LXH-3D-12.002 018/22:39. All LETG m = +3,+5. D-LXH-3D-11.042 018/23:39. All LETG m = +1. D-HXH-3D-11.043 018/23:54. All HETG MEG m = +1. D-HXH-3D-11.044 019/00:13. All HETG HEG m = +1. D-BND-BU-2.021 Skip BND5 Si-K map. BND5 O-K [CrL2] map was quite uniform. D-BND-BU-2.022 Skip BNDH Si-K map. BND5 O-K [CrL2] map was quite uniform. D-IXF-3D-11.013 019/00:43 S13 no-OTG. D-HXF-3D-11.025 019/01:02 S13 HETG MEG m = -1, 0, +1. D-HXF-3D-11.026 019/01:24 S46 HETG HEG m = -1, 0, +1. D-IXF-3D-11.014 019/01:44 S46 no-OTG. D-LXF-3D-11.024 019/01:54 All LETG m = -1, 0, +1. Shutter for S3N failed to open at start of this test. MST tried a second time and was unsuccessful. EK tried manually - first try failed,wait 5 minutes, then succeeded with manual open by EK. Started taking data at 019/02:25 -so lost up to 30 minutes due to shutters (less set-up time). D-LXH-3D-11.036 019/02:36 All LETG m = +1. D-HXH-3D-11.037 019/03:05 All HETG MEG m = +1. D-HXH-3D-11.038 019/03:35 All HETG HEG m = +1. Changing to EIPS(Cu). Perform Si-K BG during change to Cu; Cu-L & Cu-K BGs during change to PIGS. D-IXF-BG-1.011 019/04:04 BG for Si-K. !!! For next series of tests have revisions to keep number of shutter changes to a minimum. For Beam Uniformity tests keep shutters open, turn off HSI, and move to focal plane position between SSD and HSI. Change sequence of tests with gratings to reduce number of shutter 3 changes. Also, change two grating tests to ALL,ALL but keep 2 others as originally planned. For 7 grating tests change to lower current settings per direction of HETG scientist. Changes given to MST and TRW. D-BND-BU-2.001 019/05:47 BND SCAN-500 Cu-La 01/19/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-BND-BU-2.003 Started: 019/06:19 BND SCAN-500 Cu-Ka D-BND-BU-2.004 Started: 019/06:32 BND SCAN-500 Cu-Ka D-IXF-EE-4.001 Started: 019/08:00 EE at Cu Ka; Esemble D-IXF-EE-4.002 Started: 019/10:23 EE at Cu La; ensemble D-IXF-FA-4.008 Started: 109/12:49 FPC aging, ensemble D-HXH-3D-5.003 Started: 019/13:03 MEG, MP1-3 CU Ka HSI scan D-IXF-3D-22.005 Started: 019/14:02 On axis effective area, ensemble, ### Cu La (no filter) Flux was too high at lowest current so we need to lower voltage to 2.5 kV. stayed at this voltage for 22.006-22.007. D-LXF-3D-22.006 Started: 019/14:39 LETG, Cu La, ensemble, +1,0,-1 order. D-HXF-3D-22.007 Started: 019/14:50 MEG, Cu La, MP1-3, +1,0,-1 order. 1/19/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXF-3D-22.021 Cu Ka, ensemble effective area (no filter) ### Aborted: flux too high: D-LXF-3D-22.022 019/15:07:40: Cu Ka, LETG, ensemble, +1,0,-1 order D-HXF-3D-22.023 019/15:48:21: Cu Ka, MEG, MP1-3, +1,0,-1 order D-IXH-PO-12.001 019/16:13:14 D-IXH-PO-12.002 019/16:30:52 D-IXH-PO-12.003 Started 019/16:46:26 D-IXH-PO-12.004 019/16:57:09 D-IXH-PO-13.001 Started 019/17:09:25 D-IXH-PO-13.002 Started 019/17:25:29 D-IXH-PO-13.003 Started 019/17:46:25 D-IXH-PO-13.004 Started 019/17:56:53 !!! Need to change CMDB to correct for unfiltered Cu flux being too high for grating measurements in 0 order. D-IXF-PW-5.001 Started: 019/18:19:33 D-IXF-PW-5.006 Started: 019/19:00:05 D-IXF-PW-5.019 Started: 019/19:33:01 D-IXF-PW-5.002 Started: 019/20:05:07 D-IXF-PW-5.007 Started: 019/20:39:35 D-IXF-PW-5.020 Started: 019/21:11:21 01/19/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-IXF-PW-5.003 Started: 019/21:47 D-IXF-PW-5.008 Started: 019/22:28 D-IXF-PW-5.021 Started: 019/23:00 D-IXF-PW-5.004 Started: 019/23:33 D-IXF-PW-5.009 Started: 020/00:07 D-IXF-PW-5.022 Started: 020/00:40 D-IXF-PW-5.005 Started: 020/01:13 D-IXF-PW-5.010 Started: 020/01:48 D-IXF-PW-5.023 Started: 020/02:19 Finished: 020/02:52 D-HXF-3D-22.049 Started: 020/03:14 Cu Ka, MEG . ### Shutter S3N failed to open. Manually opened by EK. &&& With I=0.22, fpc_hn = 2400 c/s, but fpc_X2 gives 8200 c/s, close to requested level. !!! Proceed with test starting at 03:35. Collect for 6 s, very few counts. !!! Repeat with 100-s integration and new run_ID. Got 900 cts total in ROI - lots of continuum in addition to line. D-HXF-3D-22.050 Started: 020/03:41 Cu Ka, MEG first order. 787 cts in ROI. D-LXH-3D-22.028 Started: 020/03:49 Cu La, LETG, ensemble, first order. !!! Move HSI 50mm in +z off-focus so that when gate valve is open we can use fpc_5 and fpc_h detectors to check source strength. Reduce current to 0.3 to get approx. desired count rate. Increase integration time to 200 sec to get more counts. Data look good. D-HXH-3D-22.029 Started: 020/04:13 Cu La, MEG, ensemble, first order. !!! Increase integration time to 200 s. Current at 1.0. BND count rate nearly 1000 c/s. Reduce I to 0.31. Flux OK D-HXH-3D-22.030 Started: 020/04:30 Cu La, HEG, ensemble, first order. !!! Increase integration time to 200 s. Reduce current from 1.9 to 0.9 D-HXH-3D-22.038 Started: 020/04:45 Cu Ka, MEG, MP1-3, first order. !!! Start with low flux and integrate on HSI to make sure no 0th order on detector. Set-up checks out, so increase flux to desired level and integrate for requested 964sec. I=1.0. D-LXH-3D-22.042 Started: 020/05:17. Cu Ka, LETG, ensemble, zero order !!! Increase integration time to 245 sec per IPI request. D-HXH-3D-5.004 Started: 021/05:33 Cu Ka, HETG, MP4-6, many orders 01/19/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-HXH-3D-22.039 Started: 020/07:14 Ka, HETG, MP4-6, m=1 (HSI) (m=0 too) D-HXF-3D-22.024 Started: 020/07:56 Cu Ka, HETG, MP4-6, +1, 0, -1 order D-HXF-3D-22.008 Started: 020/08:26 Cu La, HETG, MP4-6, +1, 0, -1 order 01/20/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak &&& Cu backgrounds while setting up the Penning source: D-IXF-BG-1.001 Started: 8:42 GMT D-IXF-BG-1.002 Started: 9:18 GMT !!! PIGS setup: We wanted to make sure that the HSI had adequate efficiency to make measurements with the 130A line while the source was stabilizing. ### The first PIGS head was not very stable and had to be run at higher pressure where the flux is lower. Zero order rates are OK but first order was rather weak. &&& Results: background:2.15 cnts/sec Be filter 20 mTorr 300 mA 3.92-2.15=1.77 ct/ sec through shells 4and6 No filter 20 mTorr 300 mA 45.54-2.15=43.39 ct/ sec through shells 4and6 No filter 19 mTorr 300 mA 80.34-2.15=4017 ct/ sec through shells 4and6 w/LETG 0 order/ no filter 18 mTorr 500 mA 14.1-2.15=11.95 Hzec sh 4and6 LETG 1st order 10 mTorr and 350 mA 0.1cnts/sec in line. ### Rate is marginal but we proceed. zero order is ok. &&& Note that this work took about 1 hr. of time. D-IXF-FC-6.001 Started: 11:56 D-IXF-FC-6.002 Started: 13:23 D-IXF-FC-6.003 Started: 14:18 ### Rates for 6.002-6.003 were quite low but there are a number of lines which may make it possible to check the focus in analysis, so we proceeded. &&& I'd be suprised if anyone ever analyzes this data though. !!! Steve called with relative focus offsets for different sources. EIPS : 0 um PIGS : +177 um (toward HRMA) DCM : +401 um HIREFS: -59 um !!! Changed head and hope for better flux. ### The PIGS gas supply seemed contaminated. !!! We changed the Argon tank and purged the lines and it worked fine. D-IXF-dF-7.001 Started: 020/19:32 GMT D-IXF-dF-7.002 Started: 020/21:00 01/20/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-LXH-dF-7.003 Started: 020/22:16. Aborted at 22:29 - lower priority test D-LXH-dF-7.007 Started: 020/22:32. D-LXH-dF-7.003a Started: 020/23:32. &&& PS team decided to test for several hours with Penning source (plus 2 source changes) before switching to DCM. !!! New test order generated and given to TRW, EK, MST. ### Source EOL occurred before this test commenced. &&& Started source change at 23:35 GMT; completed at 01:25 (1 hr 50 min). &&& Check rate with 10 s on HSI: 220 c/s. Close gate valve. Determine that detector is at 0 order. Move to 1st order - not clear why move was a problem. &&& Now see 10 c/s. Collect for 1000 s, per discussion with IPI. D-HXH-3D-18.001 Started: 021/01:59. !!! Set integration to 300 s for each of 3 collection intervals to get ~1000 cts per test. D-LXH-3D-20.008 Started:021/02:31. Rate ~10c/s. !!! Reduce time from 3000 s required to get requested 30,000 cts to 1000 s (for ~ 10,000 cts). D-LXH-3D-20.009 Started:021/03:07. Integrate 1400 s to get ~10,000 cts D-LXH-3D-20.005 Started:021/03:38. Rate ~9c/s. Integrate 1000 s D-LXH-3D-20.006 Started:021/04:13 Rate ~6c/s. Integrate 1500 s. D-LXH-3D-20.011 Started:021/04:45 Rate ~8c/s. Integrate 1200 s. 01/20/97/C Steve O'Dell D-LXH-3D-20.012 Started:021/05:15. PIGS HRMA(yaw=-8.3') LETG(m=+1). !!! Set collection to 3 segments of 1000 s each, in case source dies. D-LXH-3D-20.010 021/06:00. PIGS HRMA(yaw=-8.3') LETG(m=-1). D-LXH-3D-20.004 021/06:49. PIGS HRMA(yaw=-1.0') LETG(m=-1). <<< Change PIGS (0:56). D-LXH-dF-7.006 021/08:00. PIGS HRMA(yaw= 0.0') LETG(m=+1) x6. D-LXH-dF-7.005 021/09:21. PIGS HRMA(yaw= 0.0') LETG(m= 0) x6. ### BNDs are no longer reporting PIGS flux. D-LXH-dF-7.007A 021/10:01. PIGS HRMA(yaw= 0.0') x6. ### BNDs are now reporting PIGS flux, after running BND set-up. D-LXH-dF-7.004 021/10:45. PIGS HRMA(yaw= 0.0') LETG(m=-1) x6. D-LXH-3D-30.001 021/11:45. PIGS HRMA(yaw= 0.0') LETG(m=-,0,+). !!! Modified locs file to include negative order. D-LXH-3D-20.007 021/12:24. PIGS HRMA(yaw=+1.0') LETG(m=-1). !!! Insert BGs for FPCs set up for PIGS, while changing to DCM. D-IXF-BG-99.018 021/13:37. FPCs set up for PIGS measurements. <<< Change to DCM. Notes: 1 Count rates ratios for HSI to FPC5 were approximately as follows: a PIGS(0) LETG(m=0)HSI/FPC5 ~ 0.03. FPC5 ~ 400 Hz. b PIGS(0) LETG(m=1)HSI/FPC5 ~ 0.01. FPC5 ~ 400 Hz. c PIGS(BeK2) HSI/FPC5 ~ 0.25. 01/21/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXF-BG-5.001 021/14:30. FPCs set up for 1.775 keV. D-IXF-BG-5.004 021/15:02. FPCs set up for 4.51 keV. !!! Updated FOA for DCM: X_DCM - X_EIPS = +401 um (CLOSER to HRMA). DCM set-up measurements: 109712 1D-Y BND5 scan found W-Ma (1.7754 keV) centered within 0.5 in. 109713 HSI RF 23 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(TAP, 1.7754 keV) [ZrL2]. 109715 HSI RF 17 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(Ge, 8.39 keV). 109716 HSI RF 120 Hz RAS(20 kV, 81 mA) DCM(Ge, 8.39 keV). 109713 HSI RF 23 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(TAP, 1.7754 keV) [ZrL2]. 109737 HSI RF 23 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(TAP, 1.7734 keV) [ZrL2]. 109738 HSI RF 23 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(TAP, 1.7774 keV) [ZrL2]. 109739 HSI RF 23 Hz RAS(20 kV, 10 mA) DCM(TAP, 1.7770 keV) [ZrL2]. !!! Skip BU tests and go straight to PO tests to take advantage of HXDS operator (Ian Evans) expertise. D-LXH-PO-13.009 021/18:23. PSF/Outer Core. D-LXH-PO-13.010 021/18:47. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.001 021/19:08. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.003 021/19:50. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.005 021/20:16. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.007 021/20:38. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.002 021/20:50. PSF/Outer Core. 01/21/97/B Harvey Tananbaum D-HXH-PO-13.004 021/21:14. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.006 021/23:04. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.008 021/23:19. PSF/Outer Core. D-HXH-PO-13.013 021/23:45. Effective Area D-HXH-PO-13.014 022/01:05. Effective Area D-HXH-PO-13.012 022/03:07. Effective Area ### Shutter 3N failed to open with 2 MST attempts. &&& EK succeeded with manual open. D-LXH-PO-13.011 022/04:22. Effective Area !!! For the following tests, increase total time requested in the CMBD to allow for a lack of sync between the start of data collection and the readiness of the DCM at the selected energy. !!! Also add time to allow for the time to change from 1 energy to the next in a series comprising a test. !!! Jeff K and Dan S developed a recipe to compute requested time. TRW also made an adjustment so as to send the correct nominal timeto the XSS folks. &&& TRW (JA) suggested that we update the recipe to calculate clock time (and [clock/integration]^-1 ratio ) to provide more accurate estimates. Based on present experience, DCM grating tests will be completed in 24-30 hrs. !!! Additional DCM tests on HRMA need to be reinserted into timeline. !!! If actuators are available on Saturday, will repress starting Friday. !!! We need 1 day of tests (at Al?) to cover Thursday-Friday. !!! RF test for epoxy shrinkage was requested by Podgorski and Matthews. 01/21/97/C Steve O'Dell !!! DCM scans require close coordination among MST, XSS, and TRW. D-LXH-EA-23.001 022/05:57. LEG m=-1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109810. ### Had to re-do because DCM scan ended after FPC collects were complete. ### DCM control computer was running process, which took clock cycles. D-HXH-EA-23.002 022/06:46. MEG m=-1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109811. D-HXH-EA-23.003 022/07:05. HEG m=-1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109812. D-HXH-EA-23.006 022/07:27. HEG m=+1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109813. ### Shutter 3N stuck and EKC manually reset. Leave ALL shutters OPEN. !!! Re-ordered measurements to minimize OTG moves for given DCM setting. D-HXH-EA-23.005 022/07:48. MEG m=+1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109814. D-IXH-EA-23.017 022/08:06. OTGs out ~1.875 keV. ID=109815. D-LXH-EA-23.004 022/08:25. LEG m=+1 ~1.875 keV. ID=109816. D-LXH-EA-23.007 022/08:37. LEG m=-1 ~3.250 keV. ID=109827. ### FPC5 count rates for DCM(Ge) look low. May be occulted; prepare BUs. ### Communications problems at Bldg 600 required re-booting DCM computer. D-LXH-EA-23.010 022/10:01. LEG m=+1 ~3.250 keV. ID=109831. ### Problems with DCM computer communications required aborting earlier runs. !!! Insert planned BUs now to check beam uniformity and give time to resolve communications problems at Bldg 600. D-BND-BU-3.007 022/11:11. BND5 map Ge 4.51 keV. ID=109841. ### FPC5 is severely occulted in its monitor position. D-BND-BU-3.008 022/11:27. BNDH map Ge 4.51 keV. ID=109842. D-BND-BU-3.003 022/13:16. BND5 map TAP 1.60 keV. ID=109852. D-BND-BU-3.004 022/13:51. BNDH map TAP 1.60 keV. ID=109853. !!! Jeff is concerned that MEG and HEG fluxes will be confused unless the shutters are used to isolate each from the other. Therefore, use shutters for remaining DCM scans. !!! D-HXH-EA-23.005 may not need to be re-done, because there is little overlap between MEG and HEG spectra for the energy range used. D-IXH-EA-23.018 022/15:25. OTGs out ~3.25 keV. ID=109863. D-HXH-EA-23.008 022/15:56. MEG m=-1 ~3.25 keV. ID=109864. Notes: 1 BUs show that FPC5 is severely occulted in its monitor position. 2 FPC5 gain is about 10% more than those of BNDHs. 01/22/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-HXH-EA-23.011 022/16:59. MEG m=+1 ~3.25 keV. ID=109865. D-HXH-EA-23.009 022/18:04. HEG m=-1 ~3.25 keV. ID=109866. D-HXH-EA-23.012 022/19:31. HEG m=+1 ~3.25 keV. ID=109867. D-HXH-EA-23.014 022/21:09. HEG m=-1 ~6.75 keV. ID=109877. 01/22/97/B M.C. Weisskopf D-HXH-EA-23.016 022/21:55. HEG m=+1 ~6.75 keV. ID=109878. D-IXH-EA-23.019 022/22:42. OTGs out ~6.75 keV. ID=109879. D-LXH-EA-23.013 022/23:12. LEG m=-1 ~6.75 keV. ID=109880. D-LXH-EA-23.015 022/23:56. LEG m=+1 ~6.75 keV. ID=109881. D-LXF-EA-24.001 022/00:38. LEG m=+1 ~1.80 keV. ID=109904. D-LXF-EA-24.004 023/01:37.* LEG m=+1 ~2.40 keV. ID=109914. ### Stopped prematurely due to confusion between TRW and XSS. !!! D-LXF-EA-99.019 will pick up last 4 points of energy scan. D-HXF-EA-24.002 023/02:56. MEG m=+1 ~1.80 keV. ID=109924. D-HXF-EA-24.005 023/03:40. MEG m=+1 ~2.40 keV. ID=109934. Notes: 1 Brad Wargelin just informed me that ALL FPC ageing tests were done in the wrong direction --- i.e., perpendicular to the wire rather than parallel. 2 The PSMS sheets give the flux at the central energy (not the starting energy) for DCM scans. This should be changed. 3 I think we have found the "Obstruction" Problem. 01/23/97/C Steve O'Dell D-LXF-EA-99.019 023/07:00. LEG m=+1 ~2.40 keV. ID=109935. D-HXF-EA-24.006 023/07:59. HEG m=+1 ~2.40 keV. ID=109936. D-HXF-EA-24.003 023/13:54. HEG m=+1 ~1.80 keV. ID=109946. D-IXF-EA-21.001 023/14:26. S1346 ~1.53 keV. ID=109956. D-IXF-EA-22.001 023/15:38. S1346 ~2.85 keV. ID=109966. 01/22/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-IXF-EA-23.001 023/18.06. S1346 ~5.20 keV. ID=109976. D-IXF-EA-24.001 023/20:33. S1346 ~7.80 keV. ID=109986. 01/23/97/B M.C.Weisskopf D-IXS-EA-99.020 023/21:10:01. 4.51 keV. ID=1099. D-IXF-BG-1.026 023/22:11:47 D-IXH-RF-1.005 023/23:34:20 !!! Perform the beam center both with the SSD and the FPC (20 um pinholes). !!! John and Brad will add 217 um to PrimeY, in order to account for a reversal (done a week ago) in the driving direction for SSD_X aperture wheel. &&& This will give 20-um pinhole a fighting chance to align with SSD_X. D-IXF-FA-4.013 Started 024/01:26:29 Doesn't ask for FPC2!!! !!! The next series of tests is a total repeat requested by OTG team. D-IXF-3D-66.001 Started 024/02:17. D-IXS-3D-66.009 024/02:34. D-IXS-3D-66.010 024/02:41. D-IXF-3D-66.002 024/02:48. D-HXF-3D-66.004 024/02:55. D-HXS-3D-66.012 024/03:06. D-HXF-3D-66.003 024/03:17. D-HXS-3D-66.011 024/03:39. D-LXS-3D-66.013 024/03:53. D-LXF-3D-66.005 024/04:08. D-LXS-3D-66.014 024/04:19. D-LXS-3D-66.015 024/04:41. ### Enormous noise in detector FPC-5. (With and without HV!). D-LXS-3D-66.016 024/05:12. 01/23/97/C Steve O'Dell D-LXS-3D-66.006 024/05:41. D-LXS-3D-66.007 024/06:18. D-LXS-3D-66.008 024/06:41. <<< Change to EIPS(Be). (1:04) &&& Brad Wargelin worked on FPC5 and believes it is now OK. D-IXF-BG-1.021 024/07:26. BGs for Be-K settings. FPC5 looks normal. D-BND-BU-2.041 024/08:30. BND5 map at Be-K. Abort. ### FPC_5 is still not functioning properly. ### We want FPC5 for Be-K and B-K tests, so spent 1 hour troubleshooting. ### Troubleshooting did not resolve FPC5 problem, so we went on to Sn-L. <<< Change to EIPS(Sn). (1:04) !!! Want FPC5 for Be-K and B-K measurements. D-IXF-BG-1.021 024/10:10. BGs for Sn-L settings. D-BND-BU-2.019 Skip. ### FPC5 is not functioning properly. D-BND-BU-2.020 024/11:06. BND5 map at Sn-L. D-IXF-EE-4.006 Abort. ### Is this to be changed to SSD EE measurement? D-IXH-PO-17.001 024/12:38. HSI at CAR1, before UR95. D-IXH-PO-17.002 024/13:30. HSI at UR95. D-IXH-PO-17.003 024/13:46. HSI at CAL1, before UL95. D-IXH-PO-17.004 024/14:05. HSI at UL95. D-HXH-3D-22.036 024/14:15. S13 MEG. HSI at CA5. D-HXH-3D-22.037 024/14:36. S46 HEG. HSI at CA5. D-LXH-3D-22.041 024/14:58. All LEG. HSI at CA5. Notes: 1 FPC_5 is not functioning properly, exhibiting unusual behavior. a Symptoms: i "Noise" is proportional to beam current. ii "Noise" occurs in presence of beam current, even when FPC HV is off. iii FPC5 "noise" looks like BNDH spectra, but at much lower gain. b Consequences: i Skip Be-K measurements, because they need FPC5 data. ii Skip B-K measurements until determination that FPC5 is not essential. iii Advance to Sn-L measurements, because they do not require FPC5. c Observations: i FPC5 PHA distributions are virtually identical to BNDHs', but compressed. ii Energy resolution of FPC5 is as good as that of the BNDHs. iii FPC5 gain continues to drop with time. 2 Is D-IXF-EE-4.006 to be changed to an SSD EE, per Dan Schwartz? a Skipped measurement to give time to change aperture list, if SSD EE. b Someone must generate new procedure, or we'll do EE with FPC. 3 Re-order measurements to reduce HSI/FPCX and OTG swaps. 01/24/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-LXF-3D-22.018 024/15:13. All LEG. FPCX 1-mm ap. D-IXF-3D-22.017 024/15:26. All no OTG. FPCX 1-mm ap. ### Noticed that the 3N shutter was stuck for 3D-22.041 and 22.018. &&& 20.017 ok. D-LXH-3D-22.041a 024/15:51. All LEG. HSI at CA5. D-LXF-3D-22.018a 024/16:03. All LEG. FPCX 1-mm ap. D-HXF-3D-22.019 024/16:14. S13 MEG. FPCX 1-mm ap. D-HXF-3D-22.020 024/16:29. S46 HEG. FPCX 1-mm ap. ### FPC_5 problems continue. D-IXF-EE-4.006 Aborted. Replace with SSD 99 series. D-IXS-EE-99.021 024/16:40. ssd_x Sn-L ### Aborted after 40 um pinhole was not found, and fill is about to start. D-HXH-3D-99.022 024/19:57. HEG/MEG. HSI at CA5 &&& Did this to get spectrum at 13.77 V to facilitate fpc data analysis. !!! If fpc_5 is fixed after this, do B500 bu, else change to Zr-L. <<< EIPS(Zr-L) +++ The Zr target turned out to be Nb. D-IXF-BG-1.007 Started 024/20:58:10 (Zr source) ### FPC5 still not fixed. 01/24/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! FPC5 was fixed. Brian Ramsey helped troubleshoot. &&& The HV cable was bad. D-BND-BU-2.014 Started 024/22:01:56 ### Thunderstorm: Shut down and evacuate due to severe-weather warnings. * From tc_m at 024/23:09:06 Gate Valve Closed. Thunderstorm warning. From tc_m at 025/00:10:02 please check in and advise when you are ready to recommence ** From tc_m at 025/00:25:17 Gate Valve Open.. D-BND-BU-2.013 Started 025/01:07:36 ** From tc_m at 025/01:46:18 here we go again. PLease safe your systems ** From tc_m at 025/03:00:24 Gate Valve IS Open. D-IXS-MC-1.001 Started 025/03:10:30 D-LXF-3D-63.003 Started 025/04:00:30 LETG D-LXH-3D-11.033 025/04:20:48 LETG D-HXH-3D-11.034 025/04:38:13 MEG D-HXF-3D-63.004 025/04:58:13 MEG D-IXF-3D-63.001 Started 025/05:11:33 MEG D-IXF-3D-63.002 Started 025/05:21:43 HEG D-HXF-3D-63.005 Started 025/05:29:57 HEG D-HXH-3D-11.035 025/05:45:23 HEG 01/24/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< EIPS(Mo-L) D-IXF-BG-1.009 025/06:01 GMT Mo La series D-BND_BU-2.017 025/06:51 D-BND_BU-2.018 025/07:09 D-IXF-3D-70.001 025/08:41 ### Shutter 3N failed to open; opened by EKC. D-LXF-3D-70.002 025/08:58 D-LXH-3D-22.040 025/09:13 D-HXH-3D-22.034 025/09:26 D-HXF-3D-70.003 025/09:46 D-HXF-3D-70.004 025/10:06 D-HXH-3D-22.035 025/10:31 <<< EIPS(Ni-L) D-IXF-BG-1.003 025/10:50 Ni La series D-BND-BU-2.005 025/11:32 D-IXF-3D-22.001 025/11:48 D-LXF-3D-22.002 025/11:56 D-LXH-3D-70.005 025/12:19 D-HXH-3D-70.006 025/12:42 (Noticed some warm areas at about 10-12 O'clock on the HSI display D-HXF-3D-22.003 025/12:59 D-HXF-3D-22.004 025/13:36 01/24/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak D-HXH-3D-70.007 025/15:39 D-IXF-BG-1.021 Started 025/16:05 Be Ka series D-BND-BU-2.041 Started 025/17:07 D-IXF-3D-11.009 Started 025/17:40 D-LXF-3D-12.003 Started 025/18:00 D-LXH-3D-12.004 Started 025/18:49 did at .86kV source voltage D-LXF-3D-12.003a Started 025/19:32 !!! Repeat w/ filter, higher fpc voltage (+100V), and 10-mm aperture. <<< EIPS(B-K) D-IXF-BG-1.020 Started 025/20:25 B Ka series D-BND-BU-2.039 Started 025/21:18 01/25/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf D-BND-BU-2.040 Started 025/21:46:59 D-IXF-3D-99.023 Started 026/00:04:11 !!! Insert run like D-IXF-3D-11.010, but all shutters open, to save shutters. D-LXF-3D-22.045 Started 026/00:30:07 !!! HSI image shows that need for wider aperture: Selected 10 mm. D-LXH-3D-22.043 Started 026/01:00:07 D-IXF-BG-1.027 026/01:40:41 !!! Perform C-continuum BG at proper fpc hv for continuum test (5.4 keV)> ### Have second computer problem of this evening. !!! This series is Pitch = 0, Yaw = 0 wrt IAP (which is off in Yaw). !!! Edge scan the pinhole to be sure it is centered. D-IXS-MC-7.002 026/026/02:38:29 S1S Y:431660 Z:-3420 ### More computer problems. No software/hardware support present. 01/25/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck D-IXS-MC-7.004 026/05:58 S3S D-IXS-MC-7.006 026/06:26 S4S D-IXS-MC-7.008 026/06:43 S6S D-IXS-MC-7.010 026/07:01 S1N D-IXS-MC-7.014 026/07:18 S4N D-IXS-MC-7.016 026/07:33 S6N D-IXS-MC-7.012 026/07:49 S3N !!! Move HRMA +30 arc seconds in Yaw; did edge scans (with S3N). !!! New center: primey 431685; hsiz: -3378 &&& Deltas: +25 in primey; +42 in hsiz D-IXS-MC-7.017 026/08:04 S1S D-IXS-MC-7.023 026/08:46 S4S D-IXS-MC-7.026 026/09:01 S6S D-IXS-MC-7.029 026/09:16 S1N D-IXS-MC-7.035 026/09:30 S4N D-IXS-MC-7.038 026/09:44 S6N !!! Move HRMA +30 arcsec in Yaw; did edge scans (with S1S). !!! New center: primey 431666; hsiz: -3396 &&& Deltas: -19 in primey; -18 in hsiz) &&& Expected position is on axis wrt auto-collimation flat. &&& This was confirmed to be true. D-IXS-MC-6.018 026/09:59 S1S D-IXS-MC-6.024 026/10:29 S4S D-IXS-MC-6.027 026/10:44 S6S D-IXS-MC-6.030 026/10:58 S1N D-IXS-MC-6.036 026/11:12 S4N D-IXS-MC-6.039 026/11:26 S6N !!! Moved HRMA +30 arc seconds in Yaw; did NOT do edge scans because of small changes in previous two moves. Shortened D-IXS-MC-7.040 026/11:41 S6N D-IXS-MC-7.028 026/11:58 S6S D-IXS-MC-7.025 026/12:12 S4S D-IXS-MC-7.037 026/12:26 S4N D-IXS-MC-7.019 026/ S1S (aborted; after 6:00 ) D-IXS-MC-7.031 026/ S1N (aborted) !!! Clearly on the other side of the zero yaw for MP4, MP6!! +++ HRMA decenter confused interpretation of this observation. !!! Closed shutters. *************************** END CMDB D SERIES *************************** ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB E SERIES *************************** &&& 028/15:00 TRW and MST are setting up. E-IXF-BG-1.028 028/15:47 GMT Background - Cm source in E-IXF-BU-2.035 028/17:11 integrated for 100 s/point &&& 028/17:21 TQCM change east 1Hz/4hrs: west 2Hz/4hrs E-IXF-BU-2.036 028/17:40 integrated for 50 s/point &&& 028/18:35 TQCM change east 0Hz/4hrs: west 1Hz/4hrs;0Hz/3hrs !!! Ready to Go. ### Kodak says HRMA temp is out of spec a little because the heaters were turned on late and current temp is 67 deg F. !!! Optical tests yesterday show that the repeatability in coming back on axis in yaw after going off >10 arcmin is about 0.25 arcmin. in pitch it is better, a few arcsec, according to Scott T. &&& 028/19:28 Began opening covers: ### Actuator startup delays, so we started to set up for C-K background. ### Can't run backgrounds because of actuator noise. !!! Collect with ssd5 with Cm source. ID=110298. &&& Front actuator is not believed to be the problem, software or control electronics are suspected. 028/21:11 Kodak ready: It was a homing problem. E-IXF-PI-13.001 028/21:17 !!! No need to change foa y and z: HSI image position was within 30 um of the expected position. Focus looked good too. E-IXH-SF-12.001 028/21:30 !!! The suggested change in focus is only 227 um (away from HRMA). Because the immediate tests are not sensitive to small focus errors, we did not update the foa. !!! Adjust z position by formula dz= -318 um/arcmin * pitch angle. !!! Perform a beam center to check values for a little while. !!! Move pcaz +598 ei for each of the following tests. !!! Do edge scan primeY and pcaz to check pinhole position the first time, adjust relative position. E-IXF-PW-2.001 028/22:19 6B yscan 1mm - changed to 7 point ### Because foa was not updated, the scan was improperly located in z by about 600 um. Updated foa based on the 70 um pinhole. !!! Warn 3rd floor about offset. E-IXF-PW-2.002 028/23:33 6B yscan 4mm - change to 7 point E-IXF-PW-2.003 029/00:06 6B yscan 10mm - change to 7 point E-IXF-PW-2.004 029/00:35 6B yscan 20mm - change to 7 point E-IXF-PW-2.005 029/01:03 6B yscan 36mm - change to 7 point E-IXF-PW-2.010 029/01:31 6B zscan 1mm - change to pass through 0 ### SSD_X temperature was -239F at 3:30 (vs desired -280F); concluded that we need to fill the SSD. Tank was empty. Normally, SSD is filled by time. E-IXF-PW-2.011 029/01:57 6B zscan 4mm - change to pass through 0 E-IXF-PW-2.012 029/02:21 6B zscan 10mm - change to pass through 0 E-IXF-PW-2.013 029/02:46 6B zscan 20mm - change to pass through 0 E-IXF-PW-2.018 029/03:12 6B Norm 1mm - Need this normalization. E-IXF-PW-2.019 6B Norm 4mm -abort E-IXF-PW-2.020 6B Norm 10mm -abort E-IXF-PW-2.021 6B Norm 20mm -abort !!! Reset FOA to its initial value !!! Perform edge scan to check pinhole centering (9 pt 80um steps) before first test(and avoid focus moves in proceedure) &&& Found hsiz = -3263 (expected -3236, using scale factor of -318/arc min pitch); primey = 431584 (using MP1B) !!! Raise source current to 0.6 mA for these tests. E-IXS-MC-16.001 029/03:19 pitch=-0.5',s1qB E-IXS-MC-16.013 029/04:10 -0.5',s1qT E-IXS-MC-16.004 029/04:24 -0.5',s3qB E-IXS-MC-16.016 029/04:38 -0.5',s3qT E-IXS-MC-16.007 029/04:52 -0.5',s4qB E-IXS-MC-16.019 029/05:06 -0.5',s4qT E-IXS-MC-16.010 029/05:23 -0.5',s6qB E-IXS-MC-16.022 029/05:37 -0.5',s6qT 01/28/97/C Martin C. Weisskopf !!! Check beam center with edge scans before the first test !!! Avoid focus moves in the proceedure. &&& hsiz = -3406 (expected -3422 for -318/arc min pitchprimey = 431584 E-IXS-MC-16.002 029/05:52 0',s1qB E-IXS-MC-16.014 029/06:34 0',s1qT E-IXS-MC-16.005 029/06:51 0',s3qB E-IXS-MC-16.017 029/07:06 0',s3qT E-IXS-MC-16.020 029/07:21 0',s4qT E-IXS-MC-16.008 029/07:38 0',s4qB E-IXS-MC-16.011 029/07:52 0',s6qT ### Delay for MDS check. E-IXS-MC-16.023 029/08:23 0',s6qB &&& Did not perform edge scan to check pinhole centering before first test - because of previous results. Set hsiz = -3556, primey = 431584. E-IXS-MC-16.003 029/08:38 0.5',s1qB E-IXS-MC-16.015 029/08:56 0.5',s1qT E-IXS-MC-16.006 029/09:12 0.5',s3qB E-IXS-MC-16.018 029/09:26 0.5',s3qT E-IXS-MC-16.009 029/09:41 0.5',s4qB E-IXS-MC-16.021 029/09:56 0.5',s4qT E-IXS-MC-16.012 029/10:11 0.5',s6qB E-IXS-MC-16.024 029/10:26 0.5',s6qT !!! HSIZ = -3406. Edge scan in Y yields results within 60 um of 431584; so do not move. E-IXS-MC-17.001 029/10:40 0',-0.5',s3qs E-IXS-MC-17.004 029/11:14 0',-0.5',s3qn E-IXS-MC-17.005 029/11:30 0',0',s3qn &&& Had TRW check optical axis (good to 4" in yaw, 1" in pitch) E-IXS-MC-17.002 029/11:53 0,0',s3qs E-IXS-MC-17.003 029/12:08 0.5',s3qs ### A delay. EKC software glitch in moving (yaw). E-IXS-MC-17.006 029/12:51 0.5',s3qn E-IXS-MC-17.007 029/13:06 0.5',s1qs E-IXS-MC-17.008 029/13:22 0.5',s1qn !!! DO EDGE SCANS FIRST Y: 431534 01/29/97/A Steve O'Dell E-IXS-MC-11.001 029/13:38 ID = 110371 S1S @ {0',-3.56'} E-IXS-MC-11.002 029/14:30 ID = 110372 S3S @ {0',-2.87'} E-IXS-MC-11.003 029/15:10 ID = 110373 S4S @ {0',-2.53'} E-IXS-MC-11.004 029/15:51 ID = 110374 S6S @ {0',-1.88'} E-IXS-MC-13.004 029/16:33 ID = 110375 S6N @ {0',+1.88'} E-IXS-MC-13.003 029/17:32 ID = 110377 S4N @ {0',+2.53'} ### Two power failures closed source gate valve: Had to re-start. E-IXS-MC-13.002 029/18:34 ID = 110378 S3N @ {0',+2.87'} E-IXS-MC-13.001 029/19:17 ID = 110380 S1N @ {0',+3.56'} !!! Skip to E-IXH-SF-13.001 (C-Ka) to allow time for SSD fills. E-IXH-SF-13.001 029/19:58 ID = 110391-8 S3{T,N,B,S} @ {0',0'} 01/29/97/B Leon Van Speybroeck &&& hsiz = -2430; primey = 431543 E-IXS-MC-12.001 029/19:58 ID = 110418 S1B @ {-3.56',0'} &&& hsiz = -2630 (expected -2649) E-IXS-MC-12.002 030/00:21 ID = 110421 S3B @ {-2.87',0'} &&& hsiz = -2700 (expected -2738) E-IXS-MC-12.003 030/01:05 ID = 110424 S4B @ {-2.53',0'} &&& hsiz = -2940 (expected -2907) E-IXS-MC-12.004 030/01:52 ID = 110427 S6B @ {-1.88',0'} &&& Moved HRMA to 0,0; found yaw at -9 arcsec, vs previous setting of -7 arcsec; pitch at +4 arcsec; ignore the error and move to the desired location. &&& hsiz = -4140 (expected -4136) E-IXS-MC-14.004 030/02:38 ID = 110431 S6T @ {+1.88',0'} &&& hsiz=-4331 (expected -4347) E-IXS-MC-14.003 030/03:38 ID = 110434 S4T @ {+2.53',0'} &&& hsiz = -4450 (expected -4439) E-IXS-MC-14.002 030/04:23 ID = 110437 S3T @ {+2.87',0'} &&& hsiz = -4670 (expected -4669) E-IXS-MC-14.001 030/05:07: ID = 110440 S1T @ {+3.56',0'} 01/29/97/C Harvey Tananbaum E-IXS-MC-15.001 030/05:50 ID = S1 @ {0',0'} ### Aborted at 06:22 due to warm-up of SSD_x. ### High count rate while trying to measure edge of 2mm aperture. ### Spectrum looked like a valid x-ray spectrum (to inexperienced eye), but closing of gate valve plus higher detector temperature confirmed data were noise. !!! Start to refill both SSD dewars and skip to FPC 2-D PSF scans. E-IXF-P2-68.001 030/06:26 ID = 110460 S3T @ {0',0'} !!! Start with beamcenter for 70u aperture, then 20u aperture, then update y and z. &&& Complete set-up at 07:42. E-IXF-P2-68.002 030/08:09 ID = 110461 S3N @ {0',0'} E-IXF-P2-68.003 030/08:40 ID = 110462 S3B @ {0',0'} E-IXF-P2-68.004 030/09:12 ID = 110463 S3S @ {0',0'} ### Asynchronous memory fault occurred on SAO-OP2 at start of test, before collect begins. Wait for machine to reset. Lost ~10 min. !!! Analysis results in shift of -510u for x-focus (moves focal plane detector closer to mirror by this amount). Note that y and z estimates for best focus differ by ~150u. Update the x-value in FOA after next test. E-IXF-P2-68.005 030/09:51 ID = 110464 S3T @ {0',0'} !!! Result for S3T in good agreement with first run; average to get best value of -512u for change in x. Update FOA. E-IXF-EE-3.014 030/10:22 ID=110465+ S4 @ {0',0'} !!! Do beamcenters for all apertures from 200u downward. Limit test to 2.5 hrs, deleting smallest apertures if necessary. Start with beamcen on 20u aperture. !!! For 30u update, use shift from 20u aperture; converges on first iteration. !!! Other apertures shows small shifts, but just large enough to justify beamcenters. !!! Do 1 iteration only for y and for z in beamcens and use that result, starting with 100u aperture. Do all except 7.5 and 5u aps. E-IXF-EE-3.015 030/13:09 ID=110495+ S6 @ {0',0'} !!! Follow same plan as in previous test. Start with beamcen using 20u aperture. Use position from table as starting point. Beamcen at 15 um is unrealistic for shell 6. 1/30/97/A Martin Weisskopf E-IXS-MC-15.001a 030/16:15 ID = 110539 S1 @ {0',0'} ### Set up detector manually, leading to wrong time constant, wrong ROI, and no BNDs. ### Had to kill duplicate daughter process which hung edge scan. &&& Went smoothly thereafter. E-IXS-MC-15.002 030/17:54 ID = 110540 S3 @ {0',0'} E-IXS-MC-15.003 030/18:15 ID = 110541 S4 @ {0',0'} E-IXS-MC-15.004 030/18:38 ID = S6 @ {0',0'} &&& Next a series of HSI SFs (off-axis) ### This is first time off-axis SF procedure was used: It has problems. !!! HSI Shutter Focus 5' Off axis (at 135 degrees) E-IXH-SF-15.001 030/19:02 indicates PrimeX (1.438 + 0.568 = 2.006) (ALL) E-IXH-SF-15.002 030/20:30 indicates PrimeX (1.026 + 0.462 = 1.488) (MP1) E-IXH-SF-15.003 030/21:16 indicates PrimeX (1.592 + 0.405 = 1.997) (MP3) 1/30/97/B Leon Van Speybroeck E-IXH-SF-15.004 030/21:59 indicates PrimeX (2.056 + 0.392 = 2.448) (MP4) E-IXH-SF-15.005 030/22:31 indicates PrimeX (3.647 + 0.140 = 3.787) (MP6) ### Image shows that the run ID on the second iteration which should have been the south quadrant was actually the bottom quadrant. The first iteration gave -0.408, which indicates PrimeX (3.647 + 0.408 = 4.055) (MP6). The electronic record shows no error. HSA log examined on C shift by WAP does not show the shutters behaving anomolously - the time when the image shows the bottom quadrant (#3) instead of the south (#4) has an HSA log showing just this - shutter 3 open instead of shutter 4. &&& Command probably was never issued. E-IXH-PI-6.001 030/23:04 (HSI image 5' off axis, ensemble) &&& HSI Shutter Focus 10' Off axis (at 0 degrees; -yaw) E-IXH-SF-15.006 030/23:20 (ALL) ### Lost HSI during run; actually conflict of computer processes; restarted. &&& Indicates PrimeX (5.621 + 0.045 = 5.666) E-IXH-SF-15.007 031/00:36:(MP1) indicates PrimeX (4.098 - 0.254 = 3.844) E-IXH-SF-15.008 031/01:12 (MP3) indicates PrimeX (6.283 - 0.536 = 5.747) E-IXH-SF-15.009 031/01:45 (MP4) indicates PrimeX (8.044 - 0.673 = 7.371) E-IXH-SF-15.010 031/02:23 (MP6) indicates PrimeX (14.023 -0.994 = 13.029) NOTE: HT cannot reproduce exact numbers shown for change in PRIMEX. Illustrate by example for E-IXH-SF-15.008. Iteration #1 finds df_um=487.25. MST logs show primex moved from -29253ea to -29738ea, a change of -485ea (probably within precision of stage to implement requested change). (note calculated change is of opposite sign to actual move). Then 2nd iteration computes df_um=44.81. MST logs show a move of primex to -29787ea, a further change of -49ea. Project Science board shows 487 and 44 for iterations, but actual change to primex as -536 (which is sum of 487 calculated as first desired move and 49 which was actual second move). HT surmises that correct calculation would sum first actual move plus second calculated correction or 485 + 44 = 529. Differences are small but non-zero. E-IXH-PI-7.002 031/03:02 (HSI image 10' off axis, ensemble) &&& HSI Shutter Focus 15' Off axis (at 135 degrees) E-IXH-SF-15.011 031/03:20 (ALL) indicates PrimeX (12.110 - 0.359 = 11.751) E-IXH-SF-15.012 031/03:59 (MP1) indicates PrimeX (8.962 - 0.814 = 8.148) E-IXH-SF-15.013 031/04:31 (MP3) indicates PrimeX (13.677 - 0.898 = 12.779) E-IXH-SF-15.014 031/04:48 (MP4) indicates PrimeX (17.411 - 0.791 = 16.620) E-IXH-SF-15.015 031/05:04 (MP6) indicates PrimeX (30.392 + 0.329 = 30.721) 1/30/97/C Harvey Tananbaum E-IXH-PI-6.003 031/05:28 (HSI image 15' off axis, ensemble) E-IXH-PI-7.004 031/05:49 (HSI image 20' off axis, ensemble) &&& HSI Shutter Focus 25' Off axis (at 135 degrees) E-IXH-SF-15.016 031/06:07 (ALL) indicates PrimeX (31.107 +1.090 =32.197) E-IXH-SF-15.017 031/07:00 (MP1) indicates PrimeX (23.682 +1.143 =24.825) E-IXH-SF-15.018 031/07:24 (MP3) indicates PrimeX (36.049 -0.578 =35.471) E-IXH-SF-15.019 031/07:54 (MP4) indicates PrimeX (46.401 -1.060 =45.341) !!! Increase integration time to 200 sec per quadrant. E-IXH-SF-15.020 031/08:22 (MP6) indicates PrimeX (85.014 -0.587 =84.427) !!! Increase integration time to 300sec per quadrant. ### HSI server quit during 2nd quadrant integration, giving no counts. !!! Restart and repeat N quadrant. E-IXH-PI-6.005 031/09:13 (HSI image 25' off axis, ensemble). !!! Use primex computed in test 15.016 for this image. E-IXH-PI-6.006 031/09:28 (HSI image 30' off axis, ensemble) !!! Before embarking on the SSD encircled energy measurements, need to determine positions of the 500 um and 2 mm apertures. (Previous values ar esuspect because of "direction of approach" previously used.) !!! Go on axis and manually estimated center/edges for these two apertures; then do edge scans (2 1-D scans) to determine edges and then center of aperture. ### TRW notes that the source intensity has been turned up for the next set of tests, but that the flux calculations in the CMDB were not updated and thus the FPC-h detectors would have been left for the first several tests at an excessive count rate. !!! Manually edit to keep fpc-h all off. &&& For 2mm aperture, hsi-z= -3463, and primey=431545 &&& For 500u aperture, hsi-z= -3465 , and primey=431603. E-IXS-EE-5.001 031/11:17 EE, 5' off axis at 135 degrees ### Initial beam center for 200 um aperture sees essentially no flux at nominal aperture position. !!! Realize we need to correct this and all following measurements for z change of -315 um in z per arcmin of pitch, or 1114 um for pitch=-3.54'. !!! Also, apply correction of 568 um to primex found previously for 5' off-axis. ### Use swap-ap to go from 200-um to 500-um aperture and see that rate is lower than that found for position found with on-axis edge-determined center. !!! So use that position for 500 um, with z-correction for pitch. Similarly for 2-mm aperture. !!! Do beamcens for smaller apertures. For 70, 50, and 40 um, begin to see count rate scaling with area of aperture, suggesting that flatness of energy distribution (off-axis) renders data with smaller apertures of minimal value, so stop here. ### Requested CMDB s/w mod to compute z-offset for upcoming measurements at non-zero pitch. Will assess what can be done and when. 1/31/97/A Steve O'Dell Procedure for off-axis IXS-EE measurements: 1 Do not beam center on 2000-um and 500-um apertures. a For 2000-um aperture, use PRIMEY = 431545 and HSIZ = -3463. b For 500-um aperture, use PRIMEY = 431603 and HSIZ = -3465. c For remaining apertures, use swap_ap and beam_cen. 2 Adjust for pitch de-center: dHSIZ = (-315)*thetaY. 3 Adjust for focal-surface correction based on off-axis full-HRMA SFs. a For theta = 5', dPRIMEX = + 568. b For theta = 10', dPRIMEX = + 45. c For theta = 15', dPRIMEX = - 359. d For theta = 20', dPRIMEX = ?. e For theta = 25', dPRIMEX = +1090. f For theta = 30', dPRIMEX = ?. E-IXS-EE-5.004 031/14:04 ID = 110733-45 dHSIZ = 0. All @ {0.00',-10.00'} ap = {2000,500,200,100,70,50,40} um. E-IXS-EE-5.005 031/15:53 ID = 110749-59 dHSIZ =+3341. All @ {-10.61',+10.61'} ap = {2000,500,200,100,70} um. E-IXS-EE-5.007 031/17:40 ID = 110760-64 dHSIZ =+4455. All @ {-14.14',+14.14'} ap = {2000,500,200} um. E-IXS-EE-5.009 031/18:40 ID = 110766 dHSIZ =+5568. All @ {-17.68',+17.68'} ap = {2000} um. E-IXS-EE-5.010 031/19:00 ID = 110768 dHSIZ =+6682. All @ {-21.21',+21.21'} ap = {2000} um. E-IXF-3D-11.007 031/19:24 ID = 110778 S13 ap = 1000 um. E-IXF-3D-11.008 031/19:47 ID = 110779 S46 ap = 1000 um. E-HXH-3D-11.048 031/19:55 ID = 110783 S13 HETG MEG m=-1,0,+1. E-HXF-3D-11.046 031/20:23 ID = 110784 S13 HETG MEG m=+1 ap = 10000 um. <<< Change to EIPS(Fe). E-IXF-BG-1.014 031/20:52 ID = 110794-6 1/31/97/B Martin Weisskopf E-BND-BU-2.027 031/22:23 E-BND-BU-2.028 031/22:40 !!! Insert Curium source in SSD5 (and close valve) during part of this measurement. E-IXS-EA-92.005 032/00:05 ### CMDB calls for mysterious filter. TRW inserted none. ### Because of high rate, we inserted Fe K filter. !!! Steve says this measurement requires NO filter to compare to previous. (See EA 92.004) !!! Have to lower current to do this. &&& We thus have 2 runids. E-IXF-EE-10.003 032/01:09:09 ### Correcting for 1.88' did not get us close enough (100 um off). y = -307144; z= 10049 E-IXF-EE-10.002 032/03:20:32 ### Correcting for the 2.53' did not work (100 um off). y= -307163; z= 9854. !!! Do a manual 2nd collect for 50-um aperture, because beamcen position off a little. !!! Do not do apertures smaller than 20 um. (HT) 1/31/97/C Harvey Tananbaum (last shift in January) E-IXF-EE-10.001 032/05:34. !!! Correct for 2.87' in pitch to z=9638, then move 100u to z=9738, to try first beamcen, with 20u aperture. Converges fine. ### Discuss with TRW and EK - learn that there was a 10- 15" IAP update in pitch, following E-IXS-EE-5.010 earlier today (~19:20 GMT). &&& 15" is equivalent to a shift of 79-um in pitch (315 um per 1'), close to the 100-um offset we now need in z. &&& Last FOA was 2-3 days ago, when system was still coming to thermal equilibrium. !!! IAP updates and the FOA updates need to be coordinated in the future. ### Lots of uncertainty about IAP7 update and redo of update, but likely that something was changed leading to shift in nominal position. &&& Not seen in last of C data because used large (1-mm) aperture or HSI. &&& First tests with small apertures are these EE tests with Fe-K. !!! Check mirror and alignment is within 1-2", so OK - but change done earlier today means we need to update FOA (to remove 100u offset) - will do before series of wing-scans. !!!! Note next set of HSI images and 4EAs with 35-mm aperture do not have the 100-um correction in z included, nor do they need the correction. E-IXH-PI-12.004 032/07:27 Inner core with HSI 0' pitch: -20' yaw &&& No update available for primex, beyond the nominal. E-IXH-PI-12.002 032/07:53 Inner core with HSI 0' pitch: -10' yaw. !!! Apply additional correction of +045u to primex based on PS table. E-IXH-PI-11.001 032/08:05 Inner core with HSI -3.54' p : 3.54' y !!! Apply additional correction of +568u to primex. E-IXH-PI-11.003 032/08:22 Inner core with HSI -10.61'p : 10.61' y !!! Apply additional correction of -359u to primex. E-IXH-PI-11.005 032/08:35 Inner core with HSI -17.68'p : 17.68' y !!! Apply additional correction of +1090u to primex. ### After a few hundred seconds of data collection, observe that translation of image due to -17.68' pitch angle (and use of single actuator generating an image shift of 315u per arcmin), causes part of image to be cut-off by HSI mask (near edge of detector). !!! Translate HSI 5.56mm in z and restart collect. E-IXH-PI-11.006 032/08:59 Inner core with HSI -21.21'p : 21.21' y &&& No additional correction to primex available. !!! Translate HSI 6.681mm in z to keep image on detector. E-IXF-EA-16.004 032/09:34 35mm aperture 0.00'p : -10.00' y !!! Apply additional correction of +045u to primex based on PS table. E-IXF-EA-16.002 032/09:48 35mm aperture -3.54'p : 3.54' y !!! Apply additional correction of +568u to primex. Correct z by 1115u E-IXF-EA-16.006 032/09:59 35mm aperture -10.61'p : 10.61' y !!! Apply additional correction of -359u to primex. Correct z by 3342u E-IXF-EA-16.008 032/10:08 35mm aperture -17.68'p : 17.68' y !!! Apply additional correction of +1090u to primex. Correct z by 5569u &&& Complete test at 032/10:16. !!! Pause for a moment; set HRMA to 0' pitch and 0' yaw. Take 20u aperture and beamcenter to provide FOA update and to "permanently" correct for 100u shift in z correlated with IAP update around 031/19:30. !!! Took 30 minutes (which appears as time against first wing scan below). !!! Update FOA . Move 149u in z, and -30u in y. Also find that the z-corrections for pitch angle have to be edited into the run files which give 7 values of z as absolute values, etc <<< S3B Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {-2.87',0.0'}; HXDA dz = +904 um. E-IXF-PW-3.028 032/10:17 S3B {-2.87',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110900 E-IXF-PW-3.029 032/11:27 S3B {-2.87',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110901 E-IXF-PW-3.030 032/12:05 S3B {-2.87',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110902 E-IXF-PW-3.031 032/12:46 S3B {-2.87',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110903 1/31/97/A Steve O'Dell <<< S4B Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {-2.53',0.0'}; HXDA dz = +797 um. E-IXF-PW-3.032 032/13:20 S4B {-2.53',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110904 E-IXF-PW-3.033 032/13:52 S4B {-2.53',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110905 E-IXF-PW-3.034 032/14:21 S4B {-2.53',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110906 E-IXF-PW-3.035 032/14:50 S4B {-2.53',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110907 <<< S6B Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {-1.88',0.0'}; HXDA dz = +592 um. E-IXF-PW-3.036 032/15:19 S6B {-1.88',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110908 E-IXF-PW-3.037 032/15:51 S6B {-1.88',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110909 E-IXF-PW-3.038 032/16:19 S6B {-1.88',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110910 E-IXF-PW-3.039 032/16:48 S6B {-1.88',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110911 <<< S6T Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {+1.88',0.0'}; HXDA dz = -592 um. E-IXF-PW-3.009 032/17:18 S6T {+1.88',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110912 E-IXF-PW-3.010 032/18:01 S6T {+1.88',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110913 ### FPC5 IRIG error terminated listscan. Do last 2 points. ID = 110914 E-IXF-PW-3.011 032/18:46 S6T {+1.88',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110915 E-IXF-PW-3.012 032/19:15 S6T {+1.88',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110916 <<< S4T Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {+2.53',0.0'}; HXDA dz = -797 um. E-IXF-PW-3.005 032/19:45 S4T {+2.53',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110917 E-IXF-PW-3.006 032/20:20 S4T {+2.53',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110918 E-IXF-PW-3.007 032/20:51 S4T {+2.53',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110919 E-IXF-PW-3.008 032/21:22 S4T {+2.53',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110920 Notes: 1 Per HT CO, de-center correction for pitch will appear in CMDB. a This will appear in Zoff column and locs files. b Confusion is likely, so be careful to note when implemented in CMDB! 2 Per SO CO, EA-92 EIPS set-up is 10 kV, 0.2 mA, no filter. 02/01/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf S3T Fe-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {+2.87',0.0'}; HXDA dz = -904 um. E-IXF-PW-3.001 032/21:54 S3T {+2.87',0.0'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 110921 ### EKC controllers not responding. Long Hiatus. E-IXF-PW-3.002 032/23:42 S3T {+2.87',0.0'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 110922 E-IXF-PW-3.003 033/00:12 S3T {+2.87',0.0'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 110923 E-IXF-PW-3.004 033/00:46 S3T {+2.87',0.0'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 110924 E-IXS-EA-92.006 033/01:24 (Icing test) ### There is a large difference in the counting rates from when we did EA-92.005 (yesterday). ### This is not a filter problem. We lowered the the current we saw about 1800 c/s on SSDx. ### We lowered rate by lowering current (to 0.1 mA) - and still get a flux much higher than the other day! We also looked in ROI. &&& HOWEVER, when we print out the SSDx spectrum it is fine - and, when we consider that we lowered the current by a factor of two (and increased the integration time) one gets the same results. What gives? <<< Begin grating measurements. E-HXS-3D-29.005 033/02:03 E-HXS-3D-29.003 033/02:16 E-HXS-3D-29.004 033/02:26 E-LXH-3D-25.003 033/02:55 !!! Use filter (Fe-L), increase integration time by a factor of 5. ### Problem (software) with HSI sun. Restart E-LXF-3D-25.004 033/04:15 Put in filter, increase IT by factor of 5. !!! Change pinhole to 1 mm. Then find proper spot. <<< Switch to EIPS(Ti). E-IXF-BG-1.015 033/05:08 Note: 1 Off-axis HSI images seem to agree VERY well with decenter/tilt we discovered, thus confirming the effect. I also asked Diab to look at the "fish", and "loops" etc. seen in the images to be sure we predict them. 2 The CMDB software is not predicting the SSD5 rates correctly. 02/01/97/C Jeff Kolodziejczak E-IXF-BND-2.029 033/05:44 E-IXF-BND-2.030 033/06:01 aplist={20,30,40,50,70,100,150,200,300,500,1000,2000,4000,10000,20000,35000,15,10}. E-IXF-EE-9.001 033/07:35 S1T @ {+3.56',0.0'} aplist ID = 110959-84 Aborted 10 um due to 2:30 time limit. E-IXF-EE-9.002 033/10:19 S3T @ {+2.87',0.0'} aplist ID = 110984-1013 20 & 30 um pinholes missed because they centered on local max. E-IXF-EE-9.003 033/12:39 S4T @ {+2.53',0.0'} aplist ID = 111014-43 Notes: 1 E-IXF-PW-6.009-6.018, Ti-Ka S1N&S PWs were done before; delete. 2 Martin says, "No more new HRMA tests!" 02/02/97/A Steve O'Dell E-IXF-EE-9.004 033/15:44 S6T @ {+1.88',0.0'} aplist ID = 111044-74 E-IXF-EE-9.002A 033/18:12 S3T @ {+2.87',0.0'} ap={20,30} ID = 111075-82 E-IXH-PI-22.004 033/19:03 All @ { 0.00',-20.00'} ID = 111084 E-IXH-PI-22.002 033/19:26 All @ { 0.00',-10.00'} ID = 111085 E-IXH-PI-21.001 033/19:35 All @ {- 3.54',+ 3.54'} ID = 111086 E-IXH-PI-21.003 033/19:51 All @ {-10.61',+10.61'} ID = 111087 E-IXH-PI-21.005 033/20:02 All @ {-17.68',+17.68'} ID = 111088 E-IXH-PI-21.006 033/20:11 All @ {-21.21',+21.21'} ID = 111089 E-IXF-EA-16.003 033/20:23 All @ {- 3.54',+ 3.54'} ap=3500 ID = 111090 E-IXF-EA-16.001 033/20:44 All @ { 0.00',-10.00'} ap=3500 ID = 111091 E-IXF-EA-16.005 033/20:55 All @ {-10.61',+10.61'} ap=3500 ID = 111092 E-IXF-EA-16.007 033/21:05 All @ {-17.68',+17.68'} ap=3500 ID = 111093 Notes: 1 Long-term position repeatibility is poor: dY =+80 um, dZ =-90 um. 2 De-center correction for pitch is now incorporated in CMDB and locs files. 3 Need to check Ti grating measurements. These have changed today. 02/02/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf S3S Ti-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = { 0.00',-2.87'}. E-IXF-PW-6.019 033/21:15 S3S { 0.00',-2.87'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111095 E-IXF-PW-6.020 033/22:09 S3S { 0.00',-2.87'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111096 E-IXF-PW-6.021 033/22:40 S3S { 0.00',-2.87'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111097 E-IXF-PW-6.022 033/23:10 S3S { 0.00',-2.87'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111098 E-IXF-PW-6.023 033/23:43 S3S { 0.00',-2.87'} ap = 35 mm. ID = 111099 S4S Ti-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = { 0.00',-2.53'}. E-IXF-PW-6.024 034/00:18 S4S { 0.00',-2.53'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111100 E-IXF-PW-6.025 034/00:52 S4S { 0.00',-2.53'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111101 E-IXF-PW-6.026 034/01:21 S4S { 0.00',-2.53'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111102 E-IXF-PW-6.027 034/01:50 S4S { 0.00',-2.53'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111103 E-IXF-PW-6.028 034/02:19 S4S { 0.00',-2.53'} ap = 35 mm. ID = 111104 S6S Ti-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = { 0.00',-1.88'}. E-IXF-PW-6.029 034/02:47 S6S { 0.00',-1.88'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111105 E-IXF-PW-6.030 034/03:18 S6S { 0.00',-1.88'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111106 E-IXF-PW-6.031 034/03:47 S6S { 0.00',-1.88'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111107 E-IXF-PW-6.032 034/04:16 S6S { 0.00',-1.88'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111108 E-IXF-PW-6.033 034/04:45 S6S { 0.00',-1.88'} ap = 35 mm. ID = 111109 S1B Ti-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {-3.56', 0.00'}; dZ = +1121 um. E-IXF-PW-6.005 034/05:16 S1B {-3.56', 0.00'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111110 E-IXF-PW-6.006 034/05:59 S1B {-3.56', 0.00'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111111 02/02/97/C Jeff Kolodziejczak E-IXF-PW-6.007 034/06:29 S1B {-3.56', 0.00'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111112 E-IXF-PW-6.008 034/07:01 S1B {-3.56', 0.00'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111113 S1T Ti-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {+3.56', 0.00'}; dZ = -1121 um. E-IXF-PW-6.001 034/07:32 S1T {+3.56', 0.00'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111114 E-IXF-PW-6.002 034/08:10 S1T {+3.56', 0.00'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111115 E-IXF-PW-6.003 034/08:40 S1T {+3.56', 0.00'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111116 E-IXF-PW-6.004 034/09:11 S1T {+3.56', 0.00'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111117 <<< Begin OTG measurements. E-HXH-3D-10.008 034/09:45 Aborted because locs file goes through 0 order. E-HXH-3D-10.010 034/10:07 Manual setup to avoid 0 order. ID = 111118-9 02/03/97/A Steve O'Dell !!! For next 3 tests, had changed locs file to go around 0 order. E-HXH-3D-10.008a034/12:17 ID = 111120 E-HXH-3D-10.007 034/12:34 ID = 111121 E-HXH-3D-10.009 034/12:48 ID = 111122 E-HXF-3D-10.002 034/15:04 S13 MEG {-1,0,1,2,3,3,2} ID = 111123 E-HXF-3D-10.004 034/15:17 S13 MEG {6,7,8,9,-9,-8,-7,-6} ID = 111124 E-HXF-3D-10.006 034/15:32 S13 MEG {3,4,5,6,-6,-5,-4,-3} ID = 111125 E-HXF-3D-10.001 034/15:48 S46 HEG {-1,0,1,2,3,-3,-2} ID = 111126 E-HXF-3D-10.003 034/16:00 S46 HEG {3,4,5,6,-6,-5,-4,-3} ID = 111127 E-HXF-3D-10.005 034/16:16 S46 HEG {3,4,5,6,-6,-5,-4,-3} ID = 111128 !!! At OTG request, check 2-mm aperture with edge scan. E-IXF-3D-9.001 034/16:35 All no OTG ID = 111140 E-LXH-3D-9.007 034/17:23 All LEG {1,-1} ID = 111141 E-LXH-3D-9.006 034/17:36 All LEG {6,-6} ID = 111142 E-LXH-3D-9.005 034/18:20 All LEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 111143 !!! Dan S and Jeff K reviewed CMDB and time estimates for HRMA, finding the following possible time reductions, with the goal of cutting 42-48 hours: 1 Don't do the Zn-K beam uniformity -H E-BND-BU-2.012: 4 hr savings 2 Limit time for Zn-K encircled E to 2.5 hrs: 0.6 hr savings 3 Don't do Zn-K wing scans for n and s quadrant since these were done at Cu-K which is almost the same energy, also skip all 10 mm which overlap 4 and 20 in spatial frequency: 5 hr savings 4 Limit time for Ag-L encircled E to 2.5 hrs: 0.6 hr savings 5 Don't do Ag-L psf outer core (PO) tests: 1 hr savings 6 Don't do any Cr-K: 16 hr savings 7 Don't do the Al-K beam uniformity-H E-BND-BU-2.012: 1.6 hr savings 8 Limit time for Al-K EE ends EE-7.0xx to 2.5 hrs: 8x0.6= 4.8 hr savings 9 Don't do 10-mm Al wing scans: 2 hr savings 10 Alignment tests allocated at 15 min each; previous tests took only 5 minutes each; allow 15 min for HRMA moves; 5 minutes for others: 10 min x 30 tests = 5 hr savings 11 Don't do second P2 for each shell in shutter focus set: 2 hr savings 12 Leave P2 19x19 scans on axis in as "padding" if time is short. Do a single ensemble 2d scan, or 17x17s etc. these are optional: 16 hr savings Total 58.6 hours savings. approx. 10 hrs. of slack. $$$ Scott T says that earliest last x ray for current phase is Mon Feb 10 06:00 CST. 02/03/97/B Martin C Weisskopf <<< Begin Ti-L OTG measurements. E-LXF-3D-9.004 034/21:30 All LEG {1,-1} ID = 111144 E-LXF-3D-9.003 034/21:51 All LEG {6,-6} ID = 111145 E-LXF-3D-9.002 034/22:03 All LEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 11114 E-LXH-3D-22.046 034/22:32c All LEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 111157 E-HXH-3D-22.048 034/23:02 S13 MEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 111158 E-HXF-3D-22.047 034/23:38 S13 MEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 1111 E-LXF-3D-22.044 035/01:39 All LEG {31,25,13,-13,-19,-25} ID = 11114 <<< Change to EIPS(Ag). E-IXF-BG-1.008 035/02:11 E-BND-BU-2.015 035/02:54 E-IXS-EE-71.001 035/04:44 ### This was not set up correctly. Had to do this on the fly. &&& 20 um Y= 431622; Z = -3319 ID = 111174 FOA check says (+12 arcsec yaw, 0 arcsec pitch) Note: 1 Gain of FPC5 was too high. Has been true for some time since the HV cable fix many days ago. Should now work correctly. 2 New CMDB added Cu and Zn measurements for the OTGs. We pointed out that the Zn measurements were much better done with Cu (higher flux). Herman M agreed. Next, Steve and I called Leon - we would then rather complete data set (PW with shell 6T, B) with Cu. This also avoided another EE measurement. He agreed. To buy time, we started the Ag measurements. 3 SSD5 rates are way off. True for Ti, true for Ag L. Please fix. 02/03/97/C Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! Skip (in interest of time per MCW & LVS) E-IXH-PO-14.001-004. E-IXS-EA-31.001 035/07:38 ssd sh1,3 E-IXS-EA-31.002 035/07:54 ssd sh4,6 E-IXF-EA-31.003 035/08:01 fpc sh1,3 ### Shutter 3N stuck manual override succeeded. E-IXF-EA-31.004 035/08:15 fpc sh4,6 E-IXH-3D-31.005 035/08:23 letg orders scan (-5,0,+5) w/hsi ### 3N stuck again, later tests are reordered. E-IXH-3D-31.006 035/09:39 letg orders scan (-10,+10) w/hsi E-LXF-3D-15.001 035/10:57 letg -3,-1,0,1,3 orders w/ fpc E-LXF-3D-15.002 035/11:20 letg +/- 2,3,4,5,6,7 orders w/ fpc E-LXF-3D-15.003 035/12:15 035/12:15 letg +/- 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 E-IXH-3D-31.007a035/13:41 meg orders w/hsi run at 1.5 mA E-IXH-3D-31.009 035/14:15 meg orders w/fpc E-IXH-3D-31.011 035/14:27 meg orders w/ssd !!! Did a beam center and found a ~100 um position error in z. E-IXH-3D-31.012 035/14:37 heg orders w/ssd E-IXH-3D-31.008 035/15:03 heg orders w/hsi run at 1.5 mA E-IXH-3D-31.010 035/15:31 heg orders w/fpc 02/04/97/A Steve O'Dell <<< Change to EIPS(Cu). E-IXF-BG-66.002 035/15:42 BG for Cu-K FPC set-up. ID = 111222 E-IXF-BG-66.001 035/16:19 BG for Cu-L FPC set-up. ID = 111232 E-BND-BU-2.001 035/16:44 BND5 map for Cu-L. ID = 111233 E-BND-BU-2.002 Skip. BNDH map for Cu-L. E-BND-BU-2.003 035/17:05 BND5 map for Cu-K. ID = 111243 E-BND-BU-2.004 Skip. BNDH map for Cu-K. !!! Do beamcen to re-define FOA: Y=-307109, Z=10642 (dY=+74, dZ=-50). Begin Cu-K Z-scan PWs for S6T & S6B. aplist={1, 4, 10, 20} S6T Cu-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {+1.88', 0.00'} aps = {1, 4, 10, 20} mm. E-IXF-PW-5.011 035/18:07 S6T {+1.88', 0.00'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111247 E-IXF-PW-5.012 035/18:44 S6T {+1.88', 0.00'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111248 E-IXF-PW-5.013 035/19:14 S6T {+1.88', 0.00'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111249 E-IXF-PW-5.014 035/19:46 S6T {+1.88', 0.00'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111250 <<< S6B Cu-Ka PWs HRMA tilt = {-1.88', 0.00'} aps = {1, 4, 10, 20} mm. E-IXF-PW-5.015 035/20:22 S6B {-1.88', 0.00'} ap = 1 mm. ID = 111251 E-IXF-PW-5.016 035/21:03 S6B {-1.88', 0.00'} ap = 4 mm. ID = 111252 Notes: 1 Updated FOA after beamcen on 20-um aperture (dY=+74, dZ=-50). 2 Discovered that computation of ROI sum sometimes ignores lower ROI. a John found that bug occurs when HSI_image is called. b Thus BGs were affected for all detectors, because HSI is used. c John has fixed bug so that ROI sum is always calculated properly. 02/04/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf E-IXF-PW-5.017 035/21:37 S6B {-1.88', 0.00'} ap = 10 mm. ID = 111254 E-IXF-PW-5.018 035/22:14 S6B {-1.88', 0.00'} ap = 20 mm. ID = 111255 <<< Cu-k measurements with the gratings. E-IXS-EA-32.001 035/22:48 !!! No BC was requested, but we did it because of experience. !!! For the 500 um (SSD) Y = 431552; Z = -3354 ### This was lost due to IRIG; see E-IXS-EA-32.001a below. E-IXS-EA-32.002 035/23:08 IRIG errors. slowed us down. ID = 111261 E-HXS-3D-32.008 036/00:18 HEG {+1, 0, -1} ### Lots of problems getting started because Beam Cen was so far from the FOA". !!! Update FOA, and click back to the original when we go to the FPC2. E-LXS-3D-32.007 036/00:57 LETG {+1, 0, -1} E-LXH-EA-32.009 036/01:14 LETG image of Cu K centered on 0-th order. ### IRIG problems. E-HXH-EA-32.010 036/01:3 HEG Image of Cu- K {+1, 0, -1} E-HXF-3D-32.006 036/01:52 HEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111267 E-LXF-3D-32.005 036/02:13 LETG {+1,0,1} ID = 111268 E-IXF-EA-32.004 036/02:36 (Shells 4,6) ID = 111269 E-IXF-EA-32.003 036/02:46 (Shells 1&3) ID = 111270 ### Shutter 3N stuck again. E-IXS-EA-32.001a 036/03:05 ID = 111271 <<< Cu-L E-IXF-EA-33.003 036/03:24 "Meg" (S1&S3) ID = 111281 E-IXF-EA-33.004 036/03:41 "HEG" (S4&S6) ID = 111282 E-IXS-EA-33.002 036/03:53 "HEG" (S4&S6) ID = 111283 E-IXS-EA-33.001 036/04:10 "Meg" (S1&S3) ID = 111284 E-HXS-3D-33.009 036/04:21 MEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111285 E-HXS-3D-33.010 036/04:40 HEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111286 E-LXS-3D-33.008 036/05:34 LETG {+1,0,-1}ID = 111287 E-LXH-3D-33.011 036/05:53 LETG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111288 Notes: 1 Computer reboots mess up SSD5 (rate). Second reboot cures it. 2 I spent about 0.5 hour researching the PIGS measurements that Bert B wants. I showed Theo G - who put in the change - that we already took the data. Hopefully he will remove the change. 02/04/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck E-HXH-3D-33.012 036/06:23 MEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111289 (HSI) E-HXH-3D-33.013 036/06:52 HEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111290 (HSI) E-HXF-3D-33.007 036/08:29 HEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111291 (FPC) E-HXF-3D-33.006 036/09:02 MEG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111292 (FPC) E-LXF-3D-33.005 036/09:14 LETG {+1,0,-1} ID = 111293 (FPC) <<< HIREFS RUNS !!! Counter setup for HIREFS runs: 124 eV for 14.001 to 14.008 and for background and beam uniformity runs BG-60.001 and BU-60.002 0.93 keV for 34 series (so that we can use the Cu-La background runs) E-IXF-BG-60.001 036/09:29 Background; counters set at 124 eV ### Have difficulty getting HIREFS to function; agreed to1/2 hour for troubleshooting. No Luck. !!! Because the need for the PIGS data is uncertain, we decided to switch to the aluminum series. &&& HIREFS later was found to work off line, suggesting a cable or connector problem. !!! HIREFS should be worked off-line as much as possible, but may require brief periods of EIPS off time because of danger of working near high voltage connections to EIPS <<< EIPS(Al-K) E-IXF-BG-1.018 036/11:07 Aluminum background E-BND-BU-2.035 036/11:28 Beam uniformity at Bldg 500 ID=111314 E-BND-BU-2.036 (BND_H uniformity); cancelled. E-IXF-EE-7.009 036/11:50 MP1B EE ID = This run delayed. ### Front vertical actuator is not working; EKC troubleshooting. ### Front actuator getting warmer (by 4 deg F). !!! Switch to next set which does not require HRMA moves. &&& Actuator temperature (indicator) continued to rise after power removed, as heat redistributtes. Temperature now 6.1 degrees F warmer. E-HXH-FC-28.001 036/12:23 HETG, MP1 Focus check, HSI ID = 111316-111319 ### Stopped test sequence to allow HIREFS troubleshooting 036/13:15 02/05/97/A Steve O'Dell ### Waited for HIREFS to be re-installed. !!! Lower bias from 50 to 20 to keep filament current below 1.2 A. ### Waited for EKC to troubleshoot vertical actuator. &&& EKC resolved problem with control computer. E-BND-BU-60.002 036/15:41 BND5 map, HIREFS @ 0.207 keV. ID = 111329 E-BND-BU-60.002a036/16:09 BND5 map, HIREFS @ 0.207 keV. ID = 111330 !!! Update FOA for current HIREFS configuration: !!! Adjust for different object distance: X_hirefs - X_eips = -59. !!! Do edge scan for SSD measurements, ap = 500 um. E-IXS-EA-34.016 036/16:22 S13 out HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111346 ### Scan was {9,12} Ang, rather than {9,10,11} Ang. E-IXS-EA-34.021 036/17:50 S13 out HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111347 ### Scan was {14,16} Ang, rather than {14,15} Ang. ### Must repeat above 2 scans because SSD finished scan before HIREFS. !!! Fixed procedures to include adequate overhead and minimum 50-s dwell. E-HXS-EA-34.002 036/18:10 S13 MEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.378 keV. ID = 111348 E-HXS-EA-34.005 036/18:27 S13 MEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.240 keV. ID = 111349 E-HXS-EA-34.008 036/18:39 S13 MEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.127 keV. ID = 111350 E-HXS-EA-34.011 036/18:57 S13 MEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.886 keV. ID = 111351 E-HXS-EA-34.014 036/19:18 S13 MEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.827 keV. ID = 111352 E-HXS-EA-34.019 036/19:39 S13 MEG HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111353 ### Scan was {9,12} Ang, rather than {9,10,11} Ang. ### HIREFS computer has not been reporting HIREFS scans in XSS log. ### Skip HIREFS scans until HIREFS computer is reporting wavelengths. E-LXS-EA-34.001 036/20:18 All LEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.378 keV. ID = 111354 E-LXS-EA-34.004 036/20:36 All LEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.240 keV. ID = 111355 E-LXS-EA-34.007 036/21:34 All LEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.127 keV. ID = 111356 E-LXS-EA-34.010 036/22:00 All LEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.886 keV. ID = 111357 E-LXS-EA-34.013 036/22:20 All LEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.827 keV. ID = 111358 !!! Resume HIREFS scans. Data is being recorded, but not entered in XSS log. !!! Re-order measurements to reduce OTG, shutter, and HIREFS changes. 02/05/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf E-LXS-EA-34.023 036/22:43 All LEG HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111359 ### Scan was {14,16} Ang, rather than {14,15} Ang. E-LXS-EA-34.018 036/23:04 All LEG HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111360 ### Scan was {9,12} Ang, rather than {9,10,11} Ang. &&& XSS executed incorrect HIREFS scans previously; remainder are correct. E-IXS-EA-34.016a036/23:54 S13 out HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111361 ### RAS filament burned out. 37/00:10 !!! Took 1/2 hour background. ID = 111362 ### Still problems (81 mA vs 90 mA). Proceed @ 037/03:07. ### Coordination off. Need to run again. (ID = 111363 has data, however.) See also ID = 111364. E-IXS-EA-34.021a037/03:38: S13 out HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111365 E-IXS-EA-34.022 037/03:58 S46 out HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111366 E-IXS-EA-34.017 037/04:12 S46 out HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111367 E-HXS-EA-34.003 037/04:33 S46 HEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.378 keV. ID = 111368 E-HXS-EA-34.006 037/04:49 S46 HEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.240 keV. ID = 111369 02/05/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck E-HXS-EA-34.009 037/05:15 S46 HEG HIREFS(SX) @ 1.127 keV. ID = 111370 E-HXS-EA-34.020 037/06:13 S46 HEG HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111372 E-HXS-EA-34.012 037/07:28 S46 HEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.886 keV. ID = 111373 E-HXS-EA-34.015 037/08:28 S46 HEG HIREFS(SA) @ 0.827 keV. ID = 111374 E-HXS-EA-34.025 037/09:51 S46 HEG HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111375 E-HXS-EA-34.024 037/11:13 S13 MEG HIREFS(SA) 2~0.855 keV. ID = 111376 E-HXS-EA-34.019a037/11:40 S13 MEG HIREFS(SX) 3~1.240 keV. ID = 111377 !!! Order E-IXF-EA-14 series to make monotonic and to get HSI image before doing the grating exposures. ### Expected resolution (Brad W.) of HIREFS gives width of about 0.9 mm, so the FPC aperture of 2 mm may be marginal, especially if there is some line broadening, error in HIREFS or grating dispersion calculations, etc. !!! Theo will consider changing aperture to 4 mm after viewing HSI exposures. E-IXF-EA-14.013 037/12:17 Normalization at 248 eV (FPC) ID = 111387 E-IXF-EA-14.007 037/12:30 Normalization at 207 eV (FPC) ID = 111388 E-IXF-EA-14.008 037/12:37 Normalization at 182 eV (FPC) ID = 111389 E-IXF-EA-14.009 037/12:44 Normalization at 163 eV (FPC) ID = 111390 E-IXF-EA-14.010 037/12:50 Normalization at 153 eV (FPC) ID = 111391 E-IXF-EA-14.011 037/13:02 Normalization at 144 eV (FPC) ID = 111392 E-IXF-EA-14.012 037/13:07 Normalization at 124 eV (FPC) ID = 111393 E-IXH-EA-14.015 037/13:20 LETG at 124 eV (1'st order) ID = 111394 !!! Image is about 1 mm wide, as expected. Other errors should allow us to use the 2 mm aperture for the following runs, as originally planned. 02/06/97/A Steve O'Dell E-IXF-EA-14.006 037/19:20 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.124 keV. ID = 111395 Notes: 1 Obtain a very long BG for FPCX2 to use with FPC collects in EA-14 series. 2 Re-do remaining EA-14 HIREFS scans which were done incorrectly. a E-LXS-EA-34.023a All LEG HIREFS(SA) @ {14,15} Ang. b E-LXS-EA-34.018a All LEG HIREFS(SX) @ {9,10,11} Ang. 3 Add simultaneous HSI image and FPCX2 BG. a Get details from Kathy F and Jeff K. 4 Remember to reset FOAs (global) for the HIREFS to EIPS change. a X_eips - X_hirefs = +59 um. (X_eips is closer to HRMA than is X_hirefs.) 02/06/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! Stop after 3 iterations because count rate is higher than expected and a more accurate measure of the background is critical. !!! Do BG parasitically with a new measurement (to be input shortly - see E-LXH-EA-36.001 below) that takes an HSI image in parallel. This was done in consultation with Kathy F and Theo G. E-IXF-EA-14.014 038/00:24 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.248 keV. ID = 111396 E-IXF-EA-14.005 038/00:58 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.124 keV. ID = 111397 E-IXF-EA-14.004 038/03:53 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.153 keV. ID = 111398 02/06/97C Leon Van Speybroeck E-IXF-EA-14.003 038/06:11 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.163 keV. ID = 111399 E-IXF-EA-14.002 038/08:06 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.182 keV. ID = 111400 E-IXF-EA-14.001 038/09:26 All LEG HIREFS(SB) @ 0.207 keV. ID = 111401 !!! Add following measurements, in consultation with Theo G and Kathy F. These do the following: a The 35 series allows grating team to see what was within the aperture during the 34 series. b Next measurement (36.001) makes up for and adds to data for E-IXF-EA-14.006 above. We are taking an HSI image of the line AND - more important - collecting needed background data. c The 37 series makes up for missing data from the 34 series. The problem with the 34 series was in the CMDB. It gave NUMBER of points in wavelength scan rather than WAVELENGTH STEP. !!! Be sure FPCx-2 is also ON with the detector set for 0.125 keV and the 3 um pinhole in front while the HSI image is being collected. E-LXH-EA-36.001 038/10:25 LETG HIGREFS(SB) 0.207 keV, 1'st order, HSI ID = 111402 E-HXH-EA-35.001 038/11:54 MEG HIGREFS(SX) 1.378 keV, 1'st order (HSI) ID = 111412 E-HXH-EA-35.002 038/12:18 MEG HIGREFS(SX) 1.240 keV, 1'st order (HSI) ID = 111413 E-HXH-EA-35.003 038/12:32 MEG HIGREFS(SX) 1.127 keV, 1'st order (HSI) ID = 111414 E-HXH-EA-35.004 038/12:47 MEG HIGREFS(SA) 0.886 keV, 1'st order (HSI) ID = 111416 E-HXH-EA-35.005 038/13:01 MEG HIGREFS(SA) 0.827 keV, 1'st order (HSI) ID = 111417 E-LXS-EA-37.003 038/13:17 LETG HIGREFS(SA) 0.827 keV, zero order (SSD) ID =111418 E-LXS-EA-37.002 038/13:34 LETG HIGREFS(SX) 1.127 keV, zero order (SSD) ID =111419 E-LXS-EA-37.001 038/13:49 LETG HIGREFS(SX) 1.240 keV, zero order (SSD) ID=111420 !!! Updated FOA for HIREFS TO EIPS focus shift E-IXF-BG-1.018A 038/13:59 Background, Aluminum ID = 111430 02/07/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak E-BND-BU-2.035A 038/ Beam uniformity, Aluminum (DELETE) !!! Shutter Focus MP3: Use Podgorski field sizes E-IXF-P2-67.001 Y:-307116.6 Z:10613.0 Shell 3T; 038/15:19 ID =111451 E-IXF-P2-67.002 Y:-307110.2 Z:10634.0 Shell 3N; 038/16:24 ID =111452 E-IXF-P2-67.003 Y:-307112.3 Z:10644.1 Shell 3B; 038/16:53 ID =111453 E-IXF-P2-67.004 Y:-307130.8 Z:10629.9 Shell 3S; 038/17:30 ID =111454 !!! Add 1 more column Y:-307134.2 Z:10629.1 Shell 3S; ID =111457 !!! Focus shift says move X based on Y:-282, based on Z:-365.16, Ave:-323; redefined focus. !!! Shutter Focus MP4: Use Podgorski field sizes E-IXF-P2-67.006 Y:-307114.7 Z:10629.4 Shell 4T; 038/18:28 ID =111458 E-IXF-P2-67.007 Y:-307119.1 Z:10630.6 Shell 4N; 038/19:18 ID =111459 E-IXF-P2-67.008 Y:-307119.6 Z:10630.1 Shell 4B; 038/19:48 ID =111460 E-IXF-P2-67.009 Y:-307119.8 Z:10634.4 Shell 4S; 038/20:19 ID = !!! Focus shift says move X based on Y:-9.64 based on Z:-8.23, Ave:-8.94; did not change focus. !!! Shutter Focus MP6: Use Podgorski field sizes E-IXF-P2-67.011 Y:-307109.5 Z:10600.1 Shell 6T; 038/20:50 ID =111462 E-IXF-P2-67.012 Y:-307136.6 Z:10626.2 Shell 6N; 038/21:37 ID =111463 02/07/97/B Harvey Tananbaum !!! Operator team adding 1-D extra lines in order to cover fully each quadrant of each shell, because plots show the need. E-IXF-P2-67.013 Y:-307113.4 Z:10599.3 Shell 6B; 038/22:44 ID =111466 E-IXF-P2-67.014 Y:-307131.9 Z:10628.1 Shell 6S; 038/23:30 ID =111467 !!! Focus shift says move X based on Y:85.09, based on Z:13.61, Ave:49.35; have not updated FOA; will decide after S1 completed. !!! Shutter Focus MP1: Use Podgorski field sizes E-IXF-P2-67.016 Y:-307110.6 Z:10624.5 Shell 1T; 039/00:32 ID =111470 E-IXF-P2-67.017 Y:-307102.3 Z:10630.9 Shell 1N; 039/01:24 ID =111471 E-IXF-P2-67.018 Y:-307109.3 Z:10622.1 Shell 1B; 039/02:34 ID =111474 E-IXF-P2-67.019 Y:-307115.0 Z:10633.5 Shell 1S; 039/03:17 ID =111475 !!! Focus shift says move X based on Y:-120.63, based on Z:22.61, Ave:-49.01 !!! Do next set earlier than planned in order to have best focus as just determined, before any further pitch/yaw motions etc. !!! Start with shells 3 and 4 below and ask LVS about pros and cons of focus adjust/update for shells 1 and 6. E-IXF-P2-1.002 19x19 with 10u aperture S3 All 039/04:11 ID =111476,7 ### System hung for ~16min after run 69 of 361. !!! Brad W restarted it; but need to check regularly, even for 4 hr tests. 02/07/07C Leon Van Speybroeck E-IXF-P2-1.003 19x19 with 10u aperture S4 All 039/07:45 ID = 111479 !!! Inspected coverage of current and previous shutter focus tests; decided that the current set has better coverage in MP1 and MP6, and also are more "on-axis"; therefore updated FOA tables (in primeX) for MP1 and MP6. !!! The 323 um shift (MP3) is larger than previous experience of stability, and may indicate that the EKC X-actuator position has changed between the two sets of focus measurements. E-IXF-P2-1.001 19x19 with 10u aperture S1 All 039/11:04 ID = 111481 !!! Updated FOA tables for MP4 (added 9 um) !!! Updated FOA tables for composites (all, 13, 46, leg, meg, heg) using C-K effective-area weighting. E-IXF-P2-1.004 19x19 with 10u aperture S6 All 039/14:22 ID = 111483 and 111485 ### PC problem occurred in the middle, so 2 run IDs. !!! Summary of beam center data taken foor runs E-IXF-P2-1.001,4 Shell primeY pcaZ 1 -307107 34507 3 -307107 34512 4 -307107 34509 6 -307105 34501 Ave. -307107 34508 (area weighted) FOA -307109 34518 (10 um pinhole equivalent) !!! This indicates a change of +2 um in Y, -10 um in Z. Because the mirror is moved in Z every time a pitch is done, and there well may be repeatability problems of this magnitude, it does not seem worth it to update the transverse FOA entries. 02/08/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak E-HXH-FC-28.002 039/18:25 Focus check S3,scan E-HXH-FC-28.005 039/19:01 Focus check S4,scan E-HXH-FC-28.006 039/19:28 Focus check S6,scan E-HXF-EE-3.007 039/20:00 HEG,0 ID = 111502, 111504, 111505 E-HXF-EE-3.014 039/20:37 HEG,-2 ID = 111507, 111509, 111510 E-HXF-EE-3.015 039/21:21 HEG,+2 ID = 111512, 111514, 111515 E-HXF-EE-3.012 039/22:04 MEG,-3 ID = 111517, 111519, 111520 02/08/97/B Harvey Tananbaum E-HXF-EE-3.013 039/22:36 MEG,+3 ID = 111522, 111524, 111526 ### Redo 3rd collect 100s with 500u aperture due to possible computer problem. Last runID 111526 E-LXF-EE-3.010 039/23:16 LETG,-9 ID = 111528, 111530, 111531 E-LXF-EE-3.011 039/23:57 LETG,+9 ID = 111533, 111536, 111537 E-LXF-EE-3.001 040/00:38 LETG,0 ID = 111539, 111541, 111542 &&& At this point, IPI reps compare beamcen locations for y and z for zero order for HEG (4,6 shells) determined with 20u aperture in this series and that in FOA table. !!! Change in z of -40ea, so will apply this for all subsequent runs (since LETG 0 order gave same result for 20u aperture beamcenter) and then will drop smaller apertures and beamcens - only collect with 500u aperture (including the requested position for a given order, the z-update, and the swap-ap from 20u to 500u). &&& Some of time gained (by dropping beamcens) given back during manual execution of procedure. For next test, checked procedure by demonstrating that flux was ~constant as we moved the 500u aperture +/- 100u in each direction, and that flux fell significantly when we moved off by 300u. E-LXF-EE-3.002 040/01:08 LETG,+1 ID = 111543 !!! Reduce source I from ~1.4mA to ~0.8mA to keep focal-plane counting rate less than 10,000c/s, because we have been running between 50% and 100% higher than projected count rates for much of this series of tests. E-LXF-EE-3.003 040/01:52 LETG,-1 ID = 111544 !!! Count rate in these 2 first order tests was ~4800c/s, so it would not have been too high if the current had been left unchanged. For next tests return current to 1.4mA. E-HXF-EE-3.004 040/02:04 MEG,0 ID = 111545 E-HXF-EE-3.005 040/02:16 MEG,+1 ID = 111546 E-HXF-EE-3.006 040/02:27 MEG,-1 ID = 111547 E-HXF-EE-3.008 040/02:38 HEG,+1 ID = 111548 E-HXF-EE-3.009 040/02:48 HEG,-1 ID = 111549 E-IXS-3D-26.009 040/02:58 MEG grating out. ID = 111554 !!! Use 500u aperture and SSD_x for next set of OTG measuremnts (2000u aperture for final test). !!! At start of first test, check edge of 500u aperture in all 4 directions to assure it is centered or to determine necessary shifts to apply to set of tests. !!! Set up test with 11 points in 20u steps, centered on nominal estimate of one edge and work from there. Find hsiz=-3430, and primey=431600 (change from FOA values of -64u in hsiz and -45u in primey) E-IXS-3D-26.010 040/04:22 HEG grating out ID = 111555 E-HXS-3D-26.012 040/04:37 HEG 0;+/-1;+/-2 ID = 111556 E-HXS-3D-26.011 040/05:03 MEG 0;+/-1;+/-2;+/-3;+/-4 ID = 111557 E-LXS-3D-26.013 040/05:37 LETG 0;+/-1;+/-3 ID = 111558 02/08/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck E-LXS-3D-26.014 040/ +/-2;+/-3;+/-4;+/-5;+/-6;+/-7; ID = 111559 E-LXS-3D-26.015 040/06:47 LETG +/-7->14 ID = 111560 ### Part of data useless because it hit the primey stage limit. E-LXS-3D-26.016 040/08:04 LETG +/-15->25 ID = 111562 ### Cannot do first half of measurement because of stage limit; will restart with second half (took 5 useless points). Restarted at 040/08:39. &&& Checked auto-collimator (TRW); right on axis. E-IXF-EE-7.009 040/09:24 Encircled energy/ends p:-3.56' y:0.00 S1B 20 um primeY pcaZ Initial Final 20 -307109 11752 ### Beam center was on a secondary feature, so will repeat 20 um aperture at the end of the sequence. Initial 30 Final 30 -307085 11758 ### Also error with 20 mm pinhole; reran it. Dropped 15, 10 um apertures E-IXF-EE-7.010 040/11:52 Encircled energy/ends p:-2.87' y:0.00 S3B !!! Dropped 10 um pinhole. !!! Modified remaining EE proceedures to limit beam centers to 1 cycle for pinholes of 50 um and larger. ### The beam centers for large pinholes do not converge, essentially because of shape requirements, and more iterations don't help. !!! Do Manual beam center if bad answers are obtained. 02/09/97/A Martin C. Weisskopf <<< Encircled energy including shell ends E-IXF-EE-7.011 040/14:06 p:-2.53' y:0.00 S4B ID = E-IXF-EE-7.012 040/16:25 p:-1.88' y:0.00 S6B ID = ### May have locked on the wrong peak! Will redo the 20-50 um as 7.012a at end of test set. Possibility raised by results from next test - S6B. E-IXF-EE-7.004 040/18:36 p: 1.88' y:0.00 S6T 02/09/97/B Harvey Tananbaum <<< Encircled energy including shell ends E-IXF-EE-7.003 040/21:27 p: 2.53' y:0.00 S4T ### Same problem as in S6T. Count rate for smaller apertures as much as 2x lower than expected compared to large-aperture count rates and compared to S4B. ### Local survey with 15u aperture in 10u steps over most of abutting region fails to find a higher count rate. !!! Proceed to next test and ponder possibilities. !!! Check count rate in 20u beamcenter and collect vs that found for S3B. E-IXF-EE-7.002 041/00:51 p: 2.87' y:0.00 S3T ### Beamcen for 20u aperture did not coverge in 3 iterations, but both y and z showed well-defined maxima. !!! Collect at this location. ### Rate at peak is only ~1/2 that found for 20u aperture on S3B previously. So abort this test due to lack of confidence in results for smaller apertures. !!! Do a swap-ap to 35mm aperture and do a collect for it to establish total count rate and effective area for this test. E-IXF-EE-7.001 041/01:31 p: 3.56' y:0.00 S1T ID =111729 &&& Beamcen converges in y and z. Count rate at peak is ~3/4 that found for S1B. ### Scan for best y value is quite "ratty", so keep best z fixed and do a 11 step scan (in 10u steps) about current best y value. &&& Change of 2 or 3u at most. So use value now seen as best centroid and perform collect. !!! Since peak is well-defined and smooth in y and z, decide to proceed with test although count rate is ~75-80% of that found in S1B. E-IXH-PI-50.001 041/03:58 p:0.00 y=-20.0' S6,ALL E-IXH-PI-50.002 041/04:27 p:0.00 y=-20.0' S4,ALL E-IXH-PI-50.003 041/04:38 p:0.00 y=-20.0' S3,ALL E-IXH-PI-50.004 041/04:50 p:0.00 y=-20.0' S1,ALL E-IXH-PI-51.001 041/04:57 p:-10.61' y=10.61' S6,ALL E-IXH-PI-51.002 041/05:15 p:-10.61' y=10.61' S4,ALL E-IXH-PI-51.003 041/05:23 p:-10.61' y=10.61' S3,ALL E-IXH-PI-51.004 041/05:34 p:-10.61' y=10.61' S1,ALL E-IXH-PI-52.001 041/05:41 p:17.68' y=17.68' S6,ALL ### EK reports that pitch actuator could not reach 17.68 arcmin ### We realized in the middle of this sequence that pitch is positive (used to be negative until today's CMDB - may be a valid change request or an error. &&& LVS decides data at another azimuth might be useful, so proceed as present version requests.) Actual pitch = 16.42'. E-IXH-PI-52.002 041/06:14 p:17.68' y=17.68' S4,ALL E-IXH-PI-52.003 041/06:24 p:17.68' y=17.68' S3,ALL E-IXH-PI-52.004 041/06:32 p:17.68' y=17.68' S1,ALL !!! From later discussion with Dan P; Terry G had submitted a CMDB change order, so we did accomplish his intention. 02/09/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck ### Checked count rates for each quadrant and each shell from SF tests (67 **); determined that top to bottom can differ by observed amounts for 20u (and other smaller) apertures for shells 1, 3, and 4. Shell 6 differences are about 10% in SF and we have nearly a factor of 3 in test 7.012. !!! Redo smaller apertures under assumption that we had found a secondary peak in this case and not true peak. !!! Do 7.012a and 7.002a to fix problems in first case and data deferred in second case. For 7.012a will re-beamcen the 20u aperture by using result from 7.012 offset -40 in z and -20 in y (based on offset of secondary peak from primary in SF test for S6,B. Then will do single iteration beamcens from 30u to 150u followed by collects. Also repeat the 35mm aperture. !!! For 7.002a, start with beamcen position found for 20u aperture (may redo beamcen and collect for 20u or just begin with 30u), and will do test as originally intended. E-IXF-EE-7.012a 041/06:42 p:-1.88' y=0.00' S6,B ### Initial attempts to find "primary peak" around 900c/s are challenging. Eventually abandon test - unable to find ~900 c/s peak. E-IXF-EE-7.002a 041/07:38 p: 2.87' y=0.00' S3,T ### Network problem; test interrupted. Cannot communicate with TRW, EKC, or BND_H, or the printer. !!! Continue, using the fpc_5 and ssd_5 monitors for normalization. ### However, it is necessary to edit needed configuration files, so lose some time. !!! Beam center at y = -307084, z = 9690 !!! Skip to RF and ssd mapping tests, to get better idea of time line and to avoid SSD warming before acquiring SSD data. E-IXH-RF-18.001 041/10:04 Ring focus test at -60.0 mm defocus, all shells ### Quadrant 3N did not open on first iteration; repeated close & open commands, which was successful; restarted test. &&& Auto-collimation data: +7 arcsec in pitch, +12 arcsec in yaw &&& Network is fixed thanks Ken W, Nick M), but had to logout, reboot. E-IXH-RF-18.002 041/11:02 Ring focus at -9.7 mm defocus (mesh), all shells. ### No data collection, presumably a because of network problems and subsequent reboots. D ### Did "destroy hsiserv". !!! Stopped run after 1000 s because statistics seem adequate. E-IXH-RF-1.007 041/11:35 Ring focus test at +65.2 mm defocus, all shells E-IXS-P2-31.001 041/12:12 SSD scan, with detector at focus. &&& First centered the detector on the 2 mm pinhole. &&& Current expected end of E phase is about 8:00 AM Tuesday. !!! Drop Cr BU test and 10 mm wing scans for Al, shells 3,4,6. &&& Assume chromium beam uniformity test can be performed later. 02/10/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Wing scans at Al E-IXF-PW-1.073 041/13:58 S1B, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.074 041/14:22 S1B, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.075 041/14:39 S1B, 10 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.076 041/14:56 S1B, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.077 041/15:14 S3B, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.078 041/15:32 S3B, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.079 Skipped. S3B, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.080 041/15:49 S3B, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.081 041/16:06 S4B, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.082 041/16:23 S4B, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.083 Skipped. S4B, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.084 041/16:40 S4B, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.085 041/16:59 S6B, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.086 041/17:17 S6B, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.087 Skipped. S6B, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.088 041/17:35 S6B, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.013 041/17:53 S6T, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.014 041/18:18 S6T, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.015 Skipped. S6T, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.016 041/18:35 S6T, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.009 041/18:53 S4T, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.010 041/19:10 S4T, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.011 Skipped. S4T, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.012 041/19:27 S4T, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.005 041/19:44 S3T, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.006 041/20:02 S3T, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.007 Skipped. S3T, 10 mm Aperture (**) E-IXF-PW-1.008 041/20:19 S3T, 20 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.001 041/20:37 S1T, 1 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.002 041/20:55 S1T, 4 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.003 041/21:12 S1T, 10 mm Aperture E-IXF-PW-1.004 041/21:30 S1T, 20 mm Aperture 02/10/97/B Harvey Tananbaum !!! If shutters start to stick these should be reordered. E-IXF-AL-2.003 041/21:50 s1,pitch=-20 E-IXF-AL-2.024 041/22:06 s3,pitch=-20 E-IXF-AL-2.029 041/22:12 s4,pitch=-20 E-IXF-AL-2.050 041/22:15 s6,pitch=-20 E-IXF-AL-2.004 041/22:19 s1,pitch=-15 E-IXF-AL-2.023 041/22:24 s3,pitch=-15 E-IXF-AL-2.030 041/22:27 s4,pitch=-15 E-IXF-AL-2.049 041/22:30 s6,pitch=-15 E-IXF-AL-2.005 041/22:34 s1,pitch=-10 E-IXF-AL-2.022 041/22:38 s3,pitch=-10 E-IXF-AL-2.031 041/22:42 s4,pitch=-10 E-IXF-AL-2.048 041/22:44 s6,pitch=-10 E-IXF-AL-2.006 041/22:49 s1,pitch=-5 ### sao-op2 crashed during this test - need to reboot and redo the collect. ### RunID sequence out of sync with TRW and rerun of 2.006 was thought to be 2.021 by TRW. When MST went to run 2.021, TRW test # was already at 2.032. Back- tracked and fixed by creating 2.021a below. E-IXF-AL-2.032 041/23:02 s4,pitch=-5 RUNID 111853 E-IXF-AL-2.021a 041/23:18 s3,pitch=-5 RUNID 111854 E-IXF-AL-2.047 041/23:23 s6,pitch=-5 E-IXF-AL-2.008 041/23:26 s1,pitch=+5 E-IXF-AL-2.019 041/23:31 s3,pitch=+5 E-IXF-AL-2.034 041/23:35 s4,pitch=+5 RUNID 111858 E-IXF-AL-2.045 041/23:38 s6,pitch=+5 E-IXF-AL-2.009 041/23:41 s1,pitch=+10 E-IXF-AL-2.018 041/23:46 s3,pitch=+10 E-IXF-AL-2.035 041/23:50 s4,pitch=+10 E-IXF-AL-2.044 041/23:53 s6,pitch=+10 E-IXF-AL-2.010 041/23:56 s1,pitch=+15 E-IXF-AL-2.017 042/00:01 s3,pitch=+15 E-IXF-AL-2.036 042/00:04 s4,pitch=+15 E-IXF-AL-2.043 042/00:07 s6,pitch=+15 <<< Change to EIPS(Cr), Cr K-a at 5.41 keV. E-IXF-BG--1.012 042/00:11 !!! Don't run SSD_x since last cryogen fill more than 24hrs ago. !!! At end of bkgd test, reboot all PCs to fix some errors in reading FPC-X2 Io set value. E-BND-BU-2.023 042/01:03 E-IXF-EE-4.004 042/01:23 Encircled Energy p:0.0 y:0.0 All,All ### Shutter S3N fails to open on two commands. Ask EK to operate manually. Succeeds. &&& Count rate does not increase after S3N indicated open, implying that it was just about fully open when the indeterminate state was encountered. !!! First aperture (20u) used 4 beamcens to make sure that it had converged. !!! All subsequent beamcens kept to 1 cycle. Did 15u aperture at end and skipped 10u. &&& Test completed in 2h 13m (Mark may have topped Sarah's best time for a real EE - very close in any case.) E-IXF-PW-4.001 042/03:36 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 1mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.002 042/04:13 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 4mm aperture ### This is a Super Measurement set, so no flux checks are needed between tests. ### MST-TRW snafu got next test called up before this test was done. !!! Execute next test; then come back and do 4.002a E-IXF-PW-4.003 042/04:17 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 10mm aperture RUNID 111908 E-IXF-PW-4.002a 042/04:49 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 4mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.004 042/05:18 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 20mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.005 042/05:47 p:0.0 y:-2.87' S3,S 35mm aperture 02/10/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck E-IXF-PW-4.006 042/06:16 p:0.0 y:-2.53' S4,S 1mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.007 042/06:55 p:0.0 y:-2.53' S4,S 4mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.008 042/07:23 p:0.0 y:-2.53' S4,S 10mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.009 042/07:52 p:0.0 y:-2.53' S4,S 20mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.010 042/08:20 p:0.0 y:-2.53' S4,S 35mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.011 042/08:49 p:0.0 y:-1.88' S6,S 1mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.012 042/09:18 p:0.0 y:-1.88' S6,S 4mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.013 042/09:46 p:0.0 y:-1.88' S6,S 10mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.014 042/10:15 p:0.0 y:-1.88' S6,S 20mm aperture E-IXF-PW-4.015 042/10:42 p:0.0 y:-1.88' S6,S 35mm aperture &&& Moved HRMA to On axis, read auto-collimator: Elevation: +5 arcsec Azimuth: 0 arcsec !!! DONE with PHASE 1! (except for some thinking) !!! Suggest ACIS-2C test; images, shell 6, quadrant by quadrant (or at least bottom one), "On axis" and at 1.88 arcmin off axis. *************************** END CMDB E SERIES *************************** ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB F SERIES *************************** 2/19/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak &&& 12:00 CST Trying to get things rolling: ### There are some HXDS procedure problems. ### The ssd5 is warm. !!! Try to start by 2PM after TRW staff meeting scheduled for 1PM. F-BND-BU-1.001 050/20:27 TAP 0.95 keV ID = 112149 F-BND-BU-1.024 050/21:51 ID = 112150 ### Stalled at last point; retook data at this point: ID = 112151 !!! Discussed stalling with J. Moran. Agreed to drop z-axis motor speed (which will avoid stalling). 02/19/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-BND-BU-1.002 050/22:29 ID = 112152 ### Problems in coordination between DCM and the HXDS: Energy was set before detector was in monitor position. !!! Restart. F-BND-BU-1.039 050/23:51 ID = 112153 F-BND-BU-1.003 051/00:30 ID = 112154 F-BND-BU-1.004 051/01:40 ID = 112155 F-BND-BU-1.005 051/02:52 ID = 112156 ### Break after this run due to error in personnel scheduling. !!! Resume at 7:00 am. !!! May not be a problem because pump down delayed until tomorrow noon. NOTES: 1 SSD5 is clearly partially occulted! Can we do something about this? 2/20/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak F-BND-BU-1.006 051/13:58 ID = 112166 DCM(TAP, 2.080) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.006a 051/14:59 ID = 112167 DCM(TAP, 2.080) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.007 051/15:46 ID = 112168 DCM(TAP, 2.095) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.008 051/16:39 ID = 112169 DCM(TAP, 2.110) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.009 051/17:26 ID = 112170 DCM(TAP, 2.125) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.010 051/18:17 ID = 112171 DCM(TAP, 2.140) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.011 051/19:13 ID = 112172 DCM(TAP, 2.155) opt = monitor ### My conclusion is that by optimizing near lines we tend to detune to get the line center at the monitor position. This apparently leads to more beam nonuniformity and places us at the wrong energy. &&& For scans over short energy intervals we will not be able to optimize because the optimization puts us at the same energy for each point, just varying the level of detuning at each point. !!! I began to eliminate the tuning miniscan at BU-1.012 and instructed repeats of many of the tests without the miniscans to test for uniformity improvements. 02/20/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf &&& FAM problems seem to be solved but with no clear explanation. ### Perhaps the tests done without the cryo shroud resdistributed the weight? Perhaps that these actuators were rebaked at a higher temperature (after working fine in rehearsal)? Perhaps a pinched wire? Pumpdown tonight. F-BND-BU-1.012 051/19:13 ID = 112173 DCM(TAP, 2.170) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.013 051/20:51 ID = 112175 DCM(TAP, 2.185) opt = none ### ID = 112174 died, so started again. F-BND-BU-1.014 051/22:09 ID = 112176 DCM(TAP, 2.200) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.004a 051/23:01 ID = 112177 DCM(TAP, 2.050) opt = none ### Last point may be bad: TRW prematurely sent change source command. F-BND-BU-1.005a 051/23:51 ID = 112178 DCM(TAP, 2.065) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.006b 052/00:33 ID = 112179 DCM(TAP, 2.080) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.007a 052/01:15 ID = 112180 DCM(TAP, 2.095) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.008a 052/02:05 ID = 112181 DCM(TAP, 2.110) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.009a 052/02:09 ID = 112182 DCM(TAP, 2.125) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.010a 052/03:27 ID = 112183 DCM(TAP, 2.140) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.011a 052/04:19 ID = 112184 DCM(TAP, 2.155) opt = none &&& Pumpdown! NOTES: 1 Jeff analyzed some TAP maps and we examined, by eye, uniformity differences with and without miniscan. There are several tentative conclusions: a The miniscan does not "hurt" although the energy selected may be off from the one that one wants. b Some desired energies are very close to (and/or include) spectral features. I am not sure why these were selected, perhaps this is a force play because we need to scan through edge features. We do not seem to lock onto the line but I cannot see the value of the miniscans - at least for TAP. c Brad W created plots for comparing results. Please review. 02/20/97/C Steve O'Dell F-BND-BU-1.012a 052/05:11 ID = 112185 DCM(TAP, 2.170) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.013a 052/06:08 ID = 112186 DCM(TAP, 2.185) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.014a 052/06:55 ID = 112187 DCM(TAP, 2.200) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.015 052/07:40 ID = 112188 DCM(TAP, 1.865) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.016 052/08:25 ID = 112189 DCM(TAP, 1.875) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.017 052/09:08 ID = 112190 DCM(TAP, 1.885) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.018 052/10:02 ID = 112191 DCM(TAP, 1.895) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.019 052/10:46 ID = 112192 DCM(TAP, 1.905) opt = none F-BND-BU-1.006c 052/11:30 ID = 112193 DCM(TAP, 2.080) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.008b 052/12:18 ID = 112194 DCM(TAP, 2.110) opt = on-axis F-BND-BU-1.003a 052/13:31 ID = 112195 DCM(TAP, 2.185) opt = on-axis !!! Investigated effect of OBF filter on flux at SSD5 position. F-BND-BU-1.032 052/14:52 ID = 112199 DCM(Ge, 2.670) opt = on-axis NOTES: 1 EKC/ Gary Matthews said the HETG mechanism was re-initialized. a Re-initialization occurred on 036/15:49 GMT. b Difference in rotation of HETG was dtheta_Z = -3 arcmin (-0.001 rad). 2 DCM(TAP) BUs are quite nonuniform in Y direction. a Perform DCM measurements near spectral features without opt scan. b On-axis opt scan gives more uniform DCM(TAP) beam than monitor one. c Can still do opt scan at monitor position, but apply detune. d Jeff is determining detune values as function of DCM energy setting. 3 DCM(TAP) BUs indicate that beam vignettes at SSD5 position. a Removing OBF did not eliminate vignetting at SSD5 position. 02/21/97/A J.Kolodziejczak F-BND-BU-1.032a 052/15:33 ID = 112200 DCM(Ge, 2.670) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.025 052/16:10 ID = 112201 DCM(Ge, 2.070) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.026 052/16:43 ID = 112202 DCM(Ge, 2.170) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.027 052/17:28 ID = 112203 DCM(Ge, 2.270) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.028 052/18:01 ID = 112204 DCM(Ge, 2.370) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.029 052/18:33 ID = 112205 DCM(Ge, 2.470) opt = monitor F-BND-BU-1.030 052/19:14 ID = 112211 DCM(Ge, 2.500) opt = monitor NOTES: 1 Galen requested that a beam map at 3.2 kev with Ge to see the Ar edge and check energy scale. A 1D map across the foa +/- 100 mm in 10 mm steps with the 12-mm aperture is probably ok. 2 I'll make a list once the new cmdb comes down with detune/optimization parameters for each test. 3 Galen mentioned that the FPC gas tank pressure is starting to get low (1000 psi) and we should change it at our earliest convenience. I suggested we do it during the change from DCM to EIPS. It takes about 1.5 hours. Steve should let J. Crisler know this at 7 AM meeting. 4 Once we go to Al, we should center the ssd_5 pinholes. Brad W has procedures for this. I think we should be able to use 5-mm aperture. 5 Galen checked the data from the plot that showed poor repeatability without detuning and found it to be in error. In fact, repeatability was within 15% and constant across beam. 6 Recommended strategy for optimization scans/detuning follows: a Ge all i Optimize at monitor position with 36-mm aperture. ii Optimization range = +/-600 in 9 steps, 3 s each, detuning = 0. b TAP long coarse scans (0.95-2.2 keV) i Do not optimize, do not detune. c TAP fine scans (2.05-2.035 keV and 1.83-1.88 keV) i Optimize at monitor position with 36-mm aperture. ii Optimization range = +/-1600 in 9 steps, 3 s each, detuning = +1000. 02/21/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-BND-BU-1.031 052/19:46 112212 DCM(Ge, 2.570) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.033 052/20:20 112213 DCM(Ge, 2.770) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.034 052/20:57 112214 DCM(Ge, 2.870) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.035 052/21:32 112215 DCM(Ge, 2.970) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.036 052/22:04 112216 DCM(Ge, 3.000) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.037 052/22:34 112217 DCM(Ge, 3.070) opt=monitor F-BND-BU-1.038 052/23:05 112218 DCM(Ge, 3.170) opt=monitor !!! Go back to TAP to check detune amount. F-BND-BU-1.006d 052/23:37 112219 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.008c 053/00:25 112220 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.010c 053/01:11 112221 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.012c 053/01:57 112222 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.014c 053/02:42 112223 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.016c 053/03:27 112224 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.018c 053/04:12 112225 opt=monitor detune=+1000 F-BND-BU-1.050 053/04:56 112226 opt=monitor detune=+1000 &&& Looks much more uniform. Good show, Jeff! NOTE: 1 Learned that contamination covers were not closed before starting last re-press! At least some amount of "trapped air" was let into the chamber before discovering this. We must do further contamination checks! 2 Take a close look at F-BND-BU-1.050 - I am still concerned about the miniscan strategy for these runs near the Si edge and the monster line. 02/21/97/C Steve O'Dell F-I2C-BG-2.001 053/05:34 112228 FPC BGs for 2.00 keV &&& SSD5 Cm244 calibration was performed during above FPC BGs. F-I2C-BG-2.002 053/06:59 112242 FPC BGs for 5.00 keV F-BND-BU-1.045 053/08:09 112250 DCM(TAP, 1.830) opt=monitor detune=+1000 ### Beam is very nonuniform: This is too close to a W-M line. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Before following BU at 1.835 keV, conducted experiment using BNDHs: opt= monitor none none none detune= +1000 +1000 +500 0 BNDH S,T,B,N 240,50,50,5 110,160,150,25 50,270,320,30 30,210,200,30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- F-BND-BU-1.046 053/09:42 112251 DCM(TAP, 1.835) opt=none detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.045a 053/10:47 112252 DCM(TAP, 1.830) opt=none detune=0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After preceding BU at 1.830 keV, conducted experiment using BNDHs: opt= monitor none none none detune= +1000 +1000 +500 0 BNDH S,T,B,N 50,470,430,25 40,880,890,140 40,160,180,140 40,35,35,140 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ### Skip F-BND-BU-1.047,48,49 DCM(TAP, ~1.84); go to DCM(Ge). Status (~11:00 GMT): 1 ACIS-2C is having thermal-control problem. a Fed GN2 into LN2 to warm detector hopefully to clear any blockage. 2 TQCM West is running at -1/2 Hz/h, exceeding 1/4 Hz/h requirement. F-BND-BU-1.040 053/11:24 112253 DCM(Ge, 2.700) opt=monitor detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.041 053/12:19 112254 DCM(Ge, 2.725) opt=monitor detune=0 The above 2 beam maps mistakenly used the 36-mm aperture. F-BND-BU-1.042 053/12:58 112255 DCM(Ge, 2.750) opt=monitor detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.043 053/13:39 112256 DCM(Ge, 2.775) opt=monitor detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.044 053/14:14 112257 DCM(Ge, 2.800) opt=monitor detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.020 053/14:48 112258 DCM(Ge, 3.500) opt=monitor detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.047 053/15:34 112259 DCM(TAP, 1.840) opt=none detune=0 Status (~16:00 GMT): 1 ACIS-2C is ready. 2 TQCM West is still running at -1/2 Hz/h, exceeding 1/4 Hz/h requirement. Notes: 1 DCM(TAP) BUs around 1.8 keV are highly nonuniform owing to lines. a Tried opt=monitor & detune=+1000; then did opt=none & detune=0. b Optimization scan can be misleading near spectral features. 2 Gave Dan P error list to be discussed at CMDB meeting. 3 For coarse sampling of DCM(Ge), note following: a The beam is near the edge of the crystal at 9.0 keV, so may not work. 02/22/97/A J.Kolodziejczak F-BND-BU-1.048 053/16:06 112260 DCM(TAP, 1.845) opt=none detune=0 F-BND-BU-1.049 053/16:41 112261 DCM(TAP, 1.850) opt=none detune=0 &&& Ready to open contamination covers at 11:10 AM CST (17:10 GMT) !!! Allow some time to define fiducial points. !!! No Optimize , No detune on 23.001,2,3,4 F-I2C-EA-23.001 053/18:13 1.7 keV focus check. &&& +23.2 mm out of focus to start F-I2C-EA-23.002 053/aborted unnecessary 1.7 keV focus check F-I2C-EA-23.003 053/19:13 1.7 keV focus check in focus enough for ea tests F-I2C-EA-23.004 053/aborted 1.7 keV focus check ### ACIS-2C is currently unable to provide rates. F-I2C-EA-6.001 053/19:54 front-side; 0.95-2.25 no opt. no detune F-I2C-EA-6.004 053/21:02 back-side; 0.95-2.25 no opt. no detune F-I2C-EA-3.004 053/21:56 back side; 1.865-1.905 optimize +/-1600; 9 pts; 3s; +1000 detune !!! John N. thinks he will want to change the chip1 boresight location sometime in the next few days because of cosmetic defects. 02/22/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf ### Report notes for this shift were lost. (Martin added the following from memory.) ### Major confusion. The Y, Z offsets for this phase refer to the FAM, not the image. This wasn't universally understood - the convention for the HSI was to move the image. F-I2C-EA-8.001 053/22:54 front side;0 order 1.45-2.25 no opt. no detune &&& Kathy F requests do a +8mm offset for 8.001 to get another order. ### This was the wrong direction and led to the confusion referred to above. F-I2C-EA-8.001a front side; 0 order 1.45-2.25 no opt. no detune F-I2C-EA-8.004 054/00:30 !!! I inserted an "on the floor" test to straighten things out. &&& We removed the grating and took 3 images with the FAM Y offset at +4mm, 0, -4mm. Then, having sorted out the way things move, proceeded. F-I2C-EA-8.004a 054/02:12 front side;0 order 1.45-2.25 no opt. no detune ### ACIS computer chrashed during first energy. F-I2C-EA-8.004b 054/02:59 front side;0 order 1.45-2.25 no opt. no detune ### Restarted, but again the ACIS computer crashed during the first energy. F-I2C-EA-8.004c 054/04:05 front side;0 order 1.70-2.25 no opt. no detune &&& no offset here !!! Rearranged to let gratings have time to fix tests for new cosmetic defect information, specific locations weren't available until today, so they are scrambling to redesign their tests. 02/22/97/C Steve O'Dell F-I2C-EA-11.003 054/05:43 Aborted: FAM was at wrong X. F-I2C-EA-11.003a054/06:52 DCM{1.845,1.905,0.010,noopt&+750} HEG 0 A2C0 F-I2C-EA-11.007 054/07:38 DCM{1.855,1.905,0.010,noopt&+750} HEG+1 A2C0 F-I2C-EA-8.027 054/08:23 DCM{3.250,4.000,0.250,opt&0} HEG+1 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.026 054/09:47 DCM{3.250,4.000,0.250,opt&0} HEG 0 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.023 054/10:48 DCM{2.500,3.000,0.250,opt&0} HEG 0 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.028 054/12:49 DCM{3.250,4.000,0.250,opt&0} HEG-1 A2C1 02/23/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak F-I2C-EA-8.025 054/14:17 DCM{2.500,3.000,0.250,opt&0} HEG-1 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.022 054/16:51 DCM{3.250,4.000,0.250,opt&0} MEG-1 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.019 054/18:19 DCM{2.500,3.000,0.250,opt&0} MEG+1 A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.020 054/19:48 DCM{2.500,3.000,0.250,opt&0} MEG+1 A2C1 02/23/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-I2C-EA-8.021 054/21:28 DCM-Ge{3.250,4.000,0.250,opt&0} MEG+1 A2C1 ID = 112288 F-I2C-EA-8.029 054/22:54 DCM-Ge{4.500,7.500,0.250,opt&0} MEG 0 A2C1 ID = 112294 F-I2C-EA-8.030 055/00:21:37 DCM{8.000,opt&0} MEG 0 A2C1 ID = 112295 ### Galen Z reported that the mini-scan at the beginning was performed with the gate valve closed. He will do it properly after the test and report the results. &&& Galen Z did mini-scan: It was off by only 7 motor steps. 055/1:41 F-H2C-EA-8.030 completed &&& ACIS taking background and Galen doing FOA (FPC5) to check positions of W L-alpha1 and 2 lines. ID = 112296. Galen will analyze and report impact on the energy scale. F-I2C-EA-8.031 055/02:19 DCM-Ge{4.500,9.000,0.5,opt&0} HEG+1 A2C1; ID = 112297 ### This last run may be no good. ACIS team reported that bias went south. &&& They are discussing implications with Mike W and will report back. F-I2C-EA-6.003 055/03:47 ID=112298 DCM(Ge;4.500,9.000,0.500;opt&0) All A2C1 02/23/97/C Steve O'Dell F-I2C-EA-6.006 055/06:53 ID=112299 DCM(Ge;4.500,9.000,0.500;opt&0) All A2C0 F-I2C-EA-6.002 055/10:04 ID=112305 DCM(Ge;2.500,4.500,0.500;opt&0) All A2C1 F-I2C-EA-6.005 055/11:08 ID=112306 DCM(Ge;2.500,4.500,0.500;opt&0) All A2C0 ### The CMDB erroneously extended above 2 measurements to 7.0 keV. F-I2C-EA-72.001 055/12:07 ID=112307 DCM(Ge;2.750,3.750,0.500;opt&0) All A2C1 F-I2C-EA-5.001 055/12:36 ID=112308 DCM(Ge;2.070,3.170,0.100;opt&0) All A2C1 ### Aborted: A2C computer failure. F-I2C-EA-5.001a 055/13:13 ID=112309 DCM(Ge;2.070,3.170,0.100;opt&0) All A2C1 ### Aborted: A2C computer failure. F-I2C-EA-5.001b 055/13:44 ID=112310 DCM(Ge;2.070,3.170,0.100;opt&0) All A2C1 02/24/97/A JeffKolodziejczak F-I2C-EA-5.003 055/15:46 ID=112311 DCM(Ge;2.530,2.570,0.010;opt&0) All A2C1 F-I2C-EA-5.004 055/16:43 ID=112312 DCM(Ge;2.140,2.180,0.010;opt&0) All A2C1 F-I2C-EA-5.005 055/17:39 ID=112313 DCM(Ge;2.070,2.110,0.010;opt&0) All A2C1 Notes regarding DCM: 1 Optimization scans and detuning a Ge i Optimize at monitor position with 36-mm aperture. ii Optimization range = +/-600 in 9 steps, 3 s each; detuning = 0. b TAP long coarse scans (0.95-2.2 keV) i Do not optimize, do not detune. c TAP fine scans (2.05-2.35 keV) i Optimize at monitor position with 36-mm aperture. ii Optimization range = +/-1600 in 9 steps, 3 s each, detuning = +1000. d TAP fine scans (1.83-1.88 keV) i Do not optimize, detune +750 F-H2C-EA-8.033 accidentally started by TC then cancelled F-I2C-EA-3.002 055/18:33 ID=112314 DCM(TAP;1.830,1.855,0.005;noopt&750)All A2C1 ### During 4th iteration, it was noticed that the FPC_5 rate was exceeding 30,000/sec. The 12mm aperture aperture was selected at the beginning of the 5th scan point. F-H2C-EA-8.033 055/19:44 ID=112315 DCM(TAP;1.450,0,0;noopt&0) MEG +1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.034 055/20:02 ID=112316 DCM(TAP;1.450,0,0;noopt&0) MEG -1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.002 055/20:17 ID=112317 DCM(TAP;1.700,2.20,0.5;noopt&0) MEG +1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.036 055/21:00 ID=112318 DCM(TAP;1.450,0,0;noopt&0) HEG +1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.037 055/21:15 ID=112319 DCM(TAP;1.450,0,0;noopt&0) HEG -1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.003 055/21:41 ID=112320 DCM(TAP;1.700,2.20,0.5;noopt&0) MEG -1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-9.001 055/22:11 ID=112321 DCM(TAP;2.05,2.35,0.015;opt&+1000) MEG+1A2C1 F-I2C-EA-8.006 055/23:58 ID=112322 DCM(TAP;1.70,2.20,0.25;noopt&0) HEG-1 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-8.005 056/00:41 ID=112330 DCM(TAP;1.70,2.20,0.25;noopt&0) HEG+1 A2C1 ### Pressure hiccup. EKC equipment locked up. &&& Took this time to change FPC 500 gas. &&& Also took SSD5 calibration spectrum. ID = 112328 F-H2C-EA-8.024 056/03:23 ID=112331 DCM(Ge;2.5,3.0,0.25;opt&0) HEG +1 A2C1 Note for F-H2C-EA-9.002: !!! I talked to grating team about 11.001 and 11.005. The latter is not a mistake(?) but be sure the 12 mm aperture is on the FPC5. 02/24/97/C Steve O'Dell F-H2C-EA-9.002 056/05:48 ID=112332 DCM(TAP;2.05,2.35,0.015,opt+1000) HETG0 A2C1 ### Defocus setting should be changed from 23.4 to 15.5. ### Restart: Lost bias frame. F-H2C-EA-9.002a 056/06:15 ID=112333 DCM(TAP;2.05,2.35,0.015,opt+1000) HETG0 A2C1 ### Restart: ACIS-2C computer failure. &&& DCM energy points 1-10 were completed. F-H2C-EA-9.002b 056/07:34 ID=112334 DCM(TAP;2.05,2.35,0.015,opt+1000) HETG0 A2C1 !!! Pick up DCM energy points 12-21; then go back to get 10-11. F-H2C-EA-9.003 056/09:20 ID=112335 DCM(TAP;2.05,2.35,0.015,opt+1000) HEG+1 A2C1 ### FPC_HB became very noisy and tripped out. Re-set; replace A/D. ### Re-set DLRS. (Magneto-optical drive is not working) F-H2C-EA-11.001 056/12:44 ID=112341 DCM(TAP;1.830,1.840,0.005,no+750) HEG 0 A2C1 ### XSS mistakenly used miniscan, which did not converge at last point. !!! Repeat after next; energy scale may be off 4 eV. F-H2C-EA-11.003 056/13:22 ID=112342 DCM(TAP;1.830,1.850,0.005,no+750) HEG 0 A2C1 F-H2C-EA-11.001a056/13:51 ID=112343 DCM(TAP;1.830,1.845,0.005,no+750) HEG 0 A2C1 Notes: 1 RC set-up and measurement of FCM radiation sources with A2C0 in S3 pos. a FAM positioned A2C0 to flight S3 Y&Z aim point but finite conjugate. i Positioning was excellent, based on image location in A2C coordinates. ii However, flight ACIS-S aim point is on ACIS CCD pre-amp boundary! b FAM positioned A2C0 to flight S3 Y&Z aim point for infinite conjugate. i Positioning was excellent, based on ring sizes in A2C coordinates. ii Jeff suggests using this configuration C-cont MC measurements. c Closed FCC to measure FCM radiation sources. i Image is very flat with slight gradient qualitatively as expected. ii Count rate is approximately 30 Hz total. iii Spectrum shows Mn-Ka, Ag-L, Mn-Kb, Au-M. 02/25/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! Set up position boresights w/ DCM before the RC test F-I2C-RC-72.001 056/14:56 ID=112355-6 ### Ran 3000 s, then rebooted the ACIS computers. &&& Ran only 1200 s of fpc bg before the source was ready then started BU. F-BND-BU-71.001 056/16:01 ID=112357 F-I2C-SF-1.004 056/16:53 ID=112358-69 First Iteration: MIT Numbers T y 15.397,z 1.354 N y 15.414,z 1.380 B y 15.401,z 1.379 S y 15.385,z 1.4074 dy=-350 um; dz=-302 um; dy&z=-326 um; moved +326 um PSU Numbers T y 15.4008,z 1.386 N y 15.4104,z 1.408 B y 15.4056,z 1.4074 S y 15.384 ,z 1.4074 dy=-318 um; dz=-258 um; dy&z=-288 um; Second Iteration: MIT Numbers T y 15.392,z 1.341 N y 15.377,z 1.335 B y 15.390,z 1.336 S y 15.390,z 1.370 dy=157 um; dz=60 um; dy&z=109 um; moved -109 um PSU Numbers T y 15.398,z 1.370 N y 15.384,z 1.363 B y 15.394,z 1.369 S y 15.389 ,z 1.396 dy=60 um; dz=12 um; dy&z=36 um; &&& PSU numbers were iteratively centroided around a progressively smaller region and seem consistent to 10 um in focal length. EXCELLENT! F-I2C-SF-1.002 Skip: Not necessary F-I2C-SF-1.003 056/18:27 ID=112378-112381 First Iteration: MIT Numbers T y 14.191,z 1.513 N y 14.209,z 1.544 B y 14.194,z 1.555 S y 14.165,z 1.543 dy=-531 um; dz=-507 um; dy&z=-519 um PSU Numbers T y 14.191,z 1.545 N y 14.206,z 1.572 B y 14.194,z 1.576 S y 14.169,z 1.569 dy=-446 um; dz=-374 um; dy&z=-410 um; moved 410 um Second Iteration: MIT Numbers T y 14.191,z 1.515 N y 14.189,z 1.514 B y 14.190,z 1.488 S y 14.185,z 1.491 dy=-116 um; dz=275 um; dy&z=80 um; moved -80 um PSU Numbers T y 14.194,z 1.541 N y 14.189,z 1.538 B y 14.189,z 1.518 S y 14.179,z 1.525 dy=-48 um; dz=326 um; dy&z=139 um; Third Iteration: MIT Numbers T y 14.186,z 1.517 N y 14.189,z 1.540 B y 14.190,z 1.516 S y 14.187,z 1.541 dy=-24 um; dz=12 um; dy&z=-6 um PSU Numbers T y 14.194,z 1.541 N y 14.189,z 1.538 B y 14.189,z 1.518 S y 14.179,z 1.525 dy=-116 um; dz=275 um; dy&z=80 um; F-I2C-SF-1.001 Skip. !!! Focus Check using shell 4 only. These measure the focus at the aim point and the four "corners" - (allowing for the cosmetic defects in C1). 02/25/95/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-I2C-SF-3.001 056/20:15 ID=112382-112385 !!! Because these tests were done with shell 4, we have a measurement of the difference between the HRMA as a whole focal length and shell 4. &&& The PSU software answer is -381 um (wrt ensemble). In Phase 1 we measured -388! F-I2C-SF-3.003 056/20:43 IDs=112386-112389 F-I2C-SF-3.005 056/21:15 IDs=112390-112393 F-I2C-SF-3.004 056/21:48 IDs=112394-112397 F-I2C-SF-3.002 056/22:12 IDs=112399-112402 !!! Update boresight tables for the C1 chip based on an average of on-axis boresights obtained by MIT and PSU for C1. C0: x:-84.827;y= 19.137;z= -8.962 C1: x=-84.735;y=-42.384;z=-14.936 ### MIT algorithm has a "clipping" error and is thus less trustworthy. F-I2C-SF-3.006 056/22:52 ID=112403-6 F-I2C-SF-3.007 056/23:20 ID=112407-10 F-I2C-SF-3.010 056/23:57 ID=112411-14 F-I2C-SF-3.008 057/01:03 ID=112415-18 (T,N,B,S) ### Anne J smelled "smoke" in the source building. &&& Fire engines etc., but looks like no real problem. F-I2C-SF-3.009 057/01:48 ID=112419(T); 112420(B); ii2421(S) (No N) Focus Plates: F-I2C-dF-2.014 057/02:17 ID=112421 A2C0(0.114) df=-1.00 F-I2C-dF-2.013 057/03:26 ID=112423 A2C0(0.114) df=-0.50 F-I2C-dF-2.012 057/04:26 ID=112424 A2C0(0.114) df=-0.25 F-I2C-dF-2.011 057/05:30 ID=112425 A2C0(0.114) df= 0.00 NOTES 1 At 3:30 meeting, several of us commented on the string of images obtained in F-H2C-EA-9.003. The waviness is a puzzle! This needs investigating! Thus, I instructed the ACIS team to take data in 100-frame intervals, calculate centroids, monitor the temperature and plot - all during the focus plates dF-2 series. The problem with 9.003 may be complex --- i.e., Z drift of the Facility coupled with spatial non-uniformity of the 2C!? !!! Steve, get the plot. If this tests vindicates the Facility and the Chip(s), we may want to insert a spatial linearity test. 2 The x-ray tilt measurements are not as accurate as the optical alignment measurements --- the latter good to better than 3' in each axis --- and thus somewhat meaningless. 3 I instructed TRW to lower currents for all EIPS(Al) runs by a factor of 2. This gives good agreement with observed flux. 02/25/97/C Steve O'Dell F-I2C-dF-2.010 057/06:40 ID=112426 A2C0(0.114) df=-0.25 F-I2C-dF-2.009 057/07:53 ID=112427 A2C0(0.114) df=-0.50 F-I2C-dF-2.008 057/08:54 ID=112428 A2C0(0.114) df=-1.00 F-I2C-dF-2.005 057/09:59 Abort: Modified CMDB set-up is not achievable. ### Why increase voltage and lower current? (below 0.1-mA minimum) F-I2C-PI-2.001 057/10:10 ID=112429 A2C0(0.660) df= 0.00 F-I2C-PI-1.001 057/10:41 ID=112430 A2C1(0.660) df= 0.00 F-I2C-PI-5.001 057/10:55 ID=112431 A2C1(6.000) df=90.00 <<< Count-rate senstivity measurements (CRs): F-I2C-CR-1.001 057/11:40 ID=112432 A2C0(0.114) F-I2C-CR-1.002 057/12:54 ID=112433 A2C0(0.228) F-I2C-CR-1.003 057/13:45 ID=112434 A2C0(0.319) F-I2C-CR-1.004 057/14:35 ID=112435 A2C0(0.660) 02/26/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak / Robert Austin F-I2C-CR-1.006 057/15:27 ID=112436 A2C0(0.114) Very strange count rate versus time. F-I2C-CR-1.007 057/15:59 ID=112437 A2C0(0.114) F-I2C-CR-1.005 057/16:16 ID=112438 A2C0(0.114) F-I2C-CR-1.015 057/18:31 ID=112439 A2C0(0.114) ### ACIS-2C started warming @ 20:37. -90 C @ 20:47. Measurement was aborted at 20:53. ### There was probably some water in the LN2 line that froze. The lines will have to warmed above freezing to remove the moisture. It looks like we will be down for awhile. 02/26/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! First hour of F-I2C-CR-1.015 is usable, so there are 18000 s remaining for the measurement. When the measurement recommences, we plan to pick up the remaining 18000 s. 057/21:06 SSD icing measurement ID=112440 F-I2C-CR-1.015a 057/22:52 ID=112441 A2C1(0.114) F-I2C-dF-2.005A 058/03:41 ID=112442 A2C1(0.114) df=+0.25 F-I2C-dF-2.004 058/04:48 ID=112443 A2C1(0.114) df= 0.00 F-I2C-dF-2.003 058/05:47 ID=112444 A2C1(0.114) df=-0.25 02/26/97/C Steve O'Dell F-I2C-CR-2.001 058/07:23 ID=112445 Aborted. !!! Deferred BI-CCD CRs until after added FI dF (below). F-I2C-dF-99.024 058/08:08 ID=112446 A2C1(0.114) df=-0.50 !!! Added df=-0.50 for FI CCD. &&& dF-2.005,4,3 indicated best focus was reached in Y direction only. "Astigmastism" is not in HRMA! F-I2C-CR-2.001a 058/09:15 ID=112447 A2C0(0.114) 1.20 mA K6 F-I2C-CR-2.002 058/10:16 ID=112448 A2C0(0.228) 1.20 mA K6 F-I2C-CR-2.003 058/11:01 ID=112449 A2C0(0.319) 1.20 mA K6 ### A2C computer crashed and was rebooted; then we contined measurement. F-I2C-CR-2.004 058/12:00 ID=112450 A2C0(0.660) 1.20 mA K6 F-I2C-CR-2.005 058/12:51 ID=112451 A2C0(0.114) 0.39 mA K6 Notes: 1 MST adjusted ACIS-2C thermal-control set point to reduce cycling. 2 Changed requested currents for CRs to give requested FP rates. a Entered values in this shift report. b Instructed TC to use these values. 3 ASC/ Hank will change CMDB source selection algorithm. a Change specific flux for Al-K to 2 times previous value. b Change default voltage from 4 times line energy to 2 times. Notes (MCW): 1 The mystery of the "9.003" drift is solved. A team effort by PSU, Ball, TRW, and yours truly determined that the culprit is the thermal control of the 2C electronics. The heaters kick on in phase with the effect, kick off, and then recycle. Asked TRW to continue to monitor and to give data to PSU. 2 Robert A needs to add a few more notes to what went on during the day. See, e.g., CR-1.006. What happened there? The PSU people didn't know either. But they needed to be warned or reassured. 3 The XSS did not use the appropriate P10 when they changed bottle for FPC500. They need to change to the proper gas. Look for the next good time (e.g., during tornado warning, etc. or next source change). 4 Please make sure these notes are seen by Robert/Jeff. 02/27/97 Robert Austin F-I2C-CR-2.006 058/15:29 ID=112452 A2C0(0.114) 0.44 mA K4 F-I2C-CR-2.007 058/15:53 ID=112453 A2C0(0.114) 0.91 mA K4 Special msrmnt: 058/ ID=112454, 112455 See note #2, below. F-I2C-CR-2.029 058/16:46 ID=112456 A2C0(0.114) 0.12 mA K6 Notes (RAA): ----------- 1 ACIS was put on hold for about 10 minutes during F-I2C-CR-2.005 to allow Paul Okun and Jack Loose to turn up the upper set point on the Omega CN3000 PTE controller. PTE power is now on continuously and the PTE temperature has stabilized at about 65 F. This should stabilize the ACIS 2C motion. The CCL script was not suspended, however, so ACIS continued collecting for about 10 minutes after the measurement was officially ended. 2. Before beginning measurement F-I2C-CR-2.029, the dewar was swapped out. During this down time, we performed two special measurements to determine if the SSD_5 count rate scaled with aperture area when going from the 2mm to the 5mm aperture. To obtain reasonable count rates, in the SSD_5, the source flux was increased by removing all filters and cranking up the current to 2.5 mA. RunID 112454 was a 100 sec collect on the SSD_5 with the 2mm aperture (2 iterations - by accident). RunID 112455 was a 100 sec collect on the SSD_5 with the 5mm aperture. The results are summarized below: SSD_5 Ap Dia. Count Rate (/sec) 2mm 50.40 5mm 319.54 Area ratio: 5^2/2^2=25/4=6.25 Count rate ratio: 319.54/50.40=6.34+/-0.072 ### 19:50 During F-I2C-CR-2.029 (11,000 seconds into the measurement) we realized that the FPC_5 still had the 4mm aperture in place - this is what we used for the SSD_5 aperture measurement, because the flux was so high. So we moved the 36-mm aperture back in place. ### During the BNDMOVE, motor noise was picked up by SSD_5 and was apparent in the spectrum. 02/27/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! All future tests should use the 5 mm aperture on SSD5. See Robert's note above. F-I2C-CR-2.029 058/16:07 ID=112456 ### 058/23:14 measurement ended. Long delay do to script error. F-I2C-EA-2.003 059/00:01 ID = 112457 C0 OFF-AXIS IMAGES/AREA F-I2C-EA-12.036 059/00:20 ID = 112458 (pitch:-20',yaw:0') F-I2C-EA-12.035 059/00:37 ID = 112459 (-15',0') F-I2C-EA-12.034 059/00:55 ID = 112460 (-10',0') F-I2C-EA-12.033 059/01:11 ID = 112461 (-6',0') F-I2C-EA-12.032 059/01:26 ID = 112462 (-4',0') F-I2C-EA-12.031 059/01:41 ID = 112463 (-2,0') F-I2C-EA-1.003 059/01:56 ID = 112464 C1 OFF-AXIS IMAGES/AREA F-I2C-EA-13.007 059/02:15 ID = 112465 (pitch:-20',yaw:0') F-I2C-EA-13.008 059/02:28 ID = 112466 (-15',0') F-I2C-EA-13.009 059/02:41 ID = 112467 (-10',0') ### Shutter problems (4B - second incident) F-I2C-EA-13.010 059/02:54 ID = 1124668 (-6',0') ### Shutter Problem again. F-I2C-EA-13.011 059/03:06 ID = 112469 (-4',0') ### Shutter Problem again. Several passes. F-I2C-EA-13.012 059/03:17 ID = 11246 (-2,0') ### Shutter problems. !!! ACIS doing background; HXDS also. ID = 112470 !!! Stop and take a ring focus. See our file. See image - several shutters stuck half-way. &&& Finally got them open - manually. &&& Proceeding. Use gate valve as opposed to shutters for the 2C testing. As far as the HETG - I talked to Herman Marshall - If we have to (in order to proceed): 1 Skip FC tests. 2 Perform EA tests with all shutters open EXCEPT those that are HEG 0-order - skip these. F-I2C-EA-11.018 059/04:33 ID = 112472-3 (-20',0') 2C1 F-I2C-EA-11.017 059/04:59 ID = 112474 (-15',0') 2C1 F-I2C-EA-11.016 059/05:20 ID = 112475 (-10',0') 2C1 F-I2C-EA-11.015 059/05:42 ID = 112476 ( -6',0') 2C1 F-I2C-EA-11.014 059/06:11 ID = 112477 ( -4',0') 2C1 F-I2C-EA-11.013 059/06:32 ID = 112478 ( -2',0') 2C1 02/27/97C Leon Van Speybroeck F-I2C-PW-13.001 059/06:49 ID = 112479 (-2',0') 2C1 ### Found image was located on the boundary of the 18 row sample. !!! Moved FAM to center image, and will repeat test. !!! In the future, take snapshots before committing to the long runs. F-I2C-PW-13.002 059/07:51 ID = 112480 (-4',0') 2C1 !!! Repeat of 13.001; checked alignment of HRMA at nominal (0',0') before doing the run. Found theta_y = -1", theta_z = +13". F-I2C-PW-13.001A 059/09:13 ID = 112481(-2',0') 2C1 F-I2C-PW-13.003 059/10:28ID = 112482, 483(-6',0') 2C1 ### ACIS-2C computer crash !!! Modify next test to have a 36-row field size, with twice the integration time as in the CMDB (needed to capture the large off-axis image). ### Another ACIS-2C computer crash. ### TRW has had trouble getting DLRS data, so there may be a network problem, although it seems to be working now. ### There also is lightning in the area. F-I2C-PW-13.004 059/11:43 ID = 112487 (-10',0') 2C1 Run aborted. ### Switch to 36-row readout was not accomplished. !!! Set up for 36-row readout; take new bias data; restart with same TRW ID. 02/28/97/A Robert A. Austin F-I2C-PW-13.005 059/14:20 ID = 112488 (-15',0') 2C1 F-I2C-PW-13.006 059/15:35 ID = 112489,112490 (-20',0') 2C1 &&& Auto-collimator: HRMA set to 0,0 <<< Grating/ACIS Effective Area Measurements F-H2C-EA-7.034 059/18:23 ID = 112492 (HEG,+1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.036 059/19:03 ID = 112493 (HEG,-1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.035 059/20:43 ID = 112495 (HEG,-1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.033 059/20:20 ID = 112494 (HEG,+1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.025 059/21:08 ID = 112496 (HEG,0) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.029 059/21:44 ID = 1124 (HEG,-1) 2C1 Notes: 1 Run 112489 (F-I2C-PW-13.006) was aborted due to ACIS computer crash. During down time, Paul Okun installed Variac to decrease power to PTE heaters. 2 17:17 ACIS chip is running cold: -131 and dropping.... Apparently, when the Variac was installed, contact wasn't made and no power was being supplied to the heaters. 3 Started F-H2C-EA-7.034 (run 112491), but had to abort - no HETG was inserted, so ACIS wasn't seeing any x-rays at first order. 4 Aborted run 112497 (F-H2C-EA-7.029) - had the 5 mm aperture in front of FPC_5, instead of 36mm. 02/28/97/B Harvey Tananbaum F-H2C-EA-7.027 059/22:07 ID = 1124xx (HEG,+1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.026 059/22:29 ID = 1124xx (HEG,0) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.030 059/22:59 ID = 1124xx (HEG,-1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-7.028 059/23:17 ID = 1124xx (HEG,+1) 2C1 F-H2C-EA-1.002 059/23:40 ID = 1125xx (HEG,+1) p:0.0, y:-3.0' 2C1 ### 060/00:00 Before next test, attach new readout wire for ACIS temperature monitoring - will get temperature once per 5 sec for chip. &&& Will do PTE 3/1/97. F-H2C-EA-1.003 060/00:54 ID = 112505 (HEG,-1) p:0.0, y:-3.0' 2C1 F-H2C-EA-1.001 060/01:14 ID = 112506 (HEG,0 ) p:0.0, y:-3.0' 2C1 F-H2C-EA-1.005 060/01:36 ID = 112507 (HEG,+1) p:0.0, y:-3.0' 2C1 F-H2C-EA-1.006 060/02:01 ID = 112508 (HEG,-1) p:0.0, y:-3.0' 2C1 <<< Change Source to Cu K and L target. !!! Delete BKG runs and do RC test during source change. !!! Remember to close (and later open) forward contamination cover. !!! Change P-10 gas cylinder during source change. F-I2C-RC-72.002 060/02:19 ID = no runSAOID 2C0 &&& SAO runs BND Bkgd in parallel - runIDs 112517,8,9 ### Big trouble during source change. Inadvertantly nick O-ring seal and piece of rubber falls into source generator. Trying to vacuum it out. !!! Prepare HIREFS in case EIPS is unavailable for extended time. 02/28/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck &&& Auto-collimator: theta_y = +1"; theta_z = +2". !!! EIPS fixed, and entering an extended source pumpdown. ### SSD-5 found to be warm; started fill. It was found that the LN2 fill and gas pressure (gas used to pressurize the tank) lines had been reversed, which prevented proper cooling of the detector. ### Also supply is limiting at 15 volts, rather than the 485 volts expected. This caused by temperature sensing voltage cutout. Eventually, the voltage came on, and the SSD background rates returned to nominal. ### Source turn-on was very slow, owning to earlier source vacuum opening and the desired 2.8 mA current. &&& Source people suggested running at lower current and changing the filter from 4 mean free paths to 2; concurred with decision; set current at 0.5 mA. Started test. F-BND-BU-71.002 060/08:14 ID = 112533 FPC5 F-BND-BU-71.003 060/09:26 ID = 112547 FPC5 F-I2C-PI-1.005 060/11:00 ID = 112548 Cu-K PSF Inner 2C1 F-I2C-PI-1.004 060/11:18 ID = 112549 Cu-K PSF Inner 2C1 F-I2C-PI-2.003 060/12:22 ID = 112550 Cu-K PSF Inner 2C0 F-I2C-PI-2.002 060/12:37 ID = 112551 Cu-K PSF Inner 2C0 03/01/97/A Martin C. Weisskopf F-I2C-CR-2.030 060/13:40 ID = 112552 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 (Z=0.167) ### Huge noise ssd5, fpcht, n, a little also on FPChs - near end of the measurement. Problem continues after measurement. &&& Problem has to do with the shutter racks of electronics. !!! During tests to find noise, shut off EK rack, then turned back on. ### When powering rack back on, we found the shutters had closed. See below for more, since this problem occurred during F-I2C-CR-2.013. F-I2C-CR-2.014 060/20:02 ID = 112553 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 F-I2C-CR-2.013 060/20:27 ID = 112554 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 ### More problems - now we cannot detect x rays with the CCD? HRMA moved? Answer no. The problem is that the shutters powered to closed position. ### Computer command will not open them. 03/01/97/B Harvey Tananbaum &&& Pause during test to resolve shutter situation. The explanation for all this is that during EK testing on single shutter motor earlier today, the connectors from the rack to the actual shutters were disconnected and all commands including shutter close were sent to the electronics rack as part of test. The last command sent was for all shutters to close. Then went into manual mode and forgot settings were in SAO computer. When rack reconnected to shutters, it initially read the commands left in SAO computer and shut the shutters. &&& Takes about 20 minutes to manually reopen the shutters. Resume test. F-I2C-CR-2.012 060/22:17 ID =112556 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 F-I2C-CR-2.011 061/00:17 ID =112558 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 ### Bias measurements appeared noisy to IPI team. &&& Repeated to determine 2C OK. Delayed start of data accumulation to ~ 01:00. F-I2C-CR-2.010 061/01:40 ID = 112559 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 F-I2C-CR-2.009 061/02:34 ID = 112560 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 F-I2C-CR-2.008 061/03:19 ID = 112561 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C0 F-I2C-CR-1.016 061/04:04 ID = 112562 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C1 ### After commencing data collection, ACIS team sees no x rays on 2C1. !!! Restart to make sure no software error. TRW suggests that FAM motion is not all that precise and that it is likely that source image is not in the selected electronic window. !!! Take a few full frames of data to locate source and adjust location. ### Bias measurement shows problems, so reboot computer (or reload s/w) to see that computer and chip can talk to each other. &&& Restarted data collection at 05:11 RUNID = 112563. ### Problem with FITS headers. !!! Redo bias, prepare to collect; restart 05:21 RUNID = 112564,265. 03/01/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck F-I2C-CR-1.014 061/11:52 ID = 112566 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C1 F-I2C-CR-1.013 061/12:08 ID = 112567 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C1 ### fpc_hb tripped out. Started during run F-I2C-CR-1.012 F-I2C-CR-1.012 061/12:28 ID = 112568 Cu-K Count Rate Linearity 2C1 ### ACIS-2C computer crashed during run F-I2C-CR-1.012; rebooted and restarted. 03/02/97/A Steve O'Dell F-I2C-CR-1.011 061/14:53 ID=112569 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-CR-1.010 061/15:44 ID=112571 2C1(0.319) F-I2C-CR-1.009 061/16:46 ID=112573 2C1(0.228) !!! Adjust FAM and re-start runs because image was near window boundary. ### Re-set HV for BNDH_B, which tripped out. F-I2C-CR-1.008 061/17:40 ID=112574 2C1(0.114) !!! Checked HRMA and redefined boresight for A2C1. !!! Re-ordered PW series to reduce number of HRMA moves. F-I2C-PW-13.036 061/18:35 ID=112575 (2.45,K2) {-20', 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-PW-13.030 061/19:25 ID=112576 (0.78,K4) {-20', 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-PW-13.035 061/20:28 ID=112577 (1.16,K2) {-15', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.029 061/20:38 ID=112578 (2.76,K6) {-15', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.034 061/21:42 ID=112579 (0.76,K2) {-10', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.028 061/21:54 ID=112580 (2.02,K6) {-10', 0'} 2C1(0.228) Notes: 1 CMDB does not specify correct FAM position for A2C1 sub-frame images. a Image can come too close to window edge when A2C1 frame time is changed. b CMDB will correct this for A2C1 (no correction for A2C0 aim point). FAM dZ = 0 (18 r), -144 um (38 r), -432 um (54 r), -144 um (114 r). c Check image position at start of run. 2 Re-order CMDB measurements. a Skip measurements requiring use of shutters. b Re-order EIPS targets to Cu, Fe, C, Ti, O, Si. 03/02/97/B Harvey Tananbaum F-I2C-PW-13.033 061/23:03 ID=112581 (0.55,K2) {- 6', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.027 061/23:17 ID=112582 (1.47,K6) {- 6', 0'} 2C1(0.114) F-I2C-PW-13.032 062/00:20 ID=112583 (0.49,K2) {- 4', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.026 062/00:32 ID=112584 (1.32,K6) {- 4', 0'} 2C1(0.114) ### ACIS-2C computer crashed near end of test. &&& Decide we have enough data. Reboot and move on. !!! Run an additional 5 minutes after all - RUNID 112585. F-I2C-PW-13.031 062/02:10 ID=112586 (0.45,K2) {- 2', 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-I2C-PW-13.025 062/02:22 ID=112587 (1.19,K6) {- 2', 0'} 2C1(0.114) F-I2C-EA-2.001 062/03:22 ID-112588 (0.87,K4) { 0' , 0'} 2C0(6.000) !!! After HRMA move, check boresight and remove a little backlash. !!! Re-establish target aim on 2C0 - desired position (640,512). After FAM motion, full frame data shows centroid at 680,512 so move FAM ~1mm to hit desired point on 2C0 (actually at 646,512 which is acceptable. &&& Start actual data collection at 03:58. F-I2C-EA-1.001 062/04:07 ID-112589 (0.41,K4) { 0' , 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-H2C-EA-7.066 062/04:32 ID-112590 (0.16,K2) { 0' , 0'} 2C1(0.660) F-H2C-EA-7.065 062/05:11 ID-112591 (0.17,K2) { 0' , 0'} 2C0(0.666) F-H2C-EA-1.021 062/05:52 ID-112592 (0.16,K2) { 0' ,-3'} 2C1(0.666) 03/02/97/C Leon Van speybroeck F-I2C-EA-11.006 062/06:34 ID-112593 (2.25,K4) { -20, 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-EA-11.005 062/06:58 ID-112594 (1.07,K4) { -15, 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-EA-11.004 062/07:22 ID-112595 (0.70,K4) { -10, 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-EA-11.003 062/07:47 ID-112596 (0.51,K4) { -6', 0'} 2C1(6.000) ### Interrupted before acis collect in F-I2C-EA-11.002; tornado warning (False alarm, fortunately) F-I2C-EA-11.002A 062/09:32 ID-112602 (0.46,K4) { -4', 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-EA-11.001 062/10:42 ID-112603 (0.41,K4) { -2', 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.006 062/11:04 ID-112604 (0.46,K2) { -20, 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.005 062/11:21 ID-112605 (2.25,K4) { -15, 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.004 062/11:41 ID-112606 (1.47,K4) { -10, 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.003 062/11:56 ID-112607 (1.07,K4) { -6', 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.002 062/12:10 ID-112608 (0.96,K4) { -4', 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-EA-12.001 062/12:27 ID-112609 (0.87,K4) { -2', 0'} 2C0(6.000) F-I2C-PI-1.008 062/12:43 ID-112610 (0.41,K2) { 0' , 0'} 2C1(6.000) F-I2C-PI-2.008 062/13:00 ID-112611 (0.51,K2) { 0' , 0'} 2C0(6.000) !!! Call Herman M (# on wall) before start of MC-2 series. &&& Herman wants a peak rate of about 0.5 counts per pixel (unless limited by the source) in the peak of the dispersed image, ignoring the zero order in runs 2.001, 2.008;; now he wants to be called only if there is a problem or confusion. He is at 971-5130. &&& The zero order is expected to be on the blemish in 2C0. The apparent duplication with small translations below is to be sure that all intervals are covered in spite of bad columns on the chips. &&& Found about 0.3 counts per pixel per second, which is 0.2 counts per pixel per frame. Decided to leave the current alone. Flux, as measured by the fpc_5 is about 240 Hz vs expected 62. ssd _5 flux is 9309 vs expected 1281. Switched SSD to the 2 microsecond time constant. <<< HETG measurements with OBF@ F-H2C-MC-2.001 062/13:18 ID=112620 (0.30) 2C0(0.66) ( Y 7.0, X 0.0) 03/03/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak F-H2C-MC-2.002 062/13:56 ID = 1126xx (0.87mA) 2C0(0.66) (Y 31.0, X 0.1) !!! Lower fluxes to prevent pileup, double integration times. F-H2C-MC-2.003 062/14:49 ID = 1126xx (0.12) 2C0(0.66) (Y 33.0, X 0.1) F-H2C-MC-2.004 062/15:04 ID = 1126xx (0.12) 2C0(0.66) (Y 57.0, X 0.6) F-H2C-MC-2.005 062/15:26 ID = 1126xx (0.37) 2C0(0.66) (Y 59.0, X 0.6) F-H2C-MC-2.006 062/15:42 ID = 1126xx (0.37) 2C0(0.66) (Y 83.0, X 1.3) F-H2C-MC-2.007 062/16:10 ID = 1126xx (0.37) 2C0(0.66) (Y 85.0, X 1.3) F-H2C-MC-2.001a repeat at i=0.12 mA !!! Shorten frame time F-H2C-MC-2.008 062/17:34 ID = 112630 (0.41) 2C1(0.66) (Y -11.0, X 0.0) F-H2C-MC-2.009 062/18:05 ID = 112632 (0.41) 2C1(0.33) (Y -13.0, X 0.0) F-H2C-MC-2.010 062/18:29 ID = 112633 (0.73) 2C1(0.33) (Y -31.0, X 0.2) F-H2C-MC-2.011 062/18:51 ID = 1126yy (0.73) 2C1(0.33) (Y -33.0, X 0.2) F-H2C-MC-2.012 062/19:07 ID = 1126yy (0.73) 2C1(0.33) (Y -51.0, X 0.5) F-H2C-MC-2.013 062/19:25 ID = 1126yy (0.73) 2C1(0.33) (Y -53.0, X 0.5) F-H2C-MC-2.014 062/19:38 ID = 1126yy (0.73) 2C1(0.33) (Y -71.0, X 1.0) F-H2C-MC-2.015 062/20:03 ID = 1126yy (1.46) 2C1(0.33) (Y -73.0, X 1.0) ### ACIS-2C computer crash F-H2C-MC-2.016 062/20:47 ID = 1126yy (2.77) 2C1(0.33) (Y -91.0, X 1.6) F-H2C-MC-2.017 062/21:09 ID = 1126yy (2.77) 2C1(0.66) (Y -93.0, X 1.6) Notes: 1 We had many flux adjustments because of continuum uncertainties. Integration times were doubled to partially compensate. The effects of pileup seemed to be underestimated in the grating test planning. 2 We noticed that the grating spectrum appears significantly out-of focus at high energy, but in-focus at low energy. This is a puzzle since we are positioning on the Rowland circle. The effect does not appear to be pile up although the event density is higher at high energies. 03/03/97/B Harvey Tananbaum F-I2C-EA-1.007 062/21:27 ID=1126zz (0.61) 2C1(6.00) (Y -1.0, Z 0.0, X 40.0) F-H2C-EA-7.138 062/21:47 ID=1126zz (2.54) 2C1(0,66) (Y -58.3, Z 5.3, X 23.8) F-H2C-EA-7.136 062/22:06 ID=1126zz (2.54) 2C1(0,66) (Y 58.3, Z -5.3, X 23.8) F-H2C-EA-7.137 062/22:21 ID=1126zz (2.54) 2C1(0,66) (Y -58.3, Z 5.3, X 23.8) F-H2C-EA-7.135 062/22:33 ID=1126zz (2.54) 2C1(0,66) (Y 58.3, Z -5.3, X 23.8) F-H2C-EA-7.131 062/22:45 ID=1126zz (0.71) 2C1(0,66) (Y -29.2, Z -2.4, X 15.6) F-H2C-EA-7.129 062/22:56 ID=1126zz (0.71) 2C1(0,66) (Y 29.2, Z 2.4, X 15.6) F-H2C-EA-7.127 062/23:05 ID=1126zz (0.52) 2C1(0,66) (Y 0.0, Z 0.0, X 15.5) F-H2C-EA-7.132 062/23:24 ID=1126zz (1.35) 2C1(0,66) (Y -29.2, Z -2.4, X 15.6) F-H2C-EA-7.130 062/23:37 ID=112658 (1.35) 2C1(0,66) (Y 29.2, Z 2.4, X 15.6) F-H2C-EA-7.128 062/23:43 ID=112659 (0.98) 2C1(0,66) (Y 0.0, Z 0.0, X 15.5) F-BND-BU-71.002 062/23:56 ID=112660 Cu-L Beam Uniformity Scan-500 F-BND-BU-71.003 063/00:28 ID=1126xx Cu-K Beam Uniformity Scan-500 F-I2C-RC-72.012 063/01:22 Id=112674 Radiation Contam. Monitors 2C1(6.00) <<< EIPS(Fe-K) F-BND-BU-71.008 063/01:17 ID=112675 Fe-K Beam Uniformity Scan-500 &&& Data collection commenced after source change at 063/02:37 F-H2C-EA-7.062 063/03:12 ID=112676 (0.28) 2C1(0.66) p:0.0 y:0.0 X=15.5 ### ACIS-2C computer crashes about 3/4 of way through test. &&& Reboot and go on to next test. F-H2C-EA-1.019 063/05:19 ID=112677,8 (0.10) 2C1(0.66) p:0.0 y:-3.0 X=15.5 ### Shortly after test started, MST notes that time has not been updated in BND collects to reflect increase in time for this test in latest CMDB. &&& Abort, reset time, and restart test at 05:41 with runID=112678. 03/03/97/C Leon van Speybroeck F-I2C-PI-1.003 063/07:41 ID=112679 (0.72) 2C1(0.66) all 0.0 F-I2C-EA-11.012 063/07:55 ID=112680 (0.25) 2C1(6.00) p:-20.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-11.011 063/08:18 ID=112681 (1.00) 2C1(6.00) p:-15.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-11.010 063/08:40 ID=112682 (0.72) 2C1(6.00) p:-10.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-11.009 063/09:00 ID=112683 (0.53) 2C1(6.00) p: -6.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-11.008 063/09:21 ID=112684 (0.53) 2C1(6.00) p: -4.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-11.007 063/09:39 ID=112685 (0.47) 2C1(6.00) p: -2.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-1.002 063/09:58 ID=112686 (0.43) 2C1(6.00) Y=-1.0 X= 40.0 F-I2C-PI-1.002 063/10:28 ID=112688 (0.15) 2C1(0.11) all 0.0 F-H2C-EA-7.061 063/11:50 ID=112689 (0.31) 2C0(0.66) X= 15.5 F-I2C-EA-12.012 063/14:03 ID=112690 (0.53) 2C0(6.00) p:-20.0' y:0.0' ### ACIS group (Lisa, Dave) note that zero-order image of grating (defocussed) appears broader at the top than at the bottom, and is more similar to an image taken 2 arcmin off axis (-2 minutes pitch). Some possibilities: 1 Changing grating position actually moves the HRMA 2 Grating frames interfere with beam and scatter/reflect some of flux. 3 (Doesn't count) There is a wedge in the grating lines. 4 Effect is due to mis-alignment of gratings, some diffraction of very high energy photons (but where were the mis-aligned gratings?) F-I2C-EA-12.011 063/14:23 ID=112691 (0.31) 2C0(6.00) p:-15.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-12.010 063/14:47 ID=112692 (0.22) 2C0(6.00) p:-10.0' y:0.0' 03/04/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak F-I2C-EA-12.009 063/15:05 ID=1126 (1.00) 2C0(6.00) p: -6.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-12.008 063/15:21 ID=1126 (1.00) 2C0(6.00) p: -4.0' y:0.0' F-I2C-EA-12.007 063/15:35 ID=1126 (0.90) 2C0(6.00) p: -2.0' y:0.0' &&& Stop here to watch auto-collimator as the grating is moved in and out: Only 1 arcsec motion when OTG is inserted/removed. &&& 8 arcsec yaw when Forward Contamination Cover is closed, returns to its original position when FCC re-opened. &&& I looked at some of phase-1 defocused images and was convinced the effect (ring width change with azimuth at relatively small defocus) is just due to HRMA related factors. Phase 1 images were nonintuitive when we weren't at either at ring focus or in-focus. F-I2C-EA-2.002 063/16:49 ID = 112696 (0.90) 2C0(6.00) p: 0.0' y:0.0' <<< EIPS(Fe-L) F-BND-BU-71.009 063/17:06 ID = 112703 (2.4) fpc_5 p: 0.0' y:0.0' ### Set ap size to 12 mm manually since cmdb picked the 36 but the listscan was set up for 12. ### TRW needed to do a FAM test to prepare for next phase. ### TRW isn't reading the filter material right from cmdb for FeL. We need to check that they corrected it FIRST if rates are way to high. F-H2C-EA-7.150 063/18:36 HEG -1 2C0 F-H2C-EA-7.148 063/19:06 HEG +1 2C0 F-H2C-EA-7.146 063/19:19 MEG -1 2C0 F-H2C-EA-7.144 063/19:35 MEG +1 2C0 F-H2C-EA-7.142 ABORT F-H2C-EA-7.140 063/19:47 0 order 2C0 !!! Raise voltage for these to 2 kV to get the right bnd rates. !!! We should do the same for EA-12.013-12.018 F-I2C-EA-11.030 063/20:09 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-20 F-I2C-EA-11.029 063/20:36 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-15 ID = 112710 F-I2C-EA-11.028 063/20:56 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-10 F-I2C-EA-11.027 063/21:12 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-6 ID = 112712 F-I2C-EA-11.026 063/21:29 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-4 F-I2C-EA-11.025 063/21:48 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-2 ID = 112715 F-I2C-EA-1.017 063/22:12 Run at 2.0 kV pitch = 0 ID = 112716 03/04/97B Martin Weisskopf ### Large numbers of changes to the following tests: F-H2C-EA-7.149 063/22:38 HEG -1 2C1 ID =112717, 112718 (latter correlates with the data) !!! Change: defocus=0.7 frametime=0.11 F-H2C-EA-7.147 063/23:17 HEG +1 2C1 ID = 112179 !!! Change: defocus=0.7 frametime=0.11 F-H2C-EA-7.145 063/23:38 MEG -1 2C1 112720 !!! Change: current=0.1 y_offset=-38.4 z_offset=+3.5 defocus=0.2 frametime=0.11 integration time= 300 F-H2C-EA-7.143 064/00:14 MEG +1 2C1 ID = 112721 !!! Change: current=0.1 y_offset=+38.4 z_offset=-3.5 defocus=0.2 frametime=0.11 integration time= 300 F-H2C-EA-7.141 SKIP F-H2C-EA-7.139 064/00:29 0 order 2C1 !!! no changes <<< Off-axis area tests with C0 F-I2C-EA-12.018 064/00:48 Source at 2.0 kV pitch =-20 ID = 112723 F-I2C-EA-12.017 064/01:27 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-15 ID = 112724 F-I2C-EA-12.016 064/01:51 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-10 ID = 112725 F-I2C-EA-12.015 064/02:16 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-6 ID = 112726 F-I2C-EA-12.014 064/02:39 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-4 ID = 112727 F-I2C-EA-12.013 064/02:58 Run at 2.0 kV pitch =-2 F-I2C-EA-2.005 064/03:20 Run at 2.0 kV pitch = 0 ID = 112729 F-BND-BU-71.023 064/03:42 Holdup while Jon Checks the HRMA. ID = 112736 F-I2C-RC-72.010 064/05:00 This with C1 chip. Notes: 1 The additional test (F-BND-BU-71.023) should not have been allowed. First of all, the BU maps already determine the appropriate ratios for the normalization. Thus, it doesn't matter if the flux in the BNDs is partially clipped (which it isn't). Second, this test does not require HRMA and could have been deferred until May. I let the test go as we need more data from the radioactive (door) sources. 2 Please interchange carbon CR tests with the grating MC tests. This should allow the grating people time to evaluate their dF tests before proceeding with the CR series. 3 For 2C tests that utilize the shutters, leave the tests in CMDB and "SKIP" them on the floor. This way they are clearly differentiated from ABORTED tests, and we can have a good record of what still needs to be done. How are these tests now identified? Where are they? For example F-H2C-EA-7.141 simply disappeared from today's CMDB. Please fix this. 4 CMDB problems: Yesterday test F-I2C-RC-72.010 was fine. It sent the FAM to the correct position and called for the correct chip (C1) etc. Today, it is all messed up. 5) The grating team needs to evaluate the dF series of tests before embarking on MC tests, so I told TRW to re-order. However, we need a new input from the grating team before the MC tests can proceed. F-BND-BU-71.007 064/05:57 ID=112748 (Fe Ka) 03/04/97C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Carbon continuum source, pitch = 0, yaw = 0, filter = OBFx2 ### Flux, as measured by the ssd_5 and bnds was about 7% expected values. CCD rates will be checked later to see if adequate, or if tests must be repeated. F-H2C-dF-81.001 064/07:06 ID=112757 2C0(.23) defocus = 0.0 ### Analysis of these data showed that the ACIS-2C counting rate also was lower than expected by a factor of 10 or more. !!! Decided to increase source current by a factor of 10, but could only get 0.66 mA; increased integration times to 140 seconds. ### Data from 81.001 are useable, but subsequent tests will benefit from the increased data. F-H2C-dF-81.002 064/07:42 ID=112758 2C0(.23) defocus = -1.0 F-H2C-dF-81.003 064/08:09 ID=112759 2C0(.23) defocus = -2.0 F-H2C-dF-81.004 064/08:20 ID=112760 2C0(.23) defocus = +1.0 F-H2C-dF-81.005 064/08:30 ID=112761 2C0(.23) defocus = +2.0 <<< Count rate tests. EIPS(C-K), V = 1.11 F-I2C-CR-2.028 064/08:39 ID=112771 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.37 ### For run F-I2C-CR-2.02 the CMDB specified an X6 filter and 4.5 mA; we can't get 4.5 mA; reduced current to 0.61 mA and switched to the X4 filter. F-I2C-CR-2.027 064/09:01 ID=112772 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.17 ### David H analysis of the 81.00x series showed that we are out of focus by more than 2 mm !!! Insert additional focus tests to pass through the FWHM minimum. F-H2C-dF-99.025 064/09:32 ID=112782 2C0(.23) defocus = +4.0 F-H2C-dF-99.026 064/09:57 ID=112783 2C0(.23) defocus = +3.0 ### Repeat test F-I2C-CR-2.028 because gate valve was closed during part of data collection !!! The analysis of the dF series indicates that we should move the focus +1.6 mm. This will be effected after the CR series. F-I2C-CR-2.028A 064/10:09 ID=112793 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.37 F-I2C-CR-2.026 064/10:29 ID=112794 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.02 ### After this run started, the ACIS team discovered that the image location was not satisfactory, causing us to have to repeat 2.028 (again), 2.027, and 2.026. F-I2C-CR-2.028B 064/11.08 ID=112795 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.37 F-I2C-CR-2.027A 064/11:32 ID=112796 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.17 F-I2C-CR-2.026A 064/11:54 ID=112797 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.02 ### During these runs the ACIS-2C counting rate was much higher than expected, which actually interferred with our ability to diagnose the problem because the data rate overwhelmed the system. ??? Hypothesis: visible light. Lowered the anode voltage (essentially to zero) and got the same counting rate. Hence, this is visible light. &&& Switching to the optical blocking filter; will test this filter for visible light, and, if successful, repeat (again) the CR series (after finding the proper source current, if possible). ### Found that, with the optical blocking filter, we could get only 1/4 of the desired flux. Decided to raise the source voltage for F-I2C-CR-2.028C to 2.2 kv. ### Found that the carbon counting rates were about a factor of two high, in addition to a large continuum. Reduced voltage to 1.5 kV. Now get about the desired rate, but about 1/2 are in the line and 1/2 are in the continuum. Decided to go ahead with the test. (Previously, we had shown that the ACIS-2C counting rate with the OBF, but no anode voltage, was 0.) F-I2C-CR-2.028C 064/13:11 ID=112801 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.37 (V = 1.5 kV) F-I2C-CR-2.027B 064/13:34 ID=112802 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.17 (V = 1.1 kV) F-I2C-CR-2.026B 064/13:58 ID=1128 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.02 03/05/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< V=0.92 2-mfp C8H8 filter and OBF w/ i=0.2 mA reduce continuum. ### Analysis of defocus tests indicate that we are 1.6 mm out of focus! !!! We adjusted the focus (x) location +1.6 mm to compensate. F-I2C-CR-2.025 064/16:37 ID=1128 2C0(0.66) Nom. flux = 0.06 F-I2C-CR-2.022 064/17:44 ID=1128 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.06 F-I2C-CR-2.023 064/18:30 ID=1128 2C0(0.23) Nom. flux = 0.06 !!! Scott discovered the source of the focus error: On 2/28/97 at 11:38 AM CST a fine HRMA correction of angle (~5 arcsec) caused a large but unnoticed change in the HRMA x position of 1.55 mm. This was near end of the Al phase just before F-H2C-EA-7.034. At this point, during the ACIS fill Scott moved the HRMA back to the x position where we were during the focus tests and so the following tests will be done with the FAM at 0 defocus. This error affects the results of focus sensitive tests at Cu and Fe. ### Tornado Warning F-I2C-CR-2.024 064/19:51 ID=1128 2C0(0.32) Nom. flux = 0.06 !!! Repeat without high energy continuum at V=0.92 2-mfp C8H8 filter & OBF F-I2C-CR-2.028C 064/21:35 ID=1128 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.37 i=1.2mA F-I2C-CR-2.027C 064/22:04 ID=1128 2C0(0.11) Nom. flux = 0.17 i=0.6mA ID =112812 !!! ACIS wants to check focus w/o gratings. Since things have moved around quite a bit, this seems like a good idea so insert the following tests. F-I2C-dF-99.027 064/22:25 0 defocus ID = 112813 F-I2C-dF-99.028 064/22:47 -1 mm defocus ID = 112814 F-I2C-dF-99.029 064/23:04 +1 mm defocus ID = 112815 !!! Run these like F-I2C-CR-2.022 (V=0.92 2-mfp C8H8 filter and OBF w/ i=0.2 mA, 2C0;frame time=0.11 only for 600 sec. each) <<< The following all HETG exposures, HRMA on axis !!! The current for the near zero order part of the series should be increased to about 1.32 mA, as per David H, judging from the results of the analysis of the F-H2C-dF-81.00x series. Unfortunately, we are limited to 0.66 mA. Will accept this flux; also will increase the ACIS frame size to reduce the overlap problem. Will use a sub frame time of 0.32. 03/05/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-H2C-MC-82.001 064/23:45 ID=112816 2C0(0.32) y= 7.0,z= 0.,x=0.0 F-H2C-MC-82.002 065/00:25 ID=112817;18 stopped; !!! Rerun 2C0(0.23) y= 31.0,z= 0.0,x=0.1 F-H2C-MC-82.002a 065/01:1 Had to rerun test again. ### The last one was done with 38 frames, rather than 54. ID = 112819 ??? CMDB had only SSD5 and BNDhn(36 mm) on. Why? !!! Starting with this test we turned them all on. F-H2C-MC-82.003 065/01:30 ID=112820 2C0(0.32) y= 33.0,z= 0.,x=0.1 F-H2C-MC-82.004 065/01:44 ID=112821 2C0(0.32) y= 57.0,z= 0.,x=0.6 F-H2C-MC-82.005 065/02:01 ID=112822 2C0(0.32) y= 59.0,z= 0.,x=0.6 F-H2C-MC-82.006 065/02:15 ID=112823 2C0(0.32) y= 83.0,z= 0.,x=1.3 F-H2C-MC-82.007 065/02:30 ID=112824 2C0(0.32) y= 85.0,z= 0.,x=1.3 F-H2C-MC-82.008 065/02:43 ID=112825 2C1(0.32) y=-11.0,z=-0.144,x=0.0 F-H2C-MC-82.009 065/03:10 ID=112826 2C1(0.32) y=-13.0,z=-0.144,x=0.0 F-H2C-MC-82.010 065/03:45 ID=112827 2C1(0.32) y=-31.0,z=-0.144,x=0.2 ### FAM had troubles. Started a few tests ago. F-H2C-MC-82.011 065/04:09 ID=112828 2C1(0.32) y=-33.0,z=-0.144,x=0.2 F-H2C-MC-82.012 065/04:32 ID=112829 2C1(0.32) y=-51.0,z=-0.144,x=0.5 F-H2C-MC-82.013 065/04:46 ID=112830 2C1(0.32) y=-53.0,z=-0.144,x=0.5 F-H2C-MC-82.014 065/04:59 ID=112831 2C1(0.32) y=-71.0,z=-0.144,x=1.0 F-H2C-MC-82.015 065/05:15 ID=112832 2C1(0.32) y=-73.0,z=-0.144,x=1.0 F-H2C-MC-82.016 065/05:36 ID=112833 2C1(0.32) y=-91.0,z=-0.144,x=1.6 F-H2C-MC-82.017 065/05:56 ID=112834 2C1(0.32) y=-93.0,z=-0.144,x=1.6 Notes: 1 Leon, Gary M (EKC) just noticed "something": Please follow up and make notes. The axial HRMA position seems to always be about 0.1 mm away from "desired" position, but there is some confusion over what the "desired" position is, as the "intended" position is in physical units (inches, arcmin), and the "actual" position is in encoder counts. In any event, it does not seem to be accumulating the error, so the 0.1 mm isn't a big deal. We should have some method of connecting the "intended" and "actual" positions, and also correct computer code if necessary, but the problem isn't immediate. LVS) 2 Pass on to Steve and Jeff. For CMDB planning, I assume the following: a Testing with 2C becomes progessively unproductive after the 10?,11?12?13? of March. b HRC is available on the 10?11?12?13? of March. Thus, it is to our interest to insert HRC as soon as it is available. If ACIS, with engineering paddle, is here then we put it in. If not, of course, leave the 2C in. The problem with this plan concerns any testing that requires the backside chips. This must be done before we remove 2C. We probably won't even know if ACIS will make the 11-th delivery until the 10-th. I certainly have no idea if this is possible or not. c Other consideration. Once we complete all sensible testing (subject to above) that does not involve the shutters, we will close the shutters that isolate either the HEG or the MEG - grating team choice. Perform the most useful testing and then close of an additional shell (1 or 6) to allow ACIS to perform sub pixel tests (with the BS chip). 3 Note filter voltage and current changes below. 03/05/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck F-I2C-PI-2.005 ABORT (test done in CR series) !!! Adjust focus +225 um F-I2C-PI-2.004 065/06:11 ID=112842 V=0.9 kV; i=0.2 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.048 065/07:50 ID=112843 V=0.9 kV; i=0.83mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.047 065/08:33 ID=112844 V=0.9 kV; i=0.7 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.046 065/09:00 ID=112845 V=0.9 kV; i=0.6 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.045 065/09:24 ID=112846 V=0.9 kV; i=0.6 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.044 065/09:44 ID=112847 V=0.9 kV; i=0.6 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF F-I2C-EA-12.043 065/10:02 ID=112848 V=0.9 kV; i=0.6 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF ### Cannot get to the specified position for test F-I2C-EA-1001, but could get to the equivalent position in the -1 order, instead of +1 order. Elected to do this. Subsequent conversation with John Nousek indicated that this was the correct choice. The mechanical stage limits should be caught in the CMDB processing. The offset for F-I2C-EA-1002 can be obtained in +1 order, as specified in the CMDB. (It can not be obtained in -1 order). The target for these tests are long wavelengths which cannot be detected as individual photons, so the data will be processed later; hence, no worry about the low apparent rates. !!! Also change aperture on FPC5 from 36 to 12 mm to get a useful rate; still about 10 kHz. F-I2C-EA-1.001 065/10:23 ID=112858 F-I2C-EA-1.002 065/11:07 ID=112859 F-I2C-EA-2.008 065/11:33 ID=112869 V=0.9 kV; i=0.6 mA; 2mfp-C8H8 & OBF !!! Ti Beam uniformity needs the 12 mm fpc_5 aperture and not the 36. ??? Don't understand this instruction; it isn't that the rate will be too high. Elected to try the script as is (36 mm) to see if acceptable; LVS). +++ Needed smaller aperture for spatial resolution and to avoid vignetting for locations sampled at edge of beam. F-I2C-RC-72.016 065/12:06 ID=NA 2C1(6.0) F-BND-BU-71.010 065/13:20 ID=112880 FPC5 !!! From RAA, for F-BND-BU-71.010, used 12mm aperture, 40-sec collects. 03/06/97/A Robert Austin / Steve O'Dell HETG measurements, 2C1(0.66), HRMA on axis F-H2C-EA-7.060 065/14:34 ID=112881 HEG-1 y=-12.0, z=+0.9, x=23.4 ### Aborted - contamination cover closed - then restarted (next). F-H2C-EA-7.060 065/14:34 ID=112882 HEG-1 y=-12.0, z=+0.9, x=23.4 ### Aborted - image not centered in ACIS subarray. !!! Added 0.6 mm to FAM Z for all A2C1 0.66-s frametime measurements. F-H2C-EA-7.060 065/14:34 ID=112883 HEG-1 y=-12.0, z=+1.5, x=23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.058 065/15:30 ID=112884 HEG+1 y=+12.0, z=-0.6, x=23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.054 065/15:48 ID=112885 MEG-1 y= -6.0, z= 0.0, x=15.5 F-H2C-EA-7.052 065/16:07 ID=112886 MEG+1 y= +6.0, z=+1.0, x=15.5 <<< HETG, 0 order, 2C1(0.66) F-H2C-EA-81.002 065/16:30 ID=112887 HRMA @ (0', 0') y= 0.0, z=+0.5, x=15.5 F-H2C-EA-82.002 065/17:19 ID=112888 HRMA @ (0',-3') y= 0.0, z=+0.5, x=15.5 <<< HETG measurements, 2C1(0.66), HRMA @ (0',-3'): F-H2C-EA-1.014 065/18:03 ID=112889 MEG+1 y= +6.0, z=+1.0, x=+15.5 !!! Check FAM boresight: a Full-frame image gave correct A2C aim point for FAM boresight. b dZ=+0.6 mm correction required for A2C1. F-H2C-EA-1.015 065/18:51 ID=112890 MEG-1 y= -6.0, z= 0.0, x=+15.5 F-H2C-EA-1.017 065/19:10 ID=112891 HEG+1 y=+12.0, z=-0.6, x=+23.4 F-H2C-EA-1.018 065/19:28 ID=112892 HEG-1 y=-12.0, z=+1.5, x=+23.4 <<< HETG measurements, 2C0(6.00), HRMA @ (0', 0'): F-H2C-EA-12.001 065/19:55 ID=112894 HEG+2 y=+24.0, z=-2.2, x=+30.1 ### ID=112893 aborted because boresight was for wrong chip. F-H2C-EA-12.002 065/20:47 ID=112895 HEG+2 y=+22.0, z=-2.2, x=+30.1 F-H2C-EA-12.003 065/21:10 ID=112897 HEG+4 y=+48.1, z=-4.4, x=+30.3 ### ID=112896 aborted due to ACIS-2C computer crash. F-H2C-EA-12.004 065/21:46 ID=112898 HEG+4 y=+46.1, z=-4.4, x=+30.3 F-H2C-EA-12.005 065/22:04 ID=112899 HEG+6 y=+72.1, z=-6.6, x=+30.6 F-H2C-EA-12.006 065/22:16 ID=112900 HEG+6 y=+70.1, z=-6.6, x=+30.6 Notes: 1 A2C1 measurements with 0.66-s frametime are not centered in window. a Added 600 um to the z position specified in the CMDB of the FAM. b Verified FAM boresight with full-frame image after F-H2C-EA-1.014. c CMDB gives wrong position for sub-frame windows (for A2C1 0.66 s). d Half correction is due to sign error in FAM-z shift provided by PSU. 2 Re-order remaining EIPS(Ti) measurements to defer off-axis to end. 3 HRMA tilts result in axial (focus) and (perhaps) transverse shifts. a New EK IAP procedure will include pitch move after setting IAP. b Perform dF measurements to establish focus position for FAM. c Also set FAM bore sight to place image at desired A2C aim point. 4 A2C0 measurements with 0.66-s frametime are not centered in window. a Added 240 um to the z position specified in the CMDB of the FAM. 03/06/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf <<< HETG measurements, 2C0(0.66), HRMA @ (0', 0'): !!! Some measurements need an additional z 0ffset of 240 um (all tests with a frame time of 0.66 s. <<< 2c0(0.66s) F-H2C-EA-7.059 065/22:36 ID=112901 HEG-1 y=-12.0, z=+1.1, x=+23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.057 065/23:09 ID=112902 HEG+1 y=+12.0, z=-1.1, x=+23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.053 065/23:42 ID=112903 MEG-1 y=- 6.0, z=-0.5, x=+15.5 F-H2C-EA-7.051 066/00:03 ID=112904 MEG+1 y=+ 6.0, z=+0.5, x=+15.5 !!! Check the offsets with ACIS. F-H2C-EA-81.001 066/ ID=112905 HEG 0 y= 0.0, z=+0.6?, x=+15.5 F-H2C-EA-7.153 066/01:20 ID=112914 MEG-1 y=-60.0, z=-5.0, x=+15.9 !!! Frame time changed to 18 row (0.114 seconds) - check offset! !!! Subtract 165 um (-Z). ### Ti-L flux was way too high. Reduce current from 2.1 to 0.5 to get correct flux in monitors, but then increase by factor of 2 to get the flux in the CCD correct! F-H2C-EA-7.152 066/02:15 ID=112915 MEG+1 y=+60.0, z=+5.0, x=+15.9 F-H2C-EA-7.151 066/02:36 ID=112916 MEG 0 y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+15.5 <<< ACIS-2C Ti-K off-axis measurements, 2C1(6.00): F-I2C-EA-11.024 066/02:51 ID=112924 (-20', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=-20.0 ### ACIS crashed near the end but only lost 5 frames. So proceed.. F-I2C-EA-11.023 066/03:22 ID=112925 (-15', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=-30.0 F-I2C-EA-11.022 066/03:48 ID=112926 (-10', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=+45.0 F-I2C-EA-11.021 066/04:12 ID=112927 (- 6', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-11.020 066/04:36 ID=112928 (- 4', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-11.019 066/04:57 ID=112929 (- 2', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 !!! CHECK HRMA ALIGNMENT BEFORE THIS RUN! &&& Checked theta y = -2"; theta z = -7". F-I2C-EA-1.004 066/05:29 ID=112930 ( 0', 0') y=-1.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 Notes: 1 The ACIS-2C small offset is never correct. Before a series check position. No general rule seems to apply. 1 There is no BG procedure in the CMDB for upcoming source change: HXDS should take background run during the source change. Please pass this on to those "reviewing" the CMDB. 03/06/97C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< ACIS-2C Ti-K off-axis measurements, 2C0(6.00): F-I2C-EA-12.024 066/05:54 ID=112931 (-20', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=-20.0 F-I2C-EA-12.023 066/06:10 ID=112932 (-15', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=-30.0 F-I2C-EA-12.022 066/06:24 ID=112933 (-10', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+45.0 F-I2C-EA-12.021 066/06:38 ID=112934 (- 6', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-12.020 066/06:51 ID=112935 (- 4', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-12.019 066/07:06 ID=112936 (- 2', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-2.004 066/07:20 ID=1129?? ( 0', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 ACIS-2C Ti-L off-axis measurements, 2C0(6.00): F-I2C-EA-12.054 066/07:35 ID=112946 (-20', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=-20.0 F-I2C-EA-12.053 066/08:14 ID=112947 (-15', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=-30.0 F-I2C-EA-12.052 066/08:30 ID=112948 (-10', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+45.0 F-I2C-EA-12.051 066/08:44 ID=112949 (- 6', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-12.050 066/09:00 ID=112950 (- 4', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-I2C-EA-12.049 066/09:15 ID=112951 (- 2', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 ### ACIS-2C is not seeing the Ti-L spectrum. !!! Do a special test (after 2.009) to see if LETG gets Ti-L. Rough calculation indicates correct flux. Expect 1st order spectrum at y=24.41 mm. F-I2C-EA-2.009 066/09:29 ID=112952 ( 0', 0') y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=+40.0 F-L2C-SC-99.029 066/09:55 ID=112954 ( 0', 0') y=+24.41, z= 0, x=0 &&& Source has the L lines, but a fair amount of continuum too. Further analysis is a mystery, which should be explained by the ACIS and grating people. There are two lines visible, or at least concentrations, visible. Call these "A" and "B". "A" has the appearance of an absorption edge, and is located at a distance of 24.41 mm from the zero order (this is where I had expected the Ti-La to be found). "B" is located at about 27.82 mm from zero order. So, the grating image says (if I was told the coordinate system correctly) that the events at "A" are higher energy than those of "B"; However, the ACIS spectra indicate that "A" is at about 250 eV (give or take), and the events of "B" are at about 410 eV. So, the conclusions don't hang together. If, for example, the zero point of the ACIS spectra are wrong, then point "A" becones the L-Ka point, and 250 eV -> 450 eV ("A"), and 410eV -> 610 eV ("B"). Then, Point "B" is not in the correct place, even for a 2'ed order peak. Probably the ACIS response is not linear, point "A" is the Ti-La line, and point "B" is 2nd order something. In any event, the Ti-La source is far from clean. &&& Further discussion with Dave Burrows cleared up the mystery. Point "A" is both the Ti-La line and edge; it fell onto an amplifier for which there is not a good energy calibration. Point "B" is properly assigned an energy of 400 eV by both ACIS and the grating, and corresponds to N-Ka; hence, the titanium source may have a titanium nitride contamination. F-BND-BU-71.011 066/10:17 ID=112955 F-I2C-RC-72.008 066/10:32 <<< Change to O-Ka source F-BND-BU-71.006 066/11:45 ID=112971 03/07/97A Robert Austin <<< Focus tests 2C0(0.11), y = z = 0.0 F-I2C-dF-62.001 066/14:01 ID=112972 x=+0.0, Source: 1.4ma, 1.06kV, 2mfp F-I2C-dF-62.002 066/14:27 ID=112973 x=+1.0 F-I2C-dF-62.003 066/14:58 ID=112974 x=-1.0 F-I2C-dF-62.004 066/15:14 ID=112975 x=-0.5 F-I2C-dF-62.005 066/15:30 ID=112976 x=+0.5 <<< Effective Area Measurements (2C1) F-H2C-EA-7.114 066/15:46 ID=112977 HEG-1 y=-103.25, z=+9.52, x=24.6 F-H2C-EA-7.112 066/16:08 ID=112978 HEG+1 y= 103.25, z=-9.24, x=24.6 F-H2C-EA-7.108 066/16:31 ID=112979 MEG-1 y= -51.68, z=-4.14, x=15.8 F-H2C-EA-7.106 066/16:40 ID=112980 MEG+1 y= 51.68, z=+4.43, x=15.8 ### Problem with the ACIS electronics, redo above measurement. F-H2C-EA-7.106a 066/16:40 ID=112982 MEG+1 y= 51.68, z=+4.43, x=15.8 F-I2C-EA-81.006 066/17:35 ID=112984 0 y= 0.0, z=+0.14, x=15.5 <<< PSF Inner Core (2C1) F-I2C-PI-1.007 066/18:42 ID=112985 y= 0.0, z=+0.0, x=0.144 <<< PSF Wings (2C1) F-I2C-PW-13.024 066/18:55 ID=112986 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=20.7 F-I2C-PW-13.018 066/19:01 ID=112987 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=20.7 F-I2C-PW-13.023 066/20:14 ID=112988 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=12.1 F-I2C-PW-13.017 066/20:20 ID=112989 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=12.1 F-I2C-PW-13.022 066/21:31 ID=112990 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=5.6 F-I2C-PW-13.021 066/21:50 ID=112991 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=2.2 F-I2C-PW-13.020 066/22:00 ID=112992 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=1.0 F-I2C-PW-13.019 066/22:23 ID=112993 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=0.5 Notes: 1 Source settings specified by CMDB for F-I2C-dF-62.001 resulted in undetectable flux. I requested the source current be increased from 0.2 mA to 2.0 mA. At a source voltage of 1.06kV, the maximum possible attainable is 1.4ma, so we settled for that. I requested that ACIS take a peek to check their rate (FPC_5 still wasn't seeing anything); they measured 2/sec at the focal plane. Since they were off center, they requested the FAM to move -125 um. After this move, the focal-plane rate mysteriously decreased to 1/sec. I requested the source to remove the 2mfp filter. The focal plane rate went up to 7/sec - satisfactory; fpc_5 was seeing about 5/sec. 2 At about 14:00 GMT, ACIS said they were warming up. I suggest we adopt the motto: "To Dewar Die". 3 Regarding note 1, wrong filter material was being used. The CMDB specifies filter by composition, whereas the XSS specifies filter by line it filters. Vanadium was being substituted for Chromium, and this was cutting out the O-K line. We will adopt the following strategy: Use filters requested by the CMDB and adjust current to obtain requested count rate. 4. While setting up F-I2C-EA-81.006, we noticed an error in the CMDB. The ACIS collect parameter file didn't specify the time/interation. We selected 100 30-s collects. The operator console also jammed up, so we logged out and then logged back in. 5 After analysis of defocus data, ACIS-2C recommended moving detector forward 0.25 mm in x for best focus. TRW will incorporate this value in their boresight definition. 6 (SLO) Regarding 1&3 above, I worked with Jon Arenberg to fix TRW translation from CMDB filter request to filter position transmitted to the XSS, so this problem should not occur again. The CMDB, however, uses the wrong thicknesses for the CrL filter; hence, I am submitting a change order to correct this. 7 (SLO) PSU/ Lisa is tracking dependence of Z offset upon A2C subframe size. 8 (SLO) For all measurements calling for CrL2, run with specified current; for those calling for CrL4 or CrL6, run with current 1/3 specified value. I also leveled current settings to avoid unnecessary tweeks of XSS, flux checks, and bias measurements --- i.e., to turn them into "supermeasurments". 02/07/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf C1 tests with O-Ka: off axis areas. F-I2C-EA-11.042 066/22:23 ID=112994 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=-20.0 (P=-20.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-EA-11.041 066/22:42 ID=112995 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=-30.0 (P=-15.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-EA-11.040 066/22:59 ID=112996 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=+45.0 (P=-10.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-EA-11.039 066/23:15 ID=112997 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=+45.0 (P=-6.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-EA-11.038 066/23:35 ID=112998 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=+45.0 (P=-4.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-EA-11.037 066/23:52 ID=112999 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=+45.0 (P=-2.0'; Y=0') !!! Check alignment before next test but after placing HRMA on-axis. F-I2C-EA-1.005 067/00:08 ID = 113000 y=-0.96, z=+0.0, x=+40.0 (P=0';Y=0') &&& 2" low in pitch; +5" in yaw. F-I2C-PW-13.016 067/00:46 2C1(0.23) ID=113301 y=-0.96, z=+0.0 +0.120, x=+5.6 (P=-10.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-PW-13.015 067/01:59 2c1(0.11) ID=112302 y=-0.96, z=+0.0+0.120, x=+2.2 (P=-6.0'; Y=0') F-I2C-PW-13.014 067/03:11 ID=112303;304,306 y=-0.96, z=+0.0+0.120, x=+1.0 (P=-4.0'; Y=0') ### Lots of ACIS computer problems. Measurements done in two halfs. F-I2C-PW-13.013 067/05:30 2c1(0.11) ID=112306 y=-0.96, z=+0.0+0.120, x=+0.5 (P=-2.0'; Y=0') 03/07/97C Leon Van Speybroeck F-I2C-PI-1.006 067/06:30 ID=113007 (P=0',Y=0')y=0,z=0,x=0; 2C1(0.11) The following are HETG cases 2C0(0.66), (P=0',Y=0') F-H2C-EA-7.113 067/07:33 ID=113008 HEG-1 FAM(y=-103.3,z=+9.4,x=+24.6) F-H2C-EA-7.111 067/08:04 ID=113009 HEG+1 FAM(y=+103.3,z=-9.4,x=+24.6) F-H2C-EA-7.107 067/08:29 ID=113010 MEG-1 FAM(y= -51.7,z=-4.3,x=+15.8) F-H2C-EA-7.105 067/08:45 ID=113011 MEG+1 FAM(y= +51.7,z=+4.3,x=+15.8) F-H2C-EA-81.005 067/08:58 ID=113012 HETG0 FAM(y= 0.0,z= 0.0,z=+15.5 <<< HETG removed F-I2C-PI-2.007 067/10:02 ID=113013(P=0', Y=0'), 2C0(0.66) y=0,z=0,x=0 F-I2C-EA-12.030 067/ ID=1130 (P=-20', Y=0') 2C0(6.0) y=0, z=0, x=-20 ### ACIS crash during -I2C-EA-12.030 F-I2C-EA-12.030 067/10:15 ID=113014 (P=-20', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=-20 F-I2C-EA-12.029 067/10:45 ID=113015 (P=-15', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=-30 F-I2C-EA-12.028 067/11:03 ID=113016 (P=-10', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=+45 F-I2C-EA-12.027 067/11:21 ID=113017 (P= -6', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=+40 F-I2C-EA-12.026 067/11:37 ID=113018 (P= -4', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=+40 F-I2C-EA-12.025 067/11:56 ID=113019 (P= -2', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=0, z=0, x=+40 F-I2C-EA-2.007 067/12:14 ID=113020 (P=-20', Y=0') A2C0(6.00) y=-1, z=0, x=+40 <<< The following all have P=0', Y=0', y=z=x=0 mm ### Divide specified current by another factor of 3 for EIPS at 0.7 kV. F-I2C-CR-2.021 067/12:34 ID=113022 A2C0(0.11) I=0.24 F-I2C-CR-2.020 067/12:57 ID=113023 A2C0(0.11) I=0.24 &&& Checked autocollimator ; On axis F-I2C-CR-2.019 067/13:21 ID=113024-5 A2C0(0.11) I=0.10 (Minimum available) ### Had to re-boot A2C computer. 03/08/97A Steve O'Dell ### Had to re-start DLRS. F-I2C-CR-2.018 067/17:14 ID=113026 A2C0(0.66) I=0.23 F-I2C-CR-2.017 067/18:10 ID=113027 A2C0(0.32) I=0.23 F-I2C-CR-2.016 067/19:04 ID=113028 A2C0(0.23) I=0.23 !!! Change LN2 dewar before next measurement. F-I2C-CR-2.015 067/19:53 ID=113029-30 A2C0(0.11) I=0.23 ### Repeated: A2C temp rose to -90 due to low pressure on A2C LN2 supply. ### Re-booted A2C computer, but had enough data from both measurements. <<< The following all have the HETG, P=0', Y=0', 2C0(0.11) F-H2C-PI-4.006 067/21:37 ID=113031-2 MEG+1 A2C0(0.11) FAM(y=+51.7,z=+4.3,x=0.3) ### Restarted: Moved FAM dZ=-0.12 to center image in window. F-H2C-PI-4.005 067/22:23 ID=113033 HETG0 A2C0(0.11) FAM(y=0.0,z=+0.3,x=0.0) Notes: 1 CMDB gives incorrect specific flux for EIPS(O-K, 0.70 kV). a After correction for filter, specific flux is 3 times CMDB value. b Thus, must lower current by (additional) factor of 3 at 0.70 kV. c Submitted CMDB CO to update parameter table for EIPS(O-K). 2 CMDB calls for RC with A2C1 rather than desired A2C0. a Use F-I2C-RC-72.002a,b,c,... for remainder of this subphase. b Set A2C0(6.00) FAM(y=-3.2,z=0.0,x=+195.0), IntTime=3000(10). 02/07/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf <<< Change EIPS(SiO2) source parameters for Si-K operation. !!! Simultaneously perform the following 2 measurements: F-I2C-RC-72.002a 067/00:20 A2C0(6.00) FAM(y=-3.2,z=0.0,x=195.0) F-BND-BU-71.005 067/00:20 ID=113040 See notes F-H2C-EA-7.024 068/00:20 ID=113041 HEG-1 F-H2C-EA-7.022 068/00:56 ID=113042 HEG+1 F-H2C-EA-7.018 068/01:35 ID=113043 MEG-1 F-H2C-EA-7.016 068/01:58 ID=113044 MEG-1 F-H2C-EA-81.004 068/02:21 ID = 113045 HETG0 !!! Repeat above but with C0 ### Measurements ordered incorrectly by TC script. ### ACIS-2C computer crash. F-H2C-EA-7.017 068/03:22 ID=113048 MEG(-1) F-H2C-EA-7.015 068/04:23 ID=113049 MEG(+1) F-H2C-EA-7.023 068/04:45 ID=113050 HEG(-1) F-H2C-EA-7.021 068/05:12 ID=113051 HEG(+1) ### ACIS COMPUTER CRASH but got 80% - move on. NOTES: 1 BND5 map for Si-K was set up wrong. Asked for more power than available and did not reflect HV of subsequent tests. Ordered it to be reset to 6.96 kV. 2 BU map is clearly not positioned correctly. For example, point at SSD5 is not correct. It does not scale properly even allowing for the hole. Galen suspects that 12mm aperture reference was used for 36 mm aperture. This supposition was correct. Perhaps the wrong aperture was specified. However, looking ahead - at least to the next BU (F-BND-71.013) the file is correct in that it jibes with the specified aperture. Please check all the others. 3 The flux for the Si at the 6.96 kV setting is too high (by 60%). Steve - please check out for future measurements. 4 CMDB calls for RC with A2C1 rather than desired A2C0. Use clones of F-I2C-RC-72.002 for remainder of this subphase. Set A2C0(6.00) FAM(y=-3.2,z=0.0,x=+195.0), IntTime=3000(10). 03/08/97C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< The following are grating out, HRMA(P=0',Y=0') F-H2C-EA-81.003 068/05:40 ID=113052 2C0(0.66) (y=0.0,z=0.0,x=15.5) F-I2C-AL-61.001 068/06:49 ID=113053 2C0(0.32, Integ) (y=0.0,z=0.0,x=0, dither) ### HETG had remained in, so the run will be repeated. F-I2C-AL-61.001A 068/07:22 ID=113054 2C0(0.32,Integ) (y=0.0,z=0.0,x=0, dither) !!! Tests were run with the 4 mean free path filter and I = 1.0 mA. F-I2C-EA-66.001 068/07:42 ID=113055 2C1(6.0) (y=-1.0,z=0.0,x=40.0 (x4 filter, I=1.4ma) F-I2C-EA-67.001 068/08:06 ID=113056 2C0(6.0) (y=-1.0,z=0.0,x=40.0) <<< Switch to Ni-La (Background ID = 113063) F-BND-BU-71.013 068/08:21 ID=113064 &&& For this x4 filter, the line is about 1/8 of rate meter (total) rate F-I2C-RC-72.022 068/08:21 also <<< Following are all HETG measurements, HRMA (P=0',Y=0') !!! As counting rate for Ni-La line may only be about 1/8 (but, different filter) for the total, the zero order tests below may not work. Decided to do a brief zero order test first to see if rates are OK. Dispersed orders should be OK, as the other energy X-rays will be displaced. F-H2C-EA-99.030 068/10:01 ID=113065 2C0(0.66) HEGT0 y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=23.4 ### Found that, with the x2 filter, the line was about 55% of the total rate. The total exposure overfills the subframe. The pileup was about 6% in shell 1 and 4% in shell 6. Decided to do the tests as scheduled, but use, as a flux criteria, about 1/2 of the measured rate. F-H2C-EA-7.125 068/10:18 ID=113066 2C0(0.66) HEG-1 y=-63.6, z=+5.8, x=23.9 F-H2C-EA-7.123 068/10:30 ID=113067 2C0(0.66) HEG+1 y=+63.6, z=-5.8, x=23.9 F-H2C-EA-7.121 068/10:43 ID=113068 2C0(0.66) HETG0 y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.119 068/10:51 ID=113069 2C0(0.66) MEG-1 y=-31.8, z=-2.6, x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.117 068/11:02 ID=113070 2C0(0.66) MEG+1 y=+31.8, z=+2.6, x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.115 068/11:09 ID=113071 2C0(0.66) MEG 0 y= 0.0, z= 0.0, x=15.5 F-H2C-EA-7.126 068/11:17 ID=113072 2C1(0.66) HEG-1 y=-63.6, z=+5.9, x=23.9 F-H2C-EA-7.124 068/11:35 ID=113073 2C1(0.66) HEG+1 y=+63.6, z=-5.6, x=23.9 F-H2C-EA-7.122 068/11:52 ID=113074 2C1(0.66) HETG0 y= 0.0, z= 0.1, x=23.4 F-H2C-EA-7.120 068/12:10 ID=113075 2C1(0.66) MEG-1 y=-31.8, z=-2.5, x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.118 068/12:18 ID=113076 2C1(0.66) MEG+1 y=+31.8, z=+2.8, x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.116 068/12:27 ID=113077 2C1(0.66) HETG0 y= 0.0, z= 0.1, x=15.5 <<< The following are grating out, HRMA(P=0',Y=0') F-I2C-EA-2.012 068/12:37 ID=113078 2C0(6.0) y=-1.0, z=0.0, x=40.0 F-I2C-EA-2.020 068/12:55 ID=113079 2C1(6.0) y= 0.0, z=0.0, x=40.0 03/08/97/A Steve O'Dell <<< Change to EIPS(Mg). !!! BND backgrounds for Mg-K (1.25 keV) F-I2C-RC-72.004 068/13:09 (BG=113088) A2C0(6.00) FAM(y=-3.2,z=0.0,x=195.0) ### A2C warmed to -95. LN2 pressure had dropped. ### Rebooted A2C computers and caught up on data processing. F-BND-BU-71.004 068/14:06 ID=113089 F-I2C-EA-1.009 068/14:56 ID=113090 2C1(6.00) y=-1.0,z=0.0,x=40.0 F-I2C-EA-1.029 068/15:35 ID=113091 2C0(6.00) y= 0.0,z=0.0,x=40.0 F-H2C-EA-7.005 068/15:52 ID=113092 2C0(0.66) MEG-1 y=-21.6,z=-1.8,x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.003 068/16:15 ID=113093 2C0(0.66) MEG+1 y=+21.6,z=+1.8,x=15.6 F-H2C-EA-7.001 068/16:37 ID=113094 2C0(0.66) HETG0 y= 0.0,z= 0.0,x=15.6 !!! CLOSE SHUTTERS FOR SHELLS 1,3,&6: SHELL 4 OPEN. ### Initial attempt failed. EKC re-initialized shutter electronics. F-H2C-EA-7.011 068/17:08 ID=113095 2C0(0.66) HEG-1 y=-43.2,z=+3.9,x=23.6 F-H2C-EA-7.009 068/17:46 ID=113096 2C0(0.66) HEG+1 y=+43.2,z=-3.9,x=23.6 F-H2C-EA-7.007 068/18:05 ID=113097 2C0(0.66) HEG 0 y= 0.0,z= 0.0,x=23.6 !!! For dF-66 series, use 0.55 mA and MgK2 filter. ### CMDB erroneously called for MgK6 filter but gave flux for MgK2. &&& Dan P is looking for cause of error in flux calculation (see Note 2). F-H2C-dF-66.001 068/18:22 ID=113099 2C0(0.11) S46 x= 0.0 F-H2C-dF-66.002 068/19:05 ID=113100 2C0(0.11) S46 x=+1.0 F-H2C-dF-66.003 068/19:14 ID=113101 2C0(0.11) S46 x=-1.0 F-H2C-dF-66.004 068/19:22 ID=113102 2C0(0.11) S46 x=-0.5 F-H2C-dF-66.005 068/19:29 ID=113103 2C0(0.11) S46 x=+0.5 !!! Reset FAM boresight by dx=+0.65 mm. F-H2C-PI-2.020 068/19:50 ID=113104 2C0(0.11) HEG+1 y=+43.2,z=-3.9,x=0.2 F-H2C-PI-2.019 068/20:11 ID=113105 2C0(0.11I)HEG+1 y=+43.2,z=-3.9,x=0.2 <<< Change to EIPS(Cu). !!! BND backgrounds for Cu-K (8.04 keV) and SSD5 Cm244 calibration. !!! BND backgrounds for Si-K (1.74 keV). F-I2C-RC-72.044 068/20:26 BG=113113,20 A2C0(6.00) FAM(y=-3.2,z=0.0,x=195.0) F-I2C-dF-64.011 068/21:43 ID=113128 2C1(0.11) S4 x= 0.0 ### Restart: Move FAM dx=+0.072; increase EIPS current from 0.91 to 1.6. F-I2C-dF-64.012 068/22:11 ID=113129 2C1(0.11) S4 x=+1.0 F-I2C-dF-64.013 068/22:22 ID=113130 2C1(0.11) S4 x=-1.0 F-I2C-dF-64.014 068/22:30 ID=113131 2C1(0.11) S4 x=-0.5 F-I2C-dF-64.015 068/22:45 ID=113132 2C1(0.11) S4 x=+0.5 Notes: 1 Specific flux for EIPS settings: a Observed FPC5 count rates are running higher than CMDB value. i Si-K count rate is about 1.6 CMDB value. ii Mg-K count rate is about 1.4 CMDB value. b Will submit CMDB CO to modify specific-flux table accordingly. c A2C count rate generally runs below value in CMDB. i Focal-plane rate is about 25% below CMDB value for most measurements. ii Pile-up is still low. 2 CMDB summary can give wrong filter combinations. a Dan P determined that filter requests going to TRW are correct. b CMDB summary is confused when 2 different filter materials are used. c Dan has printed special summary with 2 columns for filters. 3 Use shutters with care. a Do not exercise shutters more than necessary. b Reset only shutters which require resetting. 4 SSD5 status during repress. a Need to raise guide-tube pressure to regenerate cryo pumps. b Galen called Mike McDermott about SSD5 during GT partial re-press. i Need to close SSD5 gate valve for P > 10^-3 Torr. ii With valve closed off, SSD can be kept cold. iii With vacuum jackets, the SSD LN2 lines will not condense moisture. 03/09/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf F-I2C-PI-3.014 068/22:53 Abort - problems with the focus plates. ### Repeat at least 1 point of focus plates. !!! Update boresight for Chip C1: X=-84.485;y=-42.384,-14.828 NOW x= -83.685, etc. THUS - this is a shell 4 only boresight!!! I2C-dF-64.012a 068/22:11 ID=113129 2C1(0.11) S4 x=+1.0 !!! Run series of offsets. Note I changed source to continue with OBF and the NiK 4 mfp filter and a current of 1.10ma . F-I2C-PI-3.014a 069/00:18 ID=113134 Z offset = +0.010 !!! Note order shift in what follows due to TRW error. F-I2C-PI-3.011 069/00:32 ID=113135 Z offset = -0.005 F-I2C-PI-3.013 069/00:51 ID=113136 Z offset = +0.005 F-I2C-PI-3.012 069/01:10 ID=113137 Z offset = 0.000 F-I2C-PI-3.010 069/01:20 ID=112138 Z offset = -0.010 F-I2C-PI-3.009 069/01:30 ID=112139 Z offset = -0.015 F-I2C-PI-3.008 069/01:40 ID=113140 Now Y +0.012 F-I2C-PI-3.007 069/01:50 ID=113141 Y+0.009 F-I2C-PI-3.006 069/01:59 ID=113142 Y+0.006 F-I2C-PI-3.005 069/02:08 ID=113143 Y+0.003 F-I2C-PI-3.003 069/02:09 ID=113144 Y-0.003 F-I2C-PI-3.002 069/02:32 ID=113145 Y-0.006 F-I2C-PI-3.001 069/02:42 ID=113146 Y-0.009 F-I2C-PI-3.004 069/02:52 ID=113147 Y-0.012 F-I2C-PI-99.031 069/03:12 ID=113149. An additional Z +0.015. ### ACIS-2C COMPUTER CRASH. F-I2C-PI-99.032 069/03:49 ID=113150 An additional Y = +0.015 !!! Now start above sequence with other (C1) chip. &&& First Focus plate - expect to change boresight by +0.175 um F-I2C-dF-63.011 069/04:08 ID=113151 2C0(0.11) S4 x= 0.0 F-I2C-dF-63.012 069/04:26 ID=113152 2C0(0.11) S4 x=+1.0 F-I2C-dF-63.013 069/04:41 ID=113153 2C0(0.11) S4 x=-1.0 F-I2C-dF-63.014 069/04:51 ID=113154 2C0(0.11) S4 x=-0.5 F-I2C-dF-63.015 069/05:03 ID=113155 2C0(0.11) S4 x=+0.5 !!! Record full change of boresight. !!! ACIS-2C wants no change. Sobeit. !!! Because counting rate was fine, I left source at the same configuration for the next tests. F-I2C-PI-4.014 069/05:16 ID=113156 Z offset = +0.010 F-I2C-PI-4.013 069/05:31 ID=113157 Z offset = +0.005 Note: 1 DO NOT STOP TESTING TOMORROW WITHOUT MY PERSONAL BLESSING. a If you finish shell 6 image - then do a shell 1 image. b Don't forget to adjust focus for these. c If you do shell 1, then do shell 3. 2 Kodak raised a request to understand the "damage to the acc o-ring plate". I called F.W. to pursue this and let us know what is going on. 03/09/97/C Jeff Kolodziejczak F-I2C-PI-4.012 069/05:41 ID=113158 Z offset = +0.000 F-I2C-PI-4.011 069/05:51 ID=113159 Z offset = -0.005 F-I2C-PI-4.010 069/06:01 ID=113160 Z offset = -0.010 F-I2C-PI-4.009 069/06:09 ID=113161 Z offset = -0.015 F-I2C-PI-4.008 069/06:18 ID=113162 Y offset = +0.012 F-I2C-PI-4.007 069/06:26 ID=113163 Y offset = +0.009 F-I2C-PI-4.006 069/06:36 ID=113164 Y offset = +0.006 F-I2C-PI-4.005 069/06:45 ID=113165 Y offset = +0.003 F-I2C-PI-4.004 069/06:53 ID=113166 Y offset = 0.0 F-I2C-PI-4.003 069/07:02 ID=113167 Y offset = -0.003 F-I2C-PI-4.002 069/07:10 ID=113168 Y offset = -0.006 F-I2C-PI-4.001 069/07:18 ID=113169 Y offset = -0.009 F-I2C-PI-99.033 069/07:27 ID=113170 Y offset = -0.012 F-I2C-PI-99.034 069/07:38 ID=113171 Y offset = -0.015 <<< Change to EIPS(O) F-I2C-RC-72.042 069/07:52 did with shell 4 only &&& We'll have time later to take a long integration. ACIS-2C didn't want to risk stuck shutters yet. <<< Front side chip: F-I2C-dF-64.001 069/08:32 ID=113180 F-I2C-dF-64.002 069/08:56 ID=113181 F-I2C-dF-64.003 069/09:03 ID=113182 F-I2C-dF-64.004 069/09:12 ID=113183 F-I2C-dF-64.005 069/09:19 ID=113184 &&& Best focus at -400 um in x F-I2C-PI-3.028 069/09:27 ID=113185 Z offset = +0.010 F-I2C-PI-3.027 069/09:51 ID=113186 Z offset = +0.005 F-I2C-PI-3.026 069/09:59 ID=113187 Z offset = +0.000 F-I2C-PI-3.025 069/10:07 ID=113188 Z offset = -0.005 F-I2C-PI-3.024 069/10:14 ID=113189 Z offset = -0.010 F-I2C-PI-3.023 069/10:23 ID=113190 Z offset = -0.015 &&& Best z position for y pixel map is at z=0 F-I2C-PI-3.022 069/10:32 ID=113191 Y offset = +0.012 F-I2C-PI-3.021 069/10:40 ID=113192 Y offset = +0.009 F-I2C-PI-3.020 069/10:49 ID=113193 Y offset = +0.006 F-I2C-PI-3.019 069/10:57 ID=113194 Y offset = +0.003 F-I2C-PI-3.018 069/11:04 ID=113196 Y offset = +0.000 ### ACIS-2C Crash F-I2C-PI-3.017 069/11:30 ID=113197 Y offset = -0.003 F-I2C-PI-3.016 069/11:41 ID=113198 Y offset = -0.006 F-I2C-PI-3.015 069/11:49 ID=113199 Y offset = -0.009 F-I2C-PI-99.035 069/12:00 ID=113200 Y offset = -0.012 F-I2C-PI-99.036 069/12:09 ID=113201 Y offset = -0.015 &&& Results indicate excellent agreement in z between ACIS-2C centroid and FAM position (.02 pixels - 1 sigma) but y is larger (.11 pixels - 1 sigma) Ball/ Mike Duncan says this is consistent with FAM resolution. <<< Back Side Chip: F-I2C-dF-63.001 069/12:20 ID=113202 F-I2C-dF-63.002 069/12:31 ID=113203 F-I2C-dF-63.003 069/12:39 ID=113204 F-I2C-dF-63.004 069/12:46 ID=113205 F-I2C-dF-63.005 069/12:55 ID=113206 &&& Best focus at 0 um in x. <<< PSF Inner Core Using ACIS, 2C0 and EIPS with the O-Ka target. F-I2C-PI-4.028 069/13:30 ID=113209 dZ=+0.010 F-I2C-PI-4.027 069/13:38 ID=113210 dZ=+0.005 F-I2C-PI-4.026 069/13:48 ID=113211 dZ=+0.000 F-I2C-PI-4.025 069/13:58 ID=113112 dZ=-0.005 F-I2C-PI-4.024 069/14:08 ID=113113 dZ=-0.010 F-I2C-PI-4.023 069/14:19 ID=113114 dZ=-0.015 F-I2C-PI-4.022 069/14:27 ID=113115 dY=+0.012 F-I2C-PI-4.021 069/14:40 ID=113116 dY=+0.009 F-I2C-PI-4.020 069/14:49 ID=113117 dY=+0.006 F-I2C-PI-4.019 069/14:59 ID=113118 dY=+0.003 F-I2C-PI-4.018 069/15:07 ID=113119 dY= 0.000 F-I2C-PI-4.017 069/15:15 ID=113120 dY=-0.003 F-I2C-PI-4.016 069/15:23 ID=113121 dY=-0.006 F-I2C-PI-4.015 069/15:32 ID=113122 dY=-0.009 03/08/97/A Steve O'Dell F-I2C-PI-99.037 069/15:48 ID=113224 F-I2C-PI-99.038 069/16:06 ID=113225 F-I2C-PI-99.039 069/16:37 ID=113227 F-I2C-PI-99.040 069/16:47 ID=113228 F-I2C-PI-99.041 069/16:57 ID=113229 F-I2C-PI-99.042 069/17:06 ID=113230 F-I2C-PI-99.043 069/17:17 ID=113233 F-I2C-PI-99.044 069/17:42 ID=113234 F-I2C-PI-99.045 069/17:57 ID=113235 F-I2C-PI-99.046 069/18:11 ID=113236 F-I2C-RC-99.047 069/18:43 ID=113237 03/10/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf 069/19:31 ID=113249 F-I2C-EA-99.048 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,TiK4) S(4,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,PHCNT) 9Hz,7400s <<< Change A2C0 from PHCNT to INTEG. <<< Replace TiK4 filter with OBF4. 069/19:31 ID=113249 !!! Check Optical alignment. &&& pitch 0";yaw -9" !!! CHANGE ALL CURRENTS FROM 2.2 Ma to 1.1 mA F-I2C-PI-99.049 069/22:38 ### Took forever because the operator forgot that in INTEG mode one counts electrons not photons. Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(4,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 440Hz, 200s <<< Close shell 4 quadrant 1 (Top). F-I2C-PI-99.050 069/23:23 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(4, NBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 330Hz, 200s <<< Close shell 4 quadrant 3 (Bottom). F-I2C-PI-99.051 069/23:31 ID =113253 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(4, N S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 220Hz, 200s <<< Close shell 4 quadrant 2 (North). F-I2C-PI-99.052 069/23:44 ID = 113254 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(4, S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 110Hz, 200s >>> Close shell 4 quadrant 4 (South). >>> Set-up for S6 measurements. >>> Move FAM from S4 focus to S6 focus: dX = -429 um. >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 4 (South). F-I2C-PI-99.053 069/23:53 ID = 113256 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(6, S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 55Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 2 (North). F-I2C-PI-99.054 070/00:03 ID = 113257 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(6, N S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 110Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 3 (Bottom). F-I2C-PI-99.055 070/00:11 ID = 113258 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(6, NBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 165Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 1 (Top). F-I2C-PI-99.056 070/00:19 ID = 113259 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(6,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 220Hz, 200s >>> Replace OBF4 filter with TiK4. >>> Change A2C0 from INTEG to PHCNT. F-I2C-PI-99.057 070/00:26 ID = 113260 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,TiK4) S(6,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,PHCNT) 5Hz,7400s ### ACIS-2C COMPUTER CRASH. >>> Close shell 6 all quadrants. >>> Set-up for S1 measurements. >>> Move FAM from S6 focus to S1 focus: dX = -0.579 um. F-I2C-PI-99.058 070/03:01 ID = 113261 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,TiK4) S(1,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,PHCNT) 9Hz, 7400s >>> Change A2C0 from PHCNT to INTEG. >>> Replace TiK4 filter with OBF4. F-I2C-PI-99.059 070/04:34 ID=113262 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(1,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 440Hz, 200s >>> Close shell 1 quadrant 1 (Top). ### HXDS problems F-I2C-PI-99.060 ID = 113263 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(1, NBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 330Hz, 200s >>> Close shell 1 quadrant 3 (Bottom). F-I2C-PI-99.061 070/04:55 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(1, N S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 220Hz, 200s >>> Close shell 1 quadrant 2 (North). F-I2C-PI-99.062 070/05:02 ID=113265 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(1, S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 110Hz, 200s ** From tc at 070/05:09:02 See you when we have an HRC !!! End F-series measurements <<< Abort the following - no time left. >>> Close shell 1 quadrant 4 (South). >>> Set-up for S3 measurements. >>> Move FAM from S1 focus to S3 focus: dX = -0.277 um. >>>> Open shell 6 quadrant 4 (South). F-I2C-PI-99.062 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(3, S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 110Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 2 (North). F-I2C-PI-99.063 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(3, N S) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 220Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 3 (Bottom). F-I2C-PI-99.064 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(3, NBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 330Hz, 200s >>> Open shell 6 quadrant 1 (Top). F-I2C-PI-99.065 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,OBF4) S(3,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,INTEG) 440Hz, 200s >>> Replace OBF4 filter with TiK4. >>> Change A2C0 from INTEG to PHCNT. F-I2C-PI-99.066 Ti(9.02kV,2.2mA,TiK2,TiK4) S(3,TNBS) 2C0(0.11,PHCNT) 9Hz,7400s >>> End measurements. !!! Get ready for the next phase. *************************** END CMDB F SERIES *************************** ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB G SERIES *************************** 03/19/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf and Harvey Tannanbaum !!! Start G series &&& HRC and ACIS-2C are installed. !!! Will TOGA shutter and EKC shutters; latter just for special HRMA settings; former for safety. !!! Source settings for CR (Count-rate linearity) tests in the 3/18/97 CMDB are wrong: See notes on the pictograms. !!! In response to flux check from tc, agree to use fpc-5. Correct rates on PS sheets using DCM beam uniformity data. Last line for any energy rel to lines above is ratio of actual fpc-5 to predicted fpc-5 on PS summaries. !!! Use ratemeter which covers 0.1 - 10.5 keV and omits pulse generator.. !!! Adjustment for fpc-5 is necessary because DCM partially occults detector so rates will differ by factors of 3x or more compared to predictions on PS Summary sheets. LVS notes factors for different energies and crystals can be smaller or larger than 1 - check with Jeff K and learn that lines can be a problem at times. Not sure what to do about this - LVS and JK to discuss. G-IHI-BG-5.001 078/22:07 BKGD run RUNID=113500 !!! HRC starts at 500V for 15 minutes, then 1000V for 15 min, 1200V, 1300V, 1400V and 1500V all for 15mins. !!! Then exercise cal source - all looks nominal, see expected source gradients across the detector, see electronic gaps, see nominal looking PHA spectrum, and more-or-less see "splotcho's" associated with uncoated regions of MCPs. Then follow with long backgd accumulation at 1500V - rate is nominal, actually lower than observed in thermal bake-out chamber: 2.6 Hz over whole field with no obvious variations nor any warm or hot spots. !!! Following this test, TRW et al turns on various chamber lights that are used at different times during testing to make sure that the HRC does not respond to these light sources. Tests are successful with no increase in HRC background noted. Also, MST continues to alternate Cm source and bkgd runs using SSD-5, to calibrate icing layer. RUNIDs =113501 & 2 for data taken after completion of &&& HRC background runs. G-IHI-FC-6.001 079/04:47 DCM 2.56keV RUNID=113504 FPC5_36=50Hz ### Test aborted due to reversal of EK shutters: B4 and S3 were open and other quadrants were closed, instead of vice versa. &&& TRW and EK fixed this communication reversal and test was restarted. RUNID=113505. &&& Count rate in HRC may be a little lower than expected, even taking into account flux ~15-20% lower than originally planned. &&& Outer ring ~2.5mm across indicating that defocus is ~25mm as expected. G-IHI-FC-6.002 079/05:37 DCM 2.56keV ID=113506 FPC5_36=48Hz !!! Compute defocus more precisely: 26.8 mm vs nominal 25 mm, reasonable agreement, so no need to adjust defocus settings for upcoming measurements. G-IHI-EA-1.119 079/06:00 DCM 2.56keV ID=113507 FPC5_36=48Hz 03/19/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHI-EA-2.085 079/06:45 DCM 3.50keV RUNID=113508 FPC5_36=Hz !!! fpc-ht rates are about 12; this leads to a correction factor of about 0.2 rather than the anticipated 0.11. &&& fpc-5 measured rate of about 155 led to an HRC rate of about 22, which PI group finds acceptable G-IHI-EA-2.133 079/07:10 DCM 3.50keV ID=113509 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.183 079/07:26 DCM 3.50keV ID=113510 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.037 079/07:38 DCM 3.50keV ID=113511 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.087 079/07:53 DCM 3.50keV ID=113512 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.039 079/08:05 DCM 3.50keV ID=113513 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.075 079/08:16 DCM 3.50keV ID=113514 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.279 079/08:25 DCM 3.50keV ID=113515 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.231 079/08:36 DCM 3.50keV ID=113516 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.277 079/08:47 DCM 3.50keV ID=113517 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.135 079/08:58 DCM 3.50keV RUNID=113518 FPC 5Hz ### Lost connection between HRC and CTUE; closed gate valve; turned off HRC High voltage. &&& Reloaded telemetry format, which fixed the communication problem. ### HRC power kill switch was turned off, and 28-V supply downstairs also got turned off (reason uncertain). !!! Turn on requires: a Turn on 28 V; check HRC relays. b Turn off 28 volts. c Turn on the HRC kill switch. d Turn on the 28 volt supply. !!! HRC high voltage brought up over a period of about 10 minutes. Flux rechecked, and run G-IHI-EA-2.135 continued (actually not started before the difficulty. Time loss about 90 minutes. G-IHI-EA-2.181 079/10:34 DCM 3.50keV ID=113519 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.229 079/10:45 DCM 3.50keV ID=113520 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.077 079/10:59 DCM 4.51keV ID=113521 FPC5_36=500Hz &&& Resulted in fpc-h rates about 26, HRC rate 38-40Hz. Current about 50% of that in the CMDB G-IHI-EA-1.079 079/11:16 DCM 4.60keV ID=113522 FPC5_36=520c/s &&& Resulted in fpc-h rates of about 27 and HRC rate of about 40 Hz G-IHI-EA-1.081 079/11:29 DCM 4.80keV ID=113523 FPC5_36=580Hz &&& Resulted in fpc-h rates of about 28, HRC rate of about 50 G-IHI-EA-1.083 079/11:44 DCM 4.90keV ID=113524 FPC5_36=620Hz &&& Resulted in fpc-h rates of about 30 and an HRC rate of about 40-50 G-IHI-EA-2.089 079/11:56 DCM 4.96keV ID=113525 FPC5_36=960c/s &&& Resulted in fpc-h rates of about 46 and HRC rates of about 70-80. !!! Note that the flux was changed DURING the bnd collect G-IHI-EA-2.137 079/12:13 DCM 4.96keV ID=113526 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.187 079/12:24 DCM 4.96keV ID=113527 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.041 079/12:30 DCM 4.96keV ID=113528 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.091 079/12:39 DCM 4.96keV ID=113529 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.043 079/12:49 DCM 4.96keV ID=113530 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.085 079/12:55 DCM 4.96keV ID=113531 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.283 079/13:02 DCM 4.96keV ID=113532 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.235 079/13:09 DCM 4.96keV ID=113533 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.281 079/13:18 DCM 4.96keV ID=113534 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.139 079/13:25 DCM 4.96keV ID=113535 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.185 079/13:35 DCM 4.96keV ID=113536 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-2.233 079/13:42 DCM 4.96keV ID=113537 FPC5_36=Hz 03/20/97/A Robert Austin / Steve O'Dell !!! Ran flux at FPC5_36=higher (current = 48 mA) G-IHI-EA-1.087 079/13:53 DCM 5.060keV ID=113538 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.089 079/14:15 DCM 5.130keV ID=113539 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.091 079/14:28 DCM 5.250keV ID=113540 FPC5_36=Hz G-IHI-EA-1.093 079/14:40 DCM 5.320keV ID=113541 FPC5_36=800Hz G-IHI-EA-1.095 079/14:51 DCM 5.480keV ID=113542 FPC5_36=863Hz G-IHI-EA-1.097 079/15:10 DCM 5.660keV ID=113543 FPC5_36=893Hz G-IHI-EA-1.099 079/15:22 DCM 5.760keV ID=113544 FPC5_36=950Hz G-IHI-EA-1.101 079/15:35 DCM 6.300keV ID=113545 FPC5_36=1000Hz G-IHI-EA-2.093 079/15:49 DCM 7.000keV ID=113546 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.141 079/15:58 DCM 7.000keV ID=113547 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.191 079/16:04 DCM 7.000keV ID=113548 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.045 079/16:12 DCM 7.000keV ID=113549 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.095 079/16:20 DCM 7.000keV ID=113550 FPC5_36=1700Hz ### Lost HRC telemetry link: Safe system, re-establish link, continue. G-IHI-EA-2.047 079/16:39 DCM 7.000keV ID=113551 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-1.103 079/16:47 DCM 7.000keV ID=113552 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.287 079/16:55 DCM 7.000keV ID=113553 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.239 079/17:03 DCM 7.000keV ID=113554 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.285 079/17:11 DCM 7.000keV ID=113555 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.143 079/17:19 DCM 7.000keV ID=113556 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.189 079/17:28 DCM 7.000keV ID=113557 FPC5_36=1700Hz G-IHI-EA-2.237 079/17:36 DCM 7.000keV ID=113558 FPC5_36=1700Hz !!! Flux-check collect DCM 2.560keV ID=113559 FPC5_36=50Hz G-IHI-EA-5.001 079/17:49 DCM 2.560keV ID=113560-1 FPC5_36=50Hz ### FAM did not dwell: Single-precision limit is 64000 ms !!!! Will need to repeat as 5 separate measurements. G-IHI-SF-4.005 079/19:54 DCM 2.560keV ID=113562-4 FPC5_36=50Hz z=+48, x=-2. Full image @ 22 mA ID=113562 1000s Shutter Focus @ 90 mA ID=113563,4 1000s x 4 ### HRC computer glitch between 3rd & 4th quadrant of this test. !!! Use new RUNID for 4th quadrant collect Full image @ 90 mA ID=113564 1000s Notes: 1 Check that Kodak selects correct shutters. 03/20/97/B Harvey Tananbaum G-IHI-SF-4.006 080/00:11 DCM 2.560keV ID=113565-6 z=+48, x=+2. Full image @ 22 mA ID=113565 1000s FPC5_36=13Hz Shutter Focus @ 90 mA ID=113566 1000s x 4 FPC5_36=50Hz Full image @ 90 mA !!! Delete last colllect because **-4.005 showed no change in image position from start to end of test. G-IHI-KF-1.005 080/02:28 DCM 2.560keV ID=113567-8 Z=0.0 x=-2 Full image @22mA ID=113567 1000s FPC5_36=16HZ ### After this test step (and starting KF part) HRC CTUE Computer link fails. With loss of telemetry HRC HV is turned off for safety reasons. Then reset everything. &&& Problem traced to error in HRC script, code fixed and checked. Knife-edge Focus @ 90mA ID=113568 1000s x 4 FPC5_36=45Hz ### During first quadrant test, noted knife edge shutters let nothing through to HRC, so adjust positions of limit switches and get things set up as required. Then repeat first quadrant collect. G-IHI-KF-1.006 080/05:33 DCM 2.560keV ID=113569-70. !!! Return to 500-s integrations to prevent overrun on elapsed time. Z=0.0 x=+2 Full image @22mA ID=113569 500s FPC5_36=13HZ Knife-edge Focus @ 90mA ID=113570 500s x 4 FPC5_36=52Hz !!! Following 2 SF tests and 2 KF tests, will update focus using average of two SF tests. <<< Next 9 tests use source settings in table provided by Jeff. &&& FPC5 rates become so low that wiil sometimes need test integrations to verify post-facto that source produced enough flux. Flux verification at start of test will confirm that source is not excessively bright, but not much more. 03/20/97C Leon Van Speybroeck !!! Move nominal focal plane (boresight) for HRI/DCM forward (+X; towards HRMA) by 1.040 mm based on the shutter focus tests. !!! I conclude that correction for DCM shadowing has been included by Jeff in his table; I decided to set flux with blocking filter removed (to get more counts), and then put in filter for the run. &&& Counting rate approximately as expected from Jeff's table. !!! Did short HRC run first to check if rate is as desired. Found that HRC rate was about 0.2 Hz for this configuration (AgL x2 filter; 51 mA). ### Decided to abort test G-IHI-CR-1.001 and proceed to G-IHI-CR-2.001 G-IHI-CR-1.001 080/06:48 DCM 2.56keV ID=11357 use Jeff source table;sim_z=60. ### Aborted. Low rate! ??? (MCW) Rate probably low due to "obscuration" at SIMZ=60. G-IHI-CR-2.001 080/07:18 DCM 2.56keV ID=113571 20 kV, 10 mA, OBF2 (1000 s) &&& HRC rate 0.371 Source rate (RoI, bkg subtr) = 4.88 ### Found diffuse scatter or source counts displaced along + y direction. G-IHI-CR-2.003 080/08:00 DCM 2.56keV ID=113572 20 kV, 25 mA OBF2 (500 s) &&& HRC rate 0.996 Source rate (RoI, bkg subtr) = 12.94 (Linear so far) ### Diffuse region counts are (80/498) of image, displaced about 7 arcsec from main image. This corresponds to about 16 mm at the source/DCM distance. !!! Will do brief special test later (after G-IHI-EA-3.183) in this geometry, but with DCM set to 3.50 keV to see if we get the same thing. G-IHI-CR-2.005 080/08:22 DCM 2.56keV ID=113573 20 kV, 48 mA, OBF2 (250 s) &&& HRC rate 1.84 Source rate (RoI, bkg subtr) = 25.54 (Linear so far) G-IHI-CR-2.007 080/08:36 DCM 2.56keV ID=113574 20 kV, 90 mA, OBF2 (125 s) &&& HRC rate 3.28 Source rate (RoI, bkg subtr) = 46.71 (about 7% lower) ### Abort 1.003-1.009 (Detector is reasonably) linear for higher rates) G-IHI-CR-1.003 aborted G-IHI-CR-1.005 aborted G-IHI-CR-1.007 aborted G-IHI-CR-1.009 aborted <<< Following are DCM 3.40 keV runs; reduced current from 90 to 45 mA to get proper fpc-h rates. Got fpc-5 = 150, fpc-h = 13 (OK) !!! Run series as a super measurement G-IHI-EA-3.193 080/08:49 DCM 3.50keV ID=113575 (HRMA, P= 0.0,Y=-20.0) G-IHI-EA-3.181 080/09:24 DCM 3.50keV ID=113576 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-20.0) &&& (pore angle) G-IHI-EA-3.133 080/09:40 DCM 3.50keV ID=113577 (HRMA, P= +4.0, Y=-16.0) G-IHI-EA-3.037 080/09:59 DCM 3.50keV ID=113578 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-12.0) G-IHI-EA-3.085 080/10:13 DCM 3.50keV ID=113579 (HRMA, P= -4.1, Y= -8.0) G-IHI-EA-4.056 080/10:28 DCM 3.50keV ID=113580 (HRMA, P=+15.5, Y= -3.9) G-IHI-EA-4.028 080/10:47 DCM 3.50keV ID=113581 (HRMA, P=+12.0, Y= 0.0) G-IHI-EA-4.030 080/11:01 DCM 3.50keV ID=113582 (HRMA, P=+20.0, Y= 0.0) G-IHI-EA-4.055 080/11:19 DCM 3.50keV ID=113583 (HRMA, P=+15.5, Y= -3.9) G-IHI-EA-3.087 080/11:34 DCM 3.50keV ID=113584 (HRMA, P= -4.1, Y= +8.0) G-IHI-EA-3.039 080/11:52 DCM 3.50keV ID=113585 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+12.0) G-IHI-EA-3.135 080/12:06 DCM 3.50keV ID=113586 (HRMA, P= +4.0, Y=+16.0) G-IHI-EA-3.183 080/13:22 DCM 3.50keV ID=113587 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+20.0) !!! Special test to see if displaced image is peculiar to the DCM at 2.56 keV; a duplicate of the geometry of test G-IHI-CR-2.001-7, but at an energy of 3.50 keV. Reduced current from 45 mA to 10 mA to adjust counting rate. G-IHI-CR-99.058 080/13: ID=113588. Diffuse image still present, &&& Ratio to main image = (90/627), or the same as at the lower energy. !!! Will look at image of EIPS later (no DCM) <<< Following are DCM 4.96 keV runs; run as a super measurement !!! Adjust all currents to 57.65 mA; adjust times accordingly. &&& Adjusted current to 40 mA to better match counting rates expected. 03/21/97/A Martin C. Weisskopf G-IHI-EA-3.185 080/13:05 ID=113589 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-20.0) G-IHI-EA-3.137 080/13:31 ID=113590 (HRMA, P= +4.0, Y=-16.0) FPC5=560 G-IHI-EA-3.041 080/13:45 ID=113591 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-12.0) G-IHI-EA-3.089 080/13:56 ID=113592 (HRMA, P= -4.1, Y= -8.0) G-IHI-PI-2.021 080/14:09 ID=113593 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y= -8.0)(SIMZ=38) FPC5 1030 G-IHI-EA-4.058 080/14:25 ID=113594 (HRMA, P= +15.5, Y= -3.9)(SIMZ=0) FPC5 890 G-IHI-PI-2.011 080/14:44 ID=113597 (HRMA, P= -1.4, Y= -1.4)(SIMZ=38) FPC5=55 G-IHI-PI-2.005 080/15:41 ID=113599 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y= -1.0)(SIMZ=38) G-IHI-PI-2.006 080/16:25 ID=113600 (HRMA, P= -1.0, Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=38) &&& HRMA Check - dead on (to within 1") G-IHI-PI-1.005 080/17:12 ID=113602 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=38) !!! Insert repeats of 3 CR tests. These may not (did not) achieve their flux levels (at the focal plane) because they were performed at SIMZ=60 which was partially occulted. !!! We will redo, but with SIMZ = 48. ### Long delay - DLRS problems. G-IHI-CR-2.003a 080/18:07 DCM 2.56keV ID=113603 20 kV, 25 mA OBF2 G-IHI-CR-2.005a 080/18:55 DCM 2.56keV ID=113604 20 kV, 48 mA, OBF2 G-IHI-CR-2.007a 080/19:12 DCM 2.56keV ID=113605 20 kV, 90 mA, OBF2 G-IHI-PI-2.022 080/19:24 ID=113606 (HRMA, P=-8.0, Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=38) FPC5 875 G-IHI-PI-2.024 080/19:39 ID=113607 (HRMA, P=+8.0, Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=38) G-IHI-EA-4.031 080/19:52 ID=113608 (HRMA, P=+12.0,Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=0) G-IHI-EA-4.033 080/20:04 ID=113609 (HRMA, P=+20.0,Y= 0.0)(SIMZ=0) G-IHI-PI-2.012 080/20:19 ID=113610 (HRMA, P=-1.4,Y=+1.4)(SIMZ=38) FPC5=58 ** From tc_m at 080/20:37:39 Hold 5 min. for FAM move - will restart after move complete. ### Had to restart. Wrong position. I caught this. ID=113611 03/21/97/B Harvey Tananbaum G-IHI-EA-4.057 080/21:22 ID=113612 (HRMA, P=+15.5, Y=+3.9)(SIMZ=0) FPC5=875 G-IHI-PI-2.023 080/21:47 ID=113613 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+8.0)(SIMZ=38) FPC5=865 G-IHI-EA-3.091 080/22:13 ID=113614 (HRMA, P=-4.1, Y=+8.0) (SIMZ=0) FPC5=864 G-IHI-EA-3.043 080/22:32 ID=113615 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+12.0)(SIMZ=0) FPC5=873 G-IHI-EA-3.139 080/22:48 ID=113616 (HRMA, P=+4.0, Y=+16.0)(SIMZ=0) FPC5=867 G-IHI-EA-3.187 080/23:05 ID=113617 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+20.0)(SIMZ=0) FPC5=885 <<< Following are DCM runs at 7.0 keV, 90 mA; do as a super measurement. !!! FPC5 is now run with 12mm aperture G-IHI-EA-3.189 080/23:25 ID=113618 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-20.0) FPC5=250Hz G-IHI-EA-3.141 080/23:52 ID=113619 (HRMA, P= +4.0, Y=-16.0) FPC5=232Hz G-IHI-EA-3.045 081/00:11 ID=113620 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=-12.0) FPC5=230Hz G-IHI-EA-3.093 081/00:29 ID=113621 (HRMA, P= -4.1, Y= -8.0) FPC5=232Hz G-IHI-EA-4.060 081/00:47 ID=113622 (HRMA, P= +15.5, Y= -3.9) FPC5=234Hz G-IHI-EA-4.034 081/01:15 ID=113623 (HRMA, P= +12.0, Y= 0.0) FPC5=250Hz G-IHI-EA-4.036 081/01:30 ID=113624 (HRMA, P= +20.0, Y= 0.0) FPC5=236Hz G-IHI-EA-4.059 081/01:49 ID=113625 (HRMA, P= +15.5, Y= +3.9) FPC5=238Hz G-IHI-EA-3.095 081/02:07 ID=113626 (HRMA, P= -4.1, Y= +8.0) FPC5=237Hz G-IHI-EA-3.047 081/02:31 ID=113627 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+12.0) FPC5=228Hz G-IHI-EA-3.143 081/02:55 ID=113628 (HRMA, P= +4.0, Y=+16.0) FPC5=233Hz G-IHI-EA-3.191 081/03:10 ID=113629 (HRMA, P= 0.0, Y=+20.0) FPC5=224Hz G-IHI-EA-1.115 081/03:29 DCM 8.000keV ID=113630 (HRMA, P,y= 0.0) FPC5=1284Hz G-IHI-EA-1.117 081/03:46 DCM 9.000keV ID=113631 (HRMA, P,y= 0.0) FPC5=208Hz ### For this energy, beam uniformity scans indicate 20:1 difference between FPC5 position and in the beam rate. &&& Observe ~10% rate predicted in PS Summary, so use FPC_ht rate of 42Hz to OK run. <<< Following runs are DCM at 2.560 keV 88.4 mA (HRMA p=0.0, y=0.0). ### No PS Summary available for these 5 tests. Run source at 90mA. G-IHI-EA-15.001 081/04:10 ID=113632 FPC5=54Hz G-IHI-EA-15.002 081/04:37 ID=113633 FPC5=53Hz G-IHI-EA-15.003 081/04:57 ID=113634 FPC5=51Hz G-IHI-EA-15.004 081/05:22 ID=113635 FPC5=49Hz G-IHI-EA-15.005 081/05:43 ID=113636 FPC5=52Hz 03/21/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< Following are HETG measurements (with HRMA p=0.0, y=0.0) G-HHI-EA-7.048 081/06:04 DCM 7.000keV HETG+1 ID=113640 BNDH=70Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.047 081/06:49 DCM 6.300keV HETG+1 ID=113641 BNDH=70Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.046 081/07:17 DCM 5.760keV HETG+1 ID=113642 BNDH=75Hz @ 90mA !!! Change current from 90 to 75 mA to reduce HRC rate to 100 Hz. !!! Move FAM from z=-15.0 to x=-25.0, better to isolate HRMA shells. G-HHI-EA-7.045 081/07:40 DCM 5.660keV HETG+1 ID=113643 BNDH=65Hz @ 75mA G-HHI-EA-7.044 081/08:23 DCM 5.480keV HETG+1 ID=113644 BNDH=60Hz @ 75mA !!! Move FAM from z=-25.0 to x=+25.0, for better HRMA image. G-HHI-EA-7.043 081/08:46 DCM 5.320keV HETG+1 ID=113645 BNDH=60Hz @ 75mA G-HHI-EA-7.042 081/09:10 DCM 5.250keV HETG+1 ID=113646 BNDH=60Hz @ 75mA G-HHI-EA-7.041 081/09:31 DCM 5.130keV HETG+1 ID=113647 BNDH=60Hz @ 75mA G-HHI-EA-7.040 081/09:45 DCM 5.060keV HETG+1 ID=113648 BNDH=60Hz @ 75mA G-HHI-EA-7.039 081/09:58 DCM 4.960keV HETG+1 ID=113649 BNDH=65Hz @ 90mA ### Re-boot HRC computer. G-HHI-EA-7.038 081/10:14 DCM 4.900keV HETG+1 ID=113650 BNDH=65Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.037 081/10:32 DCM 4.800keV HETG+1 ID=113651 BNDH=55Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.036 081/10:50 DCM 4.600keV HETG+1 ID=113652 BNDH=55Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.035 081/11:08 DCM 4.510keV HETG+1 ID=113653 BNDH=50Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.034 081/11:28 DCM 4.000keV HETG+1 ID=113654 BNDH=40Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.033 081/11:50 DCM 3.500keV HETG+1 ID=113655 BNDH=30Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.032 081/12:28 DCM 2.290keV HETG+1 ID=113657 BNDH= 7Hz @ 90mA ### +200 detune wasn't done here, but shouldn't matter for grating test. G-HHI-EA-99.059 081/13:18 DCM 7.000keV HETG+1 ID=113658 BNDH=70Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-99.060 081/13:35 DCM 6.300keV HETG+1 ID=113659 BNDH=70Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-99.061 081/13:49 DCM 5.760keV HETG+1 ID=113660 BNDH=75Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.031 081/14:02 DCM 1.950keV HETG+1 ID=113661 BNDH=11Hz @ 90mA G-HHI-EA-7.030 081/14:24 DCM 1.700keV HETG+1 ID=113662 BNDH=15Hz @ 90mA 03/22/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak G-HHI-EA-10.003 081/14:43 DCM~1.540keV HETG+1 ID=113663 BNDH=21Hz @ 90mA !!! Above measurement was last with FAM x=+25; use CMDB values below. G-LHI-EA-10.004 081/15:37 DCM 1.540keV LETG+1 ID=113664 BNDH=21Hz @ 90mA G-IHI-EA-1.109 081/16:41 DCM 1.400keV OTG=0 ID=113665 BNDH=12Hz @ 52mA G-IHI-EA-1.111 081/17:02 DCM 1.530keV OTG=0 ID=113666 BNDH=12Hz @ 75mA G-IHI-EA-1.113 081/17:13 DCM 1.570keV OTG=0 ID=113667 BNDH= 8Hz @ 75mA 03/22/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf G-IHI-SL-1.002 081/17:24 DCM 2.560 keV ID=113667 BNDH=8Hz @ 32.7ma &&& Checked HRC snapshot 50 sec 2.6 cnts/sec is ok ### FAM had to bring its file over from snowwhite. ### Aborted test at line 307 because of errors in the locfile spatlinI.as converted by TRW. Cost is about 5 hours. Simply restart. 081/22:06 Restarting measurement now. ID=113669-70 ### BND_HB tripped. All HXDS stopped writing data during run ID=113670 G-IHS-BG-5.002 082/03:48 ID=113671 Background and HRC-S setup. !!! Steve, see my marked up CMDB for new/correct order. ### The CR tests were NOT SET UP CORRECTLY! !!! See wall for Jeff's notes as to correct setup! 03/22/97/C Steve O'Dell ### FPC_HB HV tripped: Reset. <<< RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 2.560 keV) G-IHS-EA-1.120 082/07:11 ID=113672 G-IHS-SF-4.007 082/07:53 ID=113673 x=-2.0 G-IHS-SF-4.008 082/10:00 ID=113674 x=+2.0 03/23/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! Update HRC-S FAM boresight by dx=-0.63, dz=+2.0. &&& TRW calculation needed to be updated for HRC-S orientation z=-U,y=+V. G-IHS-RF-7.001 082/11:18 ID=113676 x=+65.2, y=104.0, SIMz=-3.4 !!! Adjusted SIMZ to -2.6 to get full shell6 G-IHS-RF-7.002 082/12:53 ID=113677 x=+65.2, y=+55.0, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-RF-7.003 082/13:10 ID=113678 x=+65.2, y=+36.7, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-RF-7.004 082/13:24 ID=113679 x=+65.2, y=-28.7, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-RF-7.005 082/13:37 ID=113680 x=+65.2, y=-47.0, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-RF-7.006 082/13:51 ID=113681 x=+65.2, y=-96.0, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-KF-1.007 082/14:05 ID=113682 x=+65.2, y=-96.0, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-KF-1.008 082/15:57 ID=113683 x=+65.2, y=-96.0, SIMz=-2.6 G-IHS-CR-1.004 082/16:56 ID=113686 2.56 keV &&& HRC rate was lower than predicted (0.25 Hz) (BNDs OK) so increased current to 36 mA w/ AgL2 filter: HRC-S 0.49 Hz FPC_5= 4.3 Hz in 75-150 roi G-IHS-CR-1.002 aborted G-IHS-CR-2.002 082/18:20 ID=113688 16 mA, no filter &&& HRC-S rate=1.06c/s FPC_5= 9.18c/s in 75-150 roi G-IHS-CR-2.004 082/18:57 ID=113689 33 mA, no filter &&& HRC-S rate=2.12c/s FPC_5= 18.61c/s in 75-150 roi G-IHS-CR-2.006 082/19:14 ID=113690 90 mA, no filter &&& HRC-S rate=5.69c/s FPC_5= 47.71c/s in 75-150 roi G-IHS-CR-2.008 aborted G-IHS-CR-99.062 082/19:46 ID=113692 !!! Increase to 3.5 keV to get higher HRC-S count rates, 33mA, no filter HRC-S rate=7.69c/s FPC_5= 104.67c/s in 100-200 roi (excludes Argon escape) G-IHS-CR-99.063 082/20:03 ID=113693 16mA, no filter &&& HRC-S rate=3.85c/s FPC_5= 52.85c/s in 100-200 roi G-IHS-CR-99.062 082/20:24 ID=113694 90mA, no filter &&& HRC-S rate=19.84c/s FPC_5= 297.8c/s in 100-200 roi 11% drop at 20 c/s 03/23/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf Notes: I was talking to Dan Schwartz about effective areas, he said that Dale G calculates his optical constants using a 3-layer model, with zerodur, Cr, and Ir, (optionally Hydrocarbons, not used yet). Diab is using an infinitely thick Ir layerin the HRMA model, and I wonder if Ron E is doing the same thing. I wonder too, if this could explain the discrepancy above the Ir edge. G-IHS-EA-6.001 082/20:37 ID=113695 G-IHS-SL-2.002 082/21:56 Reset current to 32.5 mA; then to 60 mA. ### CTU crashed at point 222. Pick up again. ID=113696. <<< Super Measurement DCM=3.50 keV FPC5 = 300 G-IHS-EA-3.182 083/01:37 (P= 0.0;Y=-16.0) HRCS(Y=47.8;Z= 0.0;x= 0.1) ID=113697 G-IHS-EA-3.134 083/01:58 (P= 2.9;Y=-11.6) HRCS(Y=34.8;Z= 8.7;x= 0.1) ID=113698 G-IHS-EA-3.038 083/02:11 (P= 0.0;Y= -9.0) HRCS(Y=26.9;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) ID=113699 G-IHS-EA-3.086 083/02:24 (P=-2.7;Y= -5.8) HRCS(Y=17.3;Z=-8.0;x= 5.0) ID=113700 G-IHS-EA-2.086 083/02:38 (P= 0.0;Y= -3.0) HRCS(Y= 8.9;Z= 0.0;X= 5.0) ID=113701 G-IHS-EA-2.134 083/03:01 (P=-1.4;Y= -1.4) HRCS(Y= 4.2;Z=-4.2;X= 5.0) ID=113702 G-IHS-EA-2.184 083/02:50 (P= 1.4;Y= -1.4) HRCS(Y= 4.2;Z= 4.2;X= 5.0) ID=113703 G-IHS-EA-2.038 083/03:13 (P= 0.0;Y= -1.0) HRCS(Y= 3.0;Z= 0.0;X= 5.0) ID=113704 G-IHS-EA-2.088 083/03:24 (P=-2.7;Y= 0.0) HRCS(Y= 0.0;Z=-8.0;X= 5.0) ID=113705 G-IHS-EA-2.040 083/03:36 (P=-1.0;Y= 0.0) HRCS(Y= 0.0;Z=-3.0;X= 5.0) ID=113706 G-IHS-EA-1.076 083/03:47 (P= 0.0;Y= 0.0) HRCS(Y= 0.0;Z=-3.0;X= 5.0) ID=113707 G-IHS-EA-2.280 083/03:58 (P= 1.0;Y= 0.0) HRCS(Y= 0.0;Z= 3.0;X= 5.0) ID=113708 G-IHS-EA-2.232 083/04:09 (P= 2.7;Y= 0.0) HRCS(Y= 0.0;Z= 8.0;X= 5.0) ID=113709 G-IHS-EA-2.278 083/04:19 (P= 0.0;Y= 1.0) HRCS(Y=-3.0;Z= 0.0;X= 5.0) ID=113710 G-IHS-EA-2.136 083/04:30 (P=-1.4;Y= 1.4) HRCS(Y=-4.2;Z=-4.2;X= 5.0) ID=113711 G-IHS-EA-2.182 083/04:41 (P= 1.4;Y= 1.4) HRCS(Y=-4.2;Z= 4.2;X= 5.0) ID=113712 G-IHS-EA-2.230 083/04:52 (P= 0.0;Y= 3.0) HRCS(Y=-8.9;Z=-3.0;X= 5.0) ID=113713 G-IHS-EA-3.088 083/05:03 (P=-2.7;Y= 5.8) HRCS(Y=-17.3;Z=-8.0;x= 5.0) ID=113714 G-IHS-EA-3.040 083/05:15 (P= 0.0;Y= 9.0) HRCS(Y=-26.9;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) ID=113715 G-IHS-EA-3.136 083/05:25 (P= 2.7;Y= 11.6) HRCS(Y=-34.8;Z= 8.0;x= 0.1) ID=113716 G-IHS-EA-3.184 083/05:37 (P= 0.0;Y= 16.0) HRCS(Y=-52.8;Z= 0.0;x= 0.1) ID=113717 03/23/97/C Steve O'Dell < HRC-S measurements << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.510 keV), FPC_H = 50 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.078 083/05:56 ID=113718 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.600 keV), FPC_H = 50 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.080 083/06:13 ID=113719 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.800 keV), FPC_H = 55 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.082 083/06:23 ID=113720 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.900 keV), FPC_H = 60 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.084 083/06:34 ID=113721 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 60 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.960 keV), FPC_H = 40 Hz. G-IHS-EA-3.186 083/06:43 ID=113722 ( 0.0',-16.0') (Y=+47.8;Z= 0.0;x=+0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.138 083/07:14 ID=113723 (+2.7',-11.6') (Y=+34.8;Z=+8.0;x=+0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.042 083/07:23 ID=113724 ( 0.0', -9.0') (Y=+26.9;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) >> !!! HRCS rates are 2/3 expected: Increase current from 60 to 90 mA. << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.960 keV), FPC_H = 60 Hz. G-IHS-EA-3.090 083/07:32 ID=113725 (-2.7', -5.8') (Y=+17.3;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.090 083/07:44 ID=113726 ( 0.0', -3.0') (Y= +8.9;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.138 083/07:50 ID=113727 (-1.4', -1.4') (Y= +4.2;Z=-4.2;x=+5.0) ### TOGA shutter failed to close on first command, but closed on second. G-IHS-EA-2.188 083/07:59 ID=113728 (+1.4', -1.4') (Y= +4.2;Z=+4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.042 083/08:06 ID=113729 ( 0.0', -1.0') (Y= +3.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.092 083/08:13 ID=113730 (-2.7', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.044 083/08:24 ID=113731 (-1.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=-3.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-1.086 083/08:32 ID=113732 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.284 083/08:38 ID=113733 ( 1.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=+3.0;x=+5.0) ### TOGA shutter failed to close on first command, but closed on second. G-IHS-EA-2.236 083/08:44 ID=113734 (+2.7', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=+8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.282 083/08:51 ID=113735 ( 0.0', +1.0') (Y= -3.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.140 083/08:57 ID=113736 (-1.4', +1.4') (Y= -4.2;Z=-4.2;x=+5.0) ### TOGA shutter failed to close on first command, but closed on second. G-IHS-EA-2.186 083/09:04 ID=113737 (+1.4', +1.4') (Y= -4.2;Z=+4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.234 083/09:11 ID=113738 ( 0.0', +3.0') (Y= -8.9;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-3.092 083/09:17 ID=113739 (-2.7', +5.8') (Y=-17.3;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-3.044 083/09:26 ID=113740 ( 0.0', +9.0') (Y=-26.9;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.140 083/09:32 ID=113741 (+2.7',+11.6') (Y=-34.8;Z=+8.0;x=+0.1) ### TOGA shutter failed to close on first command, issue TOGA STATUS. ??? Too many processes may be polling GPIB for TOGA shutter: !!! Quitting PS and TC TOGA-shutter displays: solved problem. G-IHS-EA-3.188 083/09:41 ID=113742 ( 0.0',+16.0') (Y=-52.75;Z= 0.0;x= 0.1) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 28 mA), DCM(Ge, 4.960 keV) [VK2], FPC_5 = 32 Hz. !!! DITHER: SERPENTINE G-IHS-PI-1.006 083/10:10 ID=113743 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 48 mA), HRMA( 0.0', 0.0'), FAM(Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0): G-IHS-EA-1.088 083/11:00 ID=113744 (Ge, 5.060 keV), FPC_H = 32 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.090 083/11:15 ID=113745 (Ge, 5.130 keV), FPC_H = 36 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.092 083/11:24 ID=113746 (Ge, 5.250 keV), FPC_H = 36 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.094 083/11:33 ID=113747 (Ge, 5.320 keV), FPC_H = 36 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.096 083/11:42 ID=113748 (Ge, 5.480 keV), FPC_H = 36 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.098 083/11:50 ID=113749 (Ge, 5.660 keV), FPC_H = 37 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.100 083/11:59 ID=113751 (Ge, 5.760 keV), FPC_H = 36 Hz. G-IHS-EA-1.102 083/12:08 ID=113752 (Ge, 6.300 keV), FPC_H = 43 Hz. >> << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), DCM(Ge, 7.000 keV), FPC_H = 65 Hz: G-IHS-EA-3.190 083/12:18 ID=113753 ( 0.0',-16.0') (Y=+47.8;Z= 0.0;x=+0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.142 083/12:32 ID=113754 (+2.7',-11.6') (Y=+34.8;Z=+8.0;x=+0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.046 083/12:41 ID=113755 ( 0.0', -9.0') (Y=+26.9;Z= 0.0;x=+0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.094 083/12:50 ID=113756 (-2.7', -5.8') (Y=+17.3;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.094 083/13:01 ID=113757 ( 0.0', -3.0') (Y= +8.9;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.142 083/13:10 ID=113758 (-1.4', -1.4') (Y= +4.2;Z=-4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.192 083/13:18 ID=113759 (+1.4', -1.4') (Y= +4.2;Z=+4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.046 083/13:28 ID=113760 ( 0.0', -1.0') (Y= +3.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.096 083/13:36 ID=113761 (-2.7', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.048 083/13:44 ID=113762 (-1.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=-3.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-1.104 083/13:51 ID=113763 ( 0.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.288 083/13:59 ID=113764 ( 1.0', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=+3.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.240 083/14:06 ID=113765 (+2.7', 0.0') (Y= 0.0;Z=+8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.286 083/14:13 ID=113766 ( 0.0', +1.0') (Y= -3.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.144 083/14:21 ID=113767 (-1.4', +1.4') (Y= -4.2;Z=-4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.190 083/14:29 ID=113768 (+1.4', +1.4') (Y= -4.2;Z=+4.2;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.238 083/14:37 ID=113769 ( 0.0', +3.0') (Y= -8.9;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-3.096 083/14:45 ID=113770 (-2.7', +5.8') (Y=-17.3;Z=-8.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-3.048 083/14:56 ID=113771 ( 0.0', +9.0') (Y=-26.9;Z= 0.0;x= 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.144 083/15:06 ID=113772 (+2.7',+11.6') (Y=-34.8;Z=+8.0;x= 0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.192 083/15:16 ID=113773 ( 0.0',+16.0') (Y=-52.7;Z= 0.0;x= 0.1) >> 03/24/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! Use 36-mm aperture for FPC_5, for all measurements. << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), HRMA( 0.0', 0.0'), OTG = NONE: G-IHS-EA-1.116 083/15:34 ID=113774 (Ge, 8.000 keV) (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) G-IHS-EA-1.118 083/15:48 ID=113775 (Ge, 9.000 keV) (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) >> << RAS7(20 kV, 90 mA), HRMA( 0.0', 0.0'), OTG = LEG+1: G-IHS-EA-7.029 083/16:16 ID=113776 (Ge, 7.000 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=+1.5;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.028 083/16:57 ID=113777 (Ge, 6.300 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=+1.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.027 083/17:33 ID=113778 (Ge, 5.760 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=-1.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.026 083/18:00 ID=113780 (Ge, 5.660 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=-1.5;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.025 083/18:30 ID=113781 (Ge, 5.480 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=-2.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.024 083/18:54 ID=113782 (Ge, 5.320 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=-2.5;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.023 083/19:14 ID=113783 (Ge, 5.250 keV) (Y=-1.5;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.022 083/19:34 ID=113784 (Ge, 5.130 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=+1.5;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.021 083/19:56 ID=113785 (Ge, 5.060 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=+1.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.020 083/20:15 ID=113786 (Ge, 4.960 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=-1.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.019 083/20:35 ID=113787 (Ge, 4.900 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=-1.5;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.018 083/20:58 ID=113788 (Ge, 4.800 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=-2.0;x=-5.0) G-IHS-EA-7.017 083/21:22 ID=113789 (Ge, 4.600 keV) (Y=-1.0;Z=-2.5;x=-5.0) 03/24/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf ### XSS is down! Circuit tripped on pump? G-LHS-EA-7.016 083/21:57 ID=113790 (Ge, 4.510) (Y=-1.0;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=1000 G-LHS-EA-7.015 083/22:44 ID=113791 (Ge, 4.000) (Y=-0.5;Z=+2.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=645 G-LHS-EA-7.014 083/23:18 ID=113792 (Ge, 3.500) (Y=-0.5;Z=+1.5;x=-5.0) FPC5=300 G-LHS-EA-7.013 084/00:09 ID=113793 (Ge, 2.350) (Y=-0.5;Z=+1.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=58 ### Delayed due to RCTU error. G-LHS-EA-7.012 084/01:13 ID=113794 (Ge, 2.290) (Y=-0.5;Z=-1.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=60 G-LHS-EA-7.011 084/02:23 ID=113795 (TAP,2.260) (Y=-0.5;Z=-1.5;x=-5.0) FPC5=312 !!! Switch to TAP at request of LETG (P.P.) G-LHS-EA-7.010 084/03:06 ID=113796 (TAP,2.230) (Y=-0.5;Z=-2.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=360 G-LHS-EA-7.009 084/03:35 ID=113797 (TAP,2.190) (Y=-0.5;Z=-2.5;x=-5.0) FPC5=290 G-LHS-EA-7.008 084/04:05 ID=113799 (TAP,2.150) (Y=-0.5;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=300 ### Experienced TOGA status problems, which MST/ John Moran resolved G-LHS-EA-7.007 084/04:35 ID=113800 (TAP 2.100) (Y=+0.5;Z=+1.5;x=-5.0) FPC5=331 G-LHS-EA-7.006 084/04:58 ID=113801 (TAP,2.050) (Y=+0.5;Z=+1.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=1300 G-LHS-EA-7.005 084/05:24 ID=113802 (TAP,1.980) (Y=+0.5;Z=-1.0;x=-5.0) FPC5=386 G-LHS-EA-7.004 084/05:48 ID=113803 (TAP,1.950) (Y=+0.5;Z=-1.5;x=-5.0) FPC5=321 03/24/97/C Steve O'Dell G-LHS-EA-7.003 084/06:11 ID=113804 (TAP,1.900) (Y=+0.5;Z=-2.0;x=-5.0) FPC_H= 8 G-LHS-EA-7.002 084/06:37 ID=113805 (TAP,1.800) (Y=+0.5;Z=-2.5;x=-5.0) FPC_H=33 G-LHS-EA-7.001 084/06:59 ID=113806 (TAP,1.700) (Y=+0.5;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) FPC_H=15 G-LHS-EA-10.001 084/07:15 ID=113807 1.45:1.63x4 (Y=+0.5;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) FPC_H=17 G-LHS-EA-10.002 084/08:16 ID=113808 1.45:1.63x4 (Y=+0.5;Z=-3.0;x=-5.0) FPC_H=17 >> End LETG measurements. G-IHS-EA-1.110 084/09:08 ID=113809 (TAP, 1.400) (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) FPC_H=10 G-IHS-EA-1.112 084/09:26 ID=113810 (TAP, 1.530) (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) FPC_H= 7 G-IHS-EA-1.114 084/09:39 ID=113811 (TAP, 1.570) (Y= 0.0;Z= 0.0;x=+5.0) FPC_H=10 > End DCM HRC measurements. < Change to EIPS(C) << HRC-I measurements G-IHI-RC-82.010 084/09:53 HRC-I FCM !!! Need to repeat BND BGs set up for 0.278 keV. &&& BGs were mistakenly performed set up for 3.5 keV (DCM setting). G-BND-BU-81.007 084/11:01 ID=113826 FPC_5:36 !!! SF used EIPS(C, 1.11 kV, 0.20 mA)[CK2][OBF] to obtain FPC_5(36)=115. G-IHI-SF-4.001 084/12:31 ID=113827-28 (Y= 0.0;Z=+48.0;x=-2.0) G-IHI-SF-4.002 084/14:29 ID=113829-30 (Y= 0.0;Z=+48.0;x=+2.0) !!! Adjusted ALL HRC-I boresights by +50 um. NOTES: 1 EIPS(C) current and flux settings. a CMDB flux calculations do not include OBF ~50% transmission. b CMDB treats these situations differently. i CR ,SL, PI C-K measurements: XSS settings are correct; flux is 0.5 CMDB value. ii For all other C-K measurements: Flux is correct; XSS current should be 2 times CMDB value. 03/25/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak G-IHI-CR-4.001 084/15:37 ID=113832 (v=0.55,i=0.12,CK2+OBF) 8.7c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-CR-4.003 084/16:49 ID=113833 (v=0.55,i=0.44,CK2+OBF) 33.c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-CR-4.005 084/17:06 ID=113834 (v=0.80,i=0.25,CK2+OBF) 58.c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-CR-4.007 084/17:27 ID=113835 (v=0.80,i=0.50,CK2+OBF) 117c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-CR-4.009 084/17:39 ID=113836 (v=0.80,i=0.80,CK2+OBF) 187c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-CR-4.011 084/17:50 ID=113837 (v=0.55,i=0.44,OBFonly) 305c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHI-SL-1.001 084/18:06 ID=113838 (v=0.55,i=0.25,CK2+OBF) ### FAM has developed problems. 'sticks". &&& Turned out to be a non-problem. Requested steps were too long for the dwell time; thus the FAM could not keep up. ### An xpander error makes all the C-K fluxes too high. &&& I made a table for setting source parameters for C-K until it's fixed. 03/25/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! For all PI, change order and source settings to make them work and to perform super measurements. G-IHI-PI-2.013 084/22:24 v=1.11, i=0.8,CK2+OBF, FPC5=475 ID=113839 G-IHI-PI-2.007 084/22:44 v=0.55, i=0.44,CK2+OBF,FPC5=30 ID=113840 G-IHI-PI-3.006 084/23:45 v=0.55, i=0.44,CK2+OBF,FPC5=30 ID=113841 !!! Steve Murray says he could run with twice the count rate (and thus half the time). I will change to a new setting for the next test. G-IHI-PI-2.001 85/00:42 v=0.80, i=0.305, CK2+OBF, FPC5=75 ID=113842 ### link out to RTCU <<< v=0.80, i=0.305, CK2+OBF, FPC5=75 for the next measurements. G-IHI-PI-3.008 085/01:20 ID=113843 !!! Cranked up HV on all BNDh detectors to try to pull above the noise. G-IHI-PI-2.002 085/01:54 ID=113848; 49 G-IHI-PI-1.001 085/02:36 ID=113850 G-IHI-PI-3.002 085/03:05 ID=113851 G-IHI-PI-3.004 085/03:39 ID=113852 G-IHI-PI-3.007 085/04:07 ID=113853 G-IHI-PI-2.008 085/04:39 ID=113854 G-IHI-PI-3.005 085/05:17 ID=113855 G-IHI-PI-3.001 085/05:49 ID=113856 NOTES: 1 There are NO HXDS printouts for A-shift tests. Please ask for summed spectra (all 6 detectors) and count rate versus time from FPC5. The crew (Dan Schwartz) should go back and do this for yesterday's tests. 2 FPCHn is dominated by noise and is thus useless at low energies given the nominal settings. Better to raise voltage. Please have MST investigate. 3 FAM step file for SL test seems to have violated the step-size for the given dwell time. This is why the FAM "stuck". 4 We perused CMDB's "fixed" results for carbon. An arbitrary example compared to a test we were running showed that it was off by a factor of 2. Do not use new software fix until it is correct. 03/24/97/C Steve O'Dell << EIPS(C, 0.55, 0.35) [CK2][OBF] G-IHI-PI-3.003 085/06:21 ID=113857 >> << EIPS(C, 1.11, 0.80) [CK2][OBF] G-IHI-PI-2.014 085/06:51 ID=113858 { -8.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,-23.9;+0.0) G-IHI-PI-2.016 085/07:13 ID=113859 { +8.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,+23.9;+0.0) G-IHI-PI-2.015 085/07:29 ID=113860 { 0.0', +8.0'} (+23.9, 0.0;+0.0) >> << EIPS(C, 1.11, 0.55) [CK2][OBF] G-IHI-EA-3.153 085/07:43 ID=113861 { 0.0',-20.0'} (+59.7, 0.0;+0.2) >> << EIPS(C, 1.11, 0.65) [CK2][OBF] FPC_5(36)=380; FPC_H=5 G-IHI-EA-3.105 085/08:08 ID=113862 { +4.0',-16.0'} (+47.8,+11.9;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-3.009 085/08:22 ID=113863 { 0.0',-12.0'} (+35.8, 0.0;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-3.057 085/08:31 ID=113864 { -4.1', -8.0'} (+23.9,-12.2;+0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.057 085/08:41 ID=113865 { 0.0', -4.0'} (+11.9, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-4.042 085/08:51 ID=113866 {+15.5', -3.9'} (+11.6,+46.3;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-2.105 085/09:05 ID=113867 { -1.4', -1.4'} ( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.155 085/09:20 ID=113868 { +1.4', -1.4'} ( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.009 085/09:28 ID=113869 { 0.0', -1.0'} ( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.059 085/09:36 ID=113870 { -4.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.011 085/09:45 ID=113871 { -1.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.251 085/09:53 ID=113872 { +1.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.203 085/10:01 ID=113873 { +4.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-4.007 085/10:11 ID=113874 {+12.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,+35.8;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-4.009 085/10:22 ID=113875 {+20.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,+59.7;+0.2) G-IHI-EA-2.249 085/10:37 ID=113876 { 0.0', +1.0'} ( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.107 085/10:50 ID=113877 { -1.4', +1.4'} ( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.153 085/11:02 ID=113878 { +1.4', +1.4'} ( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-4.041 085/11:11 ID=113879 {+15.5', +3.9'} (-11.6,+46.3;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-2.201 085/11:29 ID=113880 { 0.0', +4.0'} (-11.9, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-3.011 085/11:41 ID=113881 { 0.0',+12.0'} (-35.8, 0.0;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-3.155 085/11:54 ID=113882 { 0.0',+20.0'} (-59.7, 0.0;+0.2) G-IHI-EA-1.005 085/12:08 ID=113883 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0) >> ### Halt 085/12:20 DLRS and CTUE failures forced shut down. &&& Re-boot DLRS and bring up HRC-S. !!! Skip following 2 measurements: G-IHI-EA-3.059 Skip { -4.1', +8.0'} (-23.9,-12.2;+0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.107 Skip { +4.0',+16.0'} (-47.8,+11.9;+0.1) < Change to HRC-S. G-IHS-SF-4.003 085/13:48 ID=113893 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0;-2.0);+8.0 G-IHS-SF-4.004 085/15:19 ID=113895 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0;+2.0);+8.0 !!! Adjusted ALL HRC-S boresights by 0 um. (Centroid average gave -17 um.) Notes: 1 DLRS and CTUE crashed with 2 HRC-I EA measurements remaining. a Turned off HRC-I high voltage at CTUE crash. b Brought up HRC-S and went on to HRC-S CMDB. i Skipped G-IHI-EA-3.059 and 3.107 (last 2 HRC-I C-K measurements). ii If 2 HRC-I measuremEnts are needed, perform after HRC-S C-K. 2 CMDB flux calculations have problems: a CMDB settings are sometimes wrong. i Use (HRC-I/FPC_5_36) = 0.10. b Need to account for correct filter region on HRC-S detector. i Use (HRC-S_tee/FPC_5_36) = 0.10. ii Use (HRC-S_inner/FPC_5_36) = (HRC-S_outer/FPC_5) = 0.20. iii Use (HRC-S_strip/FPC_5_36) = 0.04. 3 Recorded LASS-Z positions for HRC primary aim points: a At HRC-I aim point, LASS-Z = -517.984. a At HRC-S aim point, LASS-Z = -641.480. 03/26/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak G-IHS-PI-1.002 085/16:30 ID=113896 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0;+0.0);+8.0 G-IHS-SL-2.001 085/17:31 ID=113897 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0;+0.0);+0.0 G-IHS-CR-4.002 084/ ID=113898;99 (v=0.55,i=0.12,CK2+OBF) 8.4c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.004 084/ ID=113900 (v=0.55,i=0.44,CK2+OBF) 32.c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.006 084/ ID=113901 (v=0.80,i=0.25,CK2+OBF) 64.c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.008 084/ ID=113902 (v=0.80,i=0.50,CK2+OBF) 125c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.010 084/ ID=113903 (v=0.80,i=0.80,CK2+OBF) 187c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.012 084/ ID=113904 (v=0.65,i=0.58,OBFonly) 305c/s@fpc5;20:110roi G-IHS-CR-4.012a 085/22:46 ID=113905 (v=0.65,i=0.30,OBF only) Notes: 1 When we switch to Be, check rate vs. fpc voltage. Last time, we had to increase the Voltage 100 V 03/26/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf << Super measurement for (C,v=1.11, i= 0.8). !!! Note the rate is up (Oxygen and Fe-l?) <<< These are various positions and off-axis angles. G-IHS-EA-3.154 085/23:03 ID=113906 G-IHS-EA-3.106 085/23:16 ID=113907 G-IHS-EA-3.010 085/23:26 ID=113908 G-IHS-EA-3.058 085/23:35 ID=113909 G-IHS-EA-2.058 085/23:45 ID=113910 G-IHS-EA-2.106 085/23:53 ID=113911 G-IHS-EA-2.156 086/00:02 ID=113912 G-IHS-EA-2.058a 086/00:11 ID=113913 (mistakenly repeated) G-IHS-EA-2.010 086/00:22 ID=113914 G-IHS-EA-2.060 086/00:29 ID=113915 G-IHS-EA-2.012 086/00:39 ID=113916 G-IHS-EA-1.006 086/00:47 ID=113917 G-IHS-EA-2.252 086/00:55 ID=113918 G-IHS-EA-2.204 086/01:02 ID=113919 G-IHS-EA-2.250 086/01:10 ID=113920 G-IHS-EA-2.108 086/01:19 ID=113921 G-IHS-EA-2.154 086/01:29 ID=113922 G-IHS-EA-2.202 086/01:37 ID=113923 G-IHS-EA-3.060 086/01:45 ID=113924 G-IHS-EA-3.012 086/01:54 ID=113925 G-IHS-EA-3.108 086/02:0 ID=113926 G-IHS-EA-60.012 086/02:10 ID=113927 << EIPS(C, 0.740, 0.60) [CK2][OBF] G-IHS-SM-23.005 086/02:24 ID=113928 SIMZ=-6.6 is correct << EIPS(C, 0.740, 0.72) [CK2][OBF] G-IHS-SM-23.005a 086/02:55 ID=113929 G-IHS-SM-23.006 086/03:26 ID=113930;31 SIMZ=-6.1? is correct G-IHS-SM-24.005 086/04:16 ID=113932 ### Y wrong. Change from 34 to 47, SIMZ=-6.4 G-IHS-SM-24.006 086/04:57 ID=113933 ### Y wrong. Change from -42 to -37, SIMZ=-6.3 << EIPS(C, 1.300, 1.00) [CK2][OBF] FPC5=1300 G-IHS-SL-21.002 086/05:31 ID=113934 Change SIMZ to -0.05 (Thus"z" = -6.30) 03/26/97/C Steve O'Dell << EIPS(C, 1.10, 0.60) [OBF] LEG+1 !!BLOCK m=0!! HESF FPC_5(36)=3300 G-LHS-SM-30.002 086/06:21 ID=113935 {-0.3', 0.0'} ( 0.0,-1.0; 0.0);-6.3 G-LHS-SM-30.001 086/07:31 ID=113936 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0);-6.3 G-LHS-SM-30.003 086/06:21 ID=113937 {+0.3', 0.0'} ( 0.0,+1.0; 0.0);-6.3 >> << EIPS(C, 1.10, 0.50) [OBF] LEG+1 !!DEFOCUS!! FPC_5(12)=300 G-LHS-EA-5.003 086/08:12 ID=113938 { 0.0', 0.0'} (+1.5,-0.5;-5.0) >> << EIPS(C, 15.0, 0.10) [BK4] LEG+1 !!SEAM m=0 & DITHER!! FPC_5(12)=1000 !!Set up FPCs for 3.5 keV x rays. G-LHS-MC-11.001 086/08:43 ID=113946 { 0.0', 0.0'} (+1.5,-0.5;-5.0) >> !!! Change to EIPS(Be). !!! Change to HRC-I. G-IHI-BG-82.011 086/09:59 ID=113953 FPCs set for C-K (0.277 keV) G-IHI-BG-82.041 086/10:44 ID=113959 FPCs set for Be-K (0.108 keV) !!! Increase FPC voltages by 14 V over nominal setting for Be-K. << EIPS(Be, 0.85, 1.00) [BeK4] (Increase FPCs by 14 V.) FPC_5(36)=330 G-BND-BU-81.022 086/11:00 ID=113983-4 FPC_5(36) map: 15 x 100 s >> ??? Initial run was 20-s dwell, so re-started with 100-s dwell. ??? Broke map into 2 parts because of incorrect dwell time for 1 location. << EIPS(Be, 0.30, 0.17) [0][0] FPC_5(36)=33 G-IHI-EA-3.097 086/12:52 ID=113985 { +4.0',-16.0'} (+47.8,+11.9;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-3.145 086/13:56 ID=113986 { 0.0',-20.0'} (+59.7, 0.0,+0.2) ??? FPC_HB HV tripped during ID=113986: Re-set FPC_HB HV. G-IHI-EA-3.001 086/14:52 ID=113988 { 0.0',-12.0'} (+35.8, 0.0;+0.1) G-IHI-EA-3.049 086/15:47 ID=113989 { -4.1', -8.0'} (+23.9,-12.2; 0.0) NOTES: 1 Perform grating measurement G-LHS-EA-5.003 at all 3 voltages! (mcw) Pre-occupied with safely performing G-LHS-MC-11.001, I forgot. (slo) 2. The Cm calibration source for SSD_5 was in place during G-IHI-EA-2.049. 03/27/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak / Robert Austin G-IHI-EA-2.049 086/16:43 ID=113990 { 0.0', -4.0'} (+11.9, 0.0; 5.0) G-IHI-EA-4.038 086/19:07 ID=113991 { 15.5', 3.9'} (+11.6, 46.3; 0.1) ### FPC_HB HV tripped during ID=113991: Re-set FPC_HB HV. G-IHI-EA-2.147 086/20:01 ID=113992&93 { 1.4', 1.4'} ( 4.2, 4.2; 5.0) NOTES: 1 Cm calibration source for SSD_5 was in place during G-IHI-EA-2.049. 2 During G-IHI-EA-2.147, pwrmon (displays detector voltages) started generating continuous errors; the pc was hung and had to be rebooted. The acis_collect was discontinued and then restarted. 03/27/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! Insert (in set up) look at source with OBF removed. &&& Left filament on but turned off source high voltage. (This should have been done a long time ago!). If successful, we can reduce length of the next tests. The detector saw nothing! !!! Remove OBF filter for all remaining tests! !!! With no Be filter, this changes the spectrum, so will measure with LETG - SEE 99.065-068 below. Gamble a bit and perform the following tests with no filters at all - but for shorter time. ### Bad move it turns out but no worse than already planned measurements. << EIPS(Be;V=0.440;I=0.169; NO FILTERS) G-IHI-EA-2.001 086/22:27 ID=113994 G-IHI-EA-2.003 086/22:57 ID=113995 G-IHI-EA-2.097 086/23:26 ID=113996 G-IHI-EA-2.051 086/23:51 ID=113997 G-IHI-BG-82.043 087/00:13 ID=113998 !!! Insert LETG <<< EIPS(Be;V=0.440;I=0.3; NO FILTERS) G-LHI-EA-99.065 087/00:36 ID=113999 !!! Repeat, but move detector to get both C AND Be in 1st order G-LHI-EA-99.066 087/01:02 ID=114000 <<< EIPS(Be;V=0.440;I=0.3; BeK2 Filter) G-LHI-EA-99.067 087/01:27 ID=114001 <<< EIPS(Be;V=0.30;I=0.16; NO Filter) G-LHI-EA-99.068 087/01:54 FPC5=27 ID=114002 HRMA{0';0'} FAM{0,0,5,SIMZ=0} !!! Conclude tests without filter are dominated by C, even at lowest voltage. Steve M agrees to delete all remaining off-axis, no-Be-filter, tests with the HRC-I. We will check the situation with HRC-S later. <<< EIPS(Be;V=0.43 ;I=0.30; BeK2 filter) G-IHI-EA-1.001 087/02:26 ID=114003 HRMA{0';0'} FAM{0,0,5,SIMZ=0} G-IHI-EA-2.243 087/03:48 ID=114004 HRMA{1';0'} FAM{3,5,0,SIMZ=0} G-IHI-EA-2.195 087/04:59 ID=114005 HRMA{4';0'} FAM{5,0,11.9,SIMZ=0} 03/26/97/C Steve O'Dell !!! Reduce beam current slightly, to lower filament current to 5.8 A. << EIPS(Be, 0.43, 0.293) [BeK2] G-IHI-EA-2.145 087/06:04 ID=114006 { +1.4', +1.4'} ( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.241 087/07:10 ID=114007 { 0.0', +1.0'} ( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.099 087/08:22 ID=114008 { -1.4', +1.4'} ( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.193 087/09:35 ID=114009 { 0.0', +4.0'} (-11.9, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.001a 087/10:40 ID=114010 { 0.0', -1.0'} ( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.003a 087/11:45 ID=114011 { -1.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.097a 087/12:50 ID=114012 { -1.4', -1.4'} ( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0) G-IHI-EA-2.051a 087/13:57 ID=114014 { -4.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0) 03/29/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak/Robert A. Austin G-IHI-BG-82.045 087/15:06 ID=114015 { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.098 087/15:49 ID=114017 { 2.7', 10.7'} ( 31.9 7.9; 0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.146 087/17:00 ID=114018 { 0.0',-16.0'} ( 47.8 0.0; 0.1) G-IHS-EA-3.002 087/18:05 ID=114020 { 0.0', -9.0'} ( 26.9 0.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.050 087/19:14 ID=114021 { -2.7', 5.2'} ( 15.5 -7.9; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.148 087/20:22 ID=114022 { 1.4', -1.4'} ( 4.2 4.2; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.050 087/21:31 ID=114023 { 0.0', 2.7'} ( 7.9 0.0; 5.0) !!! Rearranging and redefining tests Notes: 1 We don't need OBF with EIPS nor any other source. See comments above. 2 For upcoming tests with HRC-S through EA-60.004, please be sure to use voltage setting (0.43,0.30) and Be filter [BeK2]. Adjust integration time accordingly. Those tests that had the filter in already should be shorter. Those tests that had the filter out will be longer. If they are too long, skip them or talk to Steve M. 03/28/97/B Martin Weisskopf G-IHS-EA-2.002 087/22:37 ID=114024;25;26 { 0.0', -1.0'} ( 3.0 0.0; 5.0) ### HXDS problems - reboot - reboot - irig problems. G-IHS-EA-2.004 087/23:42 ID=114027-30 { -1.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0 -3.0; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.098 088/00:47 ID=114031;32 { -1.4', -1.4'} ( 4.2 -4.2; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.052 088/01:56 ID=114033-36 { -1.4', -1.4'} ( 4.2 -4.2; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-1.002 088/03:01 ID=114038,9,41-4 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0 0.0; 5.0) G-IHI-BG-82.047 088/04:08 ID=114845-48 G-IHS-EA-2.196 088/04:33 ID=114049 { 2.7', 0.0'} ( 0.0 7.9; 5.0) G-IHS-EA-2.146 088/05:43 ID=114050 { 1.4', 1.4'}{ -4.2 4.2; 5.0} NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE STEVE O'DELL GETS THIS FOR CMDB MEETING. We need a slightly revised strategy for EIPS measurements to avoid some problems we have incurred. Use the upcoming Boron measurements as an example. The CMDB for these measurements, in all but one case, asks for the same voltage. Ignoring the anomaly for the moment, start the Boron tests with LETG in place - namely pull G-LHS-EA-5.010 to the first measurement. Hence, we can evaluate the spectrum to see if we really want this voltage and filter combination. The obvious concern is that "punch-through" may dominate BND data and thus normalization is impossible. Any changes should be reflected in a global change. Talk with Jeremy Drake to see about the one SL measurement that is set up at a different voltage/current/filter. For the low-energy sources, get all BND data at same incident flux (because we'll need all of it and I am worried about spectral purity. Follow this approach (as much as possible) for all EIPS targets (other than current changes, which are easy to deal with). 03/28/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHS-EA-2.244 088/06:56 ID=114053 { 1.0', 0.0'}{ 0.0 3.0; 5.0} G-IHS-EA-2.242 088/08:01 ID=114055 { 0.0', 1.0'}{ -3.0 0.0; 5.0} G-IHS-EA-2.194 088/09:07 ID=114056 { 0.0', 2.7'}{ -7.9 0.0; 5.0} G-IHS-EA-2.100 088/10:10 ID=114059 { -1.4', 1.4'}{ -4.2 -4.2; 5.0} G-IHS-EA-3.052 088/11:21 ID=114062 { -2.7', 5.2'}{-15.5 -7.9; 5.0} G-IHS-EA-3.004 088/11:44 ID=114063 { 0.0', 9.0'}{-26.9 0.0; 0.0} G-IHS-EA-3.100 088/12:07 ID=114065 { 2.7',10.7'}{-31.9 7.9; 0.1} ### Run G-IHS-EA-3.100 ended 200 s (of 3600) early because of a telemetry dropout. Fixed. ### IRIG times have been bad all evening; currently showing day 001 (Happy New Year!) G-IHS-EA-60.004 088/13:22 ID=1140667 { 0.0',14.7'}{-41.9 0.0; 0.1} ### Run G-IHS-EA-60.004 required FAM move +2 mm in Y from nominal to avoid detector edge. Run had to be restarted. ### Previous loss of telemetry caused a computer hang; rebooted. 03/29/97/A Steve O'Dell << EIPS(Be, 0.43, 0.293) [BeK2] (continued) G-IHS-SM-23.001 088/14:10 ID=114068 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-135.0, 0.0; 0.0);-6.0 G-IHS-SM-23.002 088/15:03 ID=114069 { 0.0', 0.0'}(+135.0, 0.0; 0.0);-5.6 G-IHS-SM-24.001 088/16:11 ID=114070 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -34.0, 0.0; 0.0);-5.8 G-IHS-SM-24.002 088/16:59 ID=114071 { 0.0', 0.0'}( +42.0, 0.0; 0.0);-5.8 G-LHS-SM-30.007 088/17:46 ID=114073 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0);-5.8 !!! Changed above from 0 defocus to +5.0-mm defocus. ### IRIG problem went away at 18:07 GMT. G-LHS-EA-5.009 088/20:05 ID=114074 { 0.0', 0.0'}( +2.5, -0.5;-5.0) >> 03/28/97/B Martin Weisskopf !!! Change to EIPS(B) !!! Do NOT change FPC settings. Use FPC set up for Be-K also for B-K. !!! Perform HRC-S measurements before HRC-I measurements. << EIPS(B, 0.73, 0.72) [BK2] G-IHS-BG-82.049 088/21:36 ID=114075 Leave FPCs set for Be-K (0.108 keV). <<< EIPS(B; v=0.73; i=0.72 (Fila = 5.8)} Super measurement. FPC5=630 G-LHS-EA-5.010 088/22:33 ID=114077 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 2.0, -0.5,-5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.102 088/23:30 ID=114078 { 2.7', -10.7'}( 31.9, 7.0, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.150 088/23:47 ID=114079 { 0.0', -16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.006 088/23:58 ID=114080 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.054 089/00:08 ID=114081 { -2.7', -5.2'}( 15.5,-7.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.152 089/00:23 ID=114082 { 1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2, 4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.054 089/00:33 ID=114083 { 0.0', -2.7'}( 7.9, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.006 089/00:45 ID=114084 { 0.0', -1.0'}( 3.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.008 089/00:55 ID=114085 { -1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0,-3.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.102 089/01:06 ID=114086 { -1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2,-4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.056 089/01:16 ID=114087 { -2.7 ', 0.0'}( 0.0,-7.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-1.004 089/01:26 ID=114088 { 0.0 ', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.200 089/01:35 ID=114089 { 2.7', 0.0'}( 0.0, 7.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.150 089/01:45 ID=114090 { 1.4', 1.4'}( -4.2, 4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.248 089/01:54 ID=114091 { 1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 3.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.246 089/02:03 ID=114092 { 0.0', 1.0'}( -3.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.198 089/02:13 ID=114093 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -7.9, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-2.104 089/02:22 ID=114094 { -1.4 ', 1.4'}( -4.2, 4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.104 089/02:32 ID=114095 { 2.7', 10.7'} ( -31.9, 7.9, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.008 089/02:44 ID=114096 { 0.0', 9.0'} ( -26.9, 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-3.056 089/02:53 ID=114097 { -2.7', 5.2'} ( -15.5,-7.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHS-EA-60.008 089/03:04 ID=114098 { 0.0', 14.7'} ( -43.9, 0.0, 0.1; 0.0) ### Fam in wrong position (-42.0) - restart. G-IHS-SM-23.003 089/03:15 ID=114099 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -137.0, 0.0, 0.0; -5.90) G-IHS-SM-23.004 089/03:29 ID=114100 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 137.0, 0.0, 0.0; -5.60) ### "not good" - try -5.80 G-IHS-SM-24.003 089/03:46 ID=114101 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -35.0, 0.0, 0.0; -5.75) G-IHS-SM-24.004 089/03:?? ID=114102 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 43.0, 0.0, 0.0; -5.75) G-IHS-SL-21.001 089/04:04 ID=114103 { 0.0', 0.0'}( file) ??? Why does file "defocus" to 3.75? ### HRC lost Telemetry (but at step 76 of 84), so ended measurement. G-LHS-SM-30.006 089/05:15 ID=114104 { 0.3', 0.0'}( 0.0, +1.0, 0.0;-5.75) 03/29/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-LHS-SM-30.004 089/05:48 ID=114105 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0; -5.75) G-LHS-SM-30.005 089/06:17 ID=114106 { -0.3', 0.0'}( 0.0, -1.0; 0.0;-5.75) !!! FAM should switch from HRC-S to HRC-I during BU measurement. G-BND-BU-81.021 089/06:39 ID=114107 G-IHI-EA-3.149 089/07:30 ID=114108 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0, 0.2; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.101 089/07:53 ID=114109 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.105 089/08:17 ID=114110 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.053 089/08:29 ID=114111 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2, 0.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.053 089/08:40 ID=114112 { 0.0', -4.0'}( 11.9, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-4.040 089/08:50 ID=114113 { 15.5', -3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.101 089/09:11 ID=114114 { -1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2, -4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.151 089/09:25 ID=114115 { 1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2, 4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.005 089/09:35 ID=114116 { 0.0', -1.0'}( 3.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.055 089/09:45 ID=114117 { -4.0', 0.0'}( 0.0,-11.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.007 089/09:56 ID=114118 { -1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, -3.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-1.003 089/10:05 ID=114119 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.199 089/10:16 ID=114120 { 4.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 11.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.247 089/10:26 ID=114121 { 1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 3.0, 5.0; 0.0) !!! Above were run at 1460 per plate, rather than standard 1480. &&& Expected effect is small, but will repeat above at 1480 volts, to quantify and continue to operate at 1480 volts. G-IHI-EA-2.247A 089/10:40 ID=114122 { 1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 3.0, 5.0; 0.0) !!! Found ~16% effect; called SSM for desired operating voltage. Need HRC turn-on script. SSM selected 1480; repeat previous runs. G-IHI-EA-4.006 089/10:52 ID=114123 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7, +0.2; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-4.004 089/11:15 ID=114124 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8, +0.1; 0.0) <<< Repeat runs: G-IHI-EA-3.149A 089/11:27 ID=114125 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0, 0.2; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.101A 089/11:43 ID=114126 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.105A 089/11:58 ID=114127 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-3.053A 089/12:10 ID=114128 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2, 0.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.053A 089/12:20 ID=114129 { 0.0', -4.0'}( 11.9, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-4.040A 089/12:30 ID=114130 { 15.5', -3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3, 0.1; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.101A 089/12:46 ID=114131 { -1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2, -4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.151A 089/12:59 ID=114132 { 1.4', -1.4'}( 4.2, 4.2, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.005A 089/13:09 ID=114133 { 0.0', -1.0'}( 3.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.055A 089/13:19 ID=114134 { -4.0', 0.0'}( 0.0,-11.9, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.007A 089/13:30 ID=114135 { -1.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, -3.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-1.003A 089/13:39 ID=114136 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0, 5.0; 0.0) G-IHI-EA-2.199A 089/13:53 ID=114137 { 4.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 11.9, 5.0; 0.0) End repeat runs >>> !!! Note: Some differed by 50%! 03/30/97/A Steve O'Dell << EIPS(B, 0.73, 0.72) [BK2] (continued) G-IHI-EA-2.149 089/14:02 ID=114138 { +1.4', +1.4'}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.245 089/14:12 ID=114139 { +0.0', +1.0'}( -3.0, 0.0,+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.103 089/14:21 ID=114140 { -1.4', +1.4'}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.039 089/14:32 ID=114141 {+15.5', +3.9'}(-11.6,+46.3;+0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.197 089/14:45 ID=114142 { 0.0', +4.0'}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.103 089/14:57 ID=114143 { +4.0',+16.0'}(-47.8,+11.9;+0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.007 089/15:11 ID=114144 { +0.0',+12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0;+0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.151 089/15:22 ID=114145 { +4.0',+20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0;+0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.055 089/15:36 ID=114146 { -4.1', +8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2;+0.0); 0.0>> G-IHI-BG-82.053 089/15:51 ID=114147 >>> End B-K measurements. <<< Begin Ti-L measurements. G-IHI-BG-82.019 089/16:24 ID=114156 << EIPS(Ti, 0.90, 0.94) [TiL2] G-LHS-EA-5.006 089/16:58 ID=114158 Aborted: ### FPCs, SSD5, and LETG indicate target is NOT Ti, but C. ### XSS had installed C target instead of Ti. G-IHI-BG-82.019 089/16:24 ID=114159 G-LHS-EA-5.006 089/16:58 ID=114160 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -0.5, -0.5;-5.0); 0.0) G-LHS-EA-99.069 089/18:48 ID=114161 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -0.5, -0.5;-5.0); 0.0) G-BND-BU-81.011 089/19:11 ID=114162 03/30/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf G-IHS-SM-23.007 089/19:37 ID=114164 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-141.0, 0.0, 3.8; -5.9) G-IHS-SM-23.008 089/20:33 ID=114166 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 141.0, 0.0, 3.8; -6.1) G-IHS-SM-24.007 089/21:17 ID=114167 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -37.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.25) G-IHS-SM-24.008 089/21:50 ID=114168 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 45.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.25) G-IHS-SL-22.001 089/22:13 ID=114169 { 0.0', 0.0'}( file -see log ) <<< Begin Si-K measurements. G-IHI-BG-82.009 089/23:10 ID=114177 G-LHS-EA-5.004 089/23:52 ID=114178 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 1.0, -0.5, -5.0; 0.0) ### Flux in the FPC5 was very low (65 cs). !!! Raised current to 0.2 mA and got 135 c/s, perfect for the measurement. !!! Insert CrL2 filter and raise current to 1.047. FPC5(12)=107 gives a much cleaner spectrum. << EIPS(SiO2; CrLx2 filter i.e. O2 line) ### Higher energy contamination - see SSD and grating spectra G-BND-BU-81.006 090/00:43 ID=114179 (FPC5_12)=100 &&& FPC5_36=330 (v=1.04;i=0.36) G-IHS-SM-23.009 090/01:47 ID=114180 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-143.0, 0.0, 3.8; -6.6) G-IHS-SM-23.010 090/02:00 ID=114181 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 143.0, 0.0, 3.8; -6.1) G-IHS-SM-24.009 090/02:11 ID=114182 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -38.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.3) G-IHS-SM-24.010 090/02:22 ID=114183 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 46.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.3) ### Need shutters! &&& FPC5_36=1000; HRMA alignment check (3.5" y; 1.5" z): Switch to HRC-I G-HHI-EA-6.001 090/02:35 ID=114184;5 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.0, 0.0, -5.0; 0.0) ### RCTU problems - 2 segments'. More problems, declare victory, move on. << Back to HRC-S and Silicon line (ZrL2 filter) ### CMDB asks for current that cannot be obtained at this voltage. ### CMDB asks for 2.30 mA and can only achieve 1.75. This led to flux a factor of two still too bright (for FPC5 and BNDs). Lower current to 0.85. << EIPS(SiO2; v=3.46 i=0.831; filter = ZrL2) !!! Some punch through. G-LHS-EA-5.008 090/03:49 ID=114193 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.5, -0.5, -5.0; 0.0) G-BND-BU-81.005 090/04:39 ID=114194 (FPC5_12)=100 G-IHS-SM-25.009 090/05:27 ID=114195 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-142.0, 0.0, 3.5; -7.5) G-IHS-SM-25.010 090/05:53 ID=114196 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 142.0, 0.0, 3.5; -7.5) 03/30/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHS-SM-26.009 090/06:07 ID=114197 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -39.0, 0.0, -3.0; -7.5) G-IHS-SM-26.010 090/06:24 ID=114198 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 47.0, 0.0, -3.0; -7.5) NOTES: 1 Frustrated with CMDB. Source settings (and predicted fluxes) were way off for both O2 and Si. <<< Change to EIPS(Fe-L) G-IHI-BG-82.015 090/06:42 ID=114206 << LETG G-LHS-EA-5.007 090/07:50 ID=114207 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.0, -0.5, -5.0; 0.0) G-BND-BU-81.009 090/08:11 ID=114208 !!! Change filter in the following to the X2; current to 0.3 mA G-IHS-SM-24.011 090/09:14 ID=114209 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -40.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.3) G-IHS-SM-24.012 090/09:33 ID=114210 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 48.0, 0.0, -3.0; -6.3) !!! Change current to 2.0 mA (approximate maximum) G-IHS-SM-25.001 090/09:50 ID=114211 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -134.0, 0.0, 3.5; -7.5) G-IHS-SM-25.002 090/10:08 ID=114212 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 134.0, 0.0, 3.5; -7.5) G-IHS-SM-26.001 090/10:28 ID=114213 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -35.0, 0.0, 0.0; -7.5) G-IHS-SM-26.002 090/10:49 ID=114214 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 43.0, 0.0, 0.0; -7.5) G-IHS-SL-22.002 090/11:05 ID=114216 { 0.0', 0.0'}( File ) << HETG G-HHI-EA-6.005 090/12:07 ID=114218 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -2.0, 4.5, -5.0; 0.0) <<< Change to EIPS(Ni-L) G-IHI-BG-82.023 090/12:43 ID=114225 (HRC has door source exposed.) 03/31/97A Steve O'Dell & Robert Austin << EIPS(Ni, 1.70, 1.79) [NiL2] G-LHS-EA-99.070 090/13:32 ID=114226 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.0, -0.5;-5.0); 0.0 ### Needed to redo: Wrong filter ([FeL2]) had been inserted. G-IHS-SM-25.003 090/14:59 ID=114231 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-136., 0.0;+3.5);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-25.004 090/15:46 ID=114232 { 0.0', 0.0'}(+136., 0.0,+3.5);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-26.003 090/16:59 ID=114233 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-36.0, 0.0; 0.0);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-26.004 090/17:23 ID=114234 { 0.0', 0.0'}(+44.0, 0.0; 0.0);-7.5 ### Reset FPC_H_B: BNDH_B high voltage tripped. G-BND-BU-81.013 090/17:47 ID=114235 FPC5(12) 15x50-s map >> !!! Change from EIPS(Ni) to EIPS(Cu). !!! Set FPCs for 0.93 keV (Cu-L). << EIPS(Cu, 1.86, 2.47) [CuL2] G-IHI-BG-82.003 090/18:40 ID=114246-7 FPCs set up for 0.93 keV (Cu-L). G-LHS-EA-5.005 090/19:48 ID=114247 { 0.0', 0.0'}( +0.5, -0.5;-5.0); 0.0 >> !!! Adjust EIPS(Cu) for Cu continuum. !!! Set FPCs for 3.5 keV. !!! Set FPC_5 ap = 4 mm and SSD_5 time constant = 2 us. << EIPS(Cu, 8.00, 4.0) [CrL2][NiL4] G-LHS-MC-29.001 090/20:09 ID=114257 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0);-6.3 >> 03/31/97/B Martin Weisskopf !!! Set FPCs for 0.93 keV (Cu-L). << EIPS(Cu, 1.86, 2.4) [CuL2] FPC5(36)=1840 G-BND-BU-81.002 090/22:11 ID=114264 G-HHI-EA-6.004 090/22:31 ID=114265 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.5, +4.5;-5.0); 0.0}MEG G-HHI-EA-6.006 090/23:13 ID=114266 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.5, +4.5;-5.0); 0.0}HEG >> <<< Change to EIPS(Mg-K) !!! HXDS takes background, HRC-I looks at FCM. G-IHI-RC-82.004 090/23:54 ID=114273 ### EIPS was set up for (v=2.5;i=0.54), which did not give predicted FPC5(36) rate (1270), so lowered current accordingly. !!! Now (V=2.500;i=0.32; Filter MgK2)) <<< This steps through the four quadrants: G-LHS-FC-1.001 091/00:40 ID=114274;5;6;7 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -0.5, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0} &&& EIPS(2.508,0.64, no filter}; too much. &&& EIPS(2.508,0.41, no filter}; "O.K." - very difficult: ### Removal of filter adds in N, O, and C. G-LHS-FC-1.002 091/04:13 ID=114278 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -1.5, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0} G-BND-BU-81.004 091/05:11 ID=114279 ### Later discovered that counter did not move in z during this run. !!! Bore sights: Recorded LASS-Z positions for HRC primary aim points: I At HRC-I aim point, LASS-Z = -517.984. S At HRC-S aim point, LASS-Z = -641.480. 03/31/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHS-SM-25.005 091/06:04 ID=114280 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-138., 0.0;+3.5);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-25.006 091/06:23 ID=114281 { 0.0', 0.0'}(+138., 0.0,+3.5);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-26.005 091/06:36 ID=114282 { 0.0', 0.0'}(-37.0, 0.0; 0.0);-7.5 G-IHS-SM-26.006 091/06:52 ID=114283 { 0.0', 0.0'}(+45.0, 0.0; 0.0);-7.5 <<< HETG, ALL G-HHI-FC-1.003 091/07:04 ID=114284-7 { 0.0', 0.0'}( -2.5, 0.5; 0.0); 0.0 Rate is 12.5; approximately 1/3 in zero and each MEG first order. >>> <<< HETG/MEG G-HHI-EA-6.002 091/10:08 ID=114288 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 1.0, 0.0;-5.0); 0.0 >>> <<< HETG/HEG G-HHI-EA-6.003 091/10:28 ID=114289 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 1.5, -1.5;-5.0); 0.0 >>> <<< Ghosts: ### The HRMA limit in the negative yaw direction is about -35': Cannot do 3.004, 3.003, and 3.002 below. !!! Will do 3.001. G-HHI-GI-3.004 091/ ID=1142 { 0.0',-79.0'}( 170.0, 0.0; -5.0); 0.0 G-HHI-GI-3.003 091/ ID=1142 { 0.0',-61.0'}( 170.0, 0.0; -5.0); 0.0 G-HHI-GI-3.002 091/ ID=1142 { 0.0',-53.0'}( 158.2, 0.0; -5.0); 0.0 G-HHI-GI-3.001 091/11:09 ID=114290 { 0.0',-35.0'}( 104.5, 0.0; -5.0); 0.0 ### HRMA could not move to +53' in yaw; thus we cannot do ghost tests on the other side either. Decided not to try to do them in pitch. &&& Image in G-HHI-GI-3.001 was barely above background, if at all and had no obvious structure. ### Yaw range appears to be +/-38 arcmin; useful range -36' to +38') >>> <<< Knife edge focus test: Flux at 0.29 mA about 40% high; requested 0.2 mA. OK. G-IHI-KF-61.001 091/11:51 ID=114291{ 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0;-10.0); 0.0 >>> ### HRC rate is about 25. Desire HRC rate of about 6; decided to use MgK4 filter, same voltage and current. Will do trial exposure first (defocussed). &&& Got about 20 Hz. Decided to use MgK6 filter and 0.29 mA. Acceptable HRC rate. fpc-5 gives about 20 Hz G-IHI-SL-69.001 091/12:34 ID=1142 { 0.0', 0.0'}( File, but NO DEFOCUS) 04/01/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak & Robert Austin ### Rumor that something was wrong with Mg BU test is spurious: Analysis software was looking at wrong columns. <<< Switch to HIREFS. !!! Set FPCs for 400 eV, 2-us time constant, and 30-450 ROI. G-IHS-BG-83.001 091/15:23 ID=114299 !!! First BG was at 0.400 keV settings NOTE: (JK970407) This test second at 0.1 keV settings; but data files lost. !!! HRMA = { P=0.0', Y=0.0') skipped temporarily: G-IHS-EA-65.001 091/ ID=114 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) 31.63 A 392 eV G-IHS-EA-65.002 091/ ID=1143 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) 31.63 A 392 eV !!! We can try to do these at 1.487 keV after grating tests. !!! Skipped above; modify to work at 1.487 keV <<< LETG, +1 Order; HRMA = { P=0.0', Y=0.0') G-LHS-EA-8.001 091/18:45 ID=1143 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) (60,100,8) NOTE: 1 Do all ~30-31 Angstrom with SA instead of SB HIREFS Gratings 2 Yaw for ghost-image tests is possible, but required information known only to Scott Texter. He will pass on this knowledge and we can try the tests again after PIGS. Is there any reason we couldn't do them using PIGS? 3 BND rates for HIREFS include only first order. This is sometimes only a small fraction of total because FPC detects higher orders more efficiently. 4 RAS can get 90 mA at 20% bias, not 50%, run at 20%. 04/01/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf G-LHS-EA-99.071 091/23:49 ID=114308 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) 60 A (.207 keV) ### Repeated first scan point of previous test, because it is on space between detectors. Change y = -2.0 mm G-IHS-BG-83.001a 092/00:48 ID=114311,12,13 !!! Run at fpc settings 0.100 keV 3000 sec. This is important for interpreting the data above. ### Entire run foozled - IRIG dropout (at least for the HXDS) !!! Found a work around to the IRIG: Do NOT use ACIS collects. G-IHI-EA-99.072 092/02:47 !!! NEXT INSERT THE FOLLOWING TEST(S) requested by SM, in order to trace gain problems. Removed LETG, and moved over to the HRC-I. <<< HIREFS(15,90,20,SX,10.544,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} FPC5(36)=50 H-IHI-EA-99.072 092/02:47 ID=114328;29; . Start { 0.0', 0.0'} ( 0.0 , 0.0; 5.0); 0.0 next { 0.0', 0.0'} (-35.816 , 0.0; 5.0); 0.0 ### RTCU problems then { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.816, 0.0; 0.062); 0.0 NOTE: << LETG, +1 Order; HRMA = { P=0.0', Y=0.0') G-LHS-EA-9.001 092/05:12 ID=114330 ( 1.5, -2.5; 5.0; 0.0) 8.338 A 1487 eV 04/01/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-LHS-EA-9.002 092/05:59 ID=114331 ( 1.5, -2.0; 5.0; 0.0) 9.537 A 1300 eV ### Above test stopped at 2000 of 2400 s due to loss of CTUE; declared test adequate and moved on. !!! Use SA instead of SX HIREFS for following 3 tests: ### No flux with SA; try SX. Better, and better according to data in source building, which evidently do not agree with the calibration data available here. &&& Buddy says use SA grating for 9.004 and 9.005. G-LHS-EA-9.003 092/06:48 ID=114335 ( 1.5, -1.5; 5.0; 0.0) 10.543 A 1176 eV &&& SA grating: SSD-5 rate 3.86 +- 0.36 ; FPC-5 rate 2.28 +- 0.28 &&& SX grating: SSD-5 rate 1.11 +- 0.25; FPC-5 rate 34.92 +- 1.08 ### Beam uniformity obviously bad. Elected to stay with SX grating again. G-LHS-EA-9.004 092/08:46 ID=114341 ( 1.5, -1.0; 5.0; 0.0) 11.598 A 1069 eV &&& Called Jeff K, who suggested we look at BU maps taken during last re-press; Found that fpc monitor position is reasonably indicative of mirror flux for SX grating at 9.92 A, but very low estimator for SA grating at 10.53 A. SSD-5 position reasonably good indicator for both grating positions above. &&& Conclude that I probably selected the wrong grating (Jeff probably correct). Will make HRC comparison before the next (long) run. &&& SSD-5 rate for run G-LHS-EA-9.004 = 6664/7595.92 (background ~ 111/7595; forget it for now. rate about 0.877 +- 0.011. !!! Setup; at 12.915 A &&& SX grating; SSD rate 31/99.54 = .31 +- 0.0559; HRC counts (sum of both first orders) = 29. &&& SA grating; SSD rate 297/99.54 = 2.88 +- 0.17; HRC counts (sum of both first orders) = 188. Clearly better; keep SA. (SSD normalization over channels 20-250; better choice below) G-LHS-EA-9.005 092/11:24 ID=114345 ( 1.5, 1.0; 5.0; 0.0) 12.915 A 960 eV ### Restarted run: Power surge turned off source. ### Run restarted again; CTUE/HRC communication problem. &&& SSD RoI selected for first order, but not second. (100/256). SSD-5 counts/time= &&& FPC also selected for first order, but not second. (75/200). FPC-5 Counts/time= ### Many early DLRS/CTUE problems probably caused by sequence: Bad IRIG data -> many log in/out cycles from ASC TM data retreiver -> CTUE failures. &&& Problem went away when ASC TM data retreiver disabled. &&& Previously, no trouble with this system when IRIG was good. 04/02/97A Robert Austin & Jeff Kolodziejczak G-LHS-EA-9.006 092/14:03 ID=114347 ( 1.5, 1.5; 5.0; 0.0) 16.938 A 732 eV G-LHS-EA-9.007 092/15:03 ID=114348 ( 1.5, 2.0; 5.0; 0.0) 16.314 A 760 eV G-LHS-EA-9.008 092/15:39 ID=114349 ( 1.5, 2.5; 5.0; 0.0) 17.586 A 705 eV G-LHS-EA-9.009 092/16:47 ID=114351/52/53 ( 1.5, 3.0; 5.0; 0.0) 19.074 A 650 eV ### HIREFS RAS roughing pump tripped at 17:15 came back up at 18:15 ### Measured LETGS rates are lower than predicted, but HIREFS rates are consistent with our characterization. (~0.002/cm^2/s/mA for all of 4 tests above based on ssd5 (corrected for beam nonuniformity), and fpch's. &&& Estimated normalization ### CTUE Problem: HRC kill switch hit at 18:44 came back up at 19:40 ### IRIG connection to CTUE was replaced. Loose Cable to HRC was fixed. !!! My estimated normalized fluxes @ HRMA for HIREF 1st orders: G-LHS-EA-9.006 0.187 ph/cm^2/s G-LHS-EA-9.008 0.252 ph/cm^2/s G-LHS-EA-9.009 0.248 ph/cm^2/s G-LHS-EA-9.010 0.191 ph/cm^2/s &&& Estimates assume 1 ssd_5 efficiency from Steve O's plot. 2 0.76 beam nonuniformity factor between ssd_5 and integrated HRMA location (adjusted for ssd5 opening in bldg_500 ap. plate only 31 mm, whereas the fpc_5 aperture during some of the beam maps is 36 mm 3 r^2 factor of 190 between ssd_5 and HRMA. 4 5-mm diameter ssd_5 ap 5 ssd5 roi adjusted for each energy to measure only 1st order. 04/02/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf <<< LETG, +1 Order; HRMA = { P=0.0', Y=0.0') G-LHS-EA-9.010 092/20:17 ID=114354 ( 2.0, -2.5; 5.0; 0.0) 19.837 A 625 eV << HIREFS(15,90,20,SA,20.667,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-LHS-EA-9.011 092/21:52 ID=114356 ( 2.0, -2.0; 5.0; 0.0) 20.667 A 600 eV G-LHS-EA-9.012 093/00:01 ID=114357 ( 2.0, -1.5; 5.0; 0.0) 22.543 A 550 eV !!! Watch Flux for the following test (may be on a source line) << HIREFS(15,90,22.5,SA,23.616,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} FPC5(36)150 G-LHS-EA-9.013 093/01:37 ID=114358 ( 2.0, -1.0; 5.0; 0.0) 23.616 A 525 eV !!! Use SA instead of SB HIREFS for the following 2 tests: << HIREFS(15,90,22.5,SA,30.020,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} FPC5(36)=63 G-LHS-EA-9.014 093/02:06 ID=114359 ( 2.0, 1.0; 5.0; 0.0) 30.020 A 413 eV << HIREFS(15,90,22.5,SA,31.629,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-LHS-EA-9.015 093/04:08 ID=114360 ( 2.0, 1.5; 5.0; 0.0) 31.629 A 392 eV << HIREFS(15,90,22.5,SB,39.866,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-LHS-EA-9.016 093/05:34 ID=114361 ( 2.0, 2.0; 5.0; 0.0) 39.866 A 311 eV !!! Run G-LHS-EA-9.016 shortened to 1000 s. ### Normalization data not available, mostly high-energy contamination. 04/02/97C Leon Van Speybroeck !!! Watch Flux for the following test (may be on a source line) G-LHS-EA-9.017 093/06:08 ID=114362 ( 2.0, 2.5; 5.0; 0.0) 44.760 A 277 eV !!! Run shortened to 1000 seconds. ### C-K can be seen in FPC, but not in SSD. Much high energy contamination G-IHS-BG-83.003 093/06:34 ID=114363 << HRMA ={ P=0.0', Y=0.0') G-IHS-EA-65.001 093/07:06 ID=114365 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) 8.338 A 1487 eV G-IHS-EA-65.002 093/07:18 ID=114366 ( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0; 0.0) 8.338 A 1487 eV !!! No obvious UV sensitivity found. <<< Following are done at 392 eV; changed to SA grating G-IHS-EA-3.158 093/07:30 ID=114367 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.110 093/08:01 ID=114368 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.014 093/08:22 ID=114369 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.016 093/08:40 ID=114370 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.112 093/09:06 ID=114371 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-60.016 093/09:28 ID=114372 { 0.0', 14.8'}(-44.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 <<< Following are done at 784 eV. ### New CMDB BIAS VALUES ARE STRANGE; SETTING BIAS TO PREVIOUS PERCENTAGE of 22.5% of max, = 2.25% of source voltage. !!! PLEASE CHECK HIREFS SOURCE QUANTITIES DURING NEXT CMDB REVIEW. G-IHS-EA-3.162 093/09:50 ID=114374{ 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.114 093/10:12 ID=114377 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.018 093/10:25 ID=114378 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.020 093/10:38 ID=114379 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.116 093/10:55 ID=114380 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-60.020 093/11:10 ID=114381 { 0.0', 14.8'}(-44.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 <<< Following are done at 905 eV G-IHS-EA-3.166 093/11:23 ID=114382 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.118 093/11:44 ID=114383 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.022 093/12:02 ID=114384 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.024 093/12:13 ID=114385 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.120 093/12:29 ID=114386 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-60.024 093/12:39 ID=114387 { 0.0', 14.8'}(-44.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 <<< Following are done at 1176 eV. Change to SA grating G-IHS-EA-3.170 093/12:59 ID=114389 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.122 093/13:21 ID=114390 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.026 093/13:36 ID=114391 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.028 093/13:51 ID=114392 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.124 093/14:09 ID=114393 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 04/03/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak, Robert Austin G-IHS-EA-60.028 093/14:26 ID=114394 { 0.0', 14.8'}(-44.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 ### This measurement was performed incorrectly. Image was supposed to miss gap between inner and outer HRC-S plates, but y offset (-44) was incorrect, and spot fell on gap. <<< Following are done at 1487 eV G-IHS-EA-3.174 093/15:20 ID=114395 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.126 093/15:38 ID=114396 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.030 093/15:52 ID=114397 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.032 093/16:10 ID=114398 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.128 093/16:32 ID=114399 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-60.032 093/16:53 ID=114400 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-PI-1.004 093/17:10 ID=114401 { 0.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0); 8.0 <<< Following are done at 1810 eV G-IHS-EA-3.178 093/18:15 ID=114402 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.130 093/18:34 ID=114403 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.034 093/18:48 ID=114404 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.036 093/18:59 ID=114405 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.132 093/19:11 ID=114406 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-60.036 093/19:24 ID=114407 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 <<< Redo the next 9 tests: G-IHS-EA-99.073 093/19:24 ID=114408 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0. !!! Repeat of G-IHS-EA-60.028 - Run with SX (previously run with SA) so HRC saw half the count rate they saw previously for this measurement. G-IHS-EA-99.074 093/20:26 ID=114409 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 !!! Repeat of G-IHS-EA-60.024 G-IHS-EA-99.075 093/20:51 ID=114410 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 !!! Repeat of G-IHS-EA-60.020 G-IHS-EA-99.076 093/21:16 ID=114411 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 !!! Repeat of G-IHS-EA-60.016 - Run with SB (Previously run with SA) ### Aborted due to wrong grating: Want SA. G-IHS-EA-99.077 093/21:52 ID=114412 { 0.0', 13.8'}(-41.2, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 !!! Repeat of G-IHS-EA-60.016 run with SA << 1200-s integration time for each of these: G-IHS-EA-3.158a 093/22:39 ID=114413 { 0.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 ### HRC image shows a ghost at approx. twice image distance off-axis G-IHS-EA-3.110a 093/23:11 ID=114414 { 2.7',-10.7'}( 31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.014a 093/23:42 ID=114415 { 0.0', -9.0'}( 26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.016a 094/00:12 ID=114416 { 0.0', 9.0'}(-26.9, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.112a 094/00:44 ID=114417 { 2.7', 10.7'}(-31.9, 7.9; 0.1); 0.0 << Switch to HRC-I G-IHS-BG-83.004 094/01:13 ID=114418 ### Encountered difficulty in switchover from HRC-S to HRC-I. Command to switch would not verify that it occurred - eventually decided to ignore failure to verify and completed script - during rest of steps, the "verification appeared". &&& Problem may be in timing by which steps of HRC script execute (effectively may have been looking for verification before command was actually sent, even though code has steps written in the proper order). <<< Following are HETG (Shutters=MEG), +1 order, HRMA{P=0.0',Y=0.0'} G-HHI-EA-9.018 094/02:31 ID=114420 ( 2.0, -3.0; 5.0; 0.0) 8.338 A, 1487 eV ### Time lost when BND settings in script were implemented and MST team had to restore settings to those used throughout the previous tests and not those in CMDB script G-HHI-EA-9.019 094/03:21 ID=114421 ( 2.0, -2.5; 5.0; 0.0)10.543 A, 1176 eV (SA) G-HHI-EA-9.020 094/03:50 ID=114422 ( 2.0, -2.0; 5.0; 0.0)12.915 A, 960 eV G-HHI-EA-9.021 094/04:21 ID=114423 ( 2.0, -1.5; 5.0; 0.0)16.314 A, 760 eV G-HHI-EA-9.022 094/04:56 ID=114424 ( 2.0, -1.0; 5.0; 0.0)17.586 A, 705 eV <<< Following are done at 392 eV; change to SA grating G-IHI-EA-3.157 094/05:37 ID=114425 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 04/03/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHI-EA-3.109 094/07:55 ID=114426 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.013 094/09:48 ID=114427 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.061 094/11:33 ID=114428 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.044 094/13:09 ID=114429 { 15.5',- 3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 04/04/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! To save time, run next 8 tests at 90 mA instead of 75 and reduce integration times by 17% from those specified. G-IHI-EA-4.010 094/15:08 ID=114430 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.011 094/16:33 ID=114431 { 16.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.012 094/18:04 ID=114433 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 ### SSD-5 shows significant noise for this run only - many counts in first few hundred PHA channels and pulse generator signal significantly broadened. ### Stopped for IRIG card swap and source pump problem: 1.2 hr. delay G-IHI-EA-4.043 094/20:47 ID=114434 { 15.5', 3.9'}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 04/04/97/B Harvey Tananbaum G-IHI-EA-3.063 094/22:23 ID=114435 { -4.1', 8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.015 094/23:49 ID=114436 { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.111 095/01:13 ID=114437 { 4.0', 16.0'}(-47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.159 095/02:48 ID=114438 { 0.0 , 20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 !!! Return to specified integration times here. <<< Following are done at 784 eV: G-IHI-EA-4.046 095/04:28 ID=114439 { 15.5',- 3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.013 095/04:53 ID=114440 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.014 095/05:14 ID=114441 { 16.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.015 095/05:31 ID=114442 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 04/04/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-IHI-EA-4.045 095/05:49 ID=114443 { 15.5', 3.9'}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.161 095/06:07 ID=114444 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.113 095/06:31 ID=114445 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.017 095/06:48 ID=114446 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.065 095/07:06 ID=114447 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.067 095/07:21 ID=114448 { -4.1', 8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.019 095/07:33 ID=114449 { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.115 095/07:47 ID=114450 { 4.0', 16.0'}(-47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.163 095/08:03 ID=114451 { 0.0 , 20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 <<< Following are done at 905 eV: G-IHI-EA-3.165 095/08:19 ID=114452 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.117 095/08:38 ID=114453 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.021 095/08:51 ID=114454 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.069 095/09:03 ID=114456 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.071 095/09:17 ID=114457 { -4.1', 8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.023 095/09:28 ID=114458 { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.119 095/09:40 ID=114459 { 4.0', 16.0'}(-47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.167 095/09:53 ID=114460 { 0.0 , 20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.048 095/10:08 ID=114461 { 15.5',- 3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.016 095/10:24 ID=114462 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.017 095/10:37 ID=114463 { 16.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.018 095/10:52 ID=114464 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.047 095/11:05 ID=114465 { 15.5', 3.9'}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 04/05/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< Following are done at 1176 eV: !!! HXDS set voltages for the 13 tests for 1176 eV G-IHI-EA-3.169 095/11:20 ID=114474 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.121 095/11:40 ID=114475 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.025 095/11:52 ID=114476 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.073 095/12:06 ID=114477 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.075 095/12:23 ID=114478 { -4.1', 8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.027 095/12:33 ID=114479 { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.123 095/12:45 ID=114480 { 4.0', 16.0'}(-47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.171 095/12:59 ID=114481 { 0.0 , 20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.050 095/13:14 ID=114482 { 15.5',- 3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.019 095/13:30 ID=114485 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.020 095/13:46 ID=114486 { 16.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.021 095/13:58 ID=114487 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.049 095/14:14 ID=114488 { 15.5', 3.9'}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-BG-83.006 095/14:27 ID=114489 background for 1.176 keV tests !!! Set FPCs back to 400 eV. Run the next background at this (1176 eV) setting. Do this now to save setup time. <<< Following are done at 1487 eV. All PI tests use Serpen. Dither !!! Order changed to minimize the flux changes. <<< Following have flux of about 0.13 !!! Now set up fpcs for 400 eV again &&& The reason is that HIREFS can't produce anything above 2 keV, so there is no need to adjust energy range to look for higher energy continuum G-IHI-EA-3.173 095/14:55 ID=114495 { 0.0,-20.0}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.125 095/15:14 ID=114496 { 4.0,-16.0}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.029 095/15:34 ID=114497 { 0.0,-12.0}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.077 095/15:47 ID=114498 { -4.1, -8.0}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-PI-2.017 095/16:01 ID=114499 { 0.0, -8.0}( 23.9, 0.0; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-EA-4.052 095/16:18 ID=114500 { 15.5, -3.9}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-PI-2.018 095/16:36 ID=114501 { -8.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-23.9; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-PI-2.020 095/16:54 ID=114502 { 8.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 23.9; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-EA-4.022 095/17:14 ID=114503 { 12.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.023 095/17:30 ID=114504 { 16.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.024 095/17:46 ID=114505 { 20.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.051 095/18:02 ID=114506 { 15.5, 3.9}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-PI-2.019 095/18:17 ID=114507 { 0.0, 8.0}(-23.9, 0.0; 0.0); 38.0 <<< Following are done at 1487 eV: !!! All PI tests use Serpen. Dither !!! Order changed to minimize the flux changes. <<< Following have flux of about 0.02 G-IHI-EA-3.079 095/18:35 ID=114508 { -4.1, -8.0}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.031 095/18:52 ID=114509 { 0.0,-12.0}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.127 095/19:05 ID=114510 { 4.0,-16.0}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.175 095/19:21 ID=114511 { 0.0,-20.0}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-PI-2.009 095/19:39 ID=114512 { -1.4, -1.4}( 4.2, -4.2; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-PI-1.003 095/20:42 ID=114513 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-PI-2.010 095/21:46 ID=114514 { -1.4, 1.4}( -4.2, -4.2; 0.0); 38.0 ### HRC team noted that dither did not start, so closed toga door. &&& Started dither, opened toga door, and resumed test. &&& Project ~3000 cts in relatively focused region, towards HRC-I corner. ### Following this test TRW paused to clear a CTUE problem. 04/05/97/B Harvey Tananbaum G-IHI-PI-2.003 095/22:59 ID=114515 { 0.0, -1.0}( 3.0, 0.0; 0.0); 38.0 G-IHI-PI-2.004 096/00:00 ID=114516 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0; 0.0); 38.0 <<< 1810 eV (SX): G-IHI-EA-3.177 096/00:58 ID=114517 { 0.0',-20.0'}( 59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.129 096/01:20 ID=114518 { 4.0',-16.0'}( 47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.033 096/01:34 ID=114519 { 0.0',-12.0'}( 35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.081 096/01:46 ID=114520 { -4.1', -8.0'}( 23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.083 096/01:58 ID=114521 { -4.1', 8.0'}(-23.9,-12.2; 0.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.035 096/02:09 ID=114522 { 0.0', 12.0'}(-35.8, 0.0; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.131 096/02:20 ID=114523 { 4.0', 16.0'}(-47.8, 11.9; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-3.179 096/02:34 ID=114524 { 0.0 , 20.0'}(-59.7, 0.0; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.054 096/02:49 ID=114525 { 15.5',- 3.9'}( 11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.025 096/03:06 ID=114526 { 12.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 35.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.026 096/03:18 ID=114527 { 16.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 47.8; 0.1); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.027 096/03:31 ID=114528 { 20.0', 0.0'}( 0.0, 59.7; 0.2); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-4.053 096/03:44 ID=114529 { 15.5', 3.9'}(-11.6, 46.3; 0.1); 0.0 <<< 371 eV (SA): G-IHI-EA-1.007 096/03:57 ID=114530 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0; 5.0); 0.0 04/05/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.392keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-2.061 096/05:41 ID=114531 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.109 096/06:51 ID=114532 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.159 096/07:57 ID=114533 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.013 096/09:05 ID=114534 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.063 096/10:11 ID=114535 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 !!! Started HRMA externally imposed thermal-gradient test at 11:00 GMT. G-IHI-EA-2.015 096/11:19 ID=114536 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.009 096/12:26 ID=114537 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.255 096/13:33 ID=114538 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 04/06/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak G-IHI-EA-2.207 096/14:46 ID=114540 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.253 096/16:11 ID=114541 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.111 096/17:19 ID=114542 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.157 096/18:27 ID=114543 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.205 096/19:37 ID=114544 { 0.0, 4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 04/06/96/B Harvey Tananbaum G_IHI_EA-1.011 096/20:50 ID=114545 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 413eV !!! 525eV is near O-Ka, so reduce current from 90 to 17.7 mA. G_IHI_EA-1.013 096/22:25 ID=114546 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 525eV G_IHI_EA-1.015 096/22:51 ID=114547 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 550eV G_IHI_EA-1.017 096/23:25 ID=114548 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 625eV G_IHI_EA-1.019 096/23:49 ID=114549 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 650eV G_IHI_EA-1.021 097/00:08 ID=114550 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 705eV G_IHI_EA-1.023 097/00:25 ID=114551 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 732eV G_IHI_EA-1.025 097/00:42 ID=114552 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 760eV <<< Following are done at 784 eV G-IHI-EA-2.065 097/00:56 ID=114553 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.113 097/01:09 ID=114554 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.163 097/01:21 ID=114555 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.017 097/01:32 ID=114556 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.067 097/01:46 ID=114557 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.019 097/01:58 ID=114558 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.027 097/02:09 ID=114559 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.259 097/02:18 ID=114560 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.211 097/02:28 ID=114561 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.257 097/02:39 ID=114562 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.115 097/02:50 ID=114563 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.161 097/03:03 ID=114564 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.209 097/03:15 ID=114565 { 0.0, 4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.029 097/03:26 ID=114566 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0; 5.0); 0.0 826eV G-IHI-EA-1.031 097/03:48 ID=114567 {0.0, 0.0}(0.0, 0.0; 5.0); 0.0 852eV <<< Following are done at 905 eV G-IHI-EA-2.069 097/04:02 ID=114568 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.117 097/04:15 ID=114569 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.167 097/04:25 ID=114570 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.021 097/04:36 ID=114571 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.071 097/04:46 ID=114572 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 04/06/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.905keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-2.023 097/04:56 ID=114573 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.033 097/05:06 ID=114574 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.263 097/05:16 ID=114575 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.215 097/05:25 ID=114576 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.261 097/05:36 ID=114577 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.119 097/05:46 ID=114578 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.165 097/05:57 ID=114579 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.213 097/06:09 ID=114580 { 0.0, 4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-1.035 097/06:19 ID=114581 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.960 G-IHI-EA-1.037 097/06:36 ID=114582 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.025 G-IHI-EA-1.039 097/06:47 ID=114583 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.050 G-IHI-EA-1.041 097/06:58 ID=114584 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.069 G-IHI-EA-1.043 097/07:08 ID=114585 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.100 <<< BG with FPCs set up for 0.400 keV G-IHI-BG-83.007 097/07:18 ID=114586 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,1.176keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-2.073 097/07:43 ID=114587 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.121 097/07:55 ID=114588 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.171 097/08:04 ID=114589 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.025 097/08:12 ID=114590 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.075 097/08:21 ID=114591 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.027 097/08:29 ID=114592 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.045 097/08:38 ID=114593 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.267 097/08:47 ID=114594 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.219 097/08:55 ID=114595 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.265 097/09:04 ID=114596 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.123 097/09:12 ID=114597 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.169 097/09:21 ID=114598 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.217 097/09:29 ID=114599 { 0.0, 4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-1.047 097/09:38 ID=114600 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.250 G-IHI-EA-1.049 097/10:03 ID=114601 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.300 G-IHI-EA-1.051 097/10:17 ID=114602 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.410 G-IHI-EA-1.053 097/10:29 ID=114603 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.464 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX,1.487keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-2.077 097/10:41 ID=114604 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.125 097/10:53 ID=114605 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.175 097/11:05 ID=114606 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.029 097/11:17 ID=114607 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.079 097/11:28 ID=114608 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.031 097/11:40 ID=114609 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.055 097/11:56 ID=114610 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.271 097/12:07 ID=114611 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.223 097/12:19 ID=114612 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.269 097/12:30 ID=114613 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.127 097/12:42 ID=114614 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.173 097/12:54 ID=114615 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.221 097/13:05 ID=114616 { 0.0, +4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 04/07/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-1.057 097/13:17 ID=114617 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.530 G-IHI-EA-1.059 097/13:31 ID=114618 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.568 G-IHI-EA-1.061 097/13:47 ID=114619 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.621 G-IHI-EA-1.063 097/14:00 ID=114620 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.652 G-IHI-EA-1.105 097/14:15 ID=114621 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.704 G-IHI-EA-1.065 097/14:30 ID=114622 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.739 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX,1.810keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-2.081 097/15:00 ID=114623 { 0.0, -4.0}(+11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.129 097/15:13 ID=114624 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.179 097/15:23 ID=114625 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.033 097/15:33 ID=114626 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.083 097/15:43 ID=114627 { -4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,-11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.035 097/15:52 ID=114628 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-1.067 097/16:01 ID=114629 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.275 097/16:10 ID=114630 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3,0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.227 097/16:19 ID=114631 { +4.0, 0.0}( 0.0,+11.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.273 097/16:29 ID=114632 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.131 097/16:39 ID=114633 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.177 097/16:49 ID=114634 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHI-EA-2.225 097/16:58 ID=114635 { 0.0, 4.0}(-11.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-I G-IHI-EA-1.069 097/17:10 ID=114636 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.876 G-IHI-EA-1.071 097/17:29 ID=114637 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.960 G-IHI-EA-1.107 097/18:03 ID=114638 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=2.000 G-IHI-EA-8.001 097/18:42 ID=114639 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.855 G-IHI-EA-8.003 097/ ID=1146 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.919 !!!This measurement was aborted - HIREFS efficiency is too low at 2keV, so we are just seeing a scattered W line. !!! Change from HRC-I to HRC-S. <<< BG with FPCs set up for 0.400 keV G-IHI-BG-83.005 097/19:14 ID=114640 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SX, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-8.002 097/19:41 ID=114642 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.855 G-IHS-EA-1.008 097/20:29 ID=114643 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.371 04/07/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.392keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-3.062 097/21:04 ID=114644 { -2.7, -5.2}(+15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.062 097/21:42 ID=114645 { 0.0, -2.7}( +7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.110 097/22:15 ID=114646 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.160 097/22:43 ID=114647 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.014 097/23:09 ID=114648 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.064 097/23:37 ID=114649 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.016 098/00:04 ID=114650 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.010 098/00:31 ID=114651 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.256 098/00:59 ID=114652 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.208 098/01:27 ID=114653 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.254 098/01:55 ID=114654,55{0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 ### CTUE death - long delay G-IHS-EA-2.112 098/02:57 ID=114656 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.158 098/03:25 ID=114657 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, 4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.206 098/03:52 ID=114658 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.064 098/04:19 ID=114659 { -2.7, +5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 04/07/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.413keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.012 098/04:46 ID=114660 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 !!! O-Ka follows: Reduce RAS current to 17 mA. <<< RAS14(W,15kV,17mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.525keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.014 098/05:30 ID=114661 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.116 098/05:48 ID=114662 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.550 G-IHS-EA-1.118 098/06:14 ID=114663 { 0.0, 0.0}( +0.5, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.625 G-IHS-EA-1.020 098/06:30 ID=114664 { 0.0, 0.0}( +0.5, +0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.650 G-IHS-EA-1.022 098/06:41 ID=114665 { 0.0, 0.0}( +0.5, +0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.705 G-IHS-EA-1.024 098/06:52 ID=114666 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.732 G-IHS-EA-1.026 098/07:05 ID=114667 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, +0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.760 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.784keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-3.066 098/07:16 ID=114668 { -2.7, -5.2}(+15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.066 098/07:28 ID=114669 { 0.0, -2.7}( +7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.114 098/07:39 ID=114670 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.164 098/07:49 ID=114671 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.018 098/07:58 ID=114672 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.068 098/08:08 ID=114673 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.020 098/08:17 ID=114674 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.028 098/08:27 ID=114675 { -0.0, 0.0}( -1.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.260 098/08:37 ID=114676 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.212 098/08:46 ID=114677 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.258 098/08:55 ID=114678 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.116 098/09:06 ID=114680 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 ### BND5 computer hung at start of above measurement: Reboot BND computers. G-IHS-EA-2.162 098/09:21 ID=114681 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.210 098/09:31 ID=114682 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.068 098/09:41 ID=114683 { -2.7, +5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.030 098/09:51 ID=114684 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.0, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.826 G-IHS-EA-1.032 098/10:06 ID=114686 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.0, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.852 ### Started above BND collect too early: Restart collect. <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,0.905keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-3.070 098/10:22 ID=114687 { -2.7, -5.2}(+15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.070 098/10:39 ID=114688 { 0.0, -2.7}( +7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.118 098/10:51 ID=114689 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.168 098/11:04 ID=114690 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.022 098/11:16 ID=114691 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.072 098/11:29 ID=114692 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.024 098/11:43 ID=114693 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.034 098/11:57 ID=114694 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.264 098/12:10 ID=114695 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.216 098/12:23 ID=114696 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.262 098/12:37 ID=114697 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.120 098/12:50 ID=114698 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.166 098/13:02 ID=114699 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.214 098/13:16 ID=114700 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.072 098/13:45 ID=114701 { -2.7, +5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 04/08/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.036 098/14:00 ID=114702 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=0.960 G-IHS-EA-1.038 098/14:14 ID=114703 { 0.0, 0.0}( +0.5, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.025 G-IHS-EA-1.040 098/14:27 ID=114704 { 0.0, 0.0}( +1.0, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.050 G-IHS-EA-1.042 098/14:40 ID=114705 { 0.0, 0.0}( +1.0, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.069 G-IHS-EA-1.044 098/14:53 ID=114706 { 0.0, 0.0}( +1.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.100 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,1.176keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-3.074 098/15:05 ID=114707 { -2.7, -5.2}(+15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.074 098/15:18 ID=114708 { 0.0, -2.7}( +7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.122 098/15:29 ID= { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 ### Operator error led to no BND data for above measurement, we still have rate-meter data, however, so all should be fine. G-IHS-EA-2.172 098/15:40 ID=114709 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.026 098/15:51 ID=114710 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.076 098/16:07 ID=114711 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.028 098/16:16 ID=114712 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.046 098/16:26 ID=114713 { 0.0, 0.0}( +1.0, +0.5;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.268 098/16:40 ID=111414 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.220 098/16:47 ID=114715 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.266 098/16:59 ID=114716 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.124 098/17:10 ID=114717 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.170 098/17:20 ID=114718 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.218 098/17:30 ID=114719 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.076 098/17:41 ID=114720 { -2.7, +5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.048 098/18:05 ID=114721 { 0.0, 0.0}( +1.0, +1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.250 G-IHS-EA-1.050 098/18:25 ID=114722 { 0.0, 0.0}( +0.5, +1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.300 G-IHS-EA-1.052 098/18:43 ID=114723 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.410 G-IHS-EA-1.054 098/18:59 ID=114724 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, +1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.464 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA,1.487keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-3.078 098/19:16 ID=114725 { -2.7, -5.2}(+15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.078 098/19:30 ID=114726 { 0.0, -2.7}( +7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.126 098/19:45 ID=114727 { -1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.176 098/19:59 ID=114728 { +1.4, -1.4}( +4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.030 098/20:15 ID=114729 { 0.0, -1.0}( +3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.080 098/20:31 ID=114730 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.032 098/20:46 ID=114731 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.056 098/21:02 ID=114732 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.0, +1.0;+5.0); 0.0 04/08/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf G-IHS-EA-2.272 098/21:16 ID=114733 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.224 098/21:33 ID=114734 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.270 098/21:51 ID=114735 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.128 098/22:07 ID=114736 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.174 098/22:24 ID=114737 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.222 098/22:39 ID=114738 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.080 098/22:57 ID=114739 { -2.7, +5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 <<< RAS14(W,15kV,90mA,20%) HIREFS(SA, E keV,-96,200,200) HRC-S G-IHS-EA-1.058 098/23:13 ID=114740 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.5, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.530 G-IHS-EA-1.060 098/23:29 ID=114741 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.5, -0.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.568 G-IHS-EA-1.062 098/23:46 ID=114742 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.5, -1.0;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.621 G-IHS-EA-1.064 099/00:01 ID=114743 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.5, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.652 G-IHS-EA-1.106 099/00:22 ID=114744 { 0.0, 0.0}( -1.0, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.704 G-IHS-EA-1.066 099/00:39 ID=114745 { 0.0, 0.0}( -0.5, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 E=1.739 <<< XSS settings: (15,90,20,SX,6.851,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-IHS-EA-3.082 099/00:50 ID=114746 { -2.7, -5.2}( 15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.082 099/01:05 ID=114747 { 0.0, -2.7}( 7.9, +0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.130 099/01:15 ID=114748 { -1.4, -1.4}( 4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.180 099/01:26 ID=114749 { 1.4, -1.4}( 4.2, 4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.034 099/01:37 ID=114751 { 0.0, -1.0}( 3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 ### ID=114750 was aborted. G-IHS-EA-2.084 099/01:59 ID=114752 { -2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.036 099/02:09 ID=114753 { -1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-1.068 099/02:19 ID=114754 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.276 099/02:29 ID=114755 { +1.0, 0.0}( 0.0, +3.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.228 099/02:40 ID=114756 { +2.7, 0.0}( 0.0, +7.9;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.274 099/02:50 ID=114757 { 0.0, +1.0}( -3.0, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.132 099/03:00 ID=114758 { -1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, -4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.178 099/03:17 ID=114759 { +1.4, +1.4}( -4.2, +4.2;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-2.226 099/03:28 ID=114760 { 0.0, +2.7}( -7.9, 0.0;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-EA-3.084 099/03:39 ID=114761 { -2.7, -5.2}(-15.5, -7.9;+5.0); 0.0 >>> <<< HIREFS(15,89.99,20,SX,6.61,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-IHS-EA-1.070 099/03:53 ID=114762 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.5, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 <<< HIREFS(15,90,20,SX,6.327,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-IHS-EA-1.072 099/04:12 ID=114763 { 0.0, 0.0}( 1.0, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 <<< HIREFS(15,89.97,20,SX,6.20,N/A,N/A,N/A,9904(-96),200,200} G-IHS-EA-1.108 099/04:38 ID=114764 { 0.0, 0.0}( 1.5, -1.5;+5.0); 0.0 G-IHS-BG-83.003 099/05:11 ID=114765-6 FPCs set up for 0.400 keV. 04/07/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< Change from HIREFS to PIGS. !!! Set up FPCs for 70 eV for PIGS measurements. G-IHS-BG-5.001 099/05:11 ID=114774 FPCs set up for 0.070 keV. !!! Afterward above, adjusted FPC_HN: Thus its background is invalid. <<< PIGS LETG HRC-S flux check. !!! Defocus and off-set FAM to ( 0.0, +5.0;+5.0); 0.0. LETG(0) HRC-S rate (13 Hz) seems OK due to source size (2x0.2 arcsec). !!! LETG & HRC teams agreed to use BLOCKS0 in addition to dither=GRAT1. <<< PIGS LETG HRC-S(!!! BLOCKS0 !!!) dither(!!! GRAT1 !!!). G-LHS-dF-3.006 099/06:34 ID=114782 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0); 0.0 G-LHS-dF-3.001 099/07:42 ID=114783 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;-1.0); 0.0 !!! Make source gate valve primary shutter for PIGS LETG measurements: !!! TOGA shutter does not block strong 160-Angstrom Al-L line. ### PIGS voltage reached 0.76 kV, flux rose 25%: Change PIGS heads. G-IHS-BG-5.002 099/08:23 ID=114784-5 FPCs set up for 0.070 keV. ### XSS had trouble stabilizing PIGS 2nd head. Went ahead at 18 mTorr, 400 mA, 0.81 kV. G-LHS-dF-3.002 099/10:38 ID=114786 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;-0.5); 0.0 ### Aborted measurement because of PIGS failure. ### Could not sustain ignition, so changed to PIGS 3rd head. G-IHS-BG-5.003 099/11:04 ID=114787 FPCs set up for 0.070 keV. G-LHS-dF-3.002a 099/12:06 ID=114788 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;-0.5); 0.0 G-LHS-dF-3.003 099/13:18 ID=114789 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+0.5); 0.0 G-LHS-dF-3.004 099/14:06 ID=114790 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+1.0); 0.0 G-LHS-dF-3.005 099/15:04 ID=114791 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+2.0); 0.0 04/09/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak <<< High-energy suppression filter tests (dithered): G-LHS-PI-27.001 099/15:59 ID=114792 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+1.0); -5.75 G-LHS-PI-27.002 099/16:56 ID=114793 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+0.5); -5.75 G-LHS-PI-27.003 099/17:51 ID=114794 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+0.2); -5.75 !!! Save in-focus test (27.004) for higher flux with next PIGS head. G-LHS-PI-27.005 099/18:45 ID=114795 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;-0.5); -5.75 G-IHS-BG-5.004 099/19:40 ID=114796 FPCs set up for 0.070 keV. 04/09/1997/B Martin C. Weisskopf G-LHS-PW-3.007 099/21:13 ID=114797 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+0.0); 0.0 <<< HESF(High energy suppression filter) G-LHS-PI-27.004 100/00:44 ID=114798 { 0.0, 0.0}( 0.0, 0.0;+0.0);-5.75 G-LHS-PI-28.001 100/01:41 ID=114799 { -0.3, 0.0}( 0.0, -1.0;+1.0);-5.75 G-LHS-PI-28.002 100/02:41 ID=114800 { +0.3, 0.0}( 0.0, +1.0;+0.5);-5.75 !!! Abort next two (low priority) to avoid source (head) change G-LHS-PI-28.003 100/ ID= { -0.2, -0.2}( 0.7, -0.7;+0.2);-5.75 G-LHS-PI-28.004 100/ ID= { 0.2, 0.2}( -0.7, 0.7;+0.0);-5.75 <<< RF and HESF (No LETG) lower current to 375 G-IHS-RF-8.001 100/03:34 ID=114801 { -0.0, -0.0}(-143.0, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 G-IHS-RF-8.002 100/03:54 ID=114802 { -0.0, -0.0}( -96.0, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 G-IHS-RF-8.003 100/04:07 ID=114803 { -0.0, -0.0}( -28.7, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 G-IHS-RF-8.004 100/04:27 ID=114804 { -0.0, -0.0}( -36.7, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 G-IHS-RF-8.005 100/04:42 ID=114805 { -0.0, -0.0}( -36.7, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 G-IHS-RF-8.006 100/04:56 ID=114806 { -0.0, -0.0}( -36.7, 0.0;+65.2);-2.6 04/07/97/C Steve O'Dell !!! Change from PIGS to EIPS(Mg). G-IHI-BG-1.017 100/05:11 ID=114813 FPCs set up for 1.25 keV. <<< EIPS(Mg, 2.51kV, 0.40mA, 0.4%) [MgK2] LETG HRC-I &&& FPC_5(36)=1500, SSD_5(5)=32, FPC_H=28 G-LHI-EA-6.007 100/06:06 ID=114815 { 0.0, -1.0}( -4.5, -1.0;-5.0); 0.0 G-LHI-EA-6.008 100/06:31 ID=114816 { -0.7, -0.7}( -4.5, -0.5;-5.0); 0.0 G-LHI-EA-6.009 100/06:47 ID=114817 { -3.0, 0.0}( -4.5, +0.5;-5.0); 0.0 G-LHI-EA-6.010 100/07:03 ID=114818 { 0.0, -8.3}( -4.5, +1.0;-5.0); 0.0 <<< EIPS(Mg, 2.51kV, 2.4mA, 0.4%) HRC-I &&& FPC_5(4)=1950, SSD_5(5)=2600, FPC_H=2950 G-IHI-GI-3.010 100/07:20 ID=114819 {-28.3,-28.3}(+84.4,-84.4;+3.4); 0.0 G-IHI-GI-3.011 100/07:42 ID=114820 {-28.3,+28.3}(-84.4,-84.4;+3.4); 0.0 !!! Switch from IAP5 to IAP6 for largest FAM offsets, giving 11-mm decenter. G-IHI-GI-3.014 100/08:02 ID=114821 { 0.0,-60.0}(-144., 0.0;+2.7); 0.0 ### FAM-y cannot reach +169, so use +163. G-IHI-GI-3.015 100/08:22 ID=114822 { 0.0,+60.0}(+163., 0.0;+2.7); 0.0 G-IHI-GI-3.009 100/08:43 ID=114823 { 0.0,-79.0}(+163., 0.0;+2.7); 0.0 ### Yaw has wrong sign for GI-3.014-15: Add measurements GI-99.078-79. G-IHI-GI-99.078 100/09:03 ID=114824 { 0.0,+60.0}(-144., 0.0;+2.7); 0.0 G-IHI-GI-99.079 100/09:17 ID=114825 { 0.0,-60.0}(+166., 0.0;+2.7); 0.0 !!! Switch from IAP6 back to IAP5 for remaining measurements. G-IHI-GI-3.012 100/09:31 ID=114826 {+28.3,+28.3}(-84.4,+84.4;+3.4); 0.0 G-IHI-GI-3.013 100/09:51 ID=114827 {+28.3,-28.3}(+84.4,+84.4;+3.4); 0.0 <<< EIPS(Mg, 2.51kV, 0.20mA, 0.4%) [MgK2] HRC-I &&& FPC_5(36)=740, SSD_5(5)=15, FPC_H=14 G-IHI-RF-7.007 100/10:04 ID=114828 { 0.0, 0.0}(+35.0, 0.0;65.2); 0.0 <<< EIPS(Mg, 2.51kV, 0.65mA, 0.4%) [MgK6] HRC-I &&& FPC_5(36)=740, SSD_5(5)=15, FPC_H=14 G-IHI-SI-7.007 100/12:07 ID=114829 { 0.0, 0.0}({-10,+10,1},+35; 0.0) !!! End HRC measurements; begin ACIS-2C measurements. >>> G-IHI-BG-1.017a 100/14:03 ID=114830-31 FPCs set up for 1.25 keV. 04/10/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak ### Tracked down light leak at source end. &&& Covered 2-in laser port at source end, which eliminated stray light. &&& Also turned off ion gauges in filter chamber. ### HXDS had trouble dealing with interim CMDB. !!! All measurements use front-side CCD (A2C1). G-I2C-SF-31.008 100/14:57 G-H2C-FC-1.014 100/17:47 ID=114832 HEG -2 order ; adjusted -150 um in z G-H2C-FC-1.012 100/19:17 ID=114833 HEG +2 order ; adjusted -50 um in z G-H2C-FC-1.006 100/20:29 ID=114834 -5 HEG 0 order ; adjusted -100 um in z G-H2C-FC-1.004 100/21:18 ID=114836 -7 MEG 0 order ; adjusted -100 um in z G-H2C-FC-1.010 100/21:54 ID=114838 MEG -3 ;adjusted -55 in z FPC5(12)5800 04/10/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf ### Repeat with longer frame time G-H2C-FC-1.006a 100/22:43 ID=114839 -5 HEG 0 order ; adjusted -100 um in z ### Restart but with different frame time (and lower source current) G-H2C-FC-1.010a 100/23:13 ID=114840 MEG -3; adjusted -55 in z G-H2C-FC-1.008 101/00:40 ID=114841 MEG +3; adjusted +240 in z G-L2C-FC-1.002 101/02:12 ID=114842 LETG 0; ### CMDB asks for 12mm on FPC 5. Would have produced 150,000 c/s! G-L2C-PI-32.011 101/03:26 ID=114843 LETG+1 FPC5(1)=1831 2C1 G-L2C-PI-32.012 101/03:43 ID=114844 LETG+1 G-L2C-PI-32.015 101/04:03 ID=114845 LETG+7 Correct z +.120 um G-L2C-PI-32.018 101/04:43 ID=114846 LETG+7 04/10/97C Leon Van Speybroeck <<< Following are all A-2C1, typically on axis unless noted G-L2C-PI-32.005 101/05:18 ID=114847 LETG, 0 , Integration !!! Recorded LASS-Z positions for HRC primary aim points: I At HRC-I aim point, LASS-Z = -517.984. S At HRC-S aim point, LASS-Z = -641.480. G-L2C-PI-32.006 101/05:30 ID=114848 LETG 0, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-32.001 101/05:53 ID=114849 HETG, MEG 0 , Integration G-H2C-PI-32.002 101/06:05 ID=114850 HETG, MEG 0, ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.002 101/06:29 ID=114851 HETG, MEG 0 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.006 101/06:52 ID=114852 HETG, MEG -1 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.004 101/07:18 ID=114853 HETG, MEG +1 ph_counting G-H2C-PI-32.007 101/07:32 ID=114854 HETG, MEG +1 , Integration G-H2C-PI-32.008 101/07:44 ID=114855 HETG, MEG +1, ph_counting <<< Following are MEG, +1 order, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-35.001 101/08:02 ID=114856 {P= 0.0, Y= -3.0} G-H2C-PI-35.002 101/08:32 ID=114857 {P= -4.2, Y= -4.2} G-H2C-PI-35.003 101/09:00 ID=114858 {P= 0.0, Y= -10.0} G-H2C-EA-12.009 101/09:31 ID=114859 HETG, MEG +2 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-12.010 101/09:54 ID=114860 HETG, MEG -2 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-12.012 101/10:06 ID=114861 HETG, MEG -3 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-12.011 101/10:18 ID=114862 HETG, MEG +3 ph_counting <<< Following are MEG, +3 order, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-35.009 101/10:29 ID=114863 {P= 0.0, Y= -10.0} G-H2C-PI-35.008 101/11:01 ID=114864 {P= -4.2, Y= -4.2} G-H2C-PI-35.007 101/11:30 ID=114865 {P= 0.0, Y= -3.0} 04/10/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak & Robert Austin G-H2C-PI-32.013 101/11:58 ID=114866 HETG, MEG +3 T, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-32.016 101/12:21 ID=114867 HETG, MEG +3 N, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-32.003 101/12:42 ID=114868 HETG, HEG 0 , Integration G-H2C-PI-32.004 101/12:52 ID=114869 HETG, HEG 0, ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.008 101/12:52 ID=114870 HETG, HEG 0 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.012 101/13:28 ID=114871 HETG, HEG -1 ph_counting G-H2C-EA-7.010 101/13:45 ID=114872 HETG, HEG +1 ph_counting !!! Reduced source current to 0.375ma for the above 3 measurements. G-H2C-PI-32.009 101/14:06 ID=114873 HETG, HEG +1 , Integration G-H2C-PI-32.010 101/14:17 ID=114874 HETG, HEG +1, ph_counting <<< Following are HEG, +1 order, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-35.004 101/14:36 ID=114876 {P= 0.0, Y= -3.0} doubled frame size G-H2C-PI-35.005 101/15:21 ID=114877 {P= -4.2, Y= -4.2} doubled frame size G-H2C-PI-35.006 101/15:48 ID=114879 {P= 0.0, Y= -10.0} increased frame size to accommodate 1st order image. G-H2C-PI-32.014 101/16:51 ID=114880 HETG, HEG +2 TB, ph_counting G-H2C-PI-32.017 101/17:08 ID=114881 HETG, HEG +2 NS, ph_counting G-I2C-PI-1.002 101/17:29 ID=114882 MP4 (No Grating) ph_counting <<< Switch to A-2C0 G-I2C-RC-72.004 101/18:19 ID=114883 HRMA (195 mm defocus) A-2C0 <<< Switch to Mo-La source G-H2C-EA-7.090 101/19:27 ID=114884 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-23.6, 2.3;23.5) G-H2C-EA-7.088 101/19:44 ID=114885 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 23.6,-2.0;23.5) G-H2C-EA-7.086 101/19:52 ID=114886 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 0.0, 0.1;23.4) G-H2C-EA-7.084 101/20:01 ID=114887 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-11.8,-0.8;15.5) G-H2C-EA-7.082 101/20:13 ID=114888 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 11.8, 1.1;15.5) G-H2C-EA-7.080 101/20:23: ID=114889 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 0.0, 0.1;15.5) 04/11/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! Repeat subpixel at +440 um to account for the shell-4 delta-focus G-I2C-PI-99.080 101/20:33 ID=114890 MP4 (No Grating) ph_counting G-I2C-EA-1.010 101/21:36 ID=114891 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( -1.0, 0.0;40.0) G-I2C-RC-72.046 101/21:55 ID=114892 <<< Change to Copper (Cu) source !!! Move to C0 boresight. G-I2C-SF-87.001 101/22:43 ID=114900 !!! Iterated twice and updated boresight. &&& This does NOT lead to same relative difference between C0 and C1 as in phase F! G-H2C-MC-86.001 101/23:28 ID=114902 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 7.0, 0.0; 0.0) !!! Double current and decrease frametime for efficiency on next. G-H2C-MC-86.002 102/00:21 ID=114903 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 8.0, 0.0; 0.0) !!! Just double frametime for these G-H2C-MC-86.003 102/00:49 ID=114904 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 9.0, 0.0; 0.1) G-H2C-MC-86.004 102/01:00 ID=114905 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 31.0, 0.0; 0.1) G-H2C-MC-86.005 102/01:13 ID=114906 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 32.0, 0.0; 0.1) G-H2C-MC-86.006 102/01:24 ID=114907 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 33.0, 0.0; 0.6) G-H2C-MC-86.007 102/01:37 ID=114908 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 56.0, 0.0; 0.6) G-H2C-MC-86.008 102/01:49 ID=114909 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}( 57.0, 0.0; 0.4) !!! Be sure to turn off FPCs for next 3. G-H2C-MC-86.018 102/02:00 ID=114910 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-39.7, 0.0; 0.2) G-H2C-MC-86.019 102/02:22 ID=114911 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-40.7, 0.0; 0.2) G-H2C-MC-86.020 102/02:39 ID=114912 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-41.7, 0.0; 0.2) <<< Switch to C1 (change boresight!) look at data - raise flux (by 2) shorten frame time. G-H2C-MC-86.009 102/02:59 ID=114913;14 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-10.0, 0.1; 0.0) G-H2C-MC-86.010 102/03:51 ID=114915 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-11.0, 0.1; 0.0) !!! Delete - G-H2C-MC-86.011 per Herman Marshall. G-H2C-MC-86.012 102/04:26 ID=114917 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-23.0, 0.1; 0.1) G-H2C-MC-86.013 102/04:41 ID=114918 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-24.0, 0.1; 0.1) 04/11/97C Leon Van Speybroeck G-H2C-MC-86.014 102/04:55 ID=114919 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-25.0, 0.1; 0.1) G-H2C-MC-86.015 102/05:05 ID=114921 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-36.0, 0.1; 0.2) G-H2C-MC-86.016 102/05:31 ID=114922 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-37.0, 0.1; 0.2) G-H2C-MC-86.017 102/05:40 ID=114923 {P= 0.0, Y= 0.0}(-38.0, 0.1; 0.2) G-I2C-PI-1.001 102/05;50 ID=114931 (MP4, dither) <<< Switch to DCM G-I2C-RC-72.044 102/06:48 ID=114932 (Door sources) !!! PLEASE BE SURE ALL FPCs OFF. <<< Following are done at HRMA on axis, PH_CNT mode, very high rate, HETG, various Y detector positions, A-2C0 G-H2C-SC-88.001 102/08:50 ID=114947 { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0} ### Taken 2 mm out of focus: TRW used out-of date table for DCM. G-H2C-SC-88.002 102/09:23 ID=114948 { 22.0, 0.0, 0.0} 04/12/97A Jeff Kolodziejczak G-H2C-SC-88.003 102/09:52 ID=114949 { 44.0, 0.0, 0.0} G-H2C-SC-88.004 102/10:17 ID=114950 { 66.0, 0.0, 0.0} G-H2C-SC-88.005 102/10:40 ID=114951 { 88.0, 0.0, 0.0} <<< Following are all HRMA on axis, PH_CNT mode, 0.66 sec frames, A-2C1 MP4-6 (HEG set) G-H2C-EA-41.001 102/11:03 ID=114959 HEG 0 { 0.0, 0.1, 23.4}8.73->6.03 G-H2C-EA-41.005 102/11:25 ID=114960 HEG +1 { 29.6, -2.5, 23.5}6.03 G-H2C-EA-41.002 102/11:40 ID=114961 { 0.0, 0.1, 23.4}6.03 G-H2C-EA-41.006 abort G-H2C-EA-41.004 abort G-H2C-EA-41.008 102/11:52 ID=114964 { 0.0, 0.1, 23.4}.52->.67 G-H2C-EA-41.003 102/12:26 ID=114965 HEG 0 { 0.0, 0.1, 23.4}.67 G-H2C-EA-41.007 102/13:06 ID=114966 HEG +1 { 28.8, -2.5, 23.5}.57 !!! Switch to HRC-S <<< Following are all HRMA on axis; no grating, DCM at 2.560 keV G-IHS-EA-70.002 102/13:41 ID=114967 { -36.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-70.004 102/14:46 ID=114968 { 0.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-70.006 102/15:00 ID=114969 { +36.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.001 102/15:11 ID=114970 {-125.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.002 102/15:22 ID=114971 {-100.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.003 102/15:32 ID=114972 { -75.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.004 102/15:43 ID=114973 { 75.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.005 102/15:54 ID=114974 { 100.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} G-IHS-EA-72.006 102/16:04 ID=114975 { 125.0, 0.0, 20.0; 6.0} <<< Switch to HRC-I, even if the following test is deleted G-IHI-SF-73.001 102/16:15 ID=114976/77 { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0; 30.0} &&& Focus error = 13 um !!! Prepare for re-press! *************************** END CMDB G SERIES *************************** ***************************************************************************** *************************** BEGIN CMDB H SERIES *************************** 04/17/97B Martin C. Weisskopf Start of phase H! !!! Start with DCM(Ge); set up FPCs for 3.5 keV for all DCM. $$$ Science Run 1: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.037 108/03:01 ID=114996-7 Set-up ACIS,I; xfull_i.te. ### HXDA could not control HRMA shutters. EKS manually set shutters. H-IAI-AL-1.001 108/04:56 ID=114998-01 Establish initial ACIS-I boresight. 04/17/97/C Steve O'Dell !!! LASS-Z = -66.42 for ACIS-I boresight. ### Some parties were unaware of most recent CMDB (2nd of day). &&& Started with manual corrections while TRW and HXDA loaded new CMDB. ### CMDB didn't enforce rigid-body FAM motion for off-axis measurements. &&& Corrected this manually initially. <<< DCM(Ge,{3.0,9.0,1.0}) ### SSD_5 rate is a factor-of-10 low. H-IAI-EA-2.020 108/06:36 ID=115002 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7;+40.) I3 H-IAI-EA-2.001 108/07:53 ID=115003 ( +5.0, +4.9)(-14.7,+14.7;+40.) I0 H-IAI-EA-2.002 108/08:40 ID=115004 ( +5.0, -3.7)(+11.1,+14.7;+40.) I1 H-IAI-EA-2.004 108/09:32 ID=115005 ( -3.8, -3.7)(+11.1,-11.2;+40.) I3 H-IAI-EA-2.003 108/10:14 ID=115006 ( -3.8, +4.9)(-14.9,-11.2;+40.) I2 H-IAI-EA-2.005 108/10:57 ID=115007 (-13.2, +7.0)(-20.9,-39.2;+40.) S2 H-IAI-EA-2.006 108/11:43 ID=115008 (-13.2, -1.6)( +4.9,-39.2;+40.) S3 !!! Use FPC_5 to measure 5.0-keV flux at FPCmon12, on-axis12, and SSDmon36. $$$ Science Run 2: ACIS,S xfaint_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-4.037 108/12:37 ID=115009-11 Set-up ACIS,S; xfaint_s.te. !!! Perform following AL with all shutters open and closer to focus: H-IAI-AL-1.002 108/13:17 ID=115012 Establish initial ACIS-I boresight. !!! LASS-Z = -109.8 for ACIS-S boresight. 04/18/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak & Robert Austin <<< DCM(Ge,{3.0,9.0,1.0}) H-IAS-EA-2.013 108/14:05 ID=115013 ( 0.0,-19.5)(+58.0, 0.0;+40.) S5 ### Need to repeat: FAM was at wrong tilt; ACIS performance was strange. H-IAS-EA-2.012 108/14:54 ID=115014 ( 0.0,-10.8)(+32.2, 0.0;+40.) S4 !!! Connect HRMA shutters to HXDS control computer. ### Need to shut down panels, re-home HRMA and BND_HN after re-powering. !!! Use SSD_5 to measure 5.0-keV flux for 5-mm and 2-mm apertures. ID=115016-17 H-IAS-EA-2.011 108/16:08 ID=115020 ( 0.0, -2.2)( +6.4, 0.0;+40.) S3 ### Had to re-start because HRMA shutters were in wrong position. ### Had to re-start again because after rehoming: &&& FPC-hn was not returned to monitor position from home position. H-IAS-EA-2.010 108/17:59 ID=115021 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0;+40.) S3 H-IAS-EA-2.009 108/18:50 ID=115022 ( 0.0, +6.5)(-19.3, 0.0;+40.) S2 H-IAS-EA-2.008 108/19:41 ID=115023 ( 0.0,+15.2)(-45.1, 0.0;+40.) S1 H-IAS-EA-2.007 108/20:33 ID=115024 ( 0.0,+23.9)(-70.9, 0.0;+40.) S0 04/18/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf H-IAS-EA-2.013a 108/21:33 ID=115025 ( 0.0,-19.5)(+58.0, 0.0;+40.) S5 !!! Insert HETG. <<< HETG ACIS-S, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0;+40.) S3 H-HAS-EA-8.001 108/22:31 ID=115026 DCM(TAP, {0.95,1.15,0.05}) H-HAS-EA-8.002 109/01:44 ID=115027 DCM(TAP, {1.20,1.40,0.05}) H-HAS-EA-8.003 109/02:53 ID=115028 DCM(TAP, {1.40,1.70,0.03}) H-HAS-EA-8.004 109/04:36 ID=115029 DCM(TAP, {1.86,2.00,0.02}) 04/18/97/C Steve O'Dell H-HAS-EA-8.005 109/05:39 ID=115030 DCM(TAP, {2.05,2.35,0.03}) <<< HETG ACIS-S, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; df) S3 H-HAS-EA-8.006 109/06:49 ID=115031-2 DCM( Ge, {2.50,4.00,0.15}) df=+24.0 ### ACIS computer crashed, telemetry stream stopped. &&& Recovered and restarted entire scan at 08:20. H-HAS-EA-8.007 109/09:41 ID=115033 DCM( Ge, {4.00,5.00,0.20}) df=+19.0 H-HAS-EA-8.008 109/10:28 ID=115034 DCM( Ge, {5.00,7.00,0.25}) df=+13.5 H-HAS-EA-8.009 109/12:35 ID=115035 DCM( Ge, {7.20,8.70,0.50}) df=+10.5 04/19/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak !!! <<< ACIS-S, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( -3.1, 0.0; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-SF-2.002 109/14:29 ID=115036 .DCM( Ge, 2.5) H-IAS-SF-2.004 Aborted. !!! Redefine boresights: x moved +4.84mm; y, -0.137mm; z, +0.060mm H-HAS-SC-7.001 109/16:36 ID=115037 DCM(TAP,{1.38}) df=0.0 H-HAS-SC-7.002 109/17:11 ID=115038 DCM(TAP,{1.38}) df=0.0 H-HAS-SC-7.003 109/17:37 ID=115039 DCM(TAP,{2.02}) df=0.0 H-HAS-SC-7.004 109/18:06 ID=115040 DCM(TAP,{2.02}) df=0.0 H-HAS-SC-7.005 109/18:33 ID=115041 DCM( Ge, {4.0,9.0,1.0}) df=0.0 04/19/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf H-HAS-SC-7.006 109/20:38 ID=115042 DCM( Ge, {4.0,9.0,1.0}) df=0.0 !!! Moved FAM - deliberately - by 50 um(+z) for last two data points. &&& ACIS worried about total dose! <<< Reference = I array. Took a long time to move! I-IAS-PI-21.001 110/00:00 ID=115043 (p=-13;y=24 ){x=0.321,y=-?,z=?) I-IAS-PI-21.002 110/00:28 ID=115044 (p=-13,y=15.4){x= I-IAS-PI-21.003 110/00:44 ID=115045 I-IAS-PI-21.004 110/01:09 ID=115046 (p=-13,y=-1.6){x=0.07,y=4.64,z=-37.2}Lz=-66.42 I-IAS-PI-21.005 110/01:35 ID=115047 (p=-13,y=-18.6){x=0.21,y=53.72,z=-37.32}Lz=-66.42 I-IAS-PI-21.006 110/01:48 ID=115048 H-IAI-SG-1.039 110/02:02 ID=115049 H-IAI-SF-2.001 110/02:39 ID=115051,52,53,54 DCM( Ge, 2.5) ### These take way too long and it appears we are 2.3 mm out of focus. &&& This makes sense: Focus for I array was not updated when S array shutter focus was taken. !!! Thus delete the next measurement. 04/19/97/C Steve O'Dell ### ACIS team determined that CTUE has been in wrong telemetry mode. &&& Telemetry rate of 0.5 kb/s rather than 24 kb/s had bogged down ACIS since SC measurements. ### New Science Run (SG-1.039) started before ACIS buffers were flushed. &&& This left BEP confused and lost time-stamp synch. !!! Changing CTUE mode to 24 kb/s telemetry rate resolved problem. ### Re-set of CTUE inadvertently re-set major frame number to 1: &&& This will present some problems for PSU (and ASC?) analysis. $$$ Science Run 3: ACIS,I x100_hi_i.te #rows=100 H-IAI-SG-1.039a 110/05:36 ID=115055-6 Set-up ACIS,I; x100_hi_i.te. <<< RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.006 110/06:09 ID=115058 ( +8.7, +1.2)( -3.4,+25.0; 0.0) I0 <<< RAS7(20,20,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAI-PI-2.003 110/06:36 ID=115060 ( +8.7, +1.2)( -3.4,+25.0; 0.0) I0 <<< RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.010 110/07:27 ID=115062 ( +1.2, 0.0)( 0.0, +3.5; 0.0) I1 <<< RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAI-PW-2.007 110/08:00 ID=115063 ( +1.2, 0.0)( 0.0, +3.5; 0.0) I1 H-IAI-PI-2.001 110/09:03 ID=115064 ( +1.2, +1.2)( -3.4, +3.5; 0.0) I0 <<< RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.004 110/10:06 ID=115065 ( +1.2, +1.2)( -3.4, +3.5; 0.0) I0 H-IAI-PW-2.016 110/10:20 ID=115066 ( 0.0, +1.2)( -3.4, 0.0; 0.0) I2 <<< RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAI-PI-2.013 110/10:36 ID=115067 ( 0.0, +1.2)( -3.4, 0.0; 0.0) I2 <<< RAS7(20,20,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAI-PI-2.021 110/11:37 ID=115069 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0,-21.6; 0.0) I3 <<< RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.027 110/12:15 ID=115070 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0,-21.6; 0.0) I3 !!! Change DCM( Ge) energy from 3.50 keV to 5.20 keV. <<< RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.030 110/12:29 ID=115071 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0,-21.6; 0.0) I3 <<< RAS7(20,20,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [VK2] H-IAI-PI-2.024 110/12:47 ID=115072 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0,-21.6; 0.0) I3 04/20/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak & Robert Austin !!! Change DCM( Ge) energy from 5.20 keV to 3.50 keV. !!! Change boresight from ACIS-I to ACIS-S: LASS-Z = -109.7. <<< RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAS-PW-2.040 110/13:27 ID=115073 ( +3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,+10.8; 0.0) S3 <<< RAS7(20,20,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAS-PI-2.036 110/13:53 ID=115074 ( +3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-2.035 110/14:28 ID=115075 ( +3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,+10.8; 0.0) S3 <<< RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAS-PW-2.039 110/15:02 ID=115076 ( +3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PW-2.034 110/15:17 ID=115077 ( +3.7,+10.2)(-29.5,+10.8; 0.0) S2 <<< RAS7(20,20,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAS-PI-2.032 110/15:33 ID=115078 ( +3.7,+10.2)(-29.5,+10.8; 0.0) S2 $$$ Science Run 4: ACIS,I x100_lo_tb_i.te #rows=100 H-IAI-SG-1.040 110/16:10 Set-up ACIS,I; x100_lo_tb_i.te. H-IAS-PW-2.042 110/16:24 ID=115079 ( -3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,-10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-2.038 110/16:48 ID=115080 ( -3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,-10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PW-2.041 110/17:39 ID=115081 ( -3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,-10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-2.037 110/18:02 ID=115082 ( -3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,-10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PW-2.033 110/18:38 ID=115083 ( -3.7,+10.2)(-29.5,-10.8; 0.0) S2 H-IAS-PI-2.031 110/18:58 ID=115084 ( -3.7,+10.2)(-29.5,-10.8; 0.0) S2 04/20/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf !!! Change boresight from ACIS-S to ACIS-I: LASS-Z = -66.4. ### LASSZ is stuck! Compensate with FAMZ(in boresight). H-IAI-PW-2.005 110/19:29 ID=115086 ( +8.7, +8.7)(-25.0,+25.0;+0.1) I0 H-IAI-PI-2.002 110/21:21 ID=115087 ( +8.7, +8.7)(-25.0,+25.0;+0.1) I0 H-IAI-PI-2.008 110/21:55 ID=115088 ( +8.7, -7.5)(+21.5,+25.0;+0.1) I1 H-IAI-PW-2.011 110/22:38 ID=115089 ( +8.7, -7.5)(+21.5,+25.0;+0.1) I1 H-IAI-PW-2.012 110/22:54 ID=115090 ( +1.2, -7.5)(+21.5, +3.5; 0.0) I1 H-IAI-PI-2.009 110/23:10 ID=115091 ( +1.2, -7.5)(+21.5, +3.5; 0.0) I1 H-IAI-PI-2.015 110/23:43 ID=115092 ( 0.0, +8.7)(-25.0, -0.1; 0.0) I2 !!! Move FAMY slightly for next (and additional 480 um -y) H-IAI-PW-2.018 111/00:17 ID=115093 ( 0.0, +8.7)(-25.0, -0.1; 0.0) I2 H-IAI-PW-2.017 111/00:35 ID=115094 ( -7.5, +8.7)(-25.0,-21.6; 0.0) I2 H-IAI-PI-2.014 111/00:52 ID=115095 ( -7.5, +8.7)(-25.0,-21.6; 0.0) I2 H-IAI-PI-2.020 111/01:28 ID=115096 ( -7.5, -7.5)(+21.5,-21.6; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PW-2.026 111/02:00 ID=115097 ( -7.5, -7.5)(+21.5,-21.6; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PW-2.029 111/02:17 ID=115098 ( -7.5, -7.5)(+21.5,-21.6; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PI-2.023 111/02:32 ID=115099 ( -7.5, -7.5)(+21.5,-21.6; 0.0) I3 !!! Move an additional 0.360 in -y. H-IAI-PW-2.017a 111/03:06 ID=115100 ( -7.5,+8.7)(-25,-21.6; 0.0) I2 $$$ Science Run 5: ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te #rows=38 H-IAI-SG-2.037 111/03:26 ID=115101 Set-up ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te. <<< ACIS-I, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( -0.3, 0.0; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PI-2.019 111/03:44 ID=115102 RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] &&& Needed to lower current to 10 mA; also to adjust FAM position 04/20/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< ACIS-I, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( -0.3, 0.0; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PW-2.025 111/05:06 ID=115103 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAI-PW-2.028 111/05:25 ID=115104 RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [None] ### ACIS stopped above measurement prematurely: Repeat below. H-IAI-PI-2.022 111/05:40 ID=115105 RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [VK2] H-IAI-PW-2.028a 111/06:52 ID=115106 RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [None] $$$ Science Run 6: ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te #rows=38 H-IAS-SG-2.038 111/07:04 ID=115107 Set-up ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te. <<< ACIS-S, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PW-2.045 111/07:25 ID=115108 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [None] H-IAS-PI-2.043 111/07:40 ID=115109 RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 3.50) [SnL2] H-IAS-PW-2.046 111/08:45 ID=115110 RAS7(20,60,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [None] H-IAS-PI-2.044 111/09:01 ID=115111 RAS7(20,10,20) DCM( Ge, 5.20) [VK2] $$$ Science Run 7: ACIS,S xfaint_alt_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-5.037 111/10:01 ID=115112 Set-up ACIS,S xfaint_alt_s.te. <<< HETG ACIS-S, HRMA on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( -0.3, 0.0; 0.0) S3 H-HAS-SC-17.006 111/10:23 ID=115113-4 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, {5.0,9.0,1.0}) H-BND-BU-0.001 111/13:12 ID=115115 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM(TAP, 1.20) H-BND-BU-0.002 111/14:19 ID=115116 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM(TAP, 1.95) H-BND-BU-0.003 111/15:05 ID=115117 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM(TAP, 3.00) H-BND-BU-0.004 111/15:34 ID=115118 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 6.00) H-BND-BU-0.005 111/16:09 ID=115119 RAS7(20,90,20) DCM( Ge, 8.00) $$$ Science Run 8: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.001 111/13:13 Set-up ACIS,I xfull_i.te. H-IAS-RC-1.001 111/13:32 <<< EIPS(Al) ### Locations for EA measurements were not at desired places, so replaced. H-IAS-EA-1.011->H-IAI-EA-1.001 H-IAI-EA-99.081 111/16:53 ID=115130 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7;+40.) I3 H-IAI-EA-99.082 111/18:24 ID=115131 ( +5.0, +4.9)(-14.7,+14.7;+40.) I0 H-IAI-EA-99.083 111/18:47 ID=115132 ( +5.0, -3.7)(+11.1,+14.7;+40.) I1 H-IAI-EA-99.084 111/19:04 ID=115133 ( -3.8, -3.7)(+11.1,-11.2;+40.) I3 H-IAI-EA-99.085 111/19:18 ID=115134 ( -3.8, +4.9)(-14.9,-11.2;+40.) I2 H-IAI-EA-99.086 111/19:32 ID=115135 (-13.2, +7.0)(-20.9,-39.2;+40.) S2 H-IAI-EA-99.087 111/19:45 ID=115136 (-13.2, -1.6)( +4.9,-39.2;+40.) S3 04/21/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf H-IAS-SF-3.002 111/20:02 ID=115137 &&& This may be our last SF. We were in focus! !!! Skip CR tests for now ACIS needs a software patch to perform these. $$$ Science Run 9: ACIS,I x100_hi_tb_i.te #rows=100 H-IAI-SG-1.003 111/20:36 Set-up ACIS,I x100_hi_tb_i.te. H-IAS-PI-3.008 111/20:57 ID=115139 ( +3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-3.013 111/21:52 ID=115140 ( +3.7, +1.6)( -4.5,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-3.009 111/22:13 ID=115141 ( +3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-3.014 111/23:00 ID=115142 ( +3.7, -5.9)(+17.0,+10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAI-SF-3.001 111/ ID=1151 (skip this one, if necessary do after 3.001) H-IAI-PI-3.003 111/23:19 ID=115143;44;45 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0, 21.6; 0.0) I3 ### CTUE problem H-IAI-PI-3.006 112/00:58 ID=115146 ( -7.5, 0.0)( 0.0,+21.6; 0.0) I3 H-IAI-PI-3.001 112/01:19 ID=115147-8 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) I3 ### Raise current to 0.25 in middle of test at request of Herb Manning. $$$ Science Run 10: ACIS,I x100_lo_tb_i.te #rows=100 H-IAI-SG-6.002 112/02:22 ID=115149 Set-up ACIS,I x100_lo_tb_i.te. H-IAS-PI-7.010 112/02:43 ID=115150 ( -3.7, 1.6)(-4.5, -10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-7.015 112/03:29 ID=115151 ( -3.7, 1.6)(-4.5, -10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-7.011 112/04:05 ID=115152 ( -3.7, -5.9)(17.0, -10.8; 0.0) S3 H-IAS-PI-7.016 112/04:51 ID=115153 ( -3.7, -5.9)(17.0, -10.8; 0.0) S3 04/21/97/C Steve O'Dell H-IAS-PI-7.002 112/05:09 ID=115154 ( -7.5, -7.5)(-21.6, 0.0; 0.0) I3 H-IAS-PI-7.005 112/05:57 ID=115155 ( -7.5, -7.5)(-21.6, 0.0; 0.0) I3 $$$ Science Run 11: ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te #rows=38 H-IAI-SG-2.001 112/06:13 ID=115156 Set-up ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te. <<< HRMA ACIS-I on axis ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) I3 ### Image is not centered on 38-row window: Move FAM dy=-0.36. H-IAI-CR-1.003 112/06:33 ID=115157 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.14) [AlK6] FPC_5= 26.64 H-IAI-CR-1.005 112/07:33 ID=115158 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.44) [AlK6] FPC_5= 85.0 H-IAI-CR-1.007 112/07:49 ID=115159 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.84) [AlK6] FPC_5=163.5 H-IAI-CR-1.001 112/08:06 ID=115160 EIPS(Al,2.34,0.11) [AlK6] FPC_5= 7.19 $$$ Science Run 12: ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te #rows=38 H-IAS-SG-2.002 112/10:16 ID=115161 Set-up ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te. H-IAS-CR-1.004 112/10:31 ID=115162 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.11) [AlK6] FPC_5= 20.51 H-IAS-CR-1.006 112/11:15 ID=115163 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.36) [AlK6] FPC_5= 69.4 H-IAS-CR-1.008 112/11:33 ID=115164 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.68) [AlK6] FPC_5=131.8 H-IAS-CR-1.002 112/11:43 ID=115165 EIPS(Al,2.17,0.15) [AlK6] FPC_5= 5.962 04/22/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak $$$ Science Run 13: ACIS,S xfaint_amp_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-2.002 112/13:52 ID=115166 Set-up ACIS,S xfaint_amp_s.te. H-HAS-SF(PI)-1.001 112/14:28 ID=115167 EIPS(Al,2.96,0.138) [AlK6] H-HAS-SF(PI)-1.003 112/17:52 ID=115168 EIPS(Al,2.96,0.7) [AlK6] 04/22/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf H-HAS-EA-2.001 112/19:10 ID=115169 (0, 0)( 0,0;+40.) S3 ### Next 2 tests did not have the FAM rotated - hence not rigid body. &&& Thus, skipped third test (PI-1.013), per Kathy F and Mike W. H-HAS-PI-1.011 112/19:21 ID=115170 (0, 3.0)( -9.0, 0.0; 0.0) S3 H-HAS-PI-1.012 112/21:05 ID=115171 (-4.2, -4.2)( 10.7, -10.7; 0.0) S3 ### These also were no FAM tilt. H-IAS-EA-21.001 112/21:44 ID=115172 (0.0, 23.9)( -68.5, 0.0; 40.2) S0 H-IAS-EA-21.002 112/22:05 ID=115173 (0.0, 15.2)( -43.6, 0.0; 40.1) S1 H-IAS-EA-21.003 112/22:19 ID=115174 (0.0, -10.8)( 31.1, 0.0; 40.0) S4 H-IAS-EA-21.004 112/22:27 ID=115175 (0.0, -19.5)( 56.1, 0.0; 40.2) S4 $$$ Science Run 14: ACIS,S xfaint_alt_win_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-7.001 112/22:35 ID=115176 Set-up ACIS,S xfaint_alt_win_s.te ### Lots of problems getting the window block loaded. ### CMDB calls this a PI, thus no HXDS script: More delay. ### CMDB wants 5 times available current. H-HAS-SF-18.001 112/23:21 ID=115177-80 H-LAS-SF-18.002 113/01:01 ID=115181 H-LAS-SF-18.002a 113/02:04 ID=115182 $$$ Science Run 15: ACIS,S xfaint_letg_s.te #rows=256 H-IAS-SG-4.003 113/02:21 ID=115183 Set-up ACIS,S xfaint_letg_s.te <<< HRMA LETG (0.0,0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; df) S3 H-LAS-SF-1.006 113/02:37 ID=115184 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.41)[AlK6] df=0.0 04/22/97/C Steve O'Dell <<< HRMA LETG (0.0,0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; df) S3 H-LAS-SF-1.008 113/05:37 ID=115185 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.30)[AlK4] df=0.0 H-LAS-EA-2.002 113/06:51 ID=115186 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.37)[AlK4] df=+40 $$$ Science Run 16: ACIS,I x1_i.cc continuous clocking H-IAI-SG-3.001 113/07:04 ID=115187 Set-up ACIS,I x1_i.cc. <<< HRMA (0.0,0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) 1-row continuous clocking H-IAI-PI-4.001 113/07:20 ID=115188 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.29)[AlK6] I3 H-IAI-PI-4.005 113/07:37 ID=115189 EIPS(Al,2.97,1.42)[AlK6] I3 H-IAI-PI-4.009 113/07:47 ID=115190 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.68)[AlK4] I3 H-IAS-PI-4.011 113/07:56 ID=115191-92 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.55)[AlK4] S3 H-IAS-PI-4.007 113/08:12 ID=115193 EIPS(Al,2.97,1.15)[AlK6] S3 H-IAS-PI-4.003 113/08:21 ID=115194 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.23)[AlK6] S3 $$ Science Run 17: ACIS,I x2_i.cc continuous clocking H-IAI-SG-3.003 113/08:37 ID=115195 Set-up ACIS,I x2_i.cc. ### Abort: Unable to set up HST; but telemetry was OK, so continued. &&& Corrected HST set-up during IAS-PI-4.004 and took some frames. <<< HRMA (0.0,0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) 2-row continuous clocking H-IAS-PI-4.004 113/09:12 ID=115196 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.23)[AlK6] S3 H-IAS-PI-4.008 113/09:28 ID=115197 EIPS(Al,2.97,1.15)[AlK6] S3 H-IAS-PI-4.012 113/09:38 ID=115198 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.55)[AlK4] S3 H-IAI-PI-4.010 113/09:47 ID=115199 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.68)[AlK4] I3 H-IAI-PI-4.006 113/10:00 ID=115200 EIPS(Al,2.97,1.42)[AlK6] I3 H-IAI-PI-4.002 113/10:12 ID=115201 EIPS(Al,2.97,0.29)[AlK6] I3 !!! Change from EIPS(Al) to EIPS(C). !!! Run BGs with FPCs set for 0.277 keV (C-Ka) and for 5.4 keV (C-cont). $$ Science Run 18: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.036 113/10:29 ID=115208 Set-up ACIS,I xfull_i.te. !!! Also run BGs for FPCs set for 0.28 keV (C-Ka). H-IAS-BG-1.003 113/10:50 ID=115220 ACIS,S BG & bias. !!! Also run BGs for FPCs set for 5.40 keV (C-continuum). !!! Set FPCs for 5.40 keV (C-continuum) <<< EIPS(C,15.0,0.11)[BeK2] HRMA(6B) H-IAS-MC-3.013 113/11:40 ID=115222 ( 0.0, 0.0)( +6.0, -0.5;+191) S3 H-IAS-MC-3.014 113/12:13 ID=115223 ( 0.0, 0.0)( +6.0, -0.5;+191) S2 !!! Set FPCs for 0.28 keV (C-Ka) <<< EIPS(C,1.21,0.60)[CK2] H-IAI-EA-23.001 113/12:38 ID=115234 ( +5.0, +4.9)(-14.2,+14.2;+40.) I0 H-IAI-EA-23.002 113/13:18 ID=115235 ( +5.0, -3.7)(+10.7,+14.2;+40.) I1 H-IAI-EA-23.003 113/13:38 ID=115236 ( -3.8, +4.9)(-14.2,-10.8;+40.) I2 H-IAI-EA-23.004 113/13:57 ID=115237 ( -3.8, -3.7)(+10.7,-10.8;+40.) I3 H-IAI-EA-99.088 113/14:12 ID=115239 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7;+40.) I3 04/23/97/A Jeff Kolodziejczak H-IAI-EA-23.005 113/ ID=115238 (-13.2, +7.0)(-20.2,-37.9;+40.) S2 <<< EIPS(C,1.00,0.98)[CK4] H-IAI-EA-23.006 113/15:32 ID=115240 (-13.2, -1.6)( +4.7,-37.9;+40.) S3 !!! Skip GI for now because Mark B is concerned about detector safety. &&& The tests will be reworked for the Cu anode. $$$ Science Run 19: ACIS,S xfull_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.037 113/15:49 ID=115241 H-IAI-EA-23.013 113/16:11 ID=115242 ( 0.0,-19.5)(+58.0, 0.0;+40.) S5 (3,0)(1.05kV,1.1mA) H-IAI-EA-23.012 113/16:38 ID=115243 ( 0.0,-10.8)(+32.2, 0.0;+40.) S4 (3,0)(1.05kV,1.28mA) H-IAI-EA-23.011 113/16:54 ID=115244 ( 0.0, -2.2)( +6.4, 0.0;+40.) S3 H-IAI-EA-23.010 113/17:11 ID=115245 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0;+40.) S3 H-IAI-EA-23.009 113/17:24 ID=115246 ( 0.0, +6.5)(-19.3, 0.0;+40.) S2 (3,0)(1.05kV,1.28mA) H-IAI-EA-23.008 113/17:39 ID=115247 ( 0.0,+15.2)(-45.1, 0.0;+40.) S1 H-IAI-EA-23.007 113/17:52 ID=115248 ( 0.0,+23.9)(-70.9, 0.0;+40.) s0 (3,0)(1.05kV,1.28mA) $$$ Science Run 20: ACIS,S xfaint_win_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-4.032 113/18:08 No background taken H-IAS-MC-3.010 113/18:23 ID=115264 ( 0.0, 0.0)( +6.0, -0.5;+191) S3 04/23/97/B Martin C. Weisskopf H-IAS-MC-3.011 113/21:13 ID=115265 ( 0.0, 0.0)( +6.0, -0.5;+191) S3 !!! For this measurement, lower source HV 10 kV and close N and S shutters. Half way through switch to top and bottom. H-IAS-MC-3.012 114/00:09 ID=115266 ( 0.0, 0.0)( +6.0, -0.5;+191) S3 !!! Leave source at 10 keV for these also, cyle a shutter at a time. !!! Change next measurement from RC to BG so ACIS can take background during the source change. This has a "hidden mode change". $$$ Science Run 21: ACIS,S xfull_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-BG-1.002 114/03:04 ID=115278 $$$ Science Run 22: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.006 114/04:00 ID=115279 H-IAI-EA-24.001 114/04:30 ID=115280 ( 5.0, 4.9)(-14.2, +14.2; +40) I0 04/23/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck H-IAI-EA-24.002 114/04:53 ID=115281 ( 5.0, -3.7)(+10.7, +14.2; +40) I1 H-IAI-EA-25.001 114/05:06 ID=115282 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7; +40) I3 ### Focal-plane rate about twice expected, causing pile-up problem. &&& Repeated run with 1/2 flux; reduced current from 0.65 to 0.325 mA. H-IAI-EA-25.001a 114/05:38 ID=115283 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7; +40) I3 H-IAI-EA-24.003 114/05:50 ID=115284 (-3.8, +4.9)(-14.2, -10.8; +40) I2 H-IAI-EA-24.004 114/06:04 ID=115285 (-3.8, -3.7)(+10.7, -10.8; +40) I3 <<< EIPS(Si-K) ### New setup required for counters; otherwise would overflow. !!! Get background later. H-IAI-EA-3.009 114/06:24 ID=115292 (-3.8, +4.9)(-14.2, -10.8; +40) I2 ### Found rate 80 vs 40 desired. &&& Increased filter from x2 to x4, increased current from 0.1 to 0.37 mA, and repeated run. H-IAI-EA-3.009a 114/06:39 ID=115293 (-3.8, +4.9)(-14.2, -10.8; +40) I2 ### Got only 10 Hz in the ACIS. Extended integration. &&& Will run next runs with x4 filter, but at max current and double integration times. H-IAI-EA-25.004 114/07:06 ID=115294 ( 0.0, 0.0)(+10.8, -2.7; +40) I3 H-IAI-EA-3.008 114/07:20 ID=115295 ( 5.0, -3.7)(+10.7, +14.2; +40) I1 H-IAI-EA-3.007 114/07:32 ID=115296 ( 5.0, 4.9)(-14.2, +14.2; +40) I0 $$$ Science Run 23: ACIS,I xfull_x.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-1.022 114/ ID=115298 H-IAI-EA-18.029 114/08:39 ID=115299 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; +40) S3 H-IAI-EA-18.028 114/08:51 ID=115300 ( 5.0, 4.9)(-18.7, 0.0; +40) S2 <<< Following are HETG, order 0 H-HAS-PI-19.001 114/09:02 ID=115301 (-4.2, -4.2)(+10.2, -10.2; 0.0) S3 H-HAS-PI-19.002 114/10:13 ID=115302 ( 0.0,-10.0)(+28.8, 0.0; 0.0) S4 <<< Following are HETG, order 0 H-IAI-EA-6.004 114/10:48 ID=115303 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; +40) S3 Switch to O-Ka; anticipate we need 1/2 of CMDB current; 0.69->0.342 H-IAI-EA-6.001 114/11:13 ID=115310 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; +40) S3 H-IAI-EA-24.022 114/11:28 ID=115311 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; +40) S3 H-IAI-EA-24.021 114/11:42 ID=115312 ( 0.0, 6.5)(-18.7, 0.0; +40) S2 ### Reduced current 0.24 -> 0.1 mA to avoid pileup H-IAI-EA-24.021a 114/11:54 ID=115313 ( 0.0, 6.5)(-18.7, 0.0; +40) S2 $$$ Science Run 24: ACIS,I xstag_38_s3.te #rows=38 H-IAI-SG-2.006 114/12:07 ID=115314 H-IAS-CR-1.010 114/12:21 ID=115315 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0) S3 ### Rate for above was found about 8 h`Hz in ACIS, and badly piled up. &&& Above run becomes substitute for 1.012, run for 2000 s and reduce flux by a factor of 4 for next exposure. &&& FPC_5 is running about 12 Hz, so we should shoot for flux of about 4 (assuming background of 2) for the next run. &&& Current run has x6 filter, 0.86 kV, 0.147 mA. H-IAS-CR-1.012 114/13:31 ID=115316 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)S3 !!! Source settings for above measurement: 0.1ma, 0.65kV 04/24/97/A H-IAS-CR-1.014 114/ ID=1153 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)S3 !!! Test deleted. H-IAS-CR-1.016 114/ ID=1153 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)S3 !!! Test deleted. $$$ Science Run 25: ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te #rows=38 H-IAI-SG-2.005 114/15:29 ID= $$$ No RUNID - mode change H-IAS-CR-1.009 114/16:00 ID=115317 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)I3 H-IAS-CR-1.011 114/18:22 ID=115318 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)I3 H-IAS-CR-1.013 114/ ID=1153 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)I3 !!! Test deleted. H-IAS-CR-1.015 114/ ID=1153 ( 0.0, 0.0)( 0.0, 0.0; 0.0)I3 Test deleted $$$ Science Run 26: ACIS,I xfaint_5x5_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-9.003 114/18:56 ID=115319 H-IAI-SL-1.001 114/19:22 ID=115320/1 04/24/97/B Harvey Tananbaum $$$ Science Run 27: ACIS,S xfaint_5x5_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAI-SG-9.004 114/20:18 ID=115322 H-IAS-SL-1.002 114/20:48 ID=115323/4 $$$ Science Run 28: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 <<< EIPS(Cu-K) H-IAI-SG-1.031 114/21:25 IDs 115325-115330 used for detector set-ups H-IAS-RC-1.005 114/ ID=No BND data taken - run ACIS with FCM H-IAI-EA-24.007 114/22:42 ID=115332 (5.0, 4.9) (-14.2, 14.2, 40.0) I0 H-IAI-EA-24.008 114/23:05 ID=115333 (5.0, -3.7) ( 10.7, 14.2, 40.0) I1 H-IAI-EA-25.002 114/23:21 ID=115334 (0.0, 0.0) ( 10.8, -2.7, 40.0) I3 H-IAI-EA-24.009 114/ ID=115335 (-3.8, 4.9) (-14.2,-10.8, 40.0) I2 <<< EIPS(Cu-L) &&& Set-up used runIDs 115336-115341 H-IAI-EA-3.003 114/23:51 ID=115342 (-3.8, 4.9) (-14.2,-10.8, 40.0) I2 H-IAI-EA-25.005 115/00:02 ID=115343 (0.0, 0.0) ( 10.8, -2.7, 40.0) I3 H-IAI-EA-3.002 115/00:13 ID=115344 (5.0, -3.7) ( 10.7, 14.2, 40.0) I1 H-IAI-EA-3.001 115/00:25 ID=115345 (5.0, 4.9) (-14.2, 14.2, 40.0) I0 H-IAS-SG-1.017 !!! Skip this change, except move FAM to S-boresight H-IAS-EA-18.022 115/00:34 ID=115346 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 H-IAS-EA-18.021 115/00:49 ID=115347 ( 0.0, 6.5) (-18.7, 0.0, 40.0) S2 <<< EIPS(Cu-K) &&& RunID 115348 aborted, 115349-354 used for detector set-up H-IAS-EA-24.028 115/01:01 ID=115355 ( 0.0, 6.5) (-18.7, 0.0, 40.0) S2 H-IAS-EA-24.029 115/01:35 ID=115356 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 $$$ Science Run 29: ACIS,S xbright_alt__s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-11.007 115/01:51 ID=115357 H-HAS-MC-20.001 115/02:14 ID=115358 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.2, 1.0, 0.0) S3 ### Abort collect - need to turn off FPCs per CMBD (ignore PS sheets). &&& Accumulated counts at ~75000 c/s in FPC_5 for 5-7 min and ~2500 c/s in each FPC_h for same time period. &&& Count rate too high for ACIS as well, so close N and S shutters for all 4 shells and restart. ### Still too high, so do 1 quadrant at a time -t,n,b,s. Collect for ~8 minutes (starting at 02:39 GMT) and allow 5 minutes with shutters closed, after each quadrant is exposed, to allow telemetry buffer to empty. Times estimated using IRIG clock. &&& RunID 115359 for actual test. Dither. $$$ Science Run 30: ACIS,S xfaint_win_s.cc / xfaint_win_s.1d #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-4.028 115/03:27 ID=115359 H-HAS-MC-3.001 115/03:41 ID=115360 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, -1.5, 0.0) S3 !!! Run only ssd_5 for monitor. !!! Start with top and bottom shutters open. Dither. &&& Accumulate for ~15 minutes (lots of discussion about how many counts with buffers filling, etc -- estimate 2000c/s x 1000 sec or ~2 x 10^6 cts -OK) Close shutters and empty buffer for 5 minutes. ### Realize all 4 shells were open - should be HEG only = shells 4 and 6. !!! Now open N and S shutters, but only for shells 4 and 6. &&& Count for 15 minutes (rate is ~1000 c/s), then close all for 5 minutes to dump buffer. !!! Repeat for T and B shutters, shells 4 and 6 only. &&& ACIS team concludes we can get about 400 c/s max out of telemetry system, so we are getting ~ 10^6 counts for last 2 segments of test together. ### Focal-plane rate on PS sheets could not have been achieved. H-HAS-MC-3.005 115/04:57 ID=115362 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.5, 0.0) S3 !!! MEG shutters - reduce voltage to 10 keV to reduce source flux. ### ACIS rates were ~1200 Hz and spectrum at SSD_5 was only Cu L. &&& Go back to 20 kV on source. Do 1 quadrant at a time for 15 min each and 5 minutes to dump buffer. ACIS rate now about 550. SSD_5 rate about 58. 04/24/97/C Leon Van Speybroeck H-LAS-MC-3.009 115/06:39 ID=115363 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 1.5, 0.0) S3 ### Rates higher than desired, but continued. ACIS rate about 1800 $$$ Science Run 31: ACIS,S xfull_alt_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-10.007 115/08:06 ID=115364 <<< Following 2 measurements are HETG (both MEG, HEG). !!! Note energy change. H-IAS-EA-6.006 115/08:23 ID=115366 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 11.0) S3 (Cu-K H-IAS-EA-6.003 115/08:56 ID=115373 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 Cu-L !!! Do background with counters set for Cu-La; get Ka on next set up $$$ Science Run 32: ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te #rows=38 H-IAS-SG-2.026 115/09:24 ID=115374 H-IAS-PW-12.004 115/09:39 ID=115381 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Cu-K H-IAS-PI-12.002 115/10:02 ID=115382 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Cu-K $$$ Science Run 33: ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te #rows=38 H-IAS-SG-2.025 115/10:34 ID=115383 H-IAS-PW-12.001 115/10:46 ID=115384 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Cu-K ### Spot not centered in ACIS 38 rows. &&& Thus moved FAM y = -552 um and restarted. ### Should have moved FAM -14 pixels = -336 um, but OK for this one. H-IAS-PI-12.003 115/11:30 ID=115385 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 (Cu-K) $$$ Science Run 34: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-1.011 115/11:50 ID= H-IAS-RC-1.004 115/12:16 ID=115395 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 200.0) I3 Fe-L !!! Cut above measurement off at 2000 s due to readiness of EIPS. 04/25/97/A H-IAI-EA-24.013a 115/14:15 ID=115407 ( 5.0, 4.9) (-14.2, 14.2, 40.0) I0 Fe-L ### Due to pressure rise in instrument chamber, we lost HV to the BNDs. ### To recover, it was necessary to reboot the BND PCs several times. HRMA actuators had to be rehomed. These problems resulted in about ~1 hour delay. H-IAI-EA-24.014 115/14:30 ID=115408 ( 5.0, -3.7) ( 10.7, 14.2, 40.0) I1 Fe-L H-IAI-EA-25.003 115/14:43 ID=115409 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 10.8, -2.7, 40.0) I3 Fe-L H-IAI-EA-24.015 115/14:56 ID=115417 ( -3.8, 4.9) (-14.2,-10.8, 40.0) I2 Fe-L H-IAI-EA-3.015 115/15:09 ID=115418 ( -3.8, 4.9) (-14.2,-10.8, 40.0) I2 Fe-K H-IAI-EA-25.006 115/15:37 ID=115419 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 10.8, -2.7, 40.0) I3 Fe-K H-IAI-EA-3.014 115/16:00 ID=115420 ( 5.0, -3.7) ( 10.7, 14.2, 40.0) I1 Fe-K H-IAI-EA-3.013 115/16:24 ID=115421 ( 5.0, 4.9) (-14.2, 14.2, 40.0) I0 Fe-K H-IAS-SG-1.012 !!! Skip this change, except move FAM to S-boresight H-IAI-EA-18.036 115/16:47 ID=115432 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 Fe-K H-IAI-EA-18.035 115/17:14 ID=115433 ( 0.0, 6.5) (-18.7, 0.0, 40.0) S2 Fe-K H-IAI-EA-24.036 115/17:41 ID=115440 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 Fe-L H-IAI-EA-24.035 115/17:56 ID=115441 ( 0.0, 6.5) (-18.7, 0.0, 40.0) S2 Fe-L $$$ Science Run 35: ACIS,S xfull_alt_s.te #rows=1024 H-HAS-SG-10.003 115/18:11 ID=115442 H-HAS-EA-6.002 115/18:38 ID=115443/4 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 Fe-L H-HAS-EA-6.005 115/19:26 ID=115451 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 14.0) S3 Fe-K 04/25/97/B $$$ Science Run 36: ACIS,I x100_lo_i.te #rows=100 H-IAS-SG-1.029 115/19:58 ID=115452 H-IAI-PI-1.005 115/20:24 ID=115453 ( 8.7, -7.5) ( 21.5, 25.0, 0.1) I1 Fe-K H-IAI-PW-1.009 115/21:00 ID=115454 ( 8.7, -7.5) ( 21.5, 25.0, 0.1) I1 Fe-K H-IAI-PI-1.014 115/21:17 ID=115455 ( -0.02, 8.7) (-25.0, -0.1, 0.0) I2 Fe-K H-IAI-PW-1.018 115/21:49 ID=115456 ( -0.02, 8.7) (-25.0, -0.1, 0.0) I2 Fe-K H-IAI-PW-99.089 115/22:09 ID=115457 ( -0.02, 8.7) (-25.5, -0.1, 0.0) I2 Fe-K !!! Added test because part of wing data falls off end of ACIS array. <<< Switch to S boresight. H-IAS-PI-1.029 115/22:25 ID=115458 ( -3.7, 10.2) (-29.5,-10.8, 0.0) S2 Fe-K H-IAS-PW-1.031 115/22:59 ID=115459 ( -3.7, 10.2) (-29.5,-10.8, 0.0) S2 Fe-K $$$ Science Run 37: ACIS,I xstag_38_i3.te #rows=38 !!! Watch centering; previous 38 row run was off center by 17 pixels, and required FAM move in Y of -14 pixels = -336 um. H-IAI-SG-2.021 115/23:15 ID=115460. &&& Backgd run for fpc's and Cm for icing check on ssd_5 (400 s). !!! Open gate valve and check source centering. !!! Decide to move Fam y to -0.360 for set of 4 tests. !!! Note the order change to reduce source/fpc setups. H-IAI-PI-1.021 115/23:53 ID=115461 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( -0.36, 0.0, 0.0) I3 Fe-K H-IAI-PW-1.025 116/00:25 ID=115462 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( -0.36, 0.0, 0.0) I3 Fe-K !!! Change fpc HV -- RUNIDs 115463-7 used for setup on bnds ### Previous Fe-L tests needed flux adjustment. &&& Run following tests at the source settings specified below: <<< 1.8kV, 0.4 mA FeLx4 filter (0,13): H-IAI-PI-1.023 116/00:41 ID=115468 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( -0.36, 0.0, 0.0) I3 Fe-L <<< 1.8kV, 1.08 mA FeLx2 filter (13,0): H-IAI-PW-1.027 116/01:29 ID=115469 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( -0.36, 0.0, 0.0) I3 Fe-L $$$ Science Run 38: ACIS,S xstag_38_s3.te #rows=38 H-IAS-SG-2.022 116/01:42 ID=115470 !!! Run Bkgd and Cm for ssd_5 during ACIS setup <<< 1.8kV, 0.1 mA FeLx4 filter (0,13) H-IAS-PI-1.042 116/01:55 ID=115471 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Fe-L <<< 1.8kV, 0.27 mA FeLx2 filter (13,0): H-IAS-PW-1.044 116/02:26 ID=115472 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Fe-L !!! Change FPC HV to Fe K RunIDs 115473 - 77 for bnd setups H-IAS-PI-1.041 116/02:40 ID=115478 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Fe-K H-IAS-PW-1.043 116/03:14 ID=115479 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) S3 Fe-K <<< Switch to HIREF !!! Adjust ACIS radiator/thermal control system to allow chips to cool from -110C towards -120C over next few hours. Monitor bias and dark current to note any changes (none expected). !!! FPC HV settings for 0.528 keV for all HIREFS. ID=115480-84 for setups. $$$ Science Run 39: ACIS,S xfull_s.te #rows=1024 H-IAS-SG-12.002 116/03:32 ID=115485 - Bkgd for fpc's and Cm for ssd_5. H-IAS-RC-8.001 116/03:51 ID=115486 (0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) S3 (0.689 keV) ### Note defocus should have been 191 mm. CMDB and test at 40 mm were in error. <<< Following are HETG (MEG + HEG) exposures H-HAS-EA-10.001 116/04:22 ID=115488 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.392 keV) H-HAS-EA-10.002 116/05:18 ID=115489 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.486 keV) H-HAS-EA-10.003 116/05:51 ID=115490 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.577 keV) H-HAS-EA-10.004 116/06:19 ID=115491 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.642 keV) H-HAS-EA-10.005 116/06:48 ID=115492 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.751 keV) H-HAS-EA-10.006 116/07:18 ID=115493 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 40.0) (0.800 keV) $$$ Science Run 40: ACIS,S xfaint_letg_s.te #rows=256 ### CMDB sheet has 256 rows for this setup, but 1024 rows for the test. &&& Setup is correct and test will execute OK. H-IAS-SG-13.001 116/07:50 ID=115494 Bkgd for fpc's and ssd_5 (no Cm data) H-LAS-SC-21.001 116/08:06 ID=115495/6 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) (0.528 keV) !!! Test doubled to 2000 s after underway; needed 2 run IDs. $$$ Science Run 41: ACIS,I xfull_i.te #rows 1024 H-IAS-SG-12.001 116/08:56 ID=115497 H-IAS-RC-8.002 116/09:04 ID=115498 ( 0.0, 0.0) ( 0.0, 0.0, 191.0) S3 ### Note difference in defocus between CMDB and actual test (CMDB error) <<< Switch to the SiO2 target $$$ Science Run 42: ACIS,S xfull_s.te #rows 1024 H-IAS-SG-1.022a 116/09:55 ID=1155 H-IAS-EA-18.031 116/10:08 ID=115505 ( 0.0, -10.8)(31.1, 0.0, 40.0) S4 (Si-Ka) H-IAS-EA-18.027 116/10:21 ID=115506 ( 0.0, 15.2)(-43.6, 0.0, 40.0) S1 (Si-Ka) H-IAS-EA-24.024 116/10:32 ID=115513 ( 0.0, -10.8)(31.1, 0.0, 40.0) S4 (O-Ka) H-IAS-EA-24.020 116/10:43 ID=115514 ( 0.0, 15.2)(-43.6, 0.0, 40.0) S1 (O-Ka) Last light for HRMA at XRCF! *************************** END CMDB H SERIES *************************** *****************************************************************************